<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | cdsea10 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/cdsea10/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/cdsea10/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for cdsea10.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 04:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fbeef1f46cb31f3df7529524cd5e3e41</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion notary certificate of default in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notary-certificate-of-default/#post-10057</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/notary-certificate-of-default/#post-10057"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> notary certificate of default</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>thank you</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fbeef1f46cb31f3df7529524cd5e3e41</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion notary certificate of default in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/notary-certificate-of-default/#post-10057</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/notary-certificate-of-default/#post-10057"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> notary certificate of default</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>thank you</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d75be05ea43f219950c05f9cd157a285</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion New evidence on &#34;Includes&#34; in the forum 7.5. Word Games that STEAL from and deceive people</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8230</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:49:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8230"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New evidence on &quot;Includes&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>from Public Notice by Dan Meador :</p>
<p>© INCLUDES AND INCLUDING. &#8212; The terms &#8220;includes&#8221; and &#8220;including&#8221; when used in a definition contained in this title shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.</p>
<p>Two principles of law clarify definition intent:<br />
(1) The example represents the class, and<br />
(2)&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4302"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8230" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d5c8c0674768d3abeed8cf0b1e5a4d1c</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion New evidence on &#34;Includes&#34; in the forum 7.5. Word Games that STEAL from and deceive people</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8229</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8229"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New evidence on &quot;Includes&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Brian Rookard asks :?If I say &#8220;the recipe for brownies includes eggs&#8221; &#8230; is it safe to assume that the only ingredient to make the brownies is eggs?		____ Yes.		____ No.<br />
This is common English &#8230; understood by the average person who speaks English &#8230; it isn&#039;t rocket science &#8230; and tax protestors will evade simple questions when plainly&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4301"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8229" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">efeb11f7d82d44ae3062cee0fae3831d</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion New evidence on &#34;Includes&#34; in the forum 7.5. Word Games that STEAL from and deceive people</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8226</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:42:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8226"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New evidence on &quot;Includes&quot;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Treasury Decision 3980, Vol. 29, January-December, 1927, pgs. 64 and 65 defines the words include and including as:<br />
?(1) To comprise, comprehend, or embrace?(2) To enclose within; contain; confine?But granting that the word ?including? is a term of enlargement, it is clear that it only performs that office by introducing the specific&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4298"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-evidence-on-includes/page/3/#post-8226" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">956387f19a9140980cde917d8946e7e6</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion letter to irs on non-income in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/letter-to-irs-on-non-income/#post-9603</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/letter-to-irs-on-non-income/#post-9603"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> letter to irs on non-income</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I  PUT  THE  WRONG  WEB  PAGE&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>this is the page and info i wanted feedback on&#8230;  saoory &#8211; charlie</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.wealth4freedom.com/taxes/UBDAJUDGE.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.wealth4freedom.com/taxes/UBDAJUDGE.htm</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">956387f19a9140980cde917d8946e7e6</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion letter to irs on non-income in the forum 5.4.3. Dealing administratively with the IRS</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/letter-to-irs-on-non-income/#post-9603</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/letter-to-irs-on-non-income/#post-9603"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> letter to irs on non-income</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I  PUT  THE  WRONG  WEB  PAGE&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>this is the page and info i wanted feedback on&#8230;  saoory &#8211; charlie</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.wealth4freedom.com/taxes/UBDAJUDGE.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.wealth4freedom.com/taxes/UBDAJUDGE.htm</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">625fac95d3ef7205f9c31f1d5e8a0d90</guid>
				<title>cdsea10 replied to the discussion Children Hooked on Drugs In School in the forum 6.10. Family Rights and Family Preservation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/children-hooked-on-drugs-in-school/#post-9276</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/children-hooked-on-drugs-in-school/#post-9276"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Children Hooked on Drugs In School</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>-i want to share some thoughts as my wife is a 2nd grade teacher and we discuss this subject every school year.  in her class of 20 to 22 there will be on average 2 children that are &#039;out of control&#039;.  &#039;out of control&#039; is my term.  mostly, the child is disruptive, doesn&#039;t focus, and doesn&#039;t know the word &#039;no&#039; or &#039;stop&#039;, and the child is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2527"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/children-hooked-on-drugs-in-school/#post-9276" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		