Family Guardian | Chris Duke | Activity https://famguardian.org/members/chris-duke/activity/ Activity feed for Chris Duke. Mon, 02 Nov 2026 22:43:42 +0000 https://buddypress.org/?v=3.7.0 en-US 30 hourly 2 e0140675a119cfe205fe3d07f8a57a06 Chris Duke replied to the discussion Henry Thoreau on Truth and Lawyers in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/henry-thoreau-on-truth-and-lawyers/#post-15095 Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:46:48 +0000 Reply to Henry Thoreau on Truth and Lawyers

Good quote. Normally that would be one I would share on Fb. But as of today I have extricated myself from that now Soros owned forum.

]]> 09d423093222e4a960762dcb664d5de9 Chris Duke replied to the discussion Anaheim Police corruption in the forum 3.1.5. Police corruption http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/anaheim-police-corruption/#post-15086 Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:09:32 +0000 Reply to Anaheim Police corruption

RM and the county sheriffs project rules! I'm not sure yet about the tenth amendment center other than their good intentions, but I do believe that anything good to come in the future will be on the county and local level before it's recognized by most states governments.

]]> a65bbbd63a64b1a10a5de0d7c6918de1 Chris Duke replied to the discussion Anaheim Police corruption in the forum 3.1.5. Police corruption https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/anaheim-police-corruption/#post-15084 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:44:36 +0000 Reply to Anaheim Police corruption

My take on it is that the federalized police / law enforcement, are egging on the public. What I mean by that (and I'm probably just paranoid here I hope) is they want riots. It would be too easy for them to declare martial law during civil unrest. Then strip us of our remaining freedoms. I won't get into whether or not we have been in a… Read more

]]> bc1f7c6030becc81d505ab273ab42c65 Chris Duke replied to the discussion UN Gun Treaty in the forum 6.5. Gun Rights and Gun Control https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/un-gun-treaty/#post-15052 Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:22:44 +0000 Reply to UN Gun Treaty

“This treaty is not any amendment of any prior treaty, and is by itself a [background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]“stand-alone” treaty which requires ratification by the US Senate”[/background]

[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]Would just like to add that no new treaties rescind provisions of former treaties. IE, The second treaty of France that ended… Read more

]]>