Forum Replies Created

Page 14 of 21
  • Author #2

    Member
    February 2, 2005 at 1:33 pm in reply to: Where is "Income" defined in the Code?

    See latest edition of Great IRS Hoax, section 5.6.5 for the answer.

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 30, 2005 at 3:14 pm in reply to: Making a general FOIA request

    JWR,

    Driver's licenses or other forms of identification are only required for Privacy Act, not Freedom of Information Act, requests. The purpose for requiring ID for a Privacy Act request is to protect from disclosure personal information and to make sure that the only person who can receive such information is the person who is the subject of the record.

    God bless,

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 29, 2005 at 9:38 pm in reply to: MF Decoder Update

    Your questions are answered on the SEDM website at:

    http://sedm.org/FAQs/FAQs.htm#QUESTION%206:

    See question 2.3.

    As far as improvements to the program, we have added several new and important codes to the program. The most important upgrade is the ability to deduce the exact IRS employee who did the illegal assessment by using information from the TXMOD report. We have also added an automated rebuttal letter template and a training video to demonstrate how to use the program.

    The version coming out next week on 7 FEB 05 will be version 1.88 and you probably want to wait until that version is out if you upgrade.

    God bless,

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 17, 2005 at 8:40 pm in reply to: Unwilling to listen

    Fiddo,

    Sorry to hear about your problems, and your company is terrorizing you and interfering with your right to contract. We are working on a lawsuit to file in state court against the payroll clerk individually (not the company) that will FORCE them personally to comply, and which won't involve the employer and therefore won't risk your job. This is the only remedy for people in your situation, and the most likely remedy that will work.

    God bless,

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 14, 2005 at 8:00 pm in reply to: 40 USC 3111, 3112

    The online version has not caught up with the current version yet. It was just changed. The House or Representatives website shows the new sections: 311 and 3112.

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 12, 2005 at 6:51 am in reply to: Non-Resident Alien Issue

    Ratter 14,

    The point you are missing is that if both we and our private employers are “nonresident” to the federal zone and to federal jurisdiction, then such “codes” as the I.R.C., even if they were “law”, which they aren't for those in states of the Union who aren't engaged in a “public office”, wouldn't apply to either one of us, now would they? The reference point is 26 USC 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), which defines “United States” as the District of Columbia. THAT is the only place where withholding laws are even relevant, and all the “employers” there are federal agencies populated with “U.S citizens”, and not “nationals”.

    I mentioned this to the SEDM folks and they rewrote the pamphlet to clarify that point and remove the confusion. Thanks for the feedback.

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 10, 2005 at 7:04 am in reply to: forum access

    The Newsletters and Announcements area is ONLY for my own use. This is deliberate. You can put your comments under the Feedback sedtion.

    Thanks for the comment.

    God bless,

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 7, 2005 at 5:14 am in reply to: Schiff looses again

    BOBT12,

    Thanks very much for your astute comments. They add a whole new light to my perspective on free speech. I agree wholeheartedly with everything you said.

    BRAVO!

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 5, 2005 at 11:50 pm in reply to: Request for Returns

    Ratter1,

    Thanks! 😀 Quite frankly, I don't get much sleep and usually get to bed no earlier than 11pm every night. It has been a tremendous amount of work maintaining this site over the last four years since its humble beginnings March 2001. Fortunately, I'm running out of new research and topics so the rate of change of the materials on this site from this time forward will probably be MUCH slower than it has in the past. Learning about freedom and organizing and sharing my research has also become a fascinating obsession and a never-ending journey of truth and discovery. I'm glad you enjoy the overwhelming amount of material that is here, and it wouldn't be here if I didn't find the material equally as interesting as you find it. Instead, I would have abandoned it all long ago because of boredom, since I am a pretty sharp guy who get bored easily.

    Thanks for taking the time to read and learn. Anything that took four years for a fast typist like me to put together is going to take at least that long to absorb fully and completely. I've changed my position on some things so many times it isn't funny. It's amazing how education can completely change your view of the world. My whole world is upside down from what it used to be and my priorities are totally different from what they were only five short years ago. The truth has truly set me free from fear and rendered nearly everything I used to value as meaningless. I never would have believed any of the stuff on this site only five years ago but personally verifying ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING that is on here has made me not only a believer, but what I hope is an informed, passionate spokesperson and servant for all the downtrodden out there.

    Yours in liberty,

    😀

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 4, 2005 at 11:23 pm in reply to: IRS address

    Ratter14,

    Thanks for the feedback.

    The regulation at 26 CFR 1.871-10(d)(2)(iii) still indicates the address that's in the Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Manual. Apparently, it is outdated but they have not updated the regulation. If you have a more authoritative government source to use, then please provide. We can't change anything in the manual based on hearsay.

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 4, 2005 at 7:02 pm in reply to: Anthony Hargis Persecution

    Anthony Hargis

    C/o Joe DeClue, esq.

    2427 N. Tustin Av. Suite B

    Santa Ana, California 92705

    Locked out of the Courthouse

    Recently, the government jailed me for five and a half months (for refusing to disclose records); confiscated my company (worth between four and five million dollars); its property belonged entirely to my customers, which was repeatedly asserted by the government. Next, the government fabricated a ridiculous tax liability against me (over thirty-two million dollars) using my customers' property as a basis; and plans to take customers' property to apply against my fairy-tale liability.

