NIC 2000-02, December 2000
This paper was approved for publication by the National Foreign Intelligence Board under the authority of the Director of Central Intelligence.
Prepared under the direction of the National Intelligence Council.
In undertaking this comprehensive analysis, the NIC worked actively with a range of nongovernmental institutions and experts. We began the analysis with two workshops focusing on drivers and alternative futures, as the appendix describes. Subsequently, numerous specialists from academia and the private sector contributed to every aspect of the study, from demographics to developments in science and technology, from the global arms market to implications for the United States. Many of the judgments in this paper derive from our efforts to distill the diverse views expressed at these conferences or related workshops. Major conferences cosponsored by the NIC with other government and private centers in support of Global Trends 2015 included:
In October 2000, the draft report was discussed with outside experts, including Richard Cooper and Joseph Nye (Harvard University), Richard Haass (Brookings Institution), James Steinberg (Markle Foundation), and Jessica Mathews (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace). Their comments and suggestions are incorporated in the report. Daniel Yergin (Cambridge Energy Research Associates) reviewed and commented on the final draft.
Over the past 15 months, the National Intelligence Council (NIC), in close collaboration with US Government specialists and a wide range of experts outside the government, has worked to identify major drivers and trends that will shape the world of 2015.
The key drivers identified are:
(l) Demographics.
(2) Natural resources and environment.
(3) Science and technology.
(4) The global economy and globalization.
(5) National and international governance.
(6) Future conflict.
(7) The role of the United States.
In examining these drivers, several points should be kept in mind:
Taken together, these drivers and trends intersect to create an integrated picture of the world of 2015, about which we can make projections with varying degrees of confidence and identify some troubling uncertainties of strategic importance to the United States.
The Methodology
Global Trends 2015 provides a flexible framework to discuss and debate the future.
The methodology is useful for our purposes, although admittedly inexact for the social
scientist. Our purpose is to rise above short-term, tactical considerations and provide a
longer-term, strategic perspective. Judgments about demographic and natural resource
trends are based primarily on informed extrapolation of existing trends. In contrast, many
judgments about science and technology, economic growth, globalization, governance, and
the nature of conflict represent a distillation of views of experts inside and outside the
United States Government. The former are projections about natural phenomena, about which
we can have fairly high confidence; the latter are more speculative because they are
contingent upon the decisions that societies and governments will make.
The drivers we emphasize will have staying power. Some of the trends will persist; others will be less enduring and may change course over the time frame we consider. The major contribution of the National Intelligence Council (NIC), assisted by experts from the Intelligence Community, has been to harness US Government and nongovernmental specialists to identify drivers, to determine which ones matter most, to highlight key uncertainties, and to integrate analysis of these trends into a national security context. The result identifies issues for more rigorous analysis and quantification.
Revisiting Global Trends 2010: How Our Assessments Have ChangedOver the past four years, we have tested the judgments made in the predecessor, Global Trends 2010, published in 1997. Global Trends 2010 was the centerpiece of numerous briefings, conferences, and public addresses. Various audiences were energetic in challenging, modifying or confirming our judgments. The lively debate that ensued has expanded our treatment of drivers, altered some projections we made in 1997, and matured our thinking overallwhich was the essential purpose of this exercise. Global Trends 2015 amplifies several drivers identified previously, and links them more closely to the trends we now project over the next 15 years. Some of the key changes include:
Events and trends in key states and regions over the last four years have led us to revise some projections substantially in GT 2015.
|
Demographics
World population in 2015 will be 7.2 billion, up from 6.1 billion in the year 2000, and in
most countries, people will live longer. Ninety-five percent of the increase will be in
developing countries, nearly all in rapidly expanding urban areas. Where political systems
are brittle, the combination of population growth and urbanization will foster
instability. Increasing lifespans will have significantly divergent impacts.
Natural Resources and Environment
Overall food production will be adequate to feed the world's growing population, but poor
infrastructure and distribution, political instability, and chronic poverty will lead to
malnourishment in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. The potential for famine will persist in
countries with repressive government policies or internal conflicts. Despite a 50 percent
increase in global energy demand, energy resources will be sufficient to meet demand; the
latest estimates suggest that 80 percent of the world's available oil and 95 percent of
its gas remain underground.
Science and Technology
Fifteen years ago, few predicted the profound impact of the revolution in information
technology. Looking ahead another 15 years, the world will encounter more quantum leaps in
information technology (IT) and in other areas of science and technology. The continuing
diffusion of information technology and new applications of biotechnology will be at the
crest of the wave. IT will be the major building block for international commerce and for
empowering nonstate actors. Most experts agree that the IT revolution represents the most
significant global transformation since the Industrial Revolution beginning in the
mid-eighteenth century.
The Global Economy and Globalization
The networked global economy will be driven by rapid and largely unrestricted flows of
information, ideas, cultural values, capital, goods and services, and people: that is,
globalization. This globalized economy will be a net contributor to increased political
stability in the world in 2015, although its reach and benefits will not be universal. In
contrast to the Industrial Revolution, the process of globalization is more compressed.
Its evolution will be rocky, marked by chronic financial volatility and a widening
economic divide.
National and International Governance
States will continue to be the dominant players on the world stage, but governments will
have less and less control over flows of information, technology, diseases, migrants,
arms, and financial transactions, whether licit or illicit, across their borders. Nonstate
actors ranging from business firms to nonprofit organizations will play increasingly
larger roles in both national and international affairs. The quality of governance, both
nationally and internationally, will substantially determine how well states and societies
cope with these global forces.
Globalization will increase the transparency of government decision-making, complicating the ability of authoritarian regimes to maintain control, but also complicating the traditional deliberative processes of democracies. Increasing migration will create influential diasporas, affecting policies, politics and even national identity in many countries. Globalization also will create increasing demands for international cooperation on transnational issues, but the response of both states and international organizations will fall short in 2015.
Future Conflict
The United States will maintain a strong technological edge in IT-driven "battlefield
awareness" and in precision-guided weaponry in 2015. The United States will face
three types of threats:
The risk of war among developed countries will be low. The international community will continue, however, to face conflicts around the world, ranging from relatively frequent small-scale internal upheavals to less frequent regional interstate wars. The potential for conflict will arise from rivalries in Asia, ranging from India-Pakistan to China-Taiwan, as well as among the antagonists in the Middle East. Their potential lethality will grow, driven by the availability of WMD, longer-range missile delivery systems and other technologies.
Internal conflicts stemming from religious, ethnic, economic or political disputes will remain at current levels or even increase in number. The United Nations and regional organizations will be called upon to manage such conflicts because major statesstressed by domestic concerns, perceived risk of failure, lack of political will, or tight resourceswill minimize their direct involvement.
