Invisible Empire

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTrJQpgf6sE&feature=player_embedded

You have aroused my curiosity regarding flight 800 and now I have to investigate…. 🙄 .

I know that this is not the 9/11 forum, but has anyone watched September Clues? I really appreciate the video analysis in that movie. The situation with the planes in the network archive footage is fascinating.

Still amazed at the first post and the lack of evidence linking any of the planes to the sites. 😮

I think Chief White Hawk might be my Daddy. 😀

Thanks for sharing.

I think FG Forum needs an avatar of one or more guns. heh heh heh

My buddy bought an AR-15 last year and only paid about $1,100 or so. He was worried that Obama and the corrupt Democrats in Congress would be making it more difficult to buy guns, so he loaded up. But he has had a problem getting different types of ammo for his guns. He keeps his guns in a locked room, away from his daughters, but let me tell you, the dude is packing serious heat, enough weapons and ammo to supply a platoon. Truly an awesome sight. 😎

My friend owns about 40+ guns of all shapes and sizes, including an AK – 47. I held it a couple of times but have still not sent any lead down range but I hope to do so sooner rather than later.

I have never shot an .50, but there is a place, an abandoned quarry I believe, in New Hampshire where folks go and shoot their .50 all the time and nobody says nuthin. I love New Hampshire and almost moved there many years ago, but the commute to Boston was a real bear.

***Highlights of New IRS Authority***

* IRS agents verify if you have “acceptable” health care coverage

* IRS has the authority to fine you up to $2,250 or 2 percent of

your income (whichever is greater) for failure to prove that you have

purchased “minimum essential coverage”

* IRS can confiscate your tax refund

* IRS audits are likely to increase

* IRS will need up to $10 billion to administer the new health care

program this decade

* IRS may need to hire as many as 16,500 additional auditors, agents

and other employees to investigate and collect billions in new taxes from

Americans

* Nearly half of all these new individual mandate taxes will be paid

by Americans earning less than 300 percent of poverty ($66,150 for a family

of four)

***SPECIAL EXEMPTION***

Democrats prohibit the IRS from imposing these taxes and penalties on

illegal immigrants

http://camp.house.go…S_Authority.PDF

Steve Watson and Paul Watson

Prisonplanet.com

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

H.R. 3590, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, to give it its full title, is rammed full of tax increases which will further economically cripple Americans already laboring under the worst financial crisis since the great depression.

The partnering Reconciliation Act, currently in the Senate, also contains a raft of pork barrel and tax hikes, there to fund the trillion dollar cost of nationalizing medicine.

As reported by Bloomberg News today, analysis by the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation reveals that the bill will generate $409.2 billion in additional taxes by 2019.

In addition, the Congressional Budget Office states that the bill also levies almost $69 billion more in penalties for those who fail to meet mandates to buy insurance.

The Journal of Accountancy boils down some of the tax hikes and penalty fees in H.R. 3590 and the Reconciliation Act – the highlights include:

Excise Tax on Uninsured Individuals – Individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential coverage will be subject to a penalty equal to $750. The fee for an uninsured individual under age 18 is one-half of the adult fee.

Excise Tax on High-Cost Employer Plans – The federal government would impose a 40% tax on the value of employer-sponsored health coverage exceeding certain thresholds. Those levels are projected to be $8,500 for self only and $23,000 for any other level by the year 2013. This excise was announced with fanfare by the White House and labor unions in January and remains in the final bill.

Increase in additional tax on distributions from Health Savings Accounts and Archer Medical Savings Accounts not used for qualified medical expenses – An increase from 10% to 20% on taxes of money in a health savings account not used for qualified medical expenses. For Archer medical savings accounts, an increase from 15% to 20%.

Additional Hospital Insurance Tax on High-Income Taxpayers – High income tax payers, making on a joint return over $250,000 and a standard return over $200,000, are required to pay an additional 0.5% of wages. This applies to both self-employed, and regularly employed individuals.

Fees on Health Plans – A fee applied to all health insurance providers based upon net premiums and any third party fees associated with the administration of those programs. The fees will total $6.7 billion annually. This figure begins at $8 billion in the Reconciliation Act and rises to $14.3 billion by 2018.

Tax on Indoor Tanning Services – The act imposes a 10% tax on amounts paid for indoor tanning services. Like a sales tax, the tax will be collected from the person tanning when payment for the tanning services is made.

Business Insider boils down 15 more tax hikes here – highlights include:

Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage – A 2.5% income tax on individuals who do not have health care coverage, limited to a cost less than the average national health care premium.

Excise tax on elective cosmetic medical procedures – A tax of 5% is levied upon the am mount paid for any cosmetic surgery. This does not include the need for such surgeries created by trauma or a disfiguring disease. If the tax is not collected by that professional completing the procedure, their business is still liable for the requirement.

The Reconciliation Act also legislates for the following surcharges: 1% surcharge on individuals making more than $350,000, 1.5% surcharge on individuals making more than $500,000, 5.4% surcharge on individuals making more than $1 million.

