Man, am I ever late to this thread. 😮

Fiddo, whenever I sign my name I almost always write:

“All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice. UCC 1-207.”

Upon signing one's signature and by reserving one's rights in this fashion, you are putting others on official notice that you will not be bound contractually, by any other implied or unrevealed and undisclosed contract terms or conditions.

Equally important, such a reservation of rights is guaranteed to you under the Common Law. Thus, you in effect place yourself outside of the corrupt jurisdiction and authority of the territorial courts of the federal government, where the judges are appointed to 15 year terms, and you place yourself squarely inside the Constitutional Courts of the District Courts of the United States or your local state court, as the case may be.

The laws of the United States must be interpreted and consistent with the Common Law, and when they are not, the Common Law Rules.

Bing

The U.S. supreme Court defined “income” back in the early part of the 20th century and they defined it to mean only corporate profit.

The term “income” is not defined anywhere in the special law that is the Internal Revenue Code. And that should tell ya something.

Bing

And here is a real glowing assessment (with some lies) made by former IRS Commissioner Rosotti about 14 months into the BSM Project, in the year 2000.

Boy, what a difference 5 years makes, eh?

But if ya read the US Government reports written in the last two years, all kinds of finger-pointing occurs and they admit yet again, that the IRS idiot brain trust wasted taxpayer money.

DUH!!

Ahahahahahahahahahaha.

See,

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/bsm-prog.pdf

Bing 😀

Author #2, all is not lost.

Let us not lose sight of the fact that the employees of the Department of the Treasury, the federal government, and the IRS, all of whom are engaged in a trade or business inside the UNITED STATES, are epic liars.

I have studied this matter in the past using official US Government documents and I have discovered that whereas on the surface, for purely propaganda purposes, during the early part of every “tax season”, the Dept of Treasury and the IRS publicly touts their proposed IRS enforcement budget increases, the reality is that Congress typically underfunds other IRS budgeted line items, thus forcing the IRS to allocate enforcement $$$ to other under-funded line items during each fiscal year.

What is so comical about this charade between Congress & US Dept of Treasury and IRS, is that even after the IRS big wigs repeatedly complained to Congress about lack of enforcement $$$$, our beloved Congress still “stuck it to them real good” and gave them far less money then they said that they needed.

You know what has really sucked up alot of enforcement $$$$ and resources, is the boondoggle IRS Business System Modernization program whose Prime Contractor is the felonious Computer Sciences Corporation. I am pretty sure that CSC's top managers were either indicted; or are being investigated by a federal grand jury; or if they weren't indicted, they resigned and got into trouble with the SEC for lying on their financial statements.

It figures that the lying and corrupt IRS would hire a corrupt CSC to botch the IRS's BSM. Criminals stick together.

IRS Commish Everson has pulled the plug on a number of CSC controlled BSM Work Scopes because of lack of direction and repeated failures to achieve BSM milestones.

The net impact is that an after the fact analysis revealed that for most of the past ten years, enforcement levels and $$$ resources have actually declined at the IRS. And I am including, of course, the 'blowback' from Senator Roth's IRS Hearing back in the late 1990s.

Bing

cwljr, sorry to hear about your TC problem.

Do you have an attorney?

I am puzzled as to why you insist you are a nontaxpayer, but yet, oddly enough, you sought relief in the Washington, DC based Tax Court? Hmmm.

You may want to review the TC Procedural Rules which are located at the end of the Internal Revenue Code volume in Title 26 of the United States Code.

Start there and see what you find.

Please know that you must not rely upon or trust anything that the IRS or DOJ attorneys tell you. They are liars and they will lie right to your face.

You also may want to consider making a donation to sedm.org and see if any of their stuff is applicable.

Good luck.

Bing

What is equally repulsive is to listen to President Bush drone on and on about how he is a believer in freedom and liberty, and how US troops are fighting for freedom and liberty, and how Bush wants everyone to have freedom and liberty, and yet, his own Department of Justice and the corrupt IRS, continue to trample on the Constitutional Rights of American Citizens.

Shame on you President Bush, for your unceasing mendacity and mendaciousness as you continue to lie to the American People and you do nothing as the Constitutional Rights of counteless American Citizens, such as Dick Simkanin, are usurped by a corrupt judicial system run amok.

The corrupt US Congress and President Bush are a disgrace!! 😡

Bing

Family Guardians: great website and url link, thanks.

Unlike most of America and the media, I continue to refuse to concede that the PATRIOT ACT is even a valid law. Afterall, it has NEVER been published in the Federal Register!!

That is the first point.

Second, I don't care how often the USG and the corrupt US Congress professes that PATRIOT ACT I & II are the law, the simple fact remains that they are both contrary and repugnent to the USA Constitution and thus, according to the rulings of the US supreme Court, PATRIOT ACT I & II are null and void ab initio.

Just because some government official or policeman runs around and cites the PATRIOT ACT as their lawful authority, it does not follow from that fact that they have lawful authority to act.

We must continue to press forward and do a far better job then we have in the past, in getting opinion leaders and the media on our side.

Bing

The fact that the Department of INjustice attorneys have finally admitted on the Record that the IRS Summons is meaningless and without authority, is an admission that is long overdue.

But as many of you here in this Forum already know, the IRS DOES NOT have the lawful authority to issue or act under any Summons issued to an American Citizen who lives and works exclusively inside the several united States.

Why?

Well, for starters, the Internal Revenue Code is not applicable inside the sovereign 50 states and can not be lawfully enforced against American Citizens who are not engaged in a “trade or business” (i.e. who do not hold elected or appointed office inside the US Government).

Second, according to the Office of the Federal Register & the Code of Federal Regulations Parrallel Table of Authorities and Rules, there are no Implementing Regulations issued by the Dept of Treasury, that implement the unenacted, special code known as the Internal Revenue Code, sections 7602 “Examination of Books and Witnesses, 7603 “Service of Summons”, 7604 “Enforcement of Summons”, and 7605 “Time & Place for Examination.”

We are making good progress and Schulz' efforts bode well for all Americans.

Bing