<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Family Guardian | Bing | Activity</title>
	<link>https://famguardian.org/members/bing/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://famguardian.org/members/bing/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Bing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd2eb25e7537674bf2a32973db4b28c0</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Dave Champion Injunction Being Sought in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/dave-champion-injunction-being-sought/#post-21747</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 19:07:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/dave-champion-injunction-being-sought/#post-21747"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Dave Champion Injunction Being Sought</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The Dave Champion website cited in lead post above,</p>
<p><a target='_blank' href="http://www.nontaxpayer.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.nontaxpayer.org</a></p>
<p>is no promoting cooking and foods, and has nothing to do with income taxes so far as I can  tell.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f587bc1b6c9c36a36b8e2cfd616c932</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion RICO &#38; Absence of Implementing Regulations in the forum 2.3. Court Litigation and Prosecutions</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21602</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21602"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> RICO &amp; Absence of Implementing Regulations</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As a long time student of Sun Tzu for the past 30 years, I think Sun Tzu would agree with Admin that an adversary&#8217;s strength often contains their weakness.  However, I would submit that such is not the case in every situation.</p>
<p>Sometimes, a strength really is a strong point and should not be attacked. There is a reason why US NAVY SEALs&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5216"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21602" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2efc6a9d7c9a7128540f20a8012d82fc</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion RICO &#38; Absence of Implementing Regulations in the forum 2.3. Court Litigation and Prosecutions</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21601</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:48:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21601"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> RICO &amp; Absence of Implementing Regulations</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Awesome. I did not know or else I forgot about the Due Proces of Law treatise.</p>
<p>I am puzzled by your remarks about not being a subscriber/Member of SEDM. I was one of the first members.</p>
<p>As far as I know, I am still a member/subscriber of SEDM even though I have not logged in  a long time.</p>
<p>When  I was living in a law library, and helping to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5215"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21601" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4c5b0c6f1775db7017cec659d9fff2bd</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion RICO &#38; Absence of Implementing Regulations in the forum 2.3. Court Litigation and Prosecutions</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21597</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 19:13:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21597"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> RICO &amp; Absence of Implementing Regulations</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you. Great to be back.</p>
<p>And thank you too, for the awesome reply above. I can readily see that I have a bit of reading and additional studying to do.</p>
<p>There is going to be a transition period, and lots of bumps in the road, as well meaning patriots, who arguably have not grasped the NRA position, try and explain that they are&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5213"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/#post-21597" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">17af5053e96185c2fa4cd04698a6ced2</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion The Plunderbund’s Persecution of Phil Hart in the forum 4.3.3.  Government employees and Ex government employees</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-plunderbunds-persecution-of-phil-hart/#post-21589</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:19:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-plunderbunds-persecution-of-phil-hart/#post-21589"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The Plunderbund’s Persecution of Phil Hart</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Is there any update on Phil Hart?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">97e65220e0cb455acd651b9fae8e98a5</guid>
				<title>Bing started the discussion RICO &#38; Absence of Implementing Regulations in the forum 2.3. Court Litigation and Prosecutions</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:43:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/">RICO &amp; Absence of Implementing Regulations</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I noted that the late Rep. James Traficant, from Ohio, who was known for speaking out against the lying and corrupted IRS on the floor of the Congress, was subject to a RICO civil forfeiture action by the USG.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://famguardian.org/Subjects/taxes/CaseStudies/JamesTraficant/USvTraficant/01cr207doc352.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://famguardian.org/Subjects/taxes/CaseStudies/JamesTraficant/USvTraficant/01cr207doc352.pdf</a></p>
