Personal property, as contrasted with Real Property. Chattels. Any property not attached to real estate. Property which is temporarily attached to real estate by a tenant, such as store fixtures, and which can be removed, is known as quasi personalty. -Latin For Lawyers

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

http://supreme.justi…0/107/case.html

The various propositions are so intermingled as to cause it to be difficult to classify them. We are of opinion, however,

Page 240 U. S. 11

that the confusion is not inherent, but rather arises from the conclusion that the Sixteenth Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown power of taxation — that is, a power to levy an income tax which, although direct, should not be subject to the regulation of apportionment applicable to all other direct taxes. And the far-reaching effect of this erroneous assumption will be made clear by generalizing the many contentions advanced in argument to support it, as follows: (a) The Amendment authorizes only a particular character of direct tax without apportionment, and therefore if a tax is levied under its assumed authority which does not partake of the characteristics exacted by the Amendment, it is outside of the Amendment, and is void as a direct tax in the general constitutional sense because not apportioned. ( 😎 As the Amendment authorizes a tax only upon incomes “from whatever source derived,” the exclusion from taxation of some income of designated persons and classes is not authorized, and hence the constitutionality of the law must be tested by the general provisions of the Constitution as to taxation, and thus again the tax is void for want of apportionment. © As the right to tax “incomes from whatever source derived” for which the Amendment provides must be considered as exacting intrinsic uniformity, therefore no tax comes under the authority of the Amendment not conforming to such standard, and hence all the provisions of the assailed statute must once more be tested solely under the general and preexisting provisions of the Constitution, causing the statute again to be void in the absence of apportionment. (d) As the power conferred by the Amendment is new and prospective, the attempt in the statute to make its provisions retroactively apply is void because, so far as the retroactive period is concerned, it is governed by the preexisting constitutional requirement as to apportionment.

[…]

Again, it has never moreover been questioned that the conceded complete and all-embracing taxing power was subject, so far as they were respectively applicable, to limitations resulting from the requirements of Art. I, § 8, cl. 1, that “all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States,” and to the limitations of Art I., § 2, cl. 3, that “direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states,” and of Art. I, § 9, cl. 4, that “no capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken.” In fact, the two great subdivisions embracing the complete and perfect delegation of the power to tax and the two correlated limitations as to such power were thus aptly stated by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., supra, at 157 U. S. 557:

“In the matter of taxation, the Constitution recognizes the two great classes of direct and indirect taxes, and lays down two rules by which their imposition must be governed, namely, the rule of apportionment as to direct taxes, and the rule of uniformity as to duties, imposts, and excises.”

http://supreme.justi…240/1/case.html

From Wundt's work it was only a short step to the later redefinition of education. Originally, education meant drawing out of a person's innate talents and abilities by imparting the knowledge of languages, scientific reasoning, history, literature, rhetoric, etc. — the channels through which those abilities would flourish and serve. To the experimental psychologist, however, education became the process of exposing the student to “meaningful” experiences so as to ensured desired reactions…

The conditioning of modern American society began with John Dewey, a psychologist, a Fabian Socialist and the “Father of Progressive Education.” Dewey used the psychology developed in Leipzig by Wilhelm Wundt, and believed that through a stimulus-response approach (like Pavlov) students could be conditioned for a new social order.

Well i just had an attorney tell me that the Constitution and the Supreme law has nothing to do with it and that every State does not have to abide by the united States of America Constitution at all.

[…]

Why is this important…because a hundred years ago, Americans had a constitutional right to travel without government permission or licenses. There were many state court decisions on the books so holding. For example the Supreme Court of Kansas issued a decision in 1890 holding that “[each] citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle,… subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the ‘law of the road’”. Swift v. City of Topeka, 23 P. 1075, 1076 (Kan, 1890). The right to travel by automobile without government permission was “so well established and so universally recognized in this country,” wrote the court, “that it has become a part of the alphabet of fundamental rights of the citizen.”

[…]

The right was “orphaned” because judges and policymakers described that automobile as more dangerous than previous methods of transportation. The first driver licenses were issues around 1905 in the northeastern states in the aftermath of widely reported car wrecks. Over the years, auto travelers have accepted more and more restrictions on their rights, and today most states regularly enact new regulations.

[…]

According to Dr. Roots, this loss of the right has led to a virtual state of marshal law on the highways of the twenty-first century…. Americans of previous generations would have objected strenuously to the notion that we need to ask for government permission to travel down the roads.

[…]Over time, the driver license has morphed into a complicated identification program that has little or nothing to do with ensuring the safe “operation “ of motor vehicles. Through the Driver’s License, the state has become a database manager with access to the addresses, photographs, identification numbers, and vital statistics of most Americans.

Today, traffic cops are even allowed to forcibly stab needles into drivers’ arms and draw blood from drivers without warrant and over the drivers’ objections. They may lack anything approaching the medical training that a licensed nurse needs to do the same thing, and they face almost no civil liability for infections, scars, or injuries they cause. Drivers who submit to the driver license regime are held to have “impliedly consented” to all of these invasions.

by Roger Roots, ”AMERICA’S LOST RIGHT TO TRAVEL BY AUTOMOBILE”, Republic Magazine, #6