This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
Cambodian temple. 1200 years old and they knew what a stegosaurus was before we even knew about dinosaurs!
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-cambodia.htm
"Two things I request of You (Deprive me not before I die): Remove falsehood and lies far from me; Give me neither poverty nor riches— Feed me with the food allotted to me; Lest I be full and deny You, And say, “Who is the Lord?” Or lest I be poor and steal, And profane the name of my God."
[Prov. 30:7-9, Bible, NKJV]That is amazing!
Have you checked out the Creation Seminar on http://www.drdino.com?
Also the Ica stones from Peru have dinosaur drawings from thousands of years ago (not more than 4,000). The word “dinosaur” was created around 1850, and the term for them used to be “dragons”.
I find it strange that at these ruins, there is such a vast variety of common animals carved into the stones, while there is only one dinosaur, the Stegosaurus. What of the mighty and infamous Tyrannosaurus Rex and the cunning Velociraptor. Surely, had man coexisted with dinosaurs, they would include such dangerous carnivores in their carvings. Even if they were only including docile herbivores in these carvings, they would include more than just the Stegosaurus. Or, are we assuming that man coexisted with only one type of dinosaur in a world filled with such wonder and variety in the domains and kingdoms of life? I am thoroughly unconvinced. What would've kept this nation from finding one fossil of a stegosaurus? Are any of the other carved animals unidentifiable? Are any of the other carved animals extinct?
Until I see a quality, well-thought-out, intuitive and thorough article, I will remained convinced that there was a gap in time between dinosaurs and man. There are just too many possibilities that are left unexplained in this juvenile piece of work. I am appalled that it shares its web site address with such a valued piece of literature to the world. If anyone can find me an article that will enlighten me, please do so.
Thought provoking, perhaps. But very, very ill-construed. This forum should be called “Interesting Carving Could Lead to the Inference That Perhaps (By A Longshot) Man and Dinosaurs Coexisted”, not “Amazing Evidence that Man and Dinosaurs Coexisted.” You should truly sharpen up on your scientific query process and identify the differences between 'evidence' and 'inference.'
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.