<p>Traficant was prosecuted in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5208"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/rico-absence-of-implementing-regulations/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">514112e04153bb377e026996f827a81f</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Facebook scraped call, text message data for years from Android phones;3/24/18 in the forum 6.7. Privacy Protection</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/facebook-scraped-call-text-message-data-for-years-from-android-phones3-24-18/#post-21564</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:40:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/facebook-scraped-call-text-message-data-for-years-from-android-phones3-24-18/#post-21564"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Facebook scraped call, text message data for years from Android phones;3/24/18</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>lol</p>
<p>People rush online, to catch the wave, and voluntarily input all kinds of personal info on FB, seek out &#8220;friends&#8221;, and then, amazingly, act surprised that FB stored the personal info and, uhhhh, I am sure, tried to monetize all that info, mined it like a gold mine.</p>
<p>In the era of asymmetric cyber warfare, where knowing where&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5194"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/facebook-scraped-call-text-message-data-for-years-from-android-phones3-24-18/#post-21564" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a3ea7e6e2bda636d3a3faadbfcf001b3</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion False information reports in the forum 2.3.1. Tax litigation</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/false-information-reports/#post-21562</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/false-information-reports/#post-21562"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> False information reports</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hmmm, yo, Jethro, you still around?</p>
<p>There is a very good reason that no one answered your lead (or is it, leading,) questions posed above.</p>
<p>There is top notch, right-on-the-mark, free information on FG and SEDM available to Members, that educates the reader on how to correct information reports. Check it out.</p>
<p>But separately, if your lead&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5193"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/false-information-reports/#post-21562" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b0441c099255f638b3fed064e7b12164</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution in the forum 2.5.  Freedom education</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21559</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:23:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21559"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The faux author and this faux MATRIX document could not withstand the scrutiny of a decent linguistic analyses, that would reveal that no credible judge would use certain words or phrases, let alone advance such preposterous notions as &#8220;the constitution is worthless&#8221;</p>
<p>He claims he was a judge on some unidentified court (federal&#8212; we&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5192"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21559" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d32bd7b60ef98fafd7c04e786312def</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion 9-11 WTC Biggest Gold Heist in History: $300 Billion in Bars in the forum 3.6.  Government and legal profession commercial scams</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/9-11-wtc-biggest-gold-heist-in-history-300-billion-in-bars/#post-21388</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/9-11-wtc-biggest-gold-heist-in-history-300-billion-in-bars/#post-21388"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 9-11 WTC Biggest Gold Heist in History: $300 Billion in Bars</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Many years ago, in the aftermath of 9/11, I saw a video online, that was shot on 9/11 in Manhattan,, in which the NY citizens were interviewed about what they witnessed near the WTC towers,in the days before and on 9/11.</p>
<p>And many witnesses said they saw a caravan of armored trucks pulling into and out of the WTC underground garage, where&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5058"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/9-11-wtc-biggest-gold-heist-in-history-300-billion-in-bars/#post-21388" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f52abc2a404d1ea0ddc697be7b1c43a9</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution in the forum 2.5.  Freedom education</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21175</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21175"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The unidentified author of the faux matrix document, works hard to try and convince the reader, that it is supposedly useless to rely on the USA constitution to protect ones rights. . . . . why. . . . . well, there are lots of reasons. . . . and the so-called self anointed &#8220;judge&#8221; (of traffic court???) gripes about how American lawyers are&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4878"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/#post-21175" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c0f83527a979a3552eaeed4a4052c681</guid>
				<title>Bing started the discussion A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution in the forum 2.5.  Freedom education</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/">A Critique of Pure Reason: The Matrix and USA Constitution</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I want to, finally, take the time to share with a wider audience, my perspective on a beloved document that has circulated widely throughout Patriot circles for 10 plus years and is posted on FG at</p>
