This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by 
fg_admin 5 months, 1 week ago.
-
Posts
-
SOURCE: https://linkyou.blog/gyno-economics/
________
Gyno-Economics
– Post status: published, Published: 21 hours 48 mins ago (20:38 – Saturday, January 5th, 2019) Last time Updated: 11 hours 36 mins ago (06:50 – Sunday, January 6th, 2019)
“Gyno-Economics” was written by TimBucks, and is licensed under Creative Commons’ Attribution – Share Alike 4.0 International license (a free cultural license).
A gynecologist knows all about a woman’s vagina. Gynocentric men cater to women. Gyno-Economics is about how men cater to women, in the economic system.
Gyno-economics explained: Men pay 70% of all taxes. Women are the beneficiaries of 70% of all tax money. 70% of the economy is consumer purchases, and women make 80% of all consumer purchases. Men as a group earn 30% more than women, but most men with any money, will have kids with a woman at some point, so they end up paying a woman’s bills. The money you make will usually end up paying her bills. So much for the illusion that men earn more than women do. No they don’t. Men get the money, women spend it. Feminists call this arrangement “the oppression of women”….whereby a man works his entire life, to support her lifestyle, to pay her bills, to work with her, then at the end of it, he is hated as an “oppressor”….that’s the essence of feminism. Even if you do not get married, there is no escape: The men who don’t give their money to women directly in a marriage, those men are taxed.
http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/
https://pjmedia.com/drhelen/2016/08/18/the-real-gender-gap-the-tax-gap/
“Legions of feminists will ferociously type smash the patriarchy! at their Internet rallies, calling out for the end of the male supremacy in all spheres of life. Yet, few of them acknowledge the fact that one of these spheres, the government (the institution granting them rights), is entirely funded by male taxpayers. Economically, women cost more to the state than they benefit. The government is literally paying women to be alive. As such, strong independent women are only that way because the state is transferring money from men to them. Feminists are not seriously against being dependent on men, they are just against men having the full control over their money.”
So yeah, the idea that “It’s a man’s world”….or “The world is set up to benefit men”…is nonsense.
How women end up with all the money:
First, wealth is concentrated in the top 1%. The top 1% now have greater wealth, than the bottom 90%:
Next, men have more financial obligations than women. From the classic “Myth of Male Power” by Dr. Warren Farrell:
ITEM. Among the wealthiest 1.6 percent of the U.S. population (those with assets of $500,000 or more), women’s net worth is more than men’s. <net worth is the money you are left with, once you pay off your financial obligations> How can so many of the wealthiest people be women when women hold none of the top corporate jobs? In part, by selecting the men who do and outliving them. And in part by having greater spending power and lower spending power obligations. . . . SPENDING POWER A study of large shopping malls (including men’s shops and sporting goods stores) found that seven times as much floor space is devoted to women’s personal items as to men’s. Both sexes buy more for women. The key to wealth is not in what someone earns; it is in what is spent on ourselves, at our discretion—or in what is spent on us, at our hint. Overall, women control consumer spending by a wide margin in virtually every consumer category. With spending power comes other forms of power. Women’s control over spending gives them control over TV programs because TV is dependent on sponsors. When this is combined with the fact that women watch more TV in every time slot, shows can’t afford to bite the hand that feeds them. Women are to TV what bosses are to employees.
Farrell, Warren. The Myth of Male Power . Dr. Warren Farrell. Kindle Edition….easily searchable on Kindle, if you want to confirm.
Go to a shopping mall some time, to see if Dr. Farrell is lying, about who benefits from money. Look around, open your eyes. Make note of things.
You will find most of the mall caters to women’s needs. (clothing stores, shoes, etc)
So the economy is set up basically for the very top 1%. And of the people in the top 1%, most of that money is in the hands of women. So the idea that men are economically dominant, is a fairy tale. Capitalism is about men competing to earn money, then giving that money to women. Capitalism is gyno-economics, in action. Despite the facts being what they are, the public continues to believe the feminist fraud about money.
So women end up with all the money, that is in private hands, but they also end up with all the money, the government spends on it’s citizens….all the while complaining of being powerless. How do women get away with it? We let them: We gave women the vote.
Women are the majority of voters, so they vote for political parties that take money from men, give that money to women…especially single women. Where else do you think the gigantic welfare state comes from? Where does massive government debt come from? Women voters. Politics is now largely, how women organize, to take men’s money….and to steal money from the future, as someone will have to pay those bills, down the road. That’s why most Democratic voters are women: Democrats have gone full tilt gynocentric and are willing to destroy America, to please women. Republicans will also destroy America, to please women, but will do it more slowly.
So “gyno-economics” is a realization that the whole economy is basically set up, to cater to women, to meet the needs and wishes of women. Why does the economy have this shape? Because men are judged by women, on the basis of what they can do for HER. Women get to decide who gets sex and attention, who does not. That’s part of the reason that men as a group, earn more money than women as a group: Men know women will judge them, by what they earn, so men compete for money, as it gives them more access to better looking women. It’s not necessary for women to compete for money very hard, in order to get sex. So capitalism is a gyno-centric economic system whereby men compete in a market, to acquire goods, resources and money, in order to please women….and basically get laid.
