Hehe heh heh. I love it.

I loves me some bacon. Mmmmmmm good!

I am confused as to the cite in the lead post to “Congressional Record, Congressman Patman, March 13, 1933”.

Nothing in the lead post was from a 1933 edition of the Congressional Record. Do you have page numbers and a date?

Thanks

Make no mistake this latest fiscal crises in the EU is being orchestrated behind the scenes and is being done to help bolster the argument that we should have one world currency.

Bing

Very interesting lead post. Thanks.

Simon Black does not reveal the full story though and some clarification is in order with respect to Roman history.

Man, I love to discuss the Classics.

Roman history, especially Roman military history is a subject that I know quite well.

In fact, just last nite I was re – reading Livy's History of Rome for the umpteenth time in my life. Over the years, in addition having read Michael Grant, a modern historian, I have read the ancients, such as Arrian, Polybius, Herodotus, Thucydides, and a number of other classic and Greek historians and writers and I want to make a few comments.

The excerpt “. . .Caligula was followed by Claudius, a stammering, slobbering, confused man as described by his contemporaries.. . “ is only true to the extent that Claudius was indeed perceived by others thru most of his life to be a stuttering and stammering idiot. But in reality, he was extremely smart and crafty. Also, when Claudius was child, he was paired with a young Jewish boy from a wealthy family from Judea, a kid named “Herod” – yes, that same Herod. They studied together, played together, and later, got drunk and chased girls and women together. When Rome took over a land, it was official policy to have the elite of the conquered lands, to send their children to Rome to get educated.

In essence, Rome created one of the first “foreign exchange student programs” – but make no mistake, lots of their “Roman nonresident aliens” – if you will, were kidnapped and taken back to Rome to be indoctrinated in the Roman way of doing business. It was part of their military strategy to help ensure that the children family's remained loyal to Rome and not instigate uprisings against the occupier, Rome, lest their child be killed or worse, turned into a slave.

Claudius was part of the House of Julian, the same family that begat Octavian. Octavian was the name used when he was younger, as he later is known as Augustus, the architect of the great battle of Actium, among many others. Augustus took the time to mentor Claudius on the sly and for many years, and Claude – Claude was a great student of Roman history and a scholar to boot.

But it is important to understand that Claudius acted the fool when he was young and then into his adulthood, because it was his survival strategy. A brilliant one at that. Understand that Livia, the 2nd wife of Augustus (formerly called Octavian) was a psycho – murderer who plotted for decades to have her son, Tiberius first adopted by the Emperor Augustus, and then she schemed to get Tiberius named in Augustus' will as his successor. In actuality, Livia corrupted the Vestal Virgins, where all important wills were stored for safekeeping under the notion that Roman society could always trust a virgins with their secrets and wills. Livia changed Augustus will and created a new will that named Tiberius Augustus' successor.

Anyway, as noted above, in his later years, Tiberius was morally depraved, but he was not always that way. Tiberius was a great Roman General who trained his men hard. A great Roman military man, if ever their was one.

I have to go and will post more when I have more time.

Bing

Very cool. Thanks for sharing.

The Supreme Court is very crafty and just like the Legislative and Executive Branches, often within their opinions, the US Supreme Court will hide powerful admissions right in plain sight

Let me explain.

RE: the Supreme Court's definition of commerce, what jumps right out at me, is the fact that so far as the Federal Zone is concerned, where the USG is the Sovereign and supreme authority, note that if one deconstructs the above excerpt, what the Court is really admitting is revealing and entirely consistent with the materials available from SEDM and within Famguardian.

And that, my cyber cohorts is a perfect example of the US Government's plenary power within the District and other geographic areas where the USG possesses exclusive legislative jurisdiction.

The USG, within its exclusive sphere, can and has in fact, defined what the term “commerce” means.

Bing

Good job Prollins. But don't stop there, follow through with your research.

Take it a step further and go to Black's Law dictionary 6th edition and read the definitions for “positive law” and “special law”. make a photo copy.

And if you go to the web page for the US Congress Office of Law Revision Counsel, you will see that they too admit that 26 USC is not positive law. This is called hiding something in plain site.

And if you open any volume of the USC, in the front of each volume, is a Titles page and also a page signed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Titles Page does NOT have an asterik* next to 26 USC Internal Revenue Code.

Copy all this stuff, along with 1 USC 204, and the Hoverale letter, and then write a short affidavit summarizing these facts, and send it to the IRS' top lawyers in Washington, DC and ask them whether 26 USC has been enacted in to positive law.

Put the IRS top lawyers on the defensive.

Be creative. Take the time to educate the IRS top lawyers

Repeat as desired.

Yep.

I just went to go and buy some red grapes and they were more than $6 for about 1 1/2 lbs.

The same grapes cost about 50% less about 2 months ago. WTF??

Mozzle-toff!! (Sp?) LOL