<p><a href="https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/ThreatsToLiberty/UnitedStatesMatrix.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/ThreatsToLiberty/UnitedStatesMatrix.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>My assessment is that the document linked to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4028"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/a-critique-of-pure-reason-the-matrix-and-usa-constitution/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c532c7dbe2fd2defbfdca8cc79c0d97b</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20058</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:22:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20058"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The power and jurisdiction of the federal government is already limited and restricted.</p>
<p>The problem is too few people can figure it out, or prefer not to apply the Organic law as written.</p>
<p>And the bigger problem is that the feds have done a masterful job of controlling and dumbing down law school profs and law students.</p>
<p>I have had lots&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3929"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20058" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89ed081bd01dee853f5472a6805271a8</guid>
				<title>Bing started the discussion TRUMP LETS WORKERS OFF EARLY in the forum 4.2. Jokes and Humor</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/">TRUMP LETS WORKERS OFF EARLY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>THE <del>WHITE</del> TRUMP HOUSE</p>
<p>TO:  ALL FEDERAL WORKERS</p>
<p>FROM: PRESIDENT TRUMP</p>
<p>DATE:  3 JULY 2017</p>
<p>RE:  MONDAY WORK HOURS</p>
<p>Because I have the power, and I also beat Crooked Hillary in the election, and everybody loves me, and my company makes the longest men&#8217;s dress tie in history, so long that I have extra tie length to gag my great friend Nancy&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3930"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e464134ff6422d415ed5d9c97b9727a</guid>
				<title>Bing started the discussion TRUMP LETS WORKERS OFF EARLY in the forum 4.2. Jokes and Humor</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/">TRUMP LETS WORKERS OFF EARLY</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>THE <del>WHITE</del> TRUMP HOUSE</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
TO:  ALL FEDERAL WORKERS<br />
FROM: PRESIDENT TRUMP<br />
DATE:  3 JULY 2017</p>
<p>RE:  MONDAY WORK HOURS</p>
<p>Because I have the power, and I also beat Crooked Hillary in the election, and everybody loves me, and my company makes the longest men&#8217;s dress tie in history, so long that I have extra tie length to gag my great friend Nancy&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3928"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trump-lets-workers-off-early/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">50d4f77ccfdb82f1bea3e35a125fd072</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmmm.</p>
<p>I am confused.</p>
<p>I seem to recall that a few years ago, Michigan was the 34th or 35th state to pass a bill calling for a constitutional convention.</p>
<p>But the article in the lead post seems to imply that Georgia is the first state to vote for a constitutional convention???</p>
<p>The THM and Liberty patriots are not sufficiently well represented&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3897"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">39a16e88973962567449586f00354b91</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hmmmm.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am confused.</p>
<p>I seem to recall that a few years ago, Michigan was the 34th or 35th state to pass a bill calling for a constitutional convention.</p>
<p>But the article in the lead post seems to imply that Georgia is the first state to vote for a constitutional convention???</p>
<p>The THM and Liberty patriots are not sufficiently&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3896"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7c1dec54d33d7b731937e47f0b954c9</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds in the forum 2.2. Legislative Alerts and Updates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Historic: 1st state adopts plan to rein in feds</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hmmmm.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am confused.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am confused.</p>
<p>I seem to recall that a few years ago, Michigan was the 34th or 35th state to pass a bill calling for a constitutional convention.</p>
<p>But the article in the lead post seems to imply that Georgia is the first state to vote for a constitutional convention???</p>
<p>The THM and Liberty patriots are&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3895"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/historic-1st-state-adopts-plan-to-rein-in-feds/#post-20027" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af072839e1d76b88b85d1e468b3371a8</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Ed Rivera on corruption of the government in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/ed-rivera-on-corruption-of-the-government/#post-20015</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/ed-rivera-on-corruption-of-the-government/#post-20015"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Ed Rivera on corruption of the government</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The very first part of the audio says that the discussion deals with mortgage fraud, strangely,about a minute or two later, it says that the tape deals with Organic Law of USA .</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">39469b2b791b6468d06dd55b3b2a7174</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Ed Rivera on corruption of the government in the forum 3.2. Court and Legal Profession Corruption, Enfranchisement of Courts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/ed-rivera-on-corruption-of-the-government/#post-20015</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/ed-rivera-on-corruption-of-the-government/#post-20015"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Ed Rivera on corruption of the government</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>The first part of the audio says that the discussion deals with mortgage fraud and the audio was recorded in Chicago.</p>
