CITES BY TOPIC:  legislative intent

Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 900

Legislative intent.  Such is looked to when court attempts to construe or interpret a statute which is ambiguous or inconsistent.  See also Legislative history.

[Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 900]


Phelps v. U.S., 274 U.S. 341 (1927):

"Acts of Congress are to be construed and applied in Harmony with and not to thwart the purpose of the Constitution." 

[Phelps v. U.S., 274 U.S. 341 (1927)]


Foster v. U.S., 303 U.S. 118 (1938):

"Courts should construe laws in Harmony with the legislative intent and seek to carry out legislative purpose.  With respect to the tax provisions under consideration, there is no uncertainty as to the legislative purpose to tax post-1913 corporate earnings.  We must not give effect to any contrivance which would defeat a tax Congress plainly intended to impose." 

[Foster v. U.S., 303 U.S. 118 (1938)]


Mattox v. U.S., 156 U.S. 237 (1895):

"We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted." 

[Mattox v. U.S., 156 U.S. 237 (1938)]