<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | BOBT12 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/bobt12/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/bobt12/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for BOBT12.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">251f1d8526f25cb9dabf834c93220198</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Evangelist Kent Hovind Released from Jail in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/topic/evangelist-kent-hovind-released-from-jail/#post-16035</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 04:32:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/evangelist-kent-hovind-released-from-jail/#post-16035"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Evangelist Kent Hovind Released from Jail</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am certainly glad that he is released from his unjust imprisonment.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">364a7744bf74e8bfa47c25eb0d6c607d</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015 in the forum 3.3.6.  Corruption of individual politicians</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16028</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16028"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Sadly, Attorney General Kane has caused most of her own problems. She seems to either be unaware of, or she is an enemy of the PA and U.S. Constitutions. She is the first PA AG that is actively pushing a gun control agenda. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7b67c0eec913293f5dca4b4ceef37ff9</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Revocation of Election: Key to Exit U.S. Tax Club in the forum 7.6.2. Non-Resident Non-Person Position</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/revocation-of-election-key-to-exit-u-s-tax-club/#post-15997</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/revocation-of-election-key-to-exit-u-s-tax-club/#post-15997"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Revocation of Election: Key to Exit U.S. Tax Club</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>That is an excellent video. This is something the masses might be able to digest.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e9b7175b39e9a1b004e8460dc39c598e</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion New Tax Materials from Larry Becraft-AmTax Guide in the forum 5.5.1. Legal Research Assistance</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/new-tax-materials-from-larry-becraft-amtax-guide/#post-15995</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/new-tax-materials-from-larry-becraft-amtax-guide/#post-15995"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> New Tax Materials from Larry Becraft-AmTax Guide</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>This is a good document.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa8fef706ae6b8de8d3935011f177a3d</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15990</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15990"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>The Republic will be in &#8220;abeyance&#8221; and suspended until the war effort is over with the people accepting the treaty that was offered. Lincoln made this clear in the liber code. Until someone can show me a presidential proclamation confirming the war effort over and the &#8220;usufruct&#8221; has been completed</p></blockquote>
<p>Until someone can show where this power of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15990" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b49a6e4ca5f99653d855eb9f508d1056</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC in the forum 3.3.2.  Federal government corruption</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15988</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:53:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15988"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FEDS RAID TEXAS REPUBLIC</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p><span>As anyone can see, this whole operation is overkill, and a coordinated, multi-jurisdictional, unconstitutional, effort to demonize this group in particular, and all groups that don&#8217;t like unconstitutional government in general. We see this view is being pushed by certain statist. The message is that we need to get ready for another&hellip;</span><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-500"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/feds-raid-texas-republic/#post-15988" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20e1ece8c72db1192e1dfb7d2bdc0a32</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion FREE Paul Mitchell, legal activist needs Habeaus Corpus assistance; author of SupremeLaw.org in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/free-paul-mitchell-legal-activist-needs-habeaus-corpus-assistance-author-of-supremelaw-org/#post-15914</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:55:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/free-paul-mitchell-legal-activist-needs-habeaus-corpus-assistance-author-of-supremelaw-org/#post-15914"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> FREE Paul Mitchell, legal activist needs Habeaus Corpus assistance; author of SupremeLaw.org</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>You are on fire, Bing. Keep up the good work.