
Bing
Forum Replies Created
Here is Rep Grayson grilling the Fed Inspector General over the multi-TRILLION dollar expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet in the aftermath of the
2008 financial meltdown.
The Fed loaned money, about 10 TRILLION $$$$$$, to foreign governments and to Wall Street banks and investment banks (in only a couple of days, JP Morgan got US Govt approvals and converted from an investment bank to a national bank and then lined up at the Fed window to get free money)
Bing
MemberFebruary 27, 2015 at 9:59 am in reply to: EFF unearths evidence of possible Superfish-style attacks in the wild;2/26/2015A few years ago, IBM sold their lap top division to the Chinese company, Lenovo.
Bing
MemberFebruary 27, 2015 at 9:49 am in reply to: Surveillance-based manipulation: How Facebook or Google could tilt elections;2/26/2015Phew!!!
I have never logged on to Facebook. Ever. And it amazes me how much people put their private info out there on the www.
And I rarely use google. Instead, I use duckduckgo, which is way better than it was a few years ago.
Plus, duckduckgo does not track users (so they say) and does not keep a history of user searches (so they say).
Awesome stuff!!!
A great metallic history lesson. Spot on.
LMAO at Stefan’s comment that ‘it would be like if you are paying someone to store your car, and you want it back, and they show you a hubcap, that is somewhat associated with your car.’
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
I think it is criminal that the New York Fed refused to let Germany visit the Fed vaults that allegedly contained Germany’s gold bars, so Germany can audit and inventory Germany’s gold.
Simply criminal.
Bing
MemberFebruary 7, 2015 at 5:49 pm in reply to: Larken Rose now using the phrase "sovereign individuals"I am even more impressed that Larken Rose finally found a half way decent barber.
Finally!!! 😮
There are lots of ways I know that God exists.
I know God exists because the Virgin Mary appeared to Juan Diego in Mexico, in December 1531.
To prove to the local church authorities and to the doubters, that She did indeed appear before Juan Diego, she made a rose bush bloom on a snowy hill in December, and told Juan to take the roses to the local bishop.
Juan Diego gathered up the roses in his burlap tilma (kinda like a extra long shirt), and obeyed Mary’s instructions.
When Juan unfurled his tilma and let the roses drop to the floor in front of the bishop, a multicolored image of the Virgin Mary was burnished on the tilma.
The tilma still exists, uncorrupted by the centuries, and is in the Church of Guadalupe, in Mexico City. The fibers of which the tilma was made, usually decompose after about 40 or 50 years. However, the tilma is in perfect condition!!!! Almost 500 years later!!!
God allowed Mary to appear on earth and Mary would not exist, but for the fact that God exists
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Diego#Guadalupe_narrative
The second reason I know God exists is because the Virgin Mary appeared 15 times to Bernadette Soubirous, at Lourdes, France . And the natural spring water at Lourdes has powerful healing powers.
Now, the Virgin Mary, in her picture appearing on the tilma, is praying. This tells me that as exalted as a position as she holds, she is praying to God, who obviously outranks her.
The Virgin Mary apparitions prove God exists because if God did not exist, then the Virgin Mary would not exist. The Virgin Mary does exist, therefore, God must exist.
Further, the eyes of the Virgin Mary on the tilma contain microscopic images of Juan Diego and many of the local town folk and peers of Juan Diego, way back in 1531. Mary’s eyes have been examined by dozens of the world’s leading ophthalmologists and they are in agreement that viewed under an electron microscope, the curvature of the eye, and teh images that appear in her eyes on the two dimensional tilma, are exactly of the precise dimensions and the correct angles, that one would find on a human eye. So that in itself is a miracle right there, further proof that God exists.
And finally, the bright colors that appear on the tilma, are NOT actually on the tilma at all. But are suspended ABOVE the tilma and separated from the tilma by about three tenths of a millimeter. Experts at NASA have concluded that the colors on the tilma are not from any known substance found on earth.
See http://www.catholic.net/index.php?id=6003&option=dedestaca
So there is ample evidence, hard conclusive evidence, that Mary appeared to Juan Diego and to Bernadette. And the fact that Mary appeared to Juan Diego and Bernadette, and worked miracles, is conclusive proof that God exists.
Bing
Bing
MemberFebruary 7, 2015 at 1:35 am in reply to: The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccinesA few months ago I was at the Drs., and the Dr wanted to give me a flu vaccine.
First he assumed I wanted it. Then he asked me if I wanted the flu vaccine.
I answered him by asking if thermosal (which is mercury) is in the flu vaccine.
He replied “I don’t think so”.
He doesn’t think so!!!! What kind of answer was that.
Turns out the Pharmacists inside supermarkets and the Drs, will tell patients that they can either get a flu vaccine with or without thimerosal. But how does one really know whether or not the alleged vaccine does not contain thimerosal?
You can’t.
The Medical Establishment is as evil and as corrupted as the American Lawyers, perhaps worse.
And when i asked a Pharmacist and an MD why mercury is put in all vaccines, they both told me that it is a preservative.
