I’d like to respond to fallacies in Mitchell’s reasoning:

1. 28 USC 3002(15)(2) is NOT the only authority for calling the “United States” a corporation. There are at least two others:

1.1 The U.S. Supreme Court identified ALL governments as corporations.

Quote:
“Corporations are also of all grades, and made for varied objects;… Read more

EDITORIAL: Another update from Lindsey Springer

__________

Here's an important update from Dad:

=====================================================

Lindsey Springer here thanking each of your for your continued prayers and support.

Due to the date the Government alleged the Secretary of the Treasury purportedly referred years 2000 to… Read more

Neo,

Here is what one reader sent regarding the Citizenship Diagrams you submitted. We didn't write this. Please consider these comments as a means to CONSTRUCTIVELY improve the document rather than a personal attack.

______________

You get an explanation and diagrams before you know what the purposes of the document is. The opening… Read more

Here is the rule from the SCR website:

Quote:

Wisconsin Suprme Court
SCR 23.01 Definition of practice of law.
http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59974

The practice of law in Wisconsin is the application of legal principles and judgment with regard to the circumstances or objectives of another entity… Read more

Kingstle has a pending criminal suit. And this case is some form of an interlocutory appeal or a de novo suit.

I have no idea.

Kinstle v. State, Case No. 3:11CV25. (Dist.Ct., Ohio)(1/13/2011) — Footnote #1: (“Petitioner asserts, for example, that the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act has not been followed, that the Allen County Court of… Read more

TSA Enhanced Screening Procedures Explained

Here is the SC ruling on patting people down. You can see that Janet Napolitano and her hired pervs have gone way beyond this. It's called a Terry Stop or, the second stage is called a stop and frisk….In the United States, a Terry stop is a brief detention of a person by police[1] on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal… Read more

Franklin,

Excellent. Thanks for sharing that. That was one brave graduate who told the truth.

Last time I was at a high school graduation, the image in my mind was a new crop of livestock ready to be sheared and harvested by its farmer, Uncle Sam. That crop is described in:

The REAL Matrix
http://famguardian1….REAL_Matrix.wmv

What… Read more

If the PDSRA is inevitable, then you must seek your own accommodation with “Big Brother”. If the PDSRA is avoidable, you will have to construct your “escape” from their “new world order”.

In sound bite format, I conclude that individually, and in groups, we are going to have to recognize fundamentals such as the difference between a right… Read more

Neo,

What you are engaging in clearly appears to us as “outcome based research”, which is where you know the outcome you want and interpret the facts to support the desired outcome. The outcome you want is to continue receiving the plunder stolen from your neighbor and your children to fund your retirement. In spite of everything you know… Read more

Franklin,

Thanks for the input. The above post supports the point of this website that:

1. All law is linked to fictional entities and may be enforced primarily against fictional entities, such as “public offices”.
2. The government is a private corporation.
3. We are all enfranchised and without rights as public officers in the “U.S.… Read more

For the place to file EIN applications, see:
http://www.irs.gov/f…=111138,00.html

If you are COMPELLED to file such an application in order to do business or open a bank account, we STRONGLY encourage you to attach the following form or you will likely destroy private rights and donate them to the government:

Employer Identification… Read more

SOURCE: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=214471,00.html
________________

Updating Incorrect Business Entity Information

Many taxpayers have applied for Employer Identification Numbers (EINs) listing on the application an individual or entity other than the entity’s true responsible party as the principal officer, general… Read more

Neo,

It may be true that SS is not identified in the “trade or business” category by the code. See 26 USC 861(a)(8) and 26 USC 871(a)(3). In practice, however, the SSA files information returns on the payments, making the WHOLE payment “trade or business” ANYWAY. Explain that one away.