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ab94fcb262e33236d1a0e797538a69f6</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Open Response to Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s “How Christians and Conservatives are Helping to Destroy America” - See more at: http://www.constitutionmythbu in the forum 7.8.2. God&#039;s law v. Man&#039;s law</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/open-response-to-pastor-chuck-baldwins-how-christians-and-conservatives-are-helping-to-destroy-america-see-more-at-httpwww-constitutionmythbu/#post-15920</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/open-response-to-pastor-chuck-baldwins-how-christians-and-conservatives-are-helping-to-destroy-america-see-more-at-httpwww-constitutionmythbu/#post-15920"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Open Response to Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s “How Christians and Conservatives are Helping to Destroy America” - See more at: http://www.constitutionmythbu</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>&#8220;I couldnt differ with him more when it comes to his promotion of the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land, per Article 6. In fact, he undermines much of the good he could otherwise accomplish if it werent for what seems to be an undying devotion to the biblically adverse Constitution. This is tragically true of not only Pastor&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-341"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/open-response-to-pastor-chuck-baldwins-how-christians-and-conservatives-are-helping-to-destroy-america-see-more-at-httpwww-constitutionmythbu/#post-15920" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ddf21c8313b6218327849acd1057aea3</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Judge says reporter can’t get public records about cops’ “stingray” use;12/15/2014 in the forum 3.5.1. Spying and surveillance</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-says-reporter-cant-get-public-records-about-cops-stingray-use12152014/#post-15919</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/judge-says-reporter-cant-get-public-records-about-cops-stingray-use12152014/#post-15919"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Judge says reporter can’t get public records about cops’ “stingray” use;12/15/2014</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The judge is a criminal, idiot, and/or a fool. Obviously, public records are public. If the stingrays system is paid for with public federal money (most likely they are), then it&#8217;s subject to the Freedom of Information Act. According to a Saturday report from Capitol Media Services, a state news wire, complying with reporter Beau Hodais&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6209"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-says-reporter-cant-get-public-records-about-cops-stingray-use12152014/#post-15919" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8de8a55bcbaa942ce42c85d3a821e30b</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Help w/ Notice of Deficency in the forum 5.4.4. Fighting Unlawful Liens and Levies</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/help-w-notice-of-deficency/#post-15905</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/help-w-notice-of-deficency/#post-15905"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Help w/ Notice of Deficency</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Please look at this information:<br />
 <br />
<a href='http://famguardian.org/subjects/Taxes/ChallJurisdiction/WhyMostPeopleLoseInTaxCourt.pdf' rel="nofollow">http://famguardian.org/subjects/Taxes/ChallJurisdiction/WhyMostPeopleLoseInTaxCourt.pdf</a><br />
 <br />
 <br />
<a href='http://famguardian.org/taxfreedom/Evidence/Discovery/TimeBarredAssessments.pdf' rel="nofollow">http://famguardian.org/taxfreedom/Evidence/Discovery/TimeBarredAssessments.pdf</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9505465f96840152afaab8a5df208f94</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Doctors warn that 80% of patients are contaminated with high levels of toxic mercury in the forum 4.6.6.  Harmful practices and products</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/doctors-warn-that-80-of-patients-are-contaminated-with-high-levels-of-toxic-mercury/#post-15894</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:06:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/doctors-warn-that-80-of-patients-are-contaminated-with-high-levels-of-toxic-mercury/#post-15894"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Doctors warn that 80% of patients are contaminated with high levels of toxic mercury</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>One should also avoid vaccines that have many times the safe limit of mercury, especially the flu shot. Also, this mercury bypasses the body&#8217;s filters by being injected directly into the bloodstream.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">35cf783c6933cec991dc127da9a93770</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Tax Crime Trial Disappointment in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/tax-crime-trial-disappointment/#post-15892</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/tax-crime-trial-disappointment/#post-15892"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Tax Crime Trial Disappointment</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>When the courts are dishonest, no honest person can prevail. </p>
<blockquote><p>“It is a miserable slavery where the law is vague or uncertain.” Misera est servitus, ubi jus est vagum aut incertum.— Maxim of law</p></blockquote>
<p>However, abject submission to such a dishonest system will merely lead to total enslavement. If this is the case, &#8220;But you will not win in Federal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-479"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/tax-crime-trial-disappointment/#post-15892" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4f9908805c1eed3944f30c0aea987d78</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Correcting old W-2&#039;s in the forum 5.4.2. Stopping or Correcting Illegal or Erroneous Tax Withholding and/or Reporting</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/correcting-old-w-2s/#post-15887</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:19:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/correcting-old-w-2s/#post-15887"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Correcting old W-2&#39;s</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>I&#8217;m not asking for legal advice, I&#8217;m well aware of the lawless nature of the tax system, but for practical reasons &#8211; I haven&#8217;t filed for fourteen years and have never corrected a W-2; is it ever too late to correct a W-2?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why not. The form is voluntary, </p>
