Bing
Forum Replies Created
Congrats for having real courage.
A couple of points, you need to STOP thinking and using IRS terminology to describe yourself. To wit, you refer to yourself as an “Independent Contractor” when what you really are is a sovereign Citizen of the Texas Republic and an American Citizen whose nationality is United States of America.
According to numerous US supreme Court Cases, you possess as part of your natural liberty, the unalienable right to make a living free from governmental interference. Moreover, it is unlawful to tax the exercise of one's constitutional rights. Try citing US supreme Court Cases in a nice, cooperative letter to you various payors and ask them to correct your facts.
Unless you work inside a federal enclave, you are not required by law to complete any I-9 Forms so you need to educate your payors about this fact. Their presumptions about the I-9 requirement are incorrect.
If you have not done so already, obtain a USA Passport and be certain to clarify your American Citizenship status and deny that you are a federal US citizen.
Bing
pd, if I were in your shoes, I would seriously consider checking out the website, sedm.org.
sedm.org has some hypothetical, outstanding IRS response letters and I am certain if you modify one of them slightly, you likely will be able to squash the IRS before they squash you.
Don't give in unless you genuinely believe that you are a taxpayer.
There are tons of resources and legal information/knowledge at the http://www.familyguardian.org.tzo website, and if you expend the effort, you should be able to become a formidable opponent for the IRS to handle.
Explore the sedm.org website before it is too late.
I would offer to assist you myself, but I only work with nontaxpayers and you appear confused as to your status.
Good luck.
Bing
A happy, nontaxpayer who lawfully does not pay the IRS any money for income taxes.
Whoooo-hooooo!! 🙂
Hooh-yahh!!! 🙂
Bing 🙂
beyastard, if I were in your situation, I would check out http://www.sedm.org and review the items which sedm.org has listed, and see if any of those items might help you get educated very quickly about how to address your situation.
I know for a fact that you will likely save yourself a ton of time and money, if it turns out that sedm.org's hypothetical, educational response letters fit your situation.
Check it out and good luck!!
Bing
pac, if you were born inside one of the 50 states of the USA, and not on property that was ceded to the federal government, then, at the moment of your birth you became a Citizen of [name of your state], and a national of the United States. You are also an American Citizen.
The US Congress recognizes that someone can be a state Citizen and a US national without also being a statutory “US citizen.” See, for example, 8 USC 1101 (21) and 22 (B ).
The familyguardian.com website has some great research material re: Citizenship. See, http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/USCitizen.htm
I hope the above info helps.
Bing
Back at ya, my trusted cyber cohort. 🙂
Nah, I haven't volunteered in many years. Uhh, the first year I stopped volunteering, was before Clinton was President. Chuckle. 😆 😀
Peace.
Bing
Grrrrrr!!! 😡
Bing
I have no experience with FOIA, but one day when I have the free time, I think I will file and see what is what.
The familyguardian website has outstanding educational materials re: the FOIA process and I suggest that you look there first.
Also, if you want to see the IRS fraud in action, check out Ken Evans web site at http://www.reasons2vote.com
In Ken's case, the IRS went in and manipulated his IMF illegally and classified his as being a business filer. I understand that Victoria Osborne is an expert at IMF decoding and that is who Ken retained.
Take care.
-Bing
Mr. Rookard, sir, thanks for such an outstanding series of rebutal posts. I concur 100% with your analysis.
There is not much I can add to Mr.Rookard astute observations except perhaps, relate a personal experience that I had some years ago.
Some years ago after numerous discussions with someone, they came to the conclusion, after reviewing certain evidence, that they were not liable to pay income taxes and they asked me to assist them in stopping the payor of his remuneration, from withholding income taxes and FICA Social Security income taxes.
I gave my new client the documents to provide his payor's payroll department,so that they would cease withholding all income taxes.
A couple of weeks went by and sure enough, they stopped withholding his income taxes, but they mistakenly continued to withhold social security income taxes because, according to the payroll department manager, “it is the law.”
So, what I did was I wrote a memo on behalf of my client and in which I proved to the payroll department, that the Social Security payroll tax scheme contained in IRC Subtitle C, Chapters 21-24, was only mandatory for those who worked in certain US territories and possessions. I relied upon, as well, on the US supreme Court cases that Mr. Rookard has also cited in this thread above.
What happened?
Well, after circulating the memo to in-house counsel and then their BIG 5 CPA firm, my client's company came and told him that he was right, that he need not participate in social security if he did not want to.
And then, his net pay increased by about $600 per month and he finally began to receive 100% of his remuneration (note that I did not use the term “wages”, as that term is a word of art that applies to “employees” as defined in the IRC.
As stated herein above, Social Security never was a contract in the legal sense of that term. It is a federal entitlement program and was put in place, more less, as an excuse and scheme to get the American sheeple to agree to be “numbered”.
Bravo, Mr. Rookard, and thank you for such an insightful treatise. 🙂
-Bing
I would love to be a farmer!!! You are very lucky indeed!!!
If I can ever afford one, I hope to one day own a farm myself.
I just have to figure out how to get allodial title. 😀 😆
Bing
I am self employed and own a consulting practice that used to focus exclusively on business strategy.
However, now I help educate non-taxpayers so that they can keep 100% of their remuneration while excercising their unalienable right to pursue their livlihood without having to pay the IRS or any state tax agency, any income taxes.