Export control regimes and sanctions will be less effective because of the diffusion of technology, porous borders, defense industry consolidations, and reliance upon foreign markets to maintain profitability. Arms and weapons technology transfers will be more difficult to control.
Role of the United States
The United States will continue to be a major force in the world community. US global
economic, technological, military, and diplomatic influence will be unparalleled among
nations as well as regional and international organizations in 2015. This power not only
will ensure America's preeminence, but also will cast the United States as a key driver of
the international system.
The United States will continue to be identified throughout the world as the leading proponent and beneficiary of globalization. US economic actions, even when pursued for such domestic goals as adjusting interest rates, will have a major global impact because of the tighter integration of global markets by 2015.
Diplomacy will be more complicated. Washington will have greater difficulty harnessing its power to achieve specific foreign policy goals: the US Government will exercise a smaller and less powerful part of the overall economic and cultural influence of the United States abroad.
Examining the interaction of these drivers and trends points to some major uncertainties that will only be clarified as events occur and leaders make policy decisions that cannot be foreseen today. We cite eight transnational and regional issues for which the future, according to our trends analysis, is too tough to call with any confidence or precision.
Science and Technology
We know that the possibility is greater than ever that the revolution in science and
technology will improve the quality of life. What we know about this revolution is
exciting. Advances in science and technology will generate dramatic breakthroughs in
agriculture and health and in leap-frog applications, such as universal wireless cellular
communications, which already are networking developing countries that never had
land-lines. What we do not know about the S&T revolution, however, is staggering. We
do not know to what extent technology will benefit, or further disadvantage, disaffected
national populations, alienated ethnic and religious groups, or the less developed
countries. We do not know to what degree lateral or "side-wise" technology will
increase the threat from low technology countries and groups. One certainty is that
progression will not be linear. Another is that as future technologies emerge, people will
lack full awareness of their wider economic, environmental, cultural, legal, and moral
impactor the continuing potential for research and development.
Advances in science and technology will pose national security challenges of uncertain character and scale.
Asymmetric Warfare
As noted earlier, most adversaries will recognize the information advantage and military
superiority of the United States in 2015. Rather than acquiesce to any potential US
military domination, they will try to circumvent or minimize US strengths and exploit
perceived weaknesses. IT-driven globalization will significantly increase interaction
among terrorists, narcotraffickers, weapons proliferators, and organized criminals, who in
a networked world will have greater access to information, to technology, to finance, to
sophisticated deception-and-denial techniques and to each other. Such asymmetric
approacheswhether undertaken by states or nonstate actorswill become the
dominant characteristic of most threats to the US homeland. They will be a defining
challenge for US strategy, operations, and force development, and they will require that
strategy to maintain focus on traditional, low-technology threats as well as the capacity
of potential adversaries to harness elements of proliferating advanced technologies. At
the same time, we do not know the extent to which adversaries, state and nonstate, might
be influenced or deterred by other geopolitical, economic, technological, or diplomatic
factors in 2015.
The Global Economy
Although the outlook for the global economy appears strong, achieving broad and sustained
high levels of global growth will be contingent on avoiding several potential brakes to
growth. These include:
The US economy suffers a sustained downturn. Given its large trade deficit and low domestic savings, the US economythe most important driver of recent global growthis vulnerable to a loss of international confidence in its growth prospects that could lead to a sharp downturn, which, if long lasting, would have deleterious economic and policy consequences for the rest of the world.
Europe and Japan fail to manage their demographic challenges. European and Japanese populations are aging rapidly, requiring more than 110 million new workers by 2015 to maintain current dependency ratios between the working population and retirees. Conflicts over social services or immigration policies in major European states could dampen economic growth.
China and/or India fail to sustain high growth. China's ambitious goals for reforming its economy will be difficult to achieve: restructuring state-owned enterprises, cleaning up and transforming the banking system, and cutting the government's employment rolls in half. Growth would slow if these reforms go off-track. Failure by India to implement reforms would prevent it from achieving sustained growth.
Emerging market countries fail to reform their financial institutions. Many emerging market countries have not yet undertaken the financial reforms needed to help them survive the next economic crisis. Absent such reform, a series of future economic crises in emerging market countries probably will dry up the capital flows crucial for high rates of economic growth.
Global energy supplies suffer a major disruption. Turbulence in global energy supplies would have a devastating effect. Such a result could be driven by conflict among key energy-producing states, sustained internal instability in two or more major energy-producing states, or major terrorist actions.
The Middle East
Global trends from demography and natural resources to globalization and governance appear
generally negative for the Middle East. Most regimes are change-resistant. Many are buoyed
by continuing energy revenues and will not be inclined to make the necessary reforms,
including in basic education, to change this unfavorable picture.
China
Estimates of developments in China over the next 15 years are fraught with unknowables.
Working against China's aspirations to sustain economic growth while preserving its
political system is an array of political, social, and economic pressures that will
increasingly challenge the regime's legitimacy, and perhaps its survival.
Nevertheless, China need not be overwhelmed by these problems. China has proven politically resilient, economically dynamic, and increasingly assertive in positioning itself for a leadership role in East Asia. Its long-term military program in particular suggests that Beijing wants to have the capability to achieve its territorial objectives, outmatch its neighbors, and constrain US power in the region.
Two conditions, in the view of many specialists, would lead to a major security challenge for the United States and its allies in the region: a weak, disintegrating China, or an assertive China willing to use its growing economic wealth and military capabilities to pursue its strategic advantage in the region. These opposite extremes bound a more commonly held view among experts that China will continue to see peace as essential to its economic growth and internal stability.
Russia
Between now and 2015, Moscow will be challenged even more than today to adjust its
expectations for world leadership to its dramatically reduced resources. Whether the
country can make the transition in adjusting ends to means remains an open and critical
question, according to most experts, as does the question of the character and quality of
Russian governance and economic policies. The most likely outcome is a Russia that remains
internally weak and institutionally linked to the international system primarily through
its permanent seat on the UN Security Council. In this view, whether Russia can adjust to
this diminished status in a manner that preserves rather than upsets regional stability is
also uncertain. The stakes for both Europe and the United States will be high, although
neither will have the ability to determine the outcome for Russia in 2015. Russian
governance will be the critical factor.
Japan
The first uncertainty about Japan is whether it will carry out the structural reforms
needed to resume robust economic growth and to slow its decline relative to the rest of
East Asia, particularly China. The second uncertainty is whether Japan will alter its
security policy to allow Tokyo to maintain a stronger military and more reciprocal
relationship with the United States. Experts agree that Japanese governance will be the
key driver in determining the outcomes.
India
Global trends conflict significantly in India. The size of its population1.2 billion
by 2015and its technologically driven economic growth virtually dictate that India
will be a rising regional power. The unevenness of its internal economic growth, with a
growing gap between rich and poor, and serious questions about the fractious nature of its
politics, all cast doubt on how powerful India will be by 2015. Whatever its degree of
power, India's rising ambition will further strain its relations with China, as well as
complicate its ties with Russia, Japan, and the Westand continue its nuclear
standoff with Pakistan.