As Jordan Peterson wrote: “Women have a strong proclivity to marry up or across the economic dominance hierarchy. They prefer a partner of equal or greater status. This holds true, cross-culturally. The same does not hold, by the way, for men, who are perfectly willing to marry across or down. (as the Pew research indicates) Page 301, 12 Rules for Life, by Jordan Peterson.
So that’s basically why life, why the economy, is organized around pleasing women: It’s women who decide who gets sex and women judge men, based on income. So the economy developed naturally, as an economic mechanism which caters to women, as it’s primary function.
As part of the gyno-centric organization of the economy, women control the political system, since they are the majority of voters, so only men who cater to women, get elected. If you still think we live in a democracy, forget that notion. We live in a Gynocracy. Women decide elections, not men. Women elect men who cater to women’s needs. Once elected, those men do everything in their power, to please women, tilt the whole world in the favor of women. (divorce laws, government spending)
The trouble is, this overwhelming female control and domination of our economic and political system, is starting to get out of hand, as this Joe Rogan interview talks about:
Men are usually unaware that this is how the world works, because no one has explained this over-overwhelmingly obvious fact, plus we as men evolved to compete for women and cater to them, so gynocentrism is natural to men.
This sort of thing comes out of nature itself: for all of evolution, females were physically weaker than males, they chose who to have sex with, they needed male protection and resources. The men who got their genes passed along, were the men who catered to women. That’s why human males tend to be gynocentric. Those are the genetic roots of the economy: We organize our economy, to take care of women and children. Like all mammal species, new life and protection of females is essential, for mammals to continue. The economy is just an extension of this biological reality.
And that would be fine, if feminists would just understand that males pretty much spend their whole lives working for the benefit of women, catering to them, looking after family and children. Most men spend their lives essentially being heroes who sacrifice for women. The proper attitude, should be gratitude. Rather than tell this obvious truth to women, at universities women are “educated” in a bizarre theory, that somehow men have spent all of evolution “oppressing women”. This is evil, blind, ungrateful, ignorant nonsense.
But it’s worse than this: Feminism has arisen and taken over the universities. And this nonsense is supported by the taxes of men. The purpose of feminism is to create a fictional historic narrative, to convince American women that they are in fact “oppressed”, that men are supposedly evil and out to get women. Feminists shield women from the fact that American women are the most pampered, spoiled group of human beings, that have ever existed on this planet. After a few years of feminist indoctrination, young women emerge completely ignorant of real history, and terribly ungrateful and resentful, to men….the very people keeping them alive. Once a young woman is angry, bitter and confused, she is ready to be a feminist.
Jordan Peterson is also curious, why we continue to fund universities that teach feminism.
“I do not understand why our society is providing public funding to institutions and educators whose stated, conscious and explicit aim is the demolition of the culture that supports them. Such people have a perfect right to their opinions. But they have no reasonable claim, to public funding….There are other serious problems lurking in the radical disciplines, apart from the falseness of their theories and methods…There isn’t a shred of hard evidence to support any of their central claims: That Western society is pathologically patriarchal; that the prime lesson of history is that men, rather than nature, were the primary source of the oppression of women.”
(from 12 Rules for Life, by Jordan Peterson, hardcover edition, page 313)
“Why do we teach our young people that our incredible culture is the result of male oppression? Blinded by this central assumption disciplines as diverse as education, social work, art history, gender studies, literature, sociology, and increasingly law treat men as oppressors and men’s activities as inherently destructive”. (page 305, same book)
However, despite the fairy tale feminist narrative dominating, reality is, what it is.
And now Ocasio wants to bring in something, close to communism. What is communism? Communism is just feminism, in a dress. Women survived by manipulating men, taking resources from them. Humans have a maternal dimension of compassion and openness…and this is evident in women, more than men. It’s evident in communism, in theory anyways, more than capitalism. Trouble is, communism doesn’t work. Compassion doesn’t work, unless it has a good economic theory behind it, that’s in alignment with reality. When female instincts take over the world, things get out of hand.
Gyno-centrist human tendencies are fine, they are part of being a human being, we evolved to care for women, but when we go full tilt gynocentric, with no brake pedal, we are near the end of our culture. When men both endlessly cater to women, while women berate them and take over all the levers of power, as is happening now, we are not in a good place.
Gynocentrism? It’s getting out of hand. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is like the psychotic ex-wife in court, looking for your wallet. She’s a “progressive”, who believes in open borders. Which means, there should be no borders, between her fingers, and your wallet.
"Two things I request of You (Deprive me not before I die): Remove falsehood and lies far from me; Give me neither poverty nor riches— Feed me with the food allotted to me; Lest I be full and deny You, And say, “Who is the Lord?” Or lest I be poor and steal, And profane the name of my God."
[Prov. 30:7-9, Bible, NKJV]
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.