The right of the people to be secure
in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable
searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons
or things to be seized.
U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977)
It is a well established rule that
a consent search is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the
consent was induced by the deceit, trickery or misrepresentation
of the Internal Revenue agent. United States v. Rothstein, 530 F.2d
1275 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Dawson, 486 F.2d 1326 (5th
Cir. 1973); United States v. Bland, 458 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1972) cert.
denied, 409 U.S. 843, 93 S. Ct. 43, 34 L. Ed. 2d 83 (1972); United
States v. Ponder, 444 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1971) cert. denied, 405
U.S. 918, 92 S. Ct. 944, 30 L. Ed. 2d 788 (1972); United States
v. Tonahill, 430 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S.
943, 91 S. Ct. 242, 27 L. Ed. 2d 247 (1970); United States v. Prudden,
424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.
Ct. 62, 27 L. Ed. 2d 62 (1970).
[U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977)]