Global Trends 2015 identifies governance as a major driver for the future and assumes that all trends we cite will be influenced, for good or bad, by decisions of people. The inclusion of the United States as a driverboth the US Government as well as US for-profit and nonprofit organizationsis based on the general assumption that the actions of nonstate actors as well as governments will shape global outcomes in the years ahead.
An integrated trend analysis suggests at least four related conclusions:
National Priorities Will Matter
US Responsibilities Will Cover the World, Old and New
US Foreign Priorities Will be More Transnational
National Governments Will be More Transparent
The international system in 2015 will be shaped by seven global drivers and related trends: population; natural resources and the environment; science and technology; the global economy and globalization; national and international governance; the nature of conflict; and the role of the United States. These trends will influence the capacities, priorities, and behavior of states and societies and thus substantially define the international security environment.
The world in 2015 will be populated by some 7.2 billion people, up from 6.1 billion in the year 2000. The rate of world population growth, however, will have diminished from 1.7 percent annually in 1985, to 1.3 percent today, to approximately 1 percent in 2015.
Increased life expectancy and falling fertility rates will contribute to a shift toward an aging population in high-income developed countries. Beyond that, demographic trends will sharply diverge. More than 95 percent of the increase in world population will be found in developing countries, nearly all in rapidly expanding urban areas.
Russia and many post-Communist countries of Eastern Europe will have declining populations. As a result of high mortality and low birthrates, Russia's population may drop from its current 146 million to as low as 130 to 135 million in 2015, while the neighboring states of Central Asia will experience continued population growth. In Japan and West European countries such as Italy and Spain, populations also will decline in the absence of dramatic increases in birthrates or immigration.
Global Population: 1950-2015
Divergent Aging Patterns
In developed countries and many of the more advanced developing countries, the declining
ratio of working people to retirees will strain social services, pensions, and health
systems. Governments will seek to mitigate the problem through such measures as delaying
retirement, encouraging greater participation in the work force by women, and relying on
migrant workers. Dealing effectively with declining dependency ratios is likely to require
more extensive measures than most governments will be prepared to undertake. The shift
towards a greater proportion of older voters will change the political dynamics in these
countries in ways difficult to foresee.
At the same time, "youth bulges" will persist in some developing countries, notably in Sub-Saharan Africa and a few countries in Latin America and the Middle East. A high proportion of young people will be destabilizing, particularly when combined with high unemployment or communal tension.
Movement of People
Two major trends in the movement of people will characterize the next 15
yearsurbanization and cross-border migrationeach of which poses both
opportunities and challenges.
The ratio of urban to rural dwellers is steadily increasing. By 2015 more than half of the world's population will be urban. The number of people living in mega-citiesthose containing more than 10 million inhabitantswill double to more than 400 million.
Regional Population: 1950-2015
Divergent demographic trends, the globalization of labor markets, and political instability and conflict will fuel a dramatic increase in the global movement of people through 2015. Legal and illegal migrants now account for more than 15 percent of the population in more than 50 countries. These numbers will grow substantially and will increase social and political tension and perhaps alter national identities even as they contribute to demographic and economic dynamism.
States will face increasing difficulty in managing migration pressures and flows, which will number several million people annually. Over the next 15 years, migrants will seek to move:
Regional Population by Age Group: 2000 and 2015
For high-income receiving countries, migration will relieve labor shortages and otherwise ensure continuing economic vitality. EU countries and Japan will need large numbers of new workers because of aging populations and low birthrates. Immigration will complicate political and social integration: some political parties will continue to mobilize popular sentiment against migrants, protesting the strain on social services and the difficulties in assimilation. European countries and Japan will face difficult dilemmas in seeking to reconcile protection of national borders and cultural identity with the need to address growing demographic and labor market imbalances.
For low-income receiving countries, mass migration resulting from civil conflict, natural disasters, or economic crises will strain local infrastructures, upset ethnic balances, and spark ethnic conflict. Illegal migration will become a more contentious issue between and among governments.
For low-income sending countries, mass migration will relieve pressures from unemployed and underemployed workers and generate significant remittances. Migrants will function as ethnic lobbies on behalf of sending-country interests, sometimes supporting armed conflicts in their home countries, as in the cases of the Albanian, Kurdish, Tamil, Armenian, Eritrean, and Ethiopian diasporas. At the same time, emigration increasingly will deprive low-income sending countries of their educated elites. An estimated 1.5 million skilled expatriates from developing countries already are employed in high-income countries. This brain drain from low-income to high-income countries is likely to intensify over the next 15 years.
Health
Disparities in health status between developed and developing countriesparticularly
the least developed countrieswill persist and widen. In developed countries, major
inroads against a variety of maladies will be achieved by 2015 as a result of generous
health spending and major medical advances. The revolution in biotechnology holds the
promise of even more dramatic improvements in health status. Noninfectious diseases will
pose greater challenges to health in developed countries than will infectious diseases.
Progress against infectious diseases, nevertheless, will encounter some setbacks as a
result of growing microbial resistance to antibiotics and the accelerating pace of
international movement of people and products that facilitate the spread of infectious
diseases.
Countries with Youth Bulges in 2000 and 2015
Developing countries, by contrast, are likely to experience a surge in both infectious and noninfectious diseases and in general will have inadequate health care capacities and spending.
AIDS Public Awareness Poster
AIDS will be a major problem not only in Africa but also in India, Southeast Asia, several countries formerly part of the Soviet Union, and possibly China.
Food
Driven by advances in agricultural technologies, world food grain production and stocks in
2015 will be adequate to meet the needs of a growing world population. Despite the overall
adequacy of food, problems of distribution and availability will remain.
Global Grain Production: 1971-2015
The use of genetically modified crops has great potential for meeting the nutrition needs of the poor in developing countries. Popular and political opposition in the EU countries and, to a lesser extent, in the United States, however, has clouded the prospects for applying this technology.
Water
By 2015 nearly half the world's populationmore than 3 billion peoplewill live
in countries that are "water-stressed"have less than 1,700 cubic meters of
water per capita per yearmostly in Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and northern
China.
In the developing world, 80 percent of water usage goes into agriculture, a proportion that is not sustainable; and in 2015 a number of developing countries will be unable to maintain their levels of irrigated agriculture. Overpumping of groundwater in many of the world's important grain-growing regions will be an increasing problem; about 1,000 tons of water are needed to produce a ton of grain.