<blockquote><p>vol•un•tar•y (vln-tr)adj.1. Done or undertaken of one&#8217;s own free will: a&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2150"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/correcting-old-w-2s/#post-15887" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a6071d58b36a8607c5334e8c6b1f6d6</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Former Ohio Rep. Traficant dies from injuries sustained in farm accident;9/27/2014 in the forum 4.3.5. Deaths and health issues</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/former-ohio-rep-traficant-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-farm-accident9272014/#post-15881</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/former-ohio-rep-traficant-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-farm-accident9272014/#post-15881"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Former Ohio Rep. Traficant dies from injuries sustained in farm accident;9/27/2014</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am really sad to hear this news. He was a great man.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6983f6e8a5b758cf0408d77bfb7265be</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Driving v. Traveling in the forum 6.4. Defending Your Right to Travel</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/driving-v-traveling/#post-15826</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:25:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/driving-v-traveling/#post-15826"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Driving v. Traveling</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote>
<blockquote><p>From the below legal cite, it looks like only commercial drivers are required to get licensed.Title 42 is titled Vehicles and trafficC.R.S. 42-2-101(1) Except as otherwise provided in part 4 of this article for commercial drivers, no person shall drive any motor vehicle upon a highway in this state unless such person has been issued a&hellip;</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-30"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/driving-v-traveling/#post-15826" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8fd86b5741cc4569616995e0b830635</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Who Remembers Congressman- Jim Traficant? in the forum 3.6.6.  Federal Reserve/Fiat Currency scam</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/who-remembers-congressman-jim-traficant/#post-15867</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/who-remembers-congressman-jim-traficant/#post-15867"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Who Remembers Congressman- Jim Traficant?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>James Traficant and his wife are really nice folks. I have written him off and on over the years.Of course, Jim has been out of prison for a number of years.A few years ago he, apparently unsuccessfully, ran for local office. He is not favored by the miscreant Democratic Party, so he had to run as an independent.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">52064278aa5fec201874b0636b5f540d</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion What is a Sovereign Citizen? in the forum 3.5.3. Deception and propaganda</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-is-a-sovereign-citizen/#post-15865</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/what-is-a-sovereign-citizen/#post-15865"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What is a Sovereign Citizen?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>Some sovereigns plot a violent revenge, hoping to inspire others in the movement to reach their breaking point sooner. For example, after twenty years of attempting to persuade the IRS and the Tax Court that his blender salad of legal theories was accurate, in 2010, private pilot Joseph Stack flew his airplane into an IRS building in Austin&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6206"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-is-a-sovereign-citizen/#post-15865" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9b3a10981df608469fa9c0b97411b43</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion John McAfee: Google drives humans to &#039;least common denominator&#039;;8/10/2014 in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/john-mcafee-google-drives-humans-to-least-common-denominator8102014/#post-15852</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 23:00:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/john-mcafee-google-drives-humans-to-least-common-denominator8102014/#post-15852"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> John McAfee: Google drives humans to &#39;least common denominator&#39;;8/10/2014</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The same is suppose to be true of startpage.com. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b53137d1b5b8ea10830d004f56f0e11</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Sovereign citizen movement seen by US law enforcement as top terrorist threat: study; 8/1/2014 in the forum 3.5.3. Deception and propaganda</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereign-citizen-movement-seen-by-us-law-enforcement-as-top-terrorist-threat-study-812014/#post-15848</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 01:51:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/sovereign-citizen-movement-seen-by-us-law-enforcement-as-top-terrorist-threat-study-812014/#post-15848"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Sovereign citizen movement seen by US law enforcement as top terrorist threat: study; 8/1/2014</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>This 12 million dollar scam report is all about a belief. It is apparently completely void of any facts to support the religious conviction of the responders. If anyone paid $12.00, they would have paid too much for such nonsense.<br />