The Privacy Act at 5 USC 552a(a)(13) identifies all… Read more

1. A public officer is someone who operates in a representative capacity on behalf of the public. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b) is the only way the have to reach into a state and operate upon “persons” rather than just their own property. That rule requires that the party must be acting in a representative capacity. How can you act in… Read more

Neo,

Quote:
The minute that statutory “national” and “alien” changes his domicile to a federal territory or possession, he becomes a statutory “U.S. citizen” (8 U.S.C. 1401) if he moves to Guam or Puerto Rico or a “national of the United States**” (8 USC 1101(a)(22)) if he moves to American Samoa or Swains Island. Once he moves to… Read more

Neo,

OK. Here is my synopsis of your position explained in a way that you haven’t so far. I’m not saying I agree with this yet, but I’m trying to understand your perspective by explaining it better than it has been so far. I won’t really “get it” until the WHOLE picture is in front of me on one page, and all the pieces of the puzzle… Read more

Evidence gathered so far:

QUESTION: Does being an “alien” result from nationality or domicile?
ANSWER: NO, it comes from nationality, not residence or domicile. Hence, you can't be a “national” and an “alien” at the same time.

Quote:
The term ” non-resident” as herein used means a citizen of the United States who does not reside in the… Read more

Neo,

I’m not saying that you are wrong, but simply that the arguments won’t get you anywhere in a legal forum and will hurt your position. That’s all. I’m still waiting for answers to my questions:

1. How does your position reduce cognitive dissonance for the average american not schooled in the law?
2. How does this help your position in… Read more

Neo,

Context, as you know, is EVERYTHING in determining the meaning of “words of art”. The two main contexts are “Constitutional” and “statutory”. One can be a “citizen” in a constitutional sense in relation to the national government while being “alien” in the context of a franchise or statute in relation to that same government. That is why… Read more

Amen to that, brother franklin. To your comment, I would also like to add that I hope those same corrupted judges and politicians notice the phrase “In God We Trust” on the worthless federal reserve notes they untimately justly deserve. When their counterfiet money is worthless, the only thing left for them to trust will be God, in the end.… Read more

A criminal once told me the best way to keep a criminal out of your house…besides having it well lit inside and out…is to put this sign on the door

Quote:
“Jane, don't go in…the cobra got out of its cage and we can't find it.”

Franklin,

Great response. Mega dittos.

More on the same subject:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=52840
__________________

Defense Department Establishes Civilian Expeditionary Workforce
By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 27, 2009 – The Defense Department is forming a civilian expeditionary workforce that will be
trained and… Read more

SOURCE: http://www.cusc.org/editorial/3563.htm

This man has the right idea, but implements it wrong by calling himself a “United States Citizen”. Sounds to us like he doesn’t even know what one is! See:
Why You Are a “national” or a “state national” and not a… Read more

Neo,

Thank you for sharing that with us. Where did that come from? I'd like to read more from the author.

Neo,

Now that is some interesting research. Thanks for sharing it with us. You missed a few things, but that's OK. We don't claim to have all the answers just yet, but here is some related information and brainstorming. We'll have to converge on a solution to this together and over time, because the solution isn't immediately obvious to me… Read more

Your question is irrelevant. As I said, attach:

Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm (OFFSITE LINK)
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Affidavits/AffCitDomTax.pdf

. . to ensure you aren't victimized by their ignorance or the resulting usually false presumptions… Read more

Title 49 deals with interstate commerce, over which congress has exclusive legislative power under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3. Interstate commerce is among the few things congress can or does have exclusive jurisdiction over within a state of the Union. That is why Title 49 is positive law and why the definitions could conceivably… Read more

Neo,

Thank you for your continued interest and participation in these forums. We're glad you care enough to research these subjects.

The Classification Act of 1923 was not a revenue law, so far as we are aware, so it wasn't repealed by the 1939 code, 53 Stat. 1, Section 4. The 1939 code repealed all prior REVENUE laws, but not all laws… Read more

1. The best remedy is never to have to get into an argument with payroll clerks or financial institutions to begin with. Those who don't wouldn't be likely to post here. We typically only hear when people have problems, not successes on these forums because when things are going fine, you never hear from them, unfortunately. 🙁

2. The purpose… Read more

Neo,

You are correct, but everything you already said is already thoroughly analyzed and proven in the following, which has been on this website for several years:
1. Requirement For Consent, Form #05.003, Section 9.3
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

2. Great IRS Hoax,… Read more

Thanks, Franklin.

The corruption you point of Congress delegating its authority to legislate to the Executive Branch is more thoroughly documented in section 8.3 of:

Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The direct link is:
http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf

Thanks, Author #5.