Developing Countries Challenged to Provide Infrastructure
Measures undertaken to increase water availability and to ease acute water shortagesusing water more efficiently, expanding use of desalinization, developing genetically modified crops that use less water or more saline water, and importing waterwill not be sufficient to substantially change the outlook for water shortages in 2015. Many will be expensive; policies to price water more realistically are not likely to be broadly implemented within the next 15 years, and subsidizing water is politically sensitive for the many low-income countries short of water because their populations expect cheap water.
Water has been a source of contention historically, but no water dispute has been a cause of open interstate conflict; indeed, water shortages often have stimulated cooperative arrangements for sharing the scarce resource. But as countries press against the limits of available water between now and 2015, the possibility of conflict will increase.
Nearly one-half of the world's land surface consists of river basins shared by more than one country, and more than 30 nations receive more than one-third of their water from outside their borders.
Water shortages occurring in combination with other sources of tensionsuch as in the Middle Eastwill be the most worrisome.
Energy
The global economy will continue to become more energy efficient through 2015. Traditional
industries, as well as transportation, are increasingly efficient in their energy use.
Moreover, the most dynamic growth areas in the global economy, especially services and the
knowledge fields, are less energy intensive than the economic activities that they
replace. Energy production also is becoming more efficient. Technological applications,
particularly in deep-water exploration and production, are opening remote and hostile
areas to petroleum production.
Sustained global economic growth, along with population increases, will drive a nearly 50 percent increase in the demand for energy over the next 15 years. Total oil demand will increase from roughly 75 million barrels per day in 2000 to more than 100 million barrels in 2015, an increase almost as large as OPEC's current production. Over the next 15 years, natural gas usage will increase more rapidly than that of any other energy sourceby more than 100 percentmainly stemming from the tripling of gas consumption in Asia.
Asia will drive the expansion in energy demand, replacing North America as the leading energy consumption region and accounting for more than half of the world's total increase in demand.
Fossil fuels will remain the dominant form of energy despite increasing concerns about global warming. Efficiency of solar cells will improve, genetic engineering will increase the long-term prospects for the large-scale use of ethanol, and hydrates will be used increasingly as fuels. Nuclear energy use will remain at current levels.
World Energy Consumption 1970 - 2015
Meeting the increase in demand for energy will pose neither a major supply challenge nor lead to substantial price increases in real terms. Estimates of the world's total endowment of oil have steadily increased as technological progress in extracting oil from remote sources has enabled new discoveries and more efficient production. Recent estimates indicate that 80 percent of the world's available oil still remains in the ground, as does 95 percent of the world's natural gas.
Oil-producing countries will continue to exert leverage on the market to increase prices but are unlikely to achieve stable high prices. Energy prices are likely to become more unstable in the next 15 years, as periodic price hikes are followed by price collapses.
By 2015, global energy markets will have coalesced into two quasi-hemispheric patterns. Asia's energy needs will be met either through coal from the region or from oil and gas supplies from the Persian Gulf, Central Asia, and Russia. Western Europe and the Western Hemisphere will draw on the Atlantic Basin for their energy sources at world prices.
Environment
Contemporary environmental problems will persist and in many instances grow over the next
15 years. With increasingly intensive land use, significant degradation of arable land
will continue as will the loss of tropical forests. Given the promising global economic
outlook, greenhouse gas emissions will increase substantially. The depletion of tropical
forests and other species-rich habitats, such as wetlands and coral reefs, will exacerbate
the historically large losses of biological species now occurring.
The outlook to 2015 is mixed for such localized environmental problems as high concentrations of ozone and noxious chemicals in the air and the pollution of rivers and lakes by industrial and agricultural wastes.
Some existing agreements, even when implemented, will not be able by 2015 to reverse the targeted environmental damage they were designed to address. The Montreal Protocol is on track to restore the stratospheric ozone layer over the next 50 years. Nevertheless, the seasonal Antarctic ozone hole will expand for the next two decadesincreasing the risk of skin cancer in countries like Australia, Argentina, and Chilebecause of the long lag time between emission reductions and atmospheric effects. Important new agreements will be implemented, including, for example, a global treaty to control the worldwide spread of such persistent organic chemicals as DDT and dioxins. Other agreements, such as the Convention on Biodiversity, will fall short in meeting their objectives.
Over the next 15 years the pressures on the environment as a result of economic growth will decrease as a result of less energy-intensive economic development and technological advances. For example, increased use of fuel cells and hybrid engines is likely to reduce the rate of increase in the amount of pollution produced, particularly in the transportation sector. Also, increases in the utilization of solar and wind power, advances in the efficiency of energy use, and a shift toward less polluting fuels, such as natural gas, will contribute to this trend.
Global warming will challenge the international community as indications of a warming climatesuch as meltbacks of polar ice, sea level rise, and increasing frequency of major stormsoccur. The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change, which mandates emission-reduction targets for developed countries, is unlikely to come into force soon or without substantial modification. Even in the absence of a formal treaty, however, some incremental progress will be made in reducing the growth of greenhouse gas emissions.
The continuing diffusion of information technology and new applications in the biotechnology field will be of particular global significance. Two major trends will continue:
The time between the discovery and the application of scientific advances will continue to shorten. Developments in the laboratory will reach commercial production at ever faster rates, leading to increased investments.
Information Technology (IT)
Over the next 15 years, a wide range of developments will lead to many new IT-enabled
devices and services. Rapid diffusion is likely because equipment costs will decrease at
the same time that demand is increasing. Local-to-global Internet access holds the
prospect of universal wireless connectivity via hand-held devices and large numbers of
low-cost, low-altitude satellites. Satellite systems and services will develop in ways
that increase performance and reduce costs.
By 2015, information technology will make major inroads in rural as well as urban areas around the globe. Moreover, information technology need not be widespread to produce important effects. The first information technology "pioneers" in each society will be the local economic and political elites, multiplying the initial impact.
Societies with advanced communications generally will worry about threats to individual privacy. Others will worry about the spread of "cultural contamination." Governments everywhere will be simultaneously asked to foster the diffusion of IT while controlling its "harmful" effects.
Biotechnology
By 2015, the biotechnology revolution will be in full swing with major achievements in
combating disease, increasing food production, reducing pollution, and enhancing the
quality of life. Many of these developments, especially in the medical field, will remain
costly through 2015 and will be available mainly in the West and to wealthy segments of
other societies. Some biotechnologies will continue to be controversial for moral and
religious reasons. Among the most significant developments by 2015 are:
Other Technologies
Breakthroughs in materials technology will generate widely available
products that are smart, multifunctional, environmentally compatible, more survivable, and
customizable. These products not only will contribute to the growing information and
biotechnology revolutions but also will benefit manufacturing, logistics, and personal
lifestyles. Materials with active capabilities will be used to combine sensing and
actuation in response to environmental conditions.