The criminals in government simply want a war with the American people. Well, at least anyone who tries to bind&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6180"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/sovereign-citizen-movement-seen-by-us-law-enforcement-as-top-terrorist-threat-study-812014/#post-15848" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3d0389b50283a716a88e5d761fc0f8d6</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion World Renown Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease in the forum 4.6.6.  Harmful practices and products</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/world-renown-heart-surgeon-speaks-out-on-what-really-causes-heart-disease/#post-14910</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 17:44:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/world-renown-heart-surgeon-speaks-out-on-what-really-causes-heart-disease/#post-14910"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> World Renown Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It&#8217;s great that some in the mainstream medical community are beginning to take the scientific studies to heart, in addition, many people should be taking supplement, such as selenium, and real cinnamon. Our diets are nutrient poor due to the soils that the food industry uses. The good doctor still fails to mention the dangers of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5691"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/world-renown-heart-surgeon-speaks-out-on-what-really-causes-heart-disease/#post-14910" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9de32f20d7366e9de7ef16bd81a60ba4</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion The Abolition of Private Property in America in the forum 3.6.8. Economic terrorism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-abolition-of-private-property-in-america-2/#post-15827</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:36:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-abolition-of-private-property-in-america-2/#post-15827"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Abolition of Private Property in America</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>That is a pretty good outline of the Agenda 21 plan.A very good book to explore the details of this devious plan is &#8220;BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda 21&#8243; by Rosa Koire, and Barry N. Nathan:&#8221;In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners.&#8221;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">56112e6096f06bda8788cf055d938d50</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion What &#034;voluntary&#034; means in the context of income tax in the forum 3.4.3.  Deceptive tax propaganda</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-voluntary-means-in-the-context-of-income-tax/#post-15813</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 22:26:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/what-voluntary-means-in-the-context-of-income-tax/#post-15813"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What &#34;voluntary&#34; means in the context of income tax</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Those who are &#8220;liable&#8221; must pay the &#8220;income&#8221; tax.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For a levy to be statutorily authorized in the circumstances here, two conditions must be fulfilled. First, a 10-day notice of intent to levy must have issued. See 26 U.S.C. § 6331(a). Second, the taxpayer must be liable for the tax. Id. Tax liability is a condition precedent to the demand.&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2096"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-voluntary-means-in-the-context-of-income-tax/#post-15813" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de75bbbf2da4d14122bf61cb3351f911</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion How to Get Away with Murder in the forum 3.3.1.  General Corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/how-to-get-away-with-murder/#post-15782</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/how-to-get-away-with-murder/#post-15782"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> How to Get Away with Murder</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes this describes what really happened to Mr.James Boyd. He was murdered in cold blood. We should all be very afraid of thugs that are supposed to be public servants. No one is safe!</p>
<blockquote><p>The safety of the people is the supreme law&#8230;. The safety of the people cannot be judged but by the safety of every individual.&#8211; Maxims of Common Law</p></blockquote>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b52da10159a6f43eca142153705c2b5</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion The Real IRS Scandal in the forum 3.4.1.  Evidence of corruption</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-real-irs-scandal/#post-15760</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-real-irs-scandal/#post-15760"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Real IRS Scandal</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It works for me, too, Bing.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a512ecad9ddb5ed8e4d21687558e6b8a</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/4/#post-15530</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:13:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/4/#post-15530"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>I agree with much of your assessment.In the final analysis, however, I still must disagree with your view that the Opening Post is misleading. The post is accurate in every way. It is not the OP&#8217;s fault that many people are unjustly, through ignorance, fraud, or force, encouraged to sign &#8220;voluntary&#8221; documents, such as the IRS Form W-4, etc.&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-284"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/4/#post-15530" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">737ba51616abd3c1068fee990bb04a9c</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15529</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15529"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>I agree with much of your assessment.In the final analysis, however, I still must disagree with your view that the Opening Post is misleading. The post is accurate in every way. It is not the OP&#8217;s fault that many people are unjustly, through ignorance, fraud, or force, encouraged to sign &#8220;voluntary&#8221; documents, such as the IRS Form W-4, etc.&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3677"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15529" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60b66b5f652d6ec00a780b2dd9588581</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Duck Dynasty and homosexuality in the forum 4.5.5. Sexual Immorality</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15723</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:50:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15723"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Duck Dynasty and homosexuality</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It looks like the boys are back in town.</p>
