Author #2
Forum Replies Created
Edhudmii,
I LOVE your viewpoint. You talk like an engineer or techie. Only an engineer or technie would understand “escape velocity” and Newton's Laws of Gravitation. Thanks for sharing that with us. However, who are the “Cylons”? Is that like the “Klingons”…HEEE..HEEEEE…HEEEE! 😆 😆
Oh, and by the way. How the heck do you get into Croatia without a passport?
Sovereigneer,
Look at the latest version of
Legal Notice of Change in Domicile/Citizenship Records and Divorce from the United States, Form #10.001
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Form…/NotDivorce.zip
Section 7 of the latest version of that form addresses most of your concerns. It quotes the Supreme Court, which said that all court jurisdiction over marriage and divorce, and by implication all of the consequences of it, depends on domicile.
Changing domicile affects only civil and not criminal jurisdiction. Criminal jurisdiction does not require your consent and therefore does not have domicile as a prerequisite. Therefore, by changing one's domicile, one destroys nearly all of the government's civil jurisdiction over marriage, divorce, estate taxes, income taxes, and driver's licenses. Below is how the U.S. Supreme Administrative Court put it:
Quote:Under our system of law, judicial power to grant a divorce — jurisdiction, strictly speaking — is founded on domicil. Bell v. Bell, 181 U.S. 175; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U.S. 14. The framers of the Constitution were familiar with this jurisdictional prerequisite, and, since 1789, neither this Court nor any other court in the English-speaking world has questioned it. Domicil implies a nexus between person and place of such permanence as to control the creation of legal relations and responsibilities of the utmost significance. The domicil of one spouse within a State gives power to that State, we have held, to dissolve [325 U.S. 230] a marriage wheresover contracted. In view of Williams v. North Carolina, supra, the jurisdictional requirement of domicil is freed from confusing refinements about “matrimonial domicil,” see Davis v. Davis, 305 U.S. 32, 41, and the like. Divorce, like marriage, is of concern not merely to the immediate parties. It affects personal rights of the deepest significance. It also touches basic interests of society. Since divorce, like marriage, creates a new status, every consideration of policy makes it desirable that the effect should be the same wherever the question arises.[. . .]
If a finding by the court of one State that domicil in another State has been abandoned were conclusive upon the old domiciliary State, the policy of each State in matters of most intimate concern could be subverted by the policy of every other State. This Court has long ago denied the existence of such destructive power. The issue has a far reach. For domicil is the foundation of probate jurisdiction, precisely as it is that of divorce.
[Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 (1945)]
Ed,
Thank you for sharing your esteemed opinion. I would argue with you on two points:
1. It is not difficult to fight those in government who devise evil by law by writing evil into the law. Simply divorce the state by changing your domicile to be outside its jurisdiction and then they can only have criminal jurisdiction over you. It's perfectly lawful. See Form #06.005:
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
2. On the subject of printing a substitute for the government's fiat currency, the statute you cite refers to counterfeited coin. You can print your own as long as it doesn't claim to be minted by the government. Norfed does. See:
See:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/News…ling-060615.htm
Sovereigneer,
I have told you all the options I am aware of. If you find others, please let us know. God measures the degree of our faith by the amount of pain we must endure in putting it into practice. If you would rather be safe and comfortable and beyond ridicule of friends and family members for your faith and your choices, then you are on the wrong website and ought to get used to the chains that bind you to the matrix. It is just as painful to say this as it is to hear it, but its the truth.
Sovereigneer,
The subject of correcting an existing licensed marriage is described in the Soivereign Christian Marriage Book on SEDM. Basically, yoiu have to:
1. Create and sign a marital settlement agreement.
2 Apply for a summary divorce in your state.
3 Wait the required cool off period
4 Gt the uncontested summary divorce, and then you are done.
5. Create a marriage contract that replaces the famiy code in yoiyr state.
6. Each spouse gets independent legal counsel to review the agreement.
7. The agreement is signed and notarized.
These are the basics. The full procedure is in the Sovereign Christian Marriage book.