Discoveries in nanotechnology will lead to unprecedented understanding and control over the fundamental building blocks of all physical things. Developments in this emerging field are likely to change the way almost everythingfrom vaccines to computers to automobile tires to objects not yet imaginedis designed and made. Self-assembled nanomaterials, such as semiconductor "quantum dots," could by 2015 revolutionize chemical labeling and enable rapid processing for drug discovery, blood content analysis, genetic analysis, and other biological applications.
The global economy is well-positioned to achieve a sustained period of dynamism through 2015. Global economic growth will return to the high levels reached in the 1960s and early 1970s, the final years of the post-World War II "long boom." Dynamism will be strongest among so-called "emerging markets"especially in the two Asian giants, China and Indiabut will be broadly based worldwide, including in both industrialized and many developing countries. The rising tide of the global economy will create many economic winners, but it will not lift all boats. The information revolution will make the persistence of poverty more visible, and regional differences will remain large.
Dynamism and Growth
Five factors will combine to promote widespread economic dynamism and growth:
Political pressures for higher living standards. The growing global middle classnow 2 billion strongis creating a cycle of rising aspirations, with increased information flows and the spread of democracy giving political clout to formerly disenfranchised citizens.
Improved macroeconomic policies. The widespread improvement in recent years in economic policy and management sets the stage for future dynamism. Inflation rates have been dramatically lowered across a wide range of economies. The abandonment of unsustainable fixed exchange rate regimes in Asia and the creation of the European Monetary Union (EMU) will contribute to economic growth.
Rising trade and investment. International trade and investment flows will grow, spurring rapid increases in world GDP. Opposition to further trade liberalization from special interest groups and some governments will not erode the basic trend toward expansion of trade. International capital flows, which have risen dramatically in the past decade, will remain plentiful, especially for emerging market countries that increase their transparency.
Diffusion of information technology. The pervasive incorporation of information technologies will continue to produce significant efficiency gains in the US economy. Similar gains will be witnessedalbeit in varying degreesin numerous other countries as the integration of these technologies proceeds. But the absorption of IT and its benefits will not be automatic because many countries will fail to meet the conditions needed for effective IT utilizationhigh educational levels, adequate infrastructure, and appropriate regulatory policies.
Increasingly dynamic private sectors. Rapid expansion of the private sector in many emerging market countriesalong with deregulation and privatization in Europe and Japanwill spur economic growth by generating competitive pressures to use resources more efficiently. The impact of improved efficiencies will be multiplied as the information revolution enhances the ability of firms around the world to learn "best practices" from the most successful enterprises. Indeed, the world may be on the verge of a rapid convergence in market-based financial and business practices.
Unequal Growth Prospects and Distribution
The countries and regions most at risk of falling behind economically are those with
endemic internal and/or regional conflicts and those that fail to diversify their
economies. The economies of most states in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and some
in Latin America will continue to suffer. A large segment of the Eurasian landmass
extending from Central Asia through the Caucasus to parts of southeastern Europe faces dim
economic prospects. Within countries, the gap in the standard of living also will
increase. Even in rapidly growing countries, large regions will be left behind.
World Trade as a Percentage of World GDP: 1990-2015
Emerging Asia will be the fastest growing region, led by breakout candidates China and India, whose economies already comprise roughly one-sixth of global GDP. To the degree that China implements reforms mandated by its entry into the World Trade Organization, its economy will become more efficient, enabling rapid growth to continue. China's economic development, however, will be mainly in the dynamic coastal provinces. Agricultural provinces in northern and western China will lag behind, causing social tensions that Beijing will be challenged to manage. India's relatively strong educational system, democracy, and English-language skills position it well to take advantage of gains related to information technology. India nevertheless faces enormous challenges in spreading the benefits of growth to hundreds of millions of impoverished, often illiterate citizens, particularly in the northern states.
GDP by Countries and the EU: 2000 and 2015
In Europe and Japan, the picture is mixed. Western Europe is likely to narrow what has been a growing economic performance gap with the United States, and Eastern European countries, eager for EU membership, generally will adopt reform policies and grow apace. South-Eastern Europe will improve economic prospects only gradually as it improves regional security. Although Japan's economic performance in the next 15 years will be stronger than that of the 1990s, its relative importance in the global economy will decrease. Economic prospects for Russia and Eurasia are not promising.
Latin America will manage fairly rapid aggregate growth, but it will be spread unevenly across the region. The market-oriented democracies in Mexico and the southern cone will lead the way. A new generation of entrepreneurs will be inclined to favor additional market openings, but the benefits may further distort income distribution, already the most inequitable in the world. Elsewhere, the Andean region will struggle with a poorly educated labor force, unstable governance, and dependence upon commodities such as oil, copper, and narcotics.
The Middle East and North Africa will be marked by increasing internal differentiation as some countries respond more effectively to the challenges of globalization or to the uncertainties of closer integration with the EU while others lag. In Sub-Saharan Africa, persistent conflicts and instability, autocratic and corrupt governments, overdependence on commodities with declining real prices, low levels of education, and widespread infectious diseases will combine to prevent most countries from experiencing rapid economic growth.
The Role of EducationEducation will be determinative of success in 2015 at both the individual and country levels. The globalizing economy and technological change inevitably place an increasing premium on a more highly skilled labor force. Adult literacy and school enrollments will increase in almost all countries. The educational gender gap will narrow and probably will disappear in East and Southeast Asia and Latin America.
|
Economic Crises and Resilience
The global economy will be prone to periodic financial crises, but its capacity to correct
itself will remain strong. The rapid rebound from the global financial crisis of 1997-98,
the limited impact of the recent tripling of oil prices on global economic growth, and the
successful management of the "Y2K" problem are the most recent manifestations of
resilience. Nonetheless, economic liberalization and globalization entail risks and
inevitably will create bumps in the road, some of them potentially highly disruptive.