    All this was done without any evidence of wrongdoing, with no opportunity to examine my “accuser,” or to present my case to a jury. I was, effectively, locked out of the courthouse. In the process, the government and judge committed at least a half dozen major constitutional violations.

    We have the case on appeal; if we should win, everything done to me would become unlawful: the jail time, confiscation, and ridiculous tax assessment. It would be a major disaster for the government, and probably mean the end of the judge's career, at least. The judge is protecting himself by refusing to produce a transcript needed for our appeal: no transcript, no appeal; no appeal, no reversal of judgment; no reversal, no penalty for abuse of power. See how easy it is to circumvent limitations on power?

    The government claimed that I helped organize “illegal tax schemes” but could find no evidence of it. You frequently hear of people punished for a crime they didn't commit; I was punished for a crime that never happened. So, what was it that triggered this inquisitorial feeding frenzy of violations?

    The real purpose was to retaliate against me for the information in my writings, and against my customers for supporting me. In “Plantation America”, I've uncovered a major treason related to the SS card. In “The Lost Right”, I explain that the American Founders used the right of petition to abolish, create and reform American governments; this right was the fuel that drove the American Revolution. Indeed, it is not a right at all, it is a power that guards all our other rights, and makes government accountable. Knowledge of this right has been lost for more than 200 years: of the very few Americans who use this right, they might use one twentieth of its power: “The Lost Right” explains the remaining ninety-five percent of its power. Without this knowledge, we have lost all our rights, and lost control of this government (censored)-bent on destroying our rights.

    If information in my writings became sufficiently known, too many bureaucrats would have to hang, or give back their plunder. Good reasons to silence me.

    If the government should eventually prevail against us, it will go on to the next dissenter, or whistleblower; and, emboldened by its success, it will use one or two additional barbaric tactics it was not brazen enough to use against us.

    If you are a critic of the government – or care about the ideals of freedom, here is your chance to join battle without putting your body or fortune on the line. I, and my customers, are already there; and we have legal issues that have the potential to tear a big hole in the ranks of American bandits and cutthroats.

    But, we can't do it alone: we need financial support; and especially the pressure of an outraged citizenry. Without both of these, we are lost – and you are next.

    We're not asking for donations, or sacrifices: we're asking for investments. Everything that we recover will be divided proportionately among those who invested in our case. If enough people support our case, the question will be when – not if – we prevail, and collect damages; every voice that joins us adds volume to the outrage that must be redressed. Still, redress will not be soon,

    nor easy: it may take five or ten years.

    If you are interested, perhaps the first step is to learn who I am. One way of doing this is through my writings. I have six titles ($114.00, includes shipping); or consider the two mentioned previously ($24.00 each, includes shipping also). All are offered with a 45-day, money-back guarantee. (Make payable to Anthony Hargis)

    Or, simply send five U.S. first-class stamps for more detailed information to:

    Anthony Hargis c/o Joe DeClue, esq.; 2427 N. Tustin Av. Suite B; Santa

    Ana, California 92705.

  • Author #2

    Member
    January 3, 2005 at 9:08 pm in reply to: Request for Returns

    Bing,

    VERY well said. You have really been doing your homework and reading the Great IRS Hoax book. Bravo!

  • Author #2

    Member
    December 23, 2004 at 3:37 pm in reply to: W-8BEN

    If anyone else wants to emulate this gentleman, assistance with using the W-8BEN form are found at:

    http://sedm.org/ProductInfo/RespLtrs/W-8BE…SFormW-8BEN.htm

  • Author #2

    Member
    December 21, 2004 at 2:40 am in reply to: Foreign Agents & Commerce

    Fiddo,

    See the new article on this subject:

    http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Ar…ationOfGovt.htm

    This will blow your mind!

  • Author #2

    Member
    November 29, 2004 at 12:34 am in reply to: Irwin Schiff in the news

    I too was hoping to wish everyone a Happy Holiday, but when I ran it through my lawyer, this is what came out:

    Quote:
    From me (“the wishor”) to you (“the wishee”), please accept without obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, politically correct, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral, celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.

    We wish you a financially successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2004, but with due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures or sects, and having regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical ability, religious faith, choice of computer platform or sexual preference of the wishee.

    By accepting this greeting you are bound by these terms that:

    1.This greeting is subject to further clarification or withdrawal.

    This greeting is freely transferable provided that no alteration shall be made to the original greeting and that the proprietary rights of the wishor are acknowledged.

    2.? This greeting implies no promise by the wishor to actually implement the inferences contained in this correspondence.

    3.? This greeting may not be enforceable in certain jurisdictions and/or the restrictions herein may not be binding upon certain wishees in certain geographical locations.

    4.? This greeting is warranted to perform as reasonably as may be expected within the usual application of good tidings, for a period of one year or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first.

    5.? The wishor warrants this greeting only for the limited replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wishor.

    God bless,

    😆

Page 14 of 21