<p>I did not hear any mention of Ed&#8217;s name so I stopped after about a minute</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">14cf34c7619be33cc7fbaa51c9972554</guid>
				<title>Bing started the discussion Bad Links in the forum 9.4. Bad links</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/bad-links-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 04:09:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/bad-links-2/">Bad Links</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>When I do a website search of the term &#8220;grand jury&#8221; more than 400+ HTML hits appears, but none of the HTML links will load.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2366957d54a5210e47e08952e5d48e7a</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015 in the forum 3.3.6.  Corruption of individual politicians</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16027</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:41:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16027"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>For those interested in what Penna.. Attorney General Kane allegedly did to warrant her being accused of committing a felony and a bunch of misdemeanors, this web site <br />
 <br />
<a target='_blank' href='http://www.scribd.com/doc/273732670/Kathleen-Kane-criminal-charges' rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/273732670/Kathleen-Kane-criminal-charges</a><br />
 <br />
has documents related to the Attorney General&#8217;s alleged crimes and her repeated violations of her oath of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3418"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16027" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9bc754b0421697e6b0200cd001b015b5</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015 in the forum 3.3.6.  Corruption of individual politicians</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16026</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:47:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/pa-attorney-general-charged-with-perjury-obstructing-justice862015/#post-16026"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Pa. attorney general charged with perjury, obstructing justice;8/6/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>When the Pennsylvania Legislature comes back from their months long summer recess, I am reasonably certain that the AG Kathleen Kane will face impeachment proceedings, assuming she does not resign before then<br />
 <br />
The naivete displayed by AG Kane is astounding and unmatched!!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5b133309484cebe407340529dad6775a</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Judge releases video of cops killing suspect despite PD objections/7/15/2015 in the forum 3.1.5. Police corruption</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-releases-video-of-cops-killing-suspect-despite-pd-objections7152015/#post-16024</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:57:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/judge-releases-video-of-cops-killing-suspect-despite-pd-objections7152015/#post-16024"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Judge releases video of cops killing suspect despite PD objections/7/15/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>See, this is exactly why overzealous cops get shot at by angry citizens who feel as though they are under assault by rogue cops.<br />
 <br />
Really, these three guys are suspected of stealing bikes and that is reason enough for the cops to draw their side arms?? Looks like the cops need to be retrained ASAP. . . . . . .and also charged with SOME type&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-329"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/judge-releases-video-of-cops-killing-suspect-despite-pd-objections7152015/#post-16024" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6932fd14aa3c92b997f9e6d162a82a3e</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Trowbridge v. USA in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16008</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:55:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16008"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Trowbridge v. USA</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am not a BAR attorney.  I never went to law school and my posts in this thread ARE NOT Legal advice.<br />
 <br />
My legal knowledge and expertise, to the extent that I even have any, was mostly gained by studying the materials available at FG and at SEDM. And working closely with certain FG Fellowship Member(s) whose identities are known only to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-353"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16008" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ee9b62617a4dcf82c2186db7d2f60109</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Trowbridge v. USA in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16007</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:02:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16007"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Trowbridge v. USA</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I just completed reading Trowbridge&#8217;s 22 page Appeal to the US Supreme Court, and all of the supporting case materials,  and I am pleased to report that every fact and statement made by Trowbridge is 100% accurate and true.<br />
 <br />
This document authored by Dr Trowbridge is non pareil and is genuinely a Tour de Force par excellence.<br />
 <br />