Alternative TrajectoriesAlthough the outlook for the global economy appears quite strong, achieving sustained high levels of global growth will be contingent on avoiding several potential brakes to growth. Five are described below. The US economy suffers a sustained downturn. Given the large trade deficit and low domestic savings, the US economythe most important driver of recent global growthis vulnerable to loss of international confidence in its growth prospects that could lead to a sharp downturn, which, if long-lasting, would have deleterious economic and policy consequences for the rest of the world. Key trading partners would suffer as the world's largest market contracted, and international financial markets might face profound instability. Europe and Japan fail to manage their demographic challenges. European and Japanese populations are aging rapidly, requiring more than 110 million new workers by 2015 to maintain current dependency ratios between the working population and retirees. For these countries, immigration is a controversial means of meeting these labor force requirements. Conflicts over the social contract or immigration policies in major European states could dampen economic growth. Japan faces an even more serious labor force shortage and its strategies for respondingenticing overseas Japanese to return, broadening the opportunities for women, and increasing investments elsewhere in Asiamay prove inadequate. If growth in Europe and Japan falters, the economic burden on the US economy would increase, weakening the overall global outlook. China and/or India fail to sustain high growth. China's ambitious goals for reforming its economy will be difficult to realize: restructuring state-owned enterprises, cleaning up and transforming the banking system, cutting the government's employment rolls in half, and opening up the economy to greater foreign competition. Growth would slow if these reforms go awry, which, in turn, would exacerbate bureaucratic wrangling and increase opposition to the reform agenda. India's reform driveessential to sustained economic growthcould be sidetracked by social divisions and by the bureaucratic culture of the public service. Emerging market countries fail to reform their financial institutions. Although most emerging market countries bounced back from the 1997-98 financial crisis more quickly than expected, many have not yet undertaken the financial reforms needed to help them survive the next economic crisis. Absent such reform, a series of future economic crises in emerging market countries could dry up the capital flows crucial for high rates of economic growth. Global energy supplies are disrupted in a major way. Although the world economy is less vulnerable to energy price swings than in the 1970s, a major disruption in global energy supplies still would have a devastating effect. Conflict among key energy-producing states, sustained internal instability in two or more major energy-producing states, or major terrorist actions could lead to such a disruption. |
The state will remain the single most important organizing unit of political, economic, and security affairs through 2015 but will confront fundamental tests of effective governance. The first will be to benefit from, while coping with, several facets of globalization. The second will be to deal with increasingly vocal and organized publics.
Successful states will interact with nonstate actors to manage authority and share responsibility. Between now and 2015, three important challenges for states will be:
Nonstate Actors
States continually will be dealing with private-sector organizationsboth for-profit
and nonprofit. These nonstate actors increasingly will gain resources and power over the
next 15 years as a result of the ongoing liberalization of global finance and trade, as
well as the opportunities afforded by information technology.
The For-profit Sector. The for-profit business sector will grow rapidly over the next 15 years, spearheading legal and judicial reform and challenging governments to become more transparent and predictable. At the same time, governments will be challenged to monitor and regulate business firms through measures consistent with local standards of social welfare.
Multinational corporationsnow numbering more than 50,000 with nearly one-half million affiliateshave multiplied in recent years as governments have deregulated their economies, privatized state-owned enterprises, and liberalized financial markets and trade. This trend will continue.
Medium-sized, mostly local firms will multiply in many countries, driven by the shift away from Communism and other socialist models and the broadening of financial services and banking systems. Micro-enterprises also will multiply, not only because of deregulation and liberalization, but also because many states will have a declining capacity to stymie small-scale commercial activities. As medium-sized and small businesses become more numerous, they will encourage, and then link into, various global networks.
The Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit networks with affiliates in more than one country will grow through 2015, having expanded more than 20-fold between 1964 and 1998. Within individual countries, the nonprofit sector also will expand rapidly.
The Role of the Nonprofit SectorNonprofit organizations deliver critical services to individuals and private groups, with 67 percent of nonprofit activities in health, education, and social services alone. They provide information and expertise, advocate policies on behalf of their interests, and work through international organizations, both as implementing partners and as advocates. In many development projects and humanitarian emergencies, nonprofits will continue to deliver most of the aid from governments and international organizations. |
Over the next 15 years international and national nonprofits will not only expand but change in significant ways.
Criminal Organizations and Networks
Over the next 15 years, transnational criminal organizations will become increasingly
adept at exploiting the global diffusion of sophisticated information, financial, and
transportation networks.
Criminal organizations and networks based in North America, Western Europe, China, Colombia, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, and Russia will expand the scale and scope of their activities. They will form loose alliances with one another, with smaller criminal entrepreneurs, and with insurgent movements for specific operations. They will corrupt leaders of unstable, economically fragile or failing states, insinuate themselves into troubled banks and businesses, and cooperate with insurgent political movements to control substantial geographic areas. Their income will come from narcotics trafficking; alien smuggling; trafficking in women and children; smuggling toxic materials, hazardous wastes, illicit arms, military technologies, and other contraband; financial fraud; and racketeering.
Crime and Corruption PayAvailable data suggest that current annual revenues from illicit criminal activities include: $100-300 billion from narcotics trafficking; $10-12 billion from toxic and other hazardous waste dumping; $9 billion from automobile theft in the United States and Europe; $7 billion from alien smuggling; and as much as $1 billion from theft of intellectual property through pirating of videos, software, and other commodities. Available estimates suggest that corruption costs about $500 billionor about 1 percent of global GNP in slower growth, reduced foreign investment, and lower profits. For example, the average cost of bribery to firms doing business in Russia is between 4 and 8 percent of annual revenue, according to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. |
Changing Communal Identities and Networks
Traditional communal groupswhether religious or ethnic-linguistic groupswill
pose a range of challenges for governance. Using opportunities afforded by globalization
and the opening of civil society, communal groups will be better positioned to mobilize
coreligionists or ethnic kin to assert their interests or defend against perceived
economic or political discrimination. Ethnic diasporas and coreligionists abroad also will
be more able and willing to provide fraternal groups with political, financial, and other
support.
Criminal Networks and New Technologies
Estimates of the number of distinct ethnic-linguistic groups at the beginning of the twenty-first century run from 2,000 to 5,000, ranging from small bands living in isolated areas to larger groups living in ancestral homelands or in diasporas. Most of the world's 191 states are ethnically heterogeneous, and many contain ethnic populations with co-ethnics in neighboring states. By 2015, ethnic heterogeneity will increase in almost all states, as a result of international migration and divergent birthrates of migrant and native populations.
Current World Illicit Trafficking
Worldwide Adherents of Selected Major World Religions, Mid-1998
Communal tensions, sometimes culminating in conflict, probably will increase through 2015. In addition to some ongoing communal frictions that will persist, triggers of new tensions will include:
Overall Impact on States
The developed democracies will be best positioned for good governance because they will
tend to empower legitimate nonstate actors in both the for-profit and nonprofit sectors;
will favor institutions and processes that accommodate divergent communal groups; will
press for transparency in government and the efficient delivery of public services; and
will maintain institutions to regulate legitimate for-profit and nonprofit organizations
and control illegitimate criminal groups. Countries in Western Europe, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, and Japan have the requisite agility and institutions to meet the challenges.
Countries in Eastern Europe as well as Turkey, South Korea, India, Chile, and Brazil,
among other developing countries, are moving in these directions, despite some continuing
obstacles.
Some newly democratic states and modernizing authoritarian states will have leaders amenable to technological change and access to substantial human and financial resources. They will encourage business firms, nonprofits, and communal groups supportive of the government and discourage or suppress those that are independent-minded or critical of government policies. They will have some success in coping with the energy, ideas, and resources of nonstate actors. Several Asian countries, such as Singapore, Taiwan, and perhaps China, as well as some states in the Middle East and Latin America are likely to take this approach.