I kid you not.
Please read the treatise titled “Death by Medicine”.
Bing
MemberFebruary 7, 2015 at 1:18 am in reply to: Affidavit of William Mccafrey about Mortgage FraudThis is a great affidavit!!!!
Thanks for sharing
Also worth noting, in Sunday, Feb 1, 2015 New York Times Business section, and in a New York Post article, there was an article detailing the fact that two federal judges in two separate cases, each concluded that Well Fargo defrauded homeowners, were abusive, and also committed forgery, in the processing and handling a two mortgages.
See http://nypost.com/2015/01/31/ny-federal-judge-slams-wells-fargo-for-forged-mortgage-docs/
Appearing in federal court, a Wells Fargo female representative, testified under oath and she said, “I’m not here as a human being. I’m here as a representative of Wells Fargo.”
Simply amazing!!!
“Nothing is so firmly believed as that which we least know.”
[Michel de Montaigne in his Essais]Thank you, ADMIN. Nearly everything I know about this stuff, I learned from reading and studying the materials available at Fam Guardian and SEDM.
I just hope my posts can help newbies get a better grasp of the intricate nature of this material and the inter relatedness of it. The legal constructs in this country and how one issue might relate to another issue, are extremely complex.
Therefore it is critical if one ever hopes to defend their personal freedom and liberty, that one have a basic grasp of the sweeping mosaic that is known as “federal statutory law”..
This is one reason why I have long felt that the topic of Statutory Construction (How Laws Are Made), is one of the fundamental building blocks, a keystone, a foundation, to understanding the research material at Fam Guardian and SEDM.org.
The uninitiated readers at the FG website, and the newbies to the THM, must grasp the basics of how and why the corrupted politicians and lawmakers, use language to steal and plunder wealth from the American People, under the guise of, and in the name of, “income taxes, excise taxes, fill – in – the – blank, taxes
As Confucius once said, “When words lose their meaning, the people lose their liberty”.
The US Congress manipulates words and phrases, in order to confuse, control and subjugate the American People. And then Congress and the Executive Branch conspire with the corrupted administrative judges (I dare not say “judicial branch – because we do not have a Judiciary) in applying the armed police STATE, to pressure and coerce the People to admit to crimes that they DID NOT COMMIT, in an attempt to bend their collective and personal will, so the People will NOT OPPOSE or question the tyrannical, lying, and corrupted federal, state and local government officials.
And what happens is that the Truth in the Law gets suppressed for generations. The intent of the original lawmaker gets hidden under successive layers of obfuscation and wordy deceptions.
And laws and regulations are piled one on top of the other, over and over and over again. Laws, and regulations become more and more obscure and obtuse and largely indecipherable/
And an indecipherable law is no law at all, but merely an edict from a collective of tyrannical government figures, who do the bidding or equally corrupted Lobbyists and special interests, all of whom are determined to obscure, plunder and steal the natural Rights of Man
And thus, we come full circle and we return back to the topic of the Rules of Statutory Construction, which has as one of its guiding precepts, the fact that any law or regulation that is so obtuse and so confusing, that it can not reasonably be understood by someone of average intelligence, must be void for vagueness.
And must be declared by all those sworn to do justice, to be void for vagueness. And the educated Citizen must be capable of recognizing these word games, and must also be able to recognize when a law or regulation is void for vagueness, and then have the personal courage to speak out inform others
Finally, a law that is void for vagueness has no authority and is not supposed to be applied against the American People. And to the extent that a law or regulation is void for vagueness, its application in any criminal or civil proceeding, results in an undeniable violation of due process of law.
Bing
Hmmm, interesting. Thanks
It is telling that many Union state statutes piggy back off of the definitions located in the federal Uniform Firearm Act in 18 USC 921. And many state laws specifically mention the Uniform Firearm Act
Not surprisingly, it is also worth pointing out that 18 U.S.C. 921 was disingenuously crafted, so as to NOT conflict with the 2nd Amendment Right to Bear Arms
First, 18 U.S.C. 921 ( a ) refers to “person”, and we know from various US Supreme Court cases, that when the term “person” is used in a statute, it EXCLUDES the Sovereign. For proof of this fact, please see Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 667 (1979), “in common usage, the term “person”, when used in a statue, does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word “person”, are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign.”
See also, United States v. Mine Workers, 330 US 258, at 275, (1947).
Arguably, IMHO, one of the most important web pages on the FG website, has a very compelling treatment of this issue, and is backed up and supported by credible admissions and documents from the US Government itself, and can be found at
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Sovereignty/OfficeOfPerson.htm
And second, the other reason why 18 U.S.C. 921 was so craftily constructed, so as NOT to interfere with, or impinge upon the 2nd Amendments Right to Bear Arms, and, it should be noted, that many Union state constitutions have a Right to Bear Arms clause – can be found in the limited definition of the term “State”, at 18 U.S.C. 921 ( a ) ( 2 ).