I want to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2110"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16007" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">423588566012eb575aebf9c6831d3afe</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OFFICIALLY ABOLISHED THE INDIVIDUAL STATES IN 1972&#033; in the forum 3.7. Globalization/New World Order</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-united-states-of-america-officially-abolished-the-individual-states-in-1972/#post-16023</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:30:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-united-states-of-america-officially-abolished-the-individual-states-in-1972/#post-16023"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OFFICIALLY ABOLISHED THE INDIVIDUAL STATES IN 1972&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I disagree. And it is unhelpful to the unlearned masses, to read that President Nixon reorganized the 50 states into ten regions, as if to imply that any such reorganization was lawful and in compliance with the federal and state constitutions. When in fact, any such reorganization was neither lawful nor constitutional.<br />
 <br />
NO Executive Order&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-332"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-united-states-of-america-officially-abolished-the-individual-states-in-1972/#post-16023" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">98ab67050235a2005834875e8d5eb8e2</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Why The Puerto Rico Debt Crisis Is Such A Huge Threat To The U.S. Financial System in the forum 3.6.2.  Collapses, crises, and bailouts</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/why-the-puerto-rico-debt-crisis-is-such-a-huge-threat-to-the-u-s-financial-system/#post-16022</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:25:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/why-the-puerto-rico-debt-crisis-is-such-a-huge-threat-to-the-u-s-financial-system/#post-16022"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Why The Puerto Rico Debt Crisis Is Such A Huge Threat To The U.S. Financial System</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Rut Roh!!! :huh:<br />
 <br />
When it came to taking on more debt, Puerto Rico should have learned to say, &#8220;No Mas. No Mas!!&#8221; 😀<br />
 <br />
Bing</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">53357c2fe377cc77cb73476e95e19815</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Texas establishes own gold depository independent of Federal Reserve;6/17/2015 in the forum 3.6.6.  Federal Reserve/Fiat Currency scam</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16016</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:56:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16016"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Texas establishes own gold depository independent of Federal Reserve;6/17/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>There is a serious problem in Texas<br />
 <br />
It turns out that the Texas state government, does NOT actually have the physical capacity to store the state&#8217;s gold reserves.<br />
 <br />
In other words, Texas does not own and control a vault in which to store the state&#8217;s gold reserves.<br />
 <br />
Yep<br />
 <br />
And in the Texas law that was recently passed, requiring the gold to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-88"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16016" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">02345927e8d24dd4c8f3a86f68776059</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Trowbridge v. USA in the forum 7.2. Federal jurisdiction</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16006</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/trowbridge-v-usa/#post-16006"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Trowbridge v. USA</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Ohhhh man!!!<br />
 <br />
Trowbridge has really nailed it!!!<br />
 <br />
THANK YOU Admin!!!<br />
 <br />
Bing</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3908d6b6b30a56568f02e6100e9ebca</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Texas establishes own gold depository independent of Federal Reserve;6/17/2015 in the forum 3.6.6.  Federal Reserve/Fiat Currency scam</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16015</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16015"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Texas establishes own gold depository independent of Federal Reserve;6/17/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>GO TEXAS!!!!!!<br />
 <br />
One should also keep in mind that the US Govt lawyers employed by FDR, were every bit as crafty and dishonest as IRS and government lawyers are today.<br />
 <br />
For example, EO 6102, located at <a target='_blank' href='http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611' rel="nofollow">http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611</a><br />
 <br />
uses the terms &#8220;person&#8221; and &#8220;individual&#8221;, and DOES NOT use the term &#8220;American Citizen&#8221;,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2214"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/texas-establishes-own-gold-depository-independent-of-federal-reserve6172015/#post-16015" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">078b1744fc0eabb5188a6a081ae78aa9</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Iran, Russia ditch dollar, trade in ruble;4/26/2015 in the forum 3.6.6.  Federal Reserve/Fiat Currency scam</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/iran-russia-ditch-dollar-trade-in-ruble4262015/#post-16001</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:46:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/iran-russia-ditch-dollar-trade-in-ruble4262015/#post-16001"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Iran, Russia ditch dollar, trade in ruble;4/26/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmmm, I smell another Federal Reserve/Central bank instituted war, coming soon.<br />
 <br />
Recently China formed their version of a World Bank, and 47 countries, including NATO &#8220;allies&#8221; like Great Britain and France, signed up.<br />
 <br />