Other states in varying degrees will lack the resources and leadership to achieve effective governance. Most autocratic states in the Middle East and Africa will not have the institutions or cultural orientation to exploit the opportunities provided by nonstate actorsapart from certain forms of humanitarian assistance. In many of these countries, nonstate actors will become more important than governments in providing services, such as health clinics and schools. In the weakest of these countries, communal, criminal, or terrorist groups will seek control of government institutions and/or territory.
Overall, the number of stateswhich has more than tripled since 1945 and has grown 20 percent since 1990is likely to increase at a slower rate through 2015. This growth will result from remaining cases of decolonization and to communal tensions leading to state secession, most likely in Sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia, and Indonesia. In some cases, new states will inspire other secessionist movements, destabilizing countries where minorities were not initially seeking secession.
At the same time, the very concept of "belonging" to a particular state probably will erode among a growing number of people with continuing transnational ties to more than one country through citizenship, residence or other associations.
International Cooperation
Globalization and technological change are raising widespread expectations that increased
international cooperation will help manage many transnational problems that states can no
longer manage on their own. Efforts to realize such expectations will increase, but
concerns about national interests as well as the costs and risks involved in some types of
international activism will limit success.
Mechanisms of international cooperationintended to facilitate bargaining, elucidate common interests and resolve differences among stateshave increased rapidly in recent decades.
International cooperation will continue to increase through 2015, particularly when large economic stakes have mobilized the for-profit sector, and/or when there is intense interest from nonprofit groups and networks.
Most high-income democratic states will participate in multiple international institutions and seek cooperation on a wide range of issues to protect their interests and to promote their influence. Members of the European Union will tackle the most ambitious agenda, including significant political and security cooperation.
Strongly nationalistic and/or autocratic states will play selective roles in inter-governmental organizations: working within them to protect and project their interests, while working against initiatives that they view as threatening to their domestic power structures and national sovereignty. They will also work against those international institutions viewed as creatures of the established great powers and thus rigged against themsuch as the IMF and the WTOas well as those that cede a major role to nonstate actors.
Low-income developing countries will participate actively in international organizations and arrangements to assert their sovereignty, garner resources for social and economic development, and gain support for the incumbent government. The most unstable of these states will participate in international organizations and arrangements primarily to maintain international recognition for the regime.
Agenda for International CooperationCooperation is likely to be effective in such areas as:
Cooperation is likely to be contentious and with mixed results in such areas as:
|
Through 2015, internal conflicts will pose the most frequent threat to stability around the world. Interstate wars, though less frequent, will grow in lethality due to the availability of more destructive technologies. The international community will have to deal with the military, political, and economic dimensions of the rise of China and India and the continued decline of Russia.
Internal Conflicts
Many internal conflicts, particularly those arising from communal disputes, will continue
to be vicious, long-lasting and difficult to terminateleaving bitter legacies in
their wake.
Internal conflicts stemming from state repression, religious and ethnic grievances, increasing migration pressures, and/or indigenous protest movements will occur most frequently in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caucasus and Central Asia, and parts of south and southeast Asia, Central America and the Andean region.
The United Nations and several regional organizations will continue to be called upon to manage some internal conflicts because major statesstressed by domestic concerns, perceived risk of failure, lack of political will, or tight resourceswill wish to minimize their direct involvement. When, however, some Western governments, international and regional organizations, and civil-society groups press for outside military intervention in certain internal conflicts, they will be opposed by such states as China, India, Russia and many developing countries that will tend to view interventions as dangerous precedents challenging state sovereignty.
Transnational Terrorism
States with poor governance; ethnic, cultural, or religious tensions; weak economies; and
porous borders will be prime breeding grounds for terrorism. In such states, domestic
groups will challenge the entrenched government, and transnational networks seeking
safehavens.
At the same time, the trend away from state-supported political terrorism and toward more diverse, free-wheeling, transnational networksenabled by information technologywill continue. Some of the states that actively sponsor terrorism or terrorist groups today may decrease or even cease their support by 2015 as a result of regime changes, rapprochement with neighbors, or the conclusion that terrorism has become counterproductive. But weak states also could drift toward cooperation with terrorists, creating defacto new state supporters.
Interstate Conflicts
Over the next 15 years, the international system will have to adjust to changing power
relationships in key regions:
Current Ethnic Diversity States
The changing dynamics of state power will combine with other factors to affect the risk of conflict in various regions. Changing military capabilities will be prominent among the factors that determine the risk of war. In South Asia, for example, that risk will remain fairly high over the next 15 years. India and Pakistan are both prone to miscalculation. Both will continue to build up their nuclear and missile forces.
India most likely will expand the size of its nuclear-capable force. Pakistan's nuclear and missile forces also will continue to increase. Islamabad has publicly claimed that the number of nuclear weapons and missiles it deploys will be based on "minimum" deterrence and will be independent of the size of India's arsenal. A noticeable increase in the size of India's arsenal, however, would prompt Pakistan to further increase the size of its own arsenal.
Russia will be unable to maintain conventional forces that are both sizable and modern or to project significant military power with conventional means. The Russian military will increasingly rely on its shrinking strategic and theater nuclear arsenals to deter or, if deterrence fails, to counter large-scale conventional assaults on Russian territory.
As Russia struggles with the constraints on its ambitions, it will invest scarce resources in selected and secretive military technology programs, especially WMD, hoping to counter Western conventional and strategic superiority in areas such as ballistic missile defense.
China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) will remain the world's largest military, but the majority of the force will not be fully modernized by 2015. China could close the technological gap with the West in one or more major weapons systems. China's capability for regional military operations is likely to improve significantly by 2015.
China: How to Think About Its Growing Wealth and PowerChina has been riding the crest of a significant wave of economic growth for two decades. Many experts assess that China can maintain a growth rate of 7 percent or more for many years. Such impressive rates provide a foundation for military potential, and some predict that China's rapid economic growth will lead to a significant increase in military capabilities. But the degree to which an even more powerful economy would translate into greater military power is uncertain. The relationship between economic growth and China's overall power will derive from the priorities of leaders in Beijingprovided the regime remains stable. China's leaders have assessed for some years that comprehensive national power derives both from economic strength and from the military and diplomatic resources that a healthy, large economy makes possible. They apparently agree that, for the foreseeable future, such priorities as agricultural and national infrastructure modernization must take precedence over military development. In the absence of a strong national security challenge, this view is unlikely to change even as new leaders emerge in Beijing. In a stable environment, two leadership transitions will occur in China between now and 2015. The evidence strongly suggests that the new leaders will be even more firmly committed to developing the economy as the foundation of national power and that resources for military capabilities will take a secondary role. Existing priorities and projected defense allocations could enable the PLA to emerge as the most powerful regional military force.