<blockquote><p>Duck Commander&#8217;s faith persuades A&amp;E to back downNetwork says production to resume soon, with all family members[&#8230;]Phil Robertson of &#8220;Duck Dynasty&#8221;Arts &amp; Entertainment Network, a little more than a week after announcing it was putting Duck Commander Phil Robertson of the immensely popular “Duck&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-113"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15723" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d9f0eaa1c0e687ae9d899e342608c849</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Duck Dynasty and homosexuality in the forum 4.5.5. Sexual Immorality</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15722</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:24:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15722"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Duck Dynasty and homosexuality</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I agree, and I am getting really tired of the gay/government (ObamaNOCare) mafia trying to push this garbage down everyone&#8217;s throat. Why can&#8217;t the rest of us have our own opinion and views? I have not really looked at <em>Duck Dynasty</em>, but I support Phil Robertson&#8217;s right to speak his mind. Good work, Mr. Robertson! </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;To watch the progress of&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3323"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/duck-dynasty-and-homosexuality/#post-15722" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0eaa885ac3302009ce2861c31a0a8a7c</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion Federal Assault on Doreen Hendrickson Goes to a Michigan Jury; 11/3/2013 in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-assault-on-doreen-hendrickson-goes-to-a-michigan-jury-1132013/#post-15702</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/federal-assault-on-doreen-hendrickson-goes-to-a-michigan-jury-1132013/#post-15702"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Federal Assault on Doreen Hendrickson Goes to a Michigan Jury; 11/3/2013</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>That is wonderful news. How can any juror think that some idiot judge can force anyone to sign something under penalty of perjury that they don&#8217;t believe is true?</p>
<blockquote><p>IRS Defeated by Hung Jury Against Tax ResisterSally OhActivist PostThis morning, the jury in Doreen Hendrickson’s trial returned to the courthouse and deliberated all day. At around&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-720"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/federal-assault-on-doreen-hendrickson-goes-to-a-michigan-jury-1132013/#post-15702" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be5c4e23f572f1fd0bfcb634d7cf6be8</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15526</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 02:25:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15526"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>Roberts just said that it will be a mandate on an applicable individual under Subtitle C of the IRC</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, Roberts made a mess of things by converting the &#8220;mandate&#8221; to a tax. Either way the &#8220;mandate&#8221;, as envisioned by Congress, is dead. Roberts should have declared to law unconstitutional and let the legislators correct the shortcomings of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3674"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15526" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7f8cf0805179151b33e362d5ae2e8a5e</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15524</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15524"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;How many of the people who read that article online are like you or me&#8211;not having signed a W-4 or other Article I franchise forms?&#8221;-stija. Well if people who read that article are on this site they should be members of this form, as part of their membership they should be fully aware of the issues revolving around &#8220;voluntary&#8221; vs.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3672"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15524" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1cc7185fe0ebf61523f00143a532a9cf</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15522</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15522"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I would have thought the OP quote was clear, STOP SIGNING VOLUNTARY WITHHOLDING AGREEMENTS.</p>
<blockquote><p>
26 CFR § 31.3402(p)-1 Voluntary withholding agreements.<br />
(a)	In general.<br />
An employee and his employer may enter into an agreement under section 3402(b) to provide for the withholding of income tax upon payments of amounts described in paragraph (b)(1)&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3670"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15522" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">846c44d4aa749ea281bc022199ce96d6</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15520</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15520"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The OP is correct in what it&#8217;s saying, &#8221; The &#8220;Individual Mandate&#8221; Is &#8220;Voluntary&#8221; and handled just like the &#8220;voluntary&#8221; income tax.. So, If you do not &#8220;voluntarily&#8221; sign up and give your &#8220;numbers&#8221; they are SOL.&#8221; If folks can understand this, they can take effective action to retain their rights. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8c435c2c757698aaff54ebc297013c67</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15518</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15518"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Then stop the presumptions and assumptions!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fd578f391294777d1c48e3a17a1979d7</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15516</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:13:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15516"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes,  Roberts, the OP, and I,  Agee that the mandate, as written by Congress, is destroyed. Period.<br />