I wonder how long it will be before Israel bombs Iran???</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49e44b242c0df1c39a55c2536fa79c6e</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion NSA Wants Your Encrypted Data And Is Pushing Tech Companies To Provide ‘Split Key’ Access;4/13/2015 in the forum 3.5.1. Spying and surveillance</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/nsa-wants-your-encrypted-data-and-is-pushing-tech-companies-to-provide-split-key-access4132015/#post-15996</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:41:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/nsa-wants-your-encrypted-data-and-is-pushing-tech-companies-to-provide-split-key-access4132015/#post-15996"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> NSA Wants Your Encrypted Data And Is Pushing Tech Companies To Provide ‘Split Key’ Access;4/13/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Rut roh!! 😡</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a32c3c278dc3bba3920e82c0753b768</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Anyone in South Carolina? in the forum 5.7. Members Seeking Members</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/anyone-in-south-carolina/#post-15928</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:09:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/anyone-in-south-carolina/#post-15928"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Anyone in South Carolina?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi CWU,<br />
 <br />
I see you are one with the Holy Spirit.<br />
 <br />
Good.<br />
 <br />
Just wanted to let you know that South Carolina is closed on Mondays and Tuesdays.  As is Delaware, but no one has noticed that yet.<br />
 <br />
Check back here on Wednesday and perhaps you may find a fellow South Carolina citizen<br />
 <br />
God Bless<br />
 <br />
Signed,<br />
 <br />
Your new friend, Bing</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">902c0b4b386e7f0019c5b364f35c096e</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Complex story, seeking Input from my brothers and sisters&#033; in the forum 5.2. Emancipation</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/complex-story-seeking-input-from-my-brothers-and-sisters/#post-15991</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:04:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/complex-story-seeking-input-from-my-brothers-and-sisters/#post-15991"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Complex story, seeking Input from my brothers and sisters&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Brad, welcome to Fam Guardian.<br />
 <br />
Your post above is, well, how shall I describe it?<br />
 <br />
Dense.<br />
 <br />
Yes, your post is dense.<br />
 <br />
I have no idea what you are seeking or trying to accomplish with your lead post.<br />
 <br />
My suggestion is that you pray to the Lord and ask him to send you some of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, mainly, Wisdom, Understanding, and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-338"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/complex-story-seeking-input-from-my-brothers-and-sisters/#post-15991" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">df339985db6e91dfe12a9a80688a44b1</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Thoughts about government lies in the forum 3.5.3. Deception and propaganda</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15994</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15994"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Thoughts about government lies</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>As most here are aware, the Internal Revenue Code is NOT positive law, but only prima facie evidence of the law. Since Courts are supposed to remain impartial and uphold the law. To the extent that corrupt federal judges, like, for example, the federal Judge in Texas that presided in the Dick Simkanin case, refuse to admit exculpatory&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-362"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15994" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8b44f187528874614fc12566735efbe</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Amazing Accident in the forum 4.11. Science</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/amazing-accident/#post-15985</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:19:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/amazing-accident/#post-15985"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Amazing Accident</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Error 500 occurs when the html in the lead post is clicked on<br />
 <br />
Bing</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6fbcc3d634b532a800c50a8f1514fb83</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Thoughts about government lies in the forum 3.5.3. Deception and propaganda</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15993</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:25:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15993"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Thoughts about government lies</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmm<br />
 <br />
Good point.<br />
 <br />
Also, the corruption embedded into the federal judicial system, is astounding. For example, the corrupt US Government, often will offer financial incentives to prosecution witnesses in the form of cash money, or making a favorable recommendation to a judge or a parole board for a lesser prison sentence, in return for the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2267"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/thoughts-about-government-lies/#post-15993" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7db20e9a9dff2625771258cdabbed516</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion F&#038;#K EVIL&#033;&#033;&#033;&#033; in the forum 2.1. Political Activism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15925</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 02:29:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15925"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> F&#38;#K EVIL&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Here is Rep Grayson grilling the Fed Inspector General over the multi-TRILLION dollar expansion of the Fed&#8217;s balance sheet in the aftermath of the<br />