I only work with non-taxpayers who believe in the Organic Laws of the USA and who also believe in the judicial authority of the U.S. supreme Court.
And, I am also an aspiring author, but that is a work-in-progress, and I have yet to earn any money from that pursuit.. . . .but I will, in due time, I am certain of it. :cool:.
Peace.
Bing 🙂
Henry, I have not had time to read and study up on the UCC-1 thing to which you refer, so I am unable to provide you with any insight.
My “battles”, if you will, with the IRS are basically 'over', so I never had the need to do a UCC-1, whatever that is.
What I have done (when I remembered to, that is), and I don't know if this will help you, is that when I sign my various affidavits, I write, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UCC 1-207.”
By adding that qualifier, I have preserved my rights under the Common Law.
If i get time, I will research the UCC-1 thingie, and let you know what I find. But don't wait for me to get back to you, I am absorbed in a few other projects and can not get to the UCC-1 thing for weeks, at the very earliest.
Maybe you can try a google.com search and see what is on the Web.
Good luck.
Bing 🙂
ICE, I realize that I am arriving late to this thread, but you may want to also attach the Proclamation of the US Congress from July 27, 1868, in which they declared the American Citizens have a fundamental right to expatriate their citizenship (i.e. leave the federal US citizenship and reclaim your natural born American Citizenship)
It is hardly any coincidence that Congresses' Proclamation occurred the day before the alleged 14th amenedment was declared as having been ratified.
Bing
Ahhh, I'm a coward, ehhh? Chuckle. 😀 Now THAT is funny. Ahahahahaha!
Obviously, you misconstrue my words.
Here is the thing, if you serve as a catalyst to help educate your friend, he or she is not going to need you to defend them at all. They will be able to defend themselves just fine. That is what I was talking about.
I'll tell ya what though, I really wish I had 10 friends like you watching my back as your friend has you watching his back.
People can not be saved from the IRS' tyranny unless they are willing to put forth the effort to educate themselves about certain nuances in the law.
Study the Texas Constitution and you will read some great stuff, not the least of which is the fact that Texas Constitution provides for a Republic in perpetuity.
I am not a lawyer but I was studying law and US supreme Court cases pretty intensely for years, long before teh Family Guardian web site went live in 2000 or 2001. So you have a huge advantage over a guy like me who learned the law the old fashioned way, without having the advantage of all the great legal stuff that is up on the Internet these days.
Look, I live as a free man. I am sovereign and I keep 100% of what I earn. Plus, I have communicated pretty much this same fact to the IRS' top lawyers on any number of occassions. Not only that, I have stared the IRS gorrilla in the face numerous times and I have won. And when I say I stared the IRS' gorrilla, I am speaking about the IRS' very best and brightest lawyers, not some IRS GS-9 Collection Clerk in Ogden, Utah.
I did not mean to suggest that you are not in the midst of a revolution, as we all are. But I am suggesting that it is a serious mistake to consider doing anything violent because that is not the correct way to voice one's displeasure at the IRS. Try not to become so affected that you become THEM.
I have learned in my lifetime that the law is a very powerful tool. It can be a tool for Justice just as easily as being a tool for tyranny and injustice. Cling to the former and forgo the latter. I think it is a mistake for one to violate a valid law and become a criminal just to get one's point across.
Education, in particular, self-education, is critical and is the best way to bring about real change.
Thanks for the prompt feedback and rest assured I take no offense to your speculations and musings.
Peace. 🙂
Bing
Henry, I think that I got one or more of those veiled threats too.
They are lying to you and their intent is to scare you into compliance.
I am not a lawyer and this post is NOT legal advice but is based upon my own personal experiences dealing with the IRS at the highest levels.
What I have found that worked was that I wrote the words “DISHONORED” across the IRS' Presentment, and then I sent it back to the IRS and attached it to an affidavit in which I told the IRS, inter alia, that I want to pay what I lawfully owe, but first I need the IRS to reveal to me the enacted statutes and Implementing Regulations that imposed a legal requirement upon me. This shows that you have conditionally accepted their Presentment and you are not in dishonor under UCC.
What you want to do is attack the IRS at their weakest and most vulnerable points. Thus, in the same affidavit I also presented evidence from the US Government, that conclusively proved that there were no Enforcement Regulations published in 26 CFR, for the unenacted IRC. Cite the Mersky and California Banking Assoc Cases decided by the US supreme Court.
Reference in your reply, 26 USC 7851 (a)(1)(A) and 26 USC 7851 (a)(6)(A) and tie that into the Titles Page of any USC Code Volume that proves that 26 USC is not positive law, and include a copy of 26 CFR 1.0-1.
You need to put the burden of proof back onto the IRS.
Finally, don't be shy to “spread the love around”, and I think you should strongly consider addressing your reply to one of the IRS' top Lawyers in D.C., and then send copies to as many IRS lawyers as you feell is apropriate. Don't limit yourself to dealing with IRS Collections drones. Go on the offensive and tell the IRS lawyers what you know about the law.
Trust me, if you do it properly, like I have done, they will respect you and basically leave you alone.
Also, if you want to save yourself a ton of time and possible aggravation, you may want to strongly consider making a donation to http://www.sedm.org and obtaining one or more of their incredibly powerful IRS Response Letters.
Best of luck.
-Bing
