6 pm on May 21st.

Hmmm.

I will order my dinner at 5:10 pm, desert at 5:45p.m., and then at 5:58:30pm, I will ask for the check. 😕 If i am going to hell, I may as well have one last free meal.

I tried to upload an 8 page color pamphlet I received some months ago that also asserted that 5.21.2011 was END of world, but the doc is 7MB and is too large.

I will rescan it in this week and post it in this thread. It is very interesting reading, to say the least.

Franklin, you are correct, at the very end Stansbury does make a sales pitch for a newsletter.

I listened for about 5 minutes and then decided to turn it off and simply print out the transcript. It is 49 pages in length.

I skimmed thru the document and I will read it later tonight, but it appears to be quite compelling

Anyway, I do not know when the audio tape was made, but Stansbury numbers are incorrect. For example, he asserts on page 6 that USG tax receipts = $900 BILLION, and that figure is wrong based on FY tax receipts of $2.4 TRILLION.

Strangely enough in the very next paragraph after he wrongly asserts that tax receipts = $900 BILLION, he correctly asserts that USA annual deficits are about $1.3 TRILLION. So this leads me to conclude that the is fairly recent.

But folks, do not get hung up on the incorrect tax receipts figures, the overarching thing is that this guy Stansbury, like ADMIN said, is right on the mark about the coming demise of USA at the hands of the corrupted Federal Reserve.

WOW!!

Amazing stuff. I will be sure to send this to a black woman that I know who LOVES Obama!!

I will share this lead post with many others.

Thank you for sharing this.

Wait a second!!!

To show just how hypocritical and disingenuous the US State Department is with respect to getting a passport, right now, you can apply for and get a USA passport, even if you DO NOT HAVE ANY ID AT ALL.

Yep.

All you gots to do is to get 2 people who know you, to go on Record and say that you are so – and – so. That's it!!

So from that current practice, to now wanting to know about pre-natal care given to a birth Mother and the names and address of siblings, neither of which help prove citizenship or rights to a USA passport at all.

Furthermore, another reason why the US State Department's intrusive questions are unconstitutional on their face, whether declared so or not by a judge/court, is because for many Americans, the events leading up to and after the birth of a child is an important practice and aspect of their religion.

In many homes, the family's religious faith and tradition mandates that the parents record the new born baby births name, date, etc in a Bible, to get the new born baby baptized, etc., etc., and those religious ceremonies and memorializing of those solemn religious events are constitutionally protected religious practices. Ergo, those religious events and all information associated with them, such as when they occurred or who was present, whether and if the event was recorded, are OFF LIMITS to the prying eyes of ALL GOVERNMENTS, most especially the federal government.

And the conception and nativity of a child is an extension of one's practice of religion, and any and ALL government questions which intrude upon that sacred subject are verboten and unconstitutional.

If we do not stand together and protest this en masse, the next thing the US Government will want to ask if our parents consumed alcohol on the day we were conceived.

Hmmmm. Interesting. Thanks for sharing this.

I know lots of folks who swear by their auto/boat GPS & their smart phones, then they whine about their loss of privacy. Go figure.

What kind of society have we devolved into, where taking Max Weber's Protestant Work Ethic to a whole new level, it is now proposed that we apply Emile Durkheim's Division of Labour precepts so that one can become a more efficient team thief/a/k/a “team looter”??

I think there will be serious constitutional issues that will arise in the corrupted federal and state courts if this GAO proposal gets implemented.

The possession of a USA passport should, in my view, be part and parcel to being an American national/state citizen. As such, the issuance of a passport to one of the sovereign people should not be held at the whim and mercy of either a corrupted U.S. Congress or to some bureaucratic back-office hack.

Preventing someone from applying for and receiving a passport, is akin to stealing their citizenship and their personal liberty to travel.

If the State Dept, in cooperation with Treasury Department, can conspire to prevent someone from receiving their passport, because of the presumption of an income tax liability, than surely this act must be ruled unconstitutional in due course.

Denying someone a passport is an infringement on one's unalienable right to locomotion and travel.

Refusing to give someone their passport has the net effect of interfering with the practice of my religion if I was intending on visiting Holy Lands overseas or go on a pilgrimage to find my Maker and Creator.

By linking the receipt of a passport, predicated upon acting in a certain way or manner endorsed by the federal government, in effect, the US Government would be forcing passport applicants to join the state – sponsored religion or else relinguish certain fundamental, and unalianable rights.

If the government can hold a passport application hostage until someone behaves in a proscribed manner, in this case, paying money to the IRS, well, if that is not extortion under the color of law I do not know what is.