The OP, and myself, agree  that people should not discard their their God given rights due to fraud or misunderstanding.  However,  they are certainly free to volunteer if that&#8217;s their honest intention, to enter into an private law (equal to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3664"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/3/#post-15516" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7166a7154530137ee95e42e4ddb86be2</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15514</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:16:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15514"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;You, on the other hand, contend that if it were upheld as a commerce law it would be a strict mandate on ALL individuals, irregardless of their involvement in commerce.&#8221;<br />
No, I don&#8217;t. I contend that this was Congress&#8217; intention (hence, the whole reason for the term &#8220;individual mandate&#8221;). I agree with Roberts and the OP that this whole idea&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3662"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15514" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b6fad2d0f18783edb9834563158cdf4d</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15512</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15512"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>
Tax laws are not laws?</p></blockquote>
<p>Tax laws are especially limited by the Constitution, to either a Direct tax (limited to use with an apportionment), or an indirect tax (which is just that,  INDIRECT, and geography uniform). Naturally,  there&#8217;s a third kind of tax, which is run as an indirect tax, this is the voluntary tax. Since its voluntary, there&#8217;s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3660"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15512" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">24d3b66bf5b0b0dcbdf7e57c4a019f71</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15510</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:30:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15510"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Again, you&#8217;re incorrect. As you know, or should know, law affects the public generally, as the ACA  Congressional &#8220;mandate&#8221;  attempted to do. However when Roberts struck down this provision, as noted in the OP, the mandate was destroyed under law.  When Roberts said the mandate may reasonably be characterized as a tax, the character of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3658"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15510" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d07e108d53bf8f84f18e939544fc6720</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15508</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:47:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15508"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I agree with much of your assessment.In the final analysis, however, I still must disagree with your view that the Opening Post is misleading. The post is accurate in every way. It is not the OP&#8217;s fault that many people are unjustly, through ignorance, fraud, or force, encouraged to sign &#8220;voluntary&#8221; documents, such as the IRS Form W-4, etc.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3656"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15508" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9acab015fe4f0b34f30968139cd67cb0</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15506</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:47:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15506"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;Please do give me an example of a &#8216;proper&#8217; commerce clause mandate then.&#8221;-stija. Why should I need to do this? I have never taken such a position that there IS a PROPER commerce clause MANDATE! In fact, I agree that such a mandate is improper. Did you miss that or something?&#8221;Are mandates only allowed under the commerce clause?&#8221;-stija. NO.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3654"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15506" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7d9df11bdb3e452798238d10d3cd4010</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15504</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15504"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&#8220;1. The mandate was held to not be a commerce power but a tax power.&#8221;-stija. No it was not.&#8221;Even if the mandate may reasonably be <strong>characterized</strong> as a tax&#8221;-Roberts (emphasis added). The mandate now takes of the character of a tax, and thus, works under the rules of a tax, not a mandate. </p>
<blockquote><p>char·ac·ter·izetransitive verb ˈker-ik-tə-ˌrīz,&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3652"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15504" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">95ce51f34bd2439fd2fe050fac9e0d21</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15502</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:24:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15502"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The mandate is unconstitutional my hard of hearing, friend. Instead Roberts is characterizing it as a tax. However, once the mandate has fallen, we have a tax, that must behave as a TAX.</p>