2008 financial meltdown.<br />
 <br />
The Fed loaned money, about 10 TRILLION $$$$$$, to foreign governments and to Wall Street banks and investment banks (in only a couple of days, JP Morgan got US&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-99"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15925" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1a03d8fd899c40bfba36590394fc6672</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion EFF unearths evidence of possible Superfish-style attacks in the wild;2/26/2015 in the forum 5.6. Computer Security and Freedom of Speech</title>
				<link>https://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/eff-unearths-evidence-of-possible-superfish-style-attacks-in-the-wild2262015/#post-15983</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:59:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/eff-unearths-evidence-of-possible-superfish-style-attacks-in-the-wild2262015/#post-15983"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> EFF unearths evidence of possible Superfish-style attacks in the wild;2/26/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>A few years ago, IBM sold their lap top division to the Chinese company, Lenovo.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c7527fdc157c345b9c10e84d3204a9d7</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Surveillance-based manipulation: How Facebook or Google could tilt elections;2/26/2015 in the forum 3.5.1. Spying and surveillance</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/surveillance-based-manipulation-how-facebook-or-google-could-tilt-elections2262015/#post-15984</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:49:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/surveillance-based-manipulation-how-facebook-or-google-could-tilt-elections2262015/#post-15984"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Surveillance-based manipulation: How Facebook or Google could tilt elections;2/26/2015</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Phew!!!<br />
 <br />
I have never logged on to Facebook. Ever. And it amazes me how much people put their private info out there on the www.<br />
 <br />
And I rarely use google. Instead, I use duckduckgo, which is way better than it was a few years ago.<br />
 <br />
Plus, duckduckgo does not track users (so they say) and does not keep a history of user searches (so they say).</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">85612d0bf8c0293c2aad6216e8b3c06a</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion F&#038;#K EVIL&#033;&#033;&#033;&#033; in the forum 2.1. Political Activism</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15924</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:29:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15924"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> F&#38;#K EVIL&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Awesome stuff!!!<br />
 <br />
A great metallic history lesson.  Spot on.<br />
 <br />
LMAO at Stefan&#8217;s comment that &#8216;it would be like if you are paying someone to store your car, and you want it back, and they show you a hubcap, that is somewhat associated with your car.&#8217;<br />
 <br />
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!<br />
 <br />
I think it is criminal that the New York Fed&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1438"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/fk-evil/#post-15924" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ce6e366aac01b60f24bcb7eff9ebbcb5</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Larken Rose now using the phrase &#034;sovereign individuals&#034; in the forum 4.3.7.  861 advocates</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/larken-rose-now-using-the-phrase-sovereign-individuals/#post-15961</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/larken-rose-now-using-the-phrase-sovereign-individuals/#post-15961"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Larken Rose now using the phrase &#34;sovereign individuals&#34;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am even more impressed that Larken Rose finally found a half way decent barber.<br />
 <br />
Finally!!! 😮</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5830f8839db2d225b4861966dfb7b492</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion God&#039;s Not Dead: How Science Proves God Exists&#033; in the forum 4.8. Spirituality</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gods-not-dead-how-science-proves-god-exists/#post-15969</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/gods-not-dead-how-science-proves-god-exists/#post-15969"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> God&#39;s Not Dead: How Science Proves God Exists&#33;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>There are lots of ways I know that God exists.<br />
 <br />
I know God exists because the Virgin Mary appeared to Juan Diego in Mexico, in December 1531.<br />
 <br />
To prove to the local church authorities and to the doubters, that She did indeed appear before Juan Diego, she made a rose bush bloom on a snowy hill in December, and told Juan to take the roses to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-213"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/gods-not-dead-how-science-proves-god-exists/#post-15969" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">db906ccc905e6c5bc3a06645b7d1d9ed</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion The 21 curious questions we&#039;re never allowed to ask about vaccines in the forum 4.6.6.  Harmful practices and products</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-21-curious-questions-were-never-allowed-to-ask-about-vaccines/#post-15965</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/the-21-curious-questions-were-never-allowed-to-ask-about-vaccines/#post-15965"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> The 21 curious questions we&#39;re never allowed to ask about vaccines</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>A few months ago I was at the Drs., and the Dr wanted to give me a flu vaccine.<br />