Anyone with half a brain can see that becoming a “taxpayer” is voluntary by looking at the above joke:

1. The foundation of the Constitution is equal protection. See:
Requirement for Equal Protection and Equal Treatment, Form #05.033
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

2. To tax each person unequally or an… Read more

Forwarded via an email list to me:
__________________________________

From: Christopher Hansen
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:23 AM
To: rivera office
Subject: Re: George Washington Oath

Hi Ed,

I am very sorry that you believe that masons are devil worshipers.

I suppose you also believe that Mormons, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus and… Read more

Dmiladin,

The general guidance you seek on how to get started in becoming free is on the both the Taxation page, Section 8:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/taxes.htm

and the Sovereignty and Freedom Page, Section 6.1:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Freedom.htm

That would be the following:

Path to Freedom,… Read more

SovereignMan,

This tactic does not seem uncommon, and it is an unconstitutional bill of attainder, which is a penalty administered by other than a court. The only thing required to get a passport is allegiance. They are asking for all the other information now on IN-709-01 form because they are trying to connect you to a federal franchise and… Read more

Lamskin,

Are you also called “Lambkin” on Quatloos.com forums?

http://quatloos.com

Layed,

If you are suing the mortgage company to cancel a debt, this forum is not the appropriate place to obtain help. We frown on people who abuse the legal system to escape their responsibilities.

Yes, the money system is a scam and the bank didn't loan any of it's own money per 12 USC 82(a), but two wrongs don't make a right.

If you… Read more

See:

1. About SSNs/TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

2. Why It is Illegal for Me To Request or Use a Taxpayer Identification Number, Form #04.022
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The number belongs to the government. Unless you are appearing at the passport office as a… Read more

Richard 9151:

The 1871 act to which you refer is found below:

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/16Am…tuesAtLarge.pdf

Nowhere within the act is the specific version of the constitution which was adopted mentioned. Why do you conclude that it is the Constitution FOR the United States rather than the Constitution OF the United States?

Richard 9151,

Very interesting!

1. The capitalization is different
2. The word “defence” is replaced with “defense”.

Reb,

Even under the concept of Cooperative Federalism
[e.g. http://sedm.org/LibertyU/CooperativeFederalism.pdf]

the States who are party to the Constitution cannot consent to an enlargment of federal powers within their borders. To wit:

Quote:
“To the contrary, the Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments for… Read more

juu1k0ry

One of our members talked to Ed Brown. The reason he has become a target is mainly because of his own ignorance:
1. He doesn't know that the I.R.C. is an excise tax on the “trade or business” franchise.
2. He doesn't know what a “franchise” is.
3. He doesn't know that information return reporting, such as Currency… Read more

Dear Richard9151:

I searched all the U.S. supreme court rulings from the beginning and cannot find the reference that says “exclusive” means ''without the restraint of the Constitution''. Please enlighten us.

Also, I am puzzled by your comment:

Quote:
He knew, and everyone else at that time did as well, that the Constitution did not apply… Read more

Thanks for that observation. A person who was naturalized to become a “national” but formerly had “permanent resident” status while domiciled in a state of the Union on other than federal territory was NOT within the “United States” that is defined in the I.R.C. at 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10). Federal jurisdiction over residence of aliens extends… Read more

RebelYell,

That is not our understanding. Both naturalized and natural born persons are “nationals” and “nonresident aliens”. Please justify that remark with evidence of the following form:
1. The form number with the problem.
2. Reason why you believe this problem exists.
3. Changes to the form that you believe would fix the problem.

Author #2

I don't see any amended 1099 forms on the family guardian website. However, the following offsite link has AMENDED 1099 forms where the year at the top of the form can be changed by filling in a field.

http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Form1099/CorrectingIRSForm1099.htm

Scot,

We at Family Guardian are of the informed opinion based on the evidence in the “Why you are a national” pamphlet that:

1. There is nothing wrong with being a Constitutional citizen.
2. There is EVERYTHING wrong with being a statutory citizen.
3. The term “citizen of the United States” has multiple meanings depending on the context. … Read more

Scot,

Input on what? You didn’t describe what your issue is. These forums are a mock court and to post here, you should have a case or controversey that you can demonstrate with evidence. In any court, the moving party has the burden of proof. You initiated this thread so you are the moving party who has the burden of proof, and that… Read more