Yet more tax provisions in the bill are highlighted by INvestors Business Daily in their piece titled 20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms – highlights include:

Taxes On Employers – If you are a large employer (defined as at least 101 employees) and you do not want to provide health insurance to your employee, then you will pay a $750 fine per employee (It could be $2,000 to $3,000 under the reconciliation changes) (Section 1513).

Taxes on Pharmaceutical Companies – The government will extract a fee of $2.3 billion annually from the pharmaceutical industry (Section 9008 (:cool:.

Taxes on medical device manufacturers – The government will extract a fee of $2 billion annually from medical device makers (Section 1405).

As a candidate and President, Barack Obama has had one core message for middle class Americans: I won't raise your taxes.

By putting his name to the health care reform bill today he has swiftly put to bed any pretence that he would uphold that pledge (multi-trillion dollar bailouts aside).

While the new taxes on individuals are bad enough, the penalties imposed on pharmaceutical corporations, health insurers and employers are will inevitably serve as a double whammy as the hikes will undoubtedly be passed on to the general public in the form of higher costs.

“Simply, you have nationalized healthcare by proxy.” writes Jonah Goldberg of the LA Times.

“Insurance companies are now heavily regulated government contractors. Way to get big business out of Washington! They will clear a small, government-approved profit on top of their government-approved fees. Then, when healthcare costs rise — and they will — Democrats will insist, yet again, that the profit motive is to blame and out from this Obamacare Trojan horse will pour another army of liberals demanding a more honest version of single-payer.”

“The Obama administration has turned the insurance industry into the Blackwater of socialized medicine.” Goldberg concludes.

A swift dose of propaganda is sure to silence some critics. However, if the softly softly approach fails, the myriad of new taxes and regulations contained in the Obamacare bill will be aggressively enforced by no less than 16,500 new “combat trained” IRS agents armed to the teeth with shotguns, who will also closely scrutinize Americans' income tax returns and be waiting to pounce should they find evidence of anyone trying to avoid paying for mandatory government health care.

Even if you agree with socialized health care in principle, the fact is that this will only benefit the insurance companies who wrote it. Meanwhile millions of Americans will be subjected to more taxation, harassment, and oppression at the hands of a federal government run amok. An out of control leviathan, hell-bent on an agenda to control every aspect of your life, as they lay in wait to exploit the momentum achieved through the passage of Obamacare by ramming through nightmare cap and tax levies to further financially castrate already beleaguered Americans.

Find out who your enemies are and why Obamacare is merely the next step in the new world order agenda to regulate every aspect of your existence.

http://www.infowars….-into-oblivion/

I am diligently studying the pamphlet called “The Great IRS Hoax” and my jaw just keeps dropping. I am currently reading Chapter 4: Know Your Citizenship and Rights! On page 4-290, at the bottom it discusses “the Pennsylvania Commonwealth as NOT being in the federal zone, but the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is.” I have a short request for more information on where this conclusion was drawn.

I was born in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth, so this question is of importance to me. My specific question is, if the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is mentioned in the original constitution of Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Commonwealth is not, how can this be true? Where can I see for myself that the non-federal entity is called the Pennsylvania Commonwealth?

I have tried posting over there at quatloos and found it to be nothing more then FLAME any dissenter with any view different then their own until the poster stops posting all together. They will not address any facts or present any evidence. Its your typical responses from typical ignorant “PERSONS”. They fall back on irrelevant tax court cases or tell you everything that is posted is out of context.

I find it funny that they have to resort to those type of attacks while forums like this actually try and educate using statutes and supreme court cases to back up the evidence they are trying to present. If quatloos could actually show true evidence to prove their position they would post it rather then just flame a poster off their boards but of course they don’t so they choose the latter.

Know the TRUTH about the Government Health Care Bill H.R.3200 – Key Points

http://www.youtube.c…h?v=HcBaSP31Be8

^{Folks… better watch this & see what we've gotten ourselves into. http://www.youtube.c…h?v=HcBaSP31Be8 Let's not live in denial. Consider what we're leaving for posterity. (It's still not too late if We The People wake up & educate one another) Eze. 33:6 I don't know what they're using, but it certainly is NOT the Constitution (or US Code). …Sounds a lot like the Communist Manifesto though. Bio-tech industry info: http://video.google….89573281687331# THESE are the times that try men's souls… Thomas Paine Dec. 23 1776}

Fred Lucas

CNSNews

September 15, 2009

Editor’s note: The Washington Post isn’t the crown jewel of Operation Mockingbird for nothing.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted in the three days following President Barack Obama’s speech to Congress about his health care plan found that 54% say the more they hear about the plan, the less they like it.

This particular poll result was not mentioned anywhere in the story about the poll that was posted by the Washington Post on its Web site on Monday. The result did appear in the data sheet from the poll that was linked to the story.

The 54% who now say that the more they hear about Obama’s health-care plan, the less they like it is larger than the percentage who answered a similar question about then-First Lady Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan back in 1993 and 1994.