 <br />
First he assumed I wanted it. Then he asked me if I wanted the flu vaccine.<br />
 <br />
I answered him by asking if thermosal (which is mercury) is in the flu vaccine.<br />
 <br />
He replied &#8220;I don&#8217;t think so&#8221;.<br />
 <br />
He doesn&#8217;t think so!!!! What kind of answer was that.<br />
 <br />
Turns out the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3324"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/the-21-curious-questions-were-never-allowed-to-ask-about-vaccines/#post-15965" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de4c70b10c1fb3825782ebe4343ad49e</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Affidavit of William Mccafrey about Mortgage Fraud in the forum 3.6.3. Corporate Excesses</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/affidavit-of-william-mccafrey-about-mortgage-fraud/#post-15968</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/affidavit-of-william-mccafrey-about-mortgage-fraud/#post-15968"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Affidavit of William Mccafrey about Mortgage Fraud</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>This is a great affidavit!!!!<br />
 <br />
Thanks for sharing<br />
 <br />
Also worth noting, in Sunday, Feb 1, 2015 New York Times Business section, and in a New York Post article, there was an article detailing the fact that two federal judges in two separate cases, each concluded that Well Fargo defrauded homeowners, were abusive, and also committed forgery, in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-86"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/affidavit-of-william-mccafrey-about-mortgage-fraud/#post-15968" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3bac56153b59ce18654de8f755f70f6b</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion What You Don&#039;t Know Can Kill You in the forum 2.5.  Freedom education</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/what-you-dont-know-can-kill-you/#post-15890</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/what-you-dont-know-can-kill-you/#post-15890"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What You Don&#39;t Know Can Kill You</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><blockquote><p>&#8220;Nothing is so firmly believed as that which we least know.&#8221;[Michel de Montaigne in his Essais]</p></blockquote>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd17e38cb9b7e647bde5e4406e673337</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Definition of &#034;firearm&#034; in the forum 6.5. Gun Rights and Gun Control</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15953</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15953"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Definition of &#34;firearm&#34;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thank you, ADMIN. Nearly everything I know about this stuff, I learned from reading and studying the materials available at Fam Guardian and SEDM.<br />
 <br />
I just hope my posts can help newbies get a better grasp of the intricate nature of this material and the inter relatedness of it.  The legal constructs in this country and how one issue might&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1691"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15953" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b3f160bd966dbd60037a8daf1a360d6</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Definition of &#034;firearm&#034; in the forum 6.5. Gun Rights and Gun Control</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15951</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:41:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15951"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Definition of &#34;firearm&#34;</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hmmm, interesting. Thanks<br />
 <br />
It is telling that many Union state statutes piggy back off of the definitions located in the federal Uniform Firearm Act in 18 USC 921. And many state laws specifically mention the Uniform Firearm Act<br />
 <br />
Not surprisingly, it is also worth pointing out that 18 U.S.C. 921 was disingenuously crafted, so as to NOT&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1689"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/definition-of-firearm/#post-15951" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">25ef6be34cfc7efc334e4685fae777c5</guid>
				<title>Bing replied to the discussion Peymon Mottahedeh Gets Snared in Tax Court - Rut Roh in the forum 4.3.4.  Miscellaneous personalities</title>
				<link>http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/peymon-mottahedeh-gets-snared-in-tax-court-rut-roh/#post-15943</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:37:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://famguardian.org/forums/topic/peymon-mottahedeh-gets-snared-in-tax-court-rut-roh/#post-15943"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Peymon Mottahedeh Gets Snared in Tax Court - Rut Roh</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dan Pilla Sr., and his son, Dan Pilla, Jr., are two hardcore, long time members of the THM. And, in their own special, limited way, were both instrumental in spreading the truth about the corrupt practices and lies foisted upon the American People by the lying IRS and the US Government.<br />
 <br />
If memory serves me right, I met Pops, Dan Pilla&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2170"><a href="http://famguardian.org/forums/forums/topic/peymon-mottahedeh-gets-snared-in-tax-court-rut-roh/#post-15943" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		