Jman,
All information returns connect a person to a “trade or business”, pursuant to 26 USC 6041. A “trade or business” is defined as a “public office” in 26 USC 7701(a)(26). Few federal employees are “public officers”. See:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByT…ublicOffice.htm
4 USC 72 says all “public offices” must be exercised in the District of Columbia. Unless a person maintains a legal domicile in the District of Columbia or federal zone, and fit the legal definition of a “public office”, as far as we understand, it's impossible to be a “public officer”. The article below also shows that unless a person explicitly took an oath, they can't be engaged in a public office nor be required to pay Subtitle A income taxes:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evid…-Tax-Return.pdf
For more details, see:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Arti…usinessScam.htm
I have explained the law and it is your job to decide if it applies to you. I can't give legal advice.
Sovereigneer,
Mercier addresses basically what amounts to franchises. All franchises are contracts. That subject is exhaustively discussed in:
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Additional background information is available at:
Requirement for Consent, Form #05.003-explains how the government procures invisible consent
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Legal Notice of Change in Domicile/Citizenship and Divorce fromthe United States, Form #10.001-destroys all invisible contracts and connections to the US
Not a Person,
Are you the same guy as “Natural Person”? at:
By the way, I agree that Sonik Speed SHOULD NOT be using the phrase “YOU ARE A FRAUD” against anyone, including Lambskin. I have contacted him to let him know. Name calling is not allowed by the rules of this forum. If you want to identify someone as something, you have to present evidence.
Bob,
We support the program. The disk belongs to SEDM. I'm sure they'd be happy to fix it, if you give them a detailed list of errata to fix submitted via their contact page.
If you need the latest IRS forms or amended forms, its probably best to go to:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Forms/IRS/IRSFormsPubs.htm
Bob,
Thanks for the link. 🙂
Keeping track of exactly all the changes to over 500Mbytes of content in the IRM is a daunting task that we have no interest in or time. The sections you mentioned were removed but we aren't aware of others and haven't kept track of others.
We don't know what you mean by “the one on your site”. The 6209 is nowhere on the Family Guardian Website and we can't and won't answer for SEDM.
Dr. Crimwitt,
See the following for exhaustive coverage of Withholding, Items 5.6 and 3.10:
Bing,
I second your motion. Thanks for the comments, Sonik. Personally, I think Family Guardian is more like 15 years ahead of the rest of the Tax Honesty movement. They may never catch up, IMHO.
By the time anyone even gets close, DOJ promptly does them the favor of shutting them down. FG therefore has a state-granted monopoly on the distribution of freedom and sovereignty related information, thanks to our friends in the alphabet soup agencies. Thanks guys!!
Hee….heeee….heee
😛
Bing,
Thanks for sharing your feedback. I agree with your comments. An affidavit useful for the purpose you describe might be the following:
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/Forms/Em…hAttachment.htm
We have used this form to open accounts and it works fine.
Folks,
There is an easy way to bank without numbers:
1. Close all accounts with numbers.
2. Obtain an ID without a number, such as a passport or international driver's license.
3. Reopen the accounts with the ID that has no number assigned to it and using the W-8BEN AMENDED form:
http://sedm.org/Forms/04-Tax/W-8BEN/AboutIRSFormW-8BEN.htm
or Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile,and Tax Status form, Form #02.001:
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
In practice, we have found that banks will not remove a number from an existing account, but they are more than willing to open a NEW accoung without an SSN, even AFTER the Patriot Act. There is not regulation requiring disclosure of SSN's and there can't be. See form 05.012:
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
If you give a foreign address, an ID without an SSN associated with it, and/or the above forms and tell them you never have had and don't want an SSN, we haven't found a bank yet that won't open a non-interest bearing checking account for you. Don't waste your time trying to convince banks to take the number off an EXISTING account. Instead, close the account and demand all your money back. Tell them exactly why you are doing it, and then go to another back and open an account using the procedures above.
If the bank gives you a bad time about numbers, go to a smaller bank. Smaller banks are usually a lot more flexible and accommodating. Big banks abuse their monopolistic corporate market power to jerk the little guy around. Don't waste your time on big banks that treat you like a number. Don't talk to the clerk. Insist on sitting with the bank manager and patiently but firmly educate him about the law, and go stomping out if he won't listen. If enough people do this, you will see changes. Picket the place too and tell the manager exactly why you are doing it. Use form 05.013 and demand that he rebut the evidence of his own wrongdoing at the end:
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Food for thought.