A decision to alter priorities to emphasize military development would require substantial change in the leadership. Internal instability or a rise in nationalism could produce such change but also probably would result in economic decline. |
Japan has a small but modern military force, more able than any other in Asia to integrate large quantities of new weaponry. Japan's future military strength will reflect the state of its economy and the health of its security relationship with the United States. Tokyo will increasingly pursue greater autonomy in security matters and develop security enhancements, such as defense improvements and more active diplomacy, to supplement the US alliance.
A unified Korea with a significant US military presence may become a regional military power. For the next 10 to 15 years, however, knowledgeable observers suggest that the process of unification will consume South Korea'senergies and resources.
Absent unification, North Korea's WMD capabilities will continue to cloud regional stability. P'yongyang probably has one, possibly two, nuclear weapons. It has developed medium-range missiles for years and has tested a three-stage space launch vehicle.
P'yonyang may improve the accuracy, range, and payload capabilities of its Taepo Dong-2 ICBM, deploy variants, or develop more capable systems. North Korea could have a few to several Taepo Dong-2 type missiles deployed by 2005.
In the Middle East, the confluence of domestic economic pressures and regional rivalries is likely to further the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. By contrast, spending on conventional arms probably will remain stable or decline in most countries. Some governments may maintain large armed forces to absorb otherwise unemployable youths, but such armies will be less well trained and equipped. Rather than conventional war, the region is likely to experience more terrorism, insurgencies, and humanitarian emergencies arising from internal disparities or disputes over ethnic or religious identity.
Reacting to US Military Superiority
Experts agree that the United States, with its decisive edge in both information and
weapons technology, will remain the dominant military power during the next 15 years.
Further bolstering the strong position of the United States are its unparalleled economic
power, its university system, and its investment in research and developmenthalf of
the total spent annually by the advanced industrial world. Many potential adversaries, as
reflected in doctrinal writings and statements, see US military concepts, together with
technology, as giving the United States the ability to expand its lead in conventional
warfighting capabilities.
This perception among present and potential adversaries will continue to generate the pursuit of asymmetric capabilities against US forces and interests abroad as well as the territory of the United States. US opponentsstate and such nonstate actors as drug lords, terrorists, and foreign insurgentswill not want to engage the US military on its terms. They will choose instead political and military strategies designed to dissuade the United States from using force, or, if the United States does use force, to exhaust American will, circumvent or minimize US strengths, and exploit perceived US weaknesses. Asymmetric challenges can arise across the spectrum of conflict that will confront US forces in a theater of operations or on US soil.
Central Asia: Regional Hot Spot?The interests of Russia, China, and Indiaas well as of Iran and Turkeywill intersect in Central Asia; the states of that region will attempt to balance those powers as well as keep the United States and the West engaged to prevent their domination by an outside power. The greatest danger to the region, however, will not be a conflict between states, which is unlikely, but the corrosive impact of communal conflicts and politicial insurgencies, possibly abetted by outside actors and financed at least in part by narcotraffickers. |
It is also generally recognized that the United States and other developed countries will continue to possess the political, economic, military, and technological advantagesincluding through National Missile and Theater Missile Defense systemsto reduce the gains of adversaries from lateral or "side-wise" technological improvements to their capabilities.
Threats to Critical Infrastructure. Some potential adversaries will seek ways to threaten the US homeland. The US national infrastructurecommunications, transportation, financial transactions, energy networksis vulnerable to disruption by physical and electronic attack because of its interdependent nature and by cyber attacks because of their dependence on computer networks. Foreign governments and groups will seek to exploit such vulnerabilities using conventional munitions, information operations, and even WMD. Over time, such attacks increasingly are likely to be delivered by computer networks rather than by conventional munitions, as the affinity for cyber attacks and the skill of US adversaries in employing them evolve. Cyber attacks will provide both state and nonstate adversaries new options for action against the United States beyond mere words but short of physical attackstrategic options that include selection of either nonlethal or lethal damage and the prospect of anonymity.
Information Operations. In addition to threatening the US national infrastructure, adversaries will seek to attack US military capabilities through electronic warfare, psychological operations, denial and deception, and the use of new technologies such as directed energy weapons or electromagnetic pulse weapons. The primary purpose would be to deny US forces information superiority, to prevent US weapons from working, and to undermine US domestic support for US actions. Adversaries also are likely to use cyber attacks to complicate US power projection in an era of decreasing permanent US military presence abroad by seeking to disrupt military networks during deployment operationswhen they are most stressed. Many countries have programs to develop such technologies; few have the foresight or capability to fully integrate these various tools into a comprehensive attack. But they could develop such capabilities over the next decade and beyond.
Terrorism. Much of the terrorism noted earlier will be directed at the United States and its overseas interests. Most anti-US terrorism will be based on perceived ethnic, religious or cultural grievances. Terrorist groups will continue to find ways to attack US military and diplomatic facilities abroad. Such attacks are likely to expand increasingly to include US companies and American citizens. Middle East and Southwest Asian-based terrorists are the most likely to threaten the United States.
Weapons of Mass Destruction. WMD programs reflect the motivations and intentions of the governments that produce them and, therefore, can be altered by the change of a regime or by a regime's change of view. Linear projections of WMD are intended to assess what the picture will look like if changes in motivations and intentions do not occur.
Short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, particularly if armed with WMD, already pose a significant threat overseas to US interests, military forces, and allies. By 2015, the United States, barring major political changes in these countries, will face ICBM threats from North Korea, probably from Iran, and possibly from Iraq, in addition to long-standing threats from Russia and China.
The probability that a missile armed with WMD would be used against US forces or interests is higher today than during most of the Cold War and will continue to grow. The emerging missile threats will be mounted by countries possessing considerably fewer missiles with far less accuracy, yield, survivability, reliability, and range-payload capability than the strategic forces of the Soviet Union. North Korea's space launch attempt in 1998 demonstrated that P'yongyang is seeking a long-range missile capability that could be used against US forces and interests abroad and against US territory itself. Moreover, many of the countries developing longer-range missiles assess that the mere threat of their use would complicate US crisis decisionmaking and potentially would deter Washington from pursuing certain objectives.
Other means to deliver WMD against the United States will emerge, some cheaper and more reliable and accurate than early-generation ICBMs. The likelihood of an attack by these means is greater than that of a WMD attack with an ICBM. The goal of the adversary would be to move the weapon within striking distance by using short- and medium-range missiles deployed on surface ships or covert missions using military special operations forces or state intelligence services. Non-missile delivery means, however, do not provide the same prestige, deterrence, and coercive diplomacy associated with ICBMs.
WMD Proliferation and the Potential for Unconventional Warfare and EscalationThe risks of escalation inherent in direct armed conflict will be magnified by the availability of WMD; consequently, proliferation will tend to spur a reversion to prolonged, lower-level conflict by other means: intimidation, subversion, terrorism