<blockquote><p>(a) The Affordable Care Act describes the “<strike>hared responsibilitypayment” as a “penalty,” not a “tax.” That label is fatal to the applicationof the&hellip;</strike></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3650"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15502" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">17c145c0a45ab9d5c6cee97de7dc38a3</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15500</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:04:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15500"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Sure, he would have concluded that the INDIVIDUAL MANDATE IS A VALID EXERCISE of congress’s power under the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause!</p></blockquote>
<p> And according to you then the individual mandate would not be voluntary but would actually be mandated right?</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Roberts,&#8221;the INDIVIDUAL MANDATE IS NOT A VALID EXERCISE of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3648"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/page/2/#post-15500" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6d86adf6ca9120be6848b09f7de9e22</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15498</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15498"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Roberts destroyed the individual mandate when he failed to uphold it.</p></blockquote>
<p> How would he have upheld it?Please do explain.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, he would have concluded that the INDIVIDUAL MANDATE IS A VALID EXERCISE of congress’s power under the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause! </p>
<blockquote><p>Again, are you suggesting that Congress possesses a power that can&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3432"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15498" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0cba7458bad67e7e392406add113f2d5</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15496</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:22:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15496"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Part IIIC*, concluding that the individual mandate may be upheld as within Congresss power under the Taxing Clause. Pp. 3344.</p></blockquote>
<p>Roberts destroyed the individual mandate when he failed to uphold it. Period. A mandate is a mandate and a tax is a tax, as explained above. There&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3430"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15496" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7cf04fd9b26185543108f8d81361217c</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15494</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15494"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t know what you mean by destroyed&#8230;where are you getting this?</p></blockquote>
<p>From the OP. </p>
<blockquote><p>2. Chief justice Roberts concluded in part III-A that the INDIVIDUAL MANDATE IS NOT A VALID EXERCISE of congress’s power under the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause!This DESTROYS the individual mandate!!</p></blockquote>
<p>Once the mandate is converted to something&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3428"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15494" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f0c5aba2256baa9f15d3e6068835179</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15492</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15492"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The MANDATE IS DESTROYED! Whether or not people decide to stand upon RIGHT is another matter altogether. Many people died to defend right, so there&#8217;s nothing new there, dude.</p>
<blockquote><p>If a Man invades my Property, he becomes an Aggressor, and puts himself into a State of War with me: I have a Right to oppose this Invader; If I have not Strength to&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3426"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15492" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d7fc223341366f0a1a101925d84d00a7</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15489</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15489"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>You&#8217;re missing the point.   The article implied that Roberts admitted that the individual mandate was unconstitutional as it was an invalid application of Congress&#8217; commerce or necessary and proper clause, and therefore not a valid law.  This is PARTIALLY true and very misleading. The article omits the important detail that Part III-B&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3423"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15489" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ac49be701ac85240ece961482268852a</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#033; in the forum 4.6.5.  Health care</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15487</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:44:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/you-do-not-have-to-comply-with-obumercare/#post-15487"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> You do NOT have to comply with Obumercare&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes stija, however, the tax system is either indirect (voluntary) or direct (which is limited to an apportionment). Thus, Roberts is actually admitting that ObamaNoCare is enforceable (sic) only as a voluntary tax. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d59ad7da0b5e71c789ae74011040306b</guid>
				<title>BOBT12 replied to the discussion I am a racist in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/i-am-a-racist/#post-15418</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/i-am-a-racist/#post-15418"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> I am a racist</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>We see this influx of immigrant populations occurring around the world. This coordinated attack appears to be aimed at western nations in order to overwhelm their cultural and political bonds. The racist tagline is intended to squelch voices in opposition to the plan. This is likely part of a strategy of war in order to prepare for to next&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3106"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/i-am-a-racist/#post-15418" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		