The correct application of the Rules of Statutory Construction, we can readily see that the term “State” as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921, EXCLUDES the 50 Union states.
Stated differently, 18 U.S.C. 921 is a criminal statutes written ONLY for the federal States, and is NOT SUPPOSED to be applied inside the sovereign 50 Union states or govern internal commerce within any of the 50 Union states.
Congress legislates for the District of Columbia, the US Territories and Possessions, U.S. persons, statutory US citizens, U.S. resident aliens, and anyone domiciled or resident within the “federal zone”.
Accordingly, the vast majority of all federal statutes passed by the US Congress, are applicable in ONLY those geographic areas where the US Government possesses “exclusive legislative jurisdiction” (such as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc.), as per USA Const., at 1:18:17 and 4:3:2. For proof, please see Cohens v. Virginia, 19 US 264, 6 Wheat. 265 (1821)
Please also see
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/LegalRef/StatConstruction/OrLegCounsRulesOfStConst.pdf
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/FalseRhetoric/Includess.pdf
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StatLawGovt.pdf
In sum, I would argue that contrary to popular belief among law enforcement professionals, local county District attorneys, state attorney generals, and federal Assistant US Attorneys, 18 U.S.C. 921 should NO be applied against or cited as controlling law inside the 50 Union states. And this is especially true when there is no nexus between the alleged criminal act, and any land where the US Government possesses “exclusive legislative jurisdiction”.
Where the corrupted US Government traps unsuspecting defendants, is when they kidnap the suspects identity and transport them to the “District of Columbia”, to be prosecuted under some one or the other federal territorial statutes, such as 18 U.S.C. 921, that are applicable inside the District of Columbia, but NOT necessarily applicable inside the 50 Union states
Further, to the extent that suspects in the 50 Union states were convicted in the past for violating 18 U.S.C. 921, one could argue that said conviction was, or may have been, a denial of due process of law and also a violation of equal protection under the law. And when an element due process of law or equal protection under the law is violated, (NOTE: a violation of equal protection under the law, is itself, a due process of law violation) jurisdiction in the court is voided, and, therefore, all decisions made by said court on INCOMPETENT jurisdiction, are null and void ab initio.
If my legal reasoning and interpretation above is faulty and incorrect, I welcome the FG readers to enlighten me and correct me where I am wrong
Bing
Bing
MemberJanuary 22, 2015 at 8:37 am in reply to: Peymon Mottahedeh Gets Snared in Tax Court – Rut RohDan Pilla Sr., and his son, Dan Pilla, Jr., are two hardcore, long time members of the THM. And, in their own special, limited way, were both instrumental in spreading the truth about the corrupt practices and lies foisted upon the American People by the lying IRS and the US Government.
If memory serves me right, I met Pops, Dan Pilla Sr., about 10 years ago.. Very nice gentleman.
The Pilla materials that I have read over the years were decent in many respects, but they suffer from incompleteness, and they pale in comparison to the research unmatched thoroughness of the material located on the FG and SEDM websites.
Despite this lack of completeness, the Pilla’s were single handedly responsible for motivating countless freedom loving folks in Minnesota, Idaho, the Dakotas, to question the corrupted IRS and challenge them.
God Bless the Pilla Family
Bing
MemberJanuary 14, 2015 at 10:28 pm in reply to: Marc Stevens: Show Me the Evidence Your Laws ApplyGood points
Also., he does not tie in US Supreme Court decisions (such as Connolly v. General Construction) that make it very clear, that the People have a due process of law right to know what the law commands or forbids.
And the refusal to identify on the record the laws and implementing regulations that are being used by the government/IRS, amounts to a denial of due process of law and also violates one’s equal protection under the law.
THM litigants have hurt themselves by not proactively identifying the plethora of due process of law issues that are ALWAYS present when the IRS takes one to court. And this has weakened their cases in the main and hurt their chances to prevail on appeal.
It is rare that a THM litigant will cite the Statutes at Large from Feb 10, 1939, to prove that the Internal Revenue Code was repealed. And tie that fact to the US Code Titles page, and to 1 USC 204, and admissions from the Office of Law Revision Counsel of the US House of Representative.s, proving that the Internal Revenue Code is NOT positive law, but merely special law.
All that said, I applaud Marc Stevens for fighting the good fight and at least educating folks of the need to fight back against the corrupted government officials
Bing
MemberJanuary 14, 2015 at 8:45 pm in reply to: Petition of Tamah Clark to U.N. regarding De Facto U.S. GovernmentThis is awesome
I love it!!!
I noted that pages 7 and 8 are missing
Thanks for sharing
So, if one is to believe the corrupted and lying USG 9.11 Truth Commission Final Report, that 15 of the alleged hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi nationals/citizens, how come the US Government increased trade with Saudi Arabia?
Based on the USG OWN conclusions about 9/11, isn’t Saudi Arabia an enemy of the People of United States of America?
Ohhh, I see, it is okay for the corrupted US Govt to trade with the enemy, but it is supposedly illegal if anyone else trades with the so-called enemy.
Bing