stija

Admin, What you refer to as ‘my presumptions’ are factual statements based in reality and supported by the law and court opinions.  Thus if you DISAGREE, you CARRY the burden of proof, not reality and facts. 

Your have the burden of proof.  Prove with evidence that: 1.  You can have a civil STATUTORY status without a federal domicile. I am assumi…

[Read more]

Admin,
 
As usual, my responses are in red faced font–the commie font. 
 

1.  Even those in receipt of a CONSTITUTIONAL franchise and therefore POLITICAL privilege such as voting don’t automatically acquire a CIVIL status under federal law by doing so.  They have to accept a STATUTORY franchise and have a domicile on federal territory BEFO…

[Read more]

Admin,
 
I will explain it to you as easily and simply as possible.  
 

If you think possessions are not legislatively foreign, then why are:
 
They are NOT legislatively foreign because they are included in the definition of States in 4 USC 110, BUT they ARE constitutionally foreign to Article I legislative powers extending over the United Sta…

[Read more]

Admin, I think you are wrong and i am going to explain why and prove it with quotes.  My corrections of your assumptions are in red faced ink.  

ANSWERS: 1.  District courts cannot act under Article III except against constitutions states or constitutional citizens.  They can only do what legislation expressly authorizes in respect to a federa…

[Read more]

Admin,
 
Section 28 USC 1332(d)(5) says:
 

(5) Paragraphs (2) through (4) shall not apply to any class action in which—
(A) the primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental entities against whom the district court may be foreclosed from ordering relief; or

 
 
Questions:
 
1. In what instance would a federal Article…[Read more]

2. Here is an example of voting, which is a constitutional franchise privilege, being identified as a franchise.
 

“Long ago in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 1071, 30 L.Ed. 220 the Court referred to ‘the political franchise of voting’ as a ‘fundamental political right, because preservative of all rights.’ Recently in Re…

[Read more]

So a state citizen would have to accept a federal public right/office to vote in federal elections right?
So he has to accept the u.s. citizen status right? I agree and that is my whole point with this dual sovereign character. He can’t vote as a state citizen or NRA or can he?

Admin,
 
You are beyond wrong.
 

3.1.1 Constitutional franchises all relate to humans.
3.1.2 Statutory franchises all relate to public offices.

 
Nothing in the constitution is a constitutional franchise of private rights.  Where do you allege the evidence for this FRIVOLOUS claim is?
 
The constitution is a delegation/conferral of powers to the…[Read more]

RESPONSES:
1. Post 3:
1.1 STATEMENT: Second, the United States in 26 USC 7701 is the constitutional United States because IRC is promulgated on Congress Art. I:8:1 constitutional authority thus IT CAN ONLY be the constitutional United States.
REBUTTAL: FALSE. Produce the EXPRESS inclusion of the constitutional states in the GEOGRAPHICAL context…

[Read more]

Admin said more of the same:

4. Statutes such as 28 USC 1332 would be invoked for a tax case because they deal ONLY with public rights and franchises. Constitutional diversity in Article III Section 2 deals with PRIVATE rights and would be invoked only when both parties are PRIVATE non-corporate entities.
5. There may only be ONE truth, but there…

[Read more]

Admin said:

NOTES:
1. The “United States” found in 26 USC 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) is different than that which is the subject above. This issue did NOT deal with a tax issue and therefore presumes the constitutional U.S.
2. 28 USC 1332 and Article III, Section 2 do not deal with the same geography because the “State” in 28 U.S.C. 1332(e) is not a…

[Read more]

This is just one example you reference here where courts explain that NRA can bring suits in federal courts under Article III. This shows three things:
1. Article III courts are district courts empower under law promulgated under Art. III;
2. NRA can bring suits in federal courts;
3. NRA referred to in this decision are of foreign…[Read more]

Admin,You overwhelm with useless or moot points. There’s no need to address them.For example, counterfeiting FRN’s is a legislated crime under Article I and not a real crime against private rights such as murder or theft, thus Mookini is IRRELEVANT man.Also I did not avoid the question about citizenship, I simply found it irrelevant and moot. If…[Read more]

Yes, I agree that it’s pointless.  It is pointless because:
 
1. You live in fantasy land.
2. No court opinion supports what you allege.
3. The court opinions you quote EITHER are not relative to the argument at hand OR plainly support the truth when read as a whole.
 
Take this made up and blatantly frivolous conclusion of your…[Read more]

Dude where did I say that the united states nation is only the 50 states?? I explicitly included D.C. and territorial possessions…don’t make me quote it to prove it.
Now….these are three distinct geographical locations comprising the geography of United States:
1. the 50 states; and
2. D.C.; and
3. territorial possessions.
WE AGREED ON THIS SO…[Read more]

Oh but you are confused. You are making a distinction between 1. and 4. when there isn’t one.
The United States is NOT a body politic comprised of state citizens their governments and their geography. Instead, it is comprised of state citizens who granted their federal govt explicit powers or sovereignty over their geography, as well as others…[Read more]

Theoretical mass..?
1. Is United States nation-union a political association/body of state citizens conferring powers to a national government over their geography?
2. I thought we agreed that the Uniter States geographically is comprised of: above in 1,D.C., and territorial possessions, did you change your mind?
If you agree with the above then…[Read more]

Answer 2. It is to delineate the geography where the constitutional consent for such subject matter legislation extends over–the 50 states only. Which is why D.C. is explicitly included.
I am not conflating anything. One cannot be a civil citizen without 1) being a political citizen and 2) maintaining a domicile within the civil jurisdiction.
For…[Read more]

R#1.1. The statutes clearly include states in every definition of the united states. This ministry is of the opinion that the states referred are the federal states, but Article I legislation deals with powers the states conferred to Congress, thus the only states it can include by default is the same states that granted them the powers. Because…[Read more]

Neo, We accepted the following facts: 1. The state is a political association of people into one republican government sovereign over its geography.2. The United States nation-union is a political association of states’ people into one national government sovereign in powers delegated to it over the union’s geography constituted in part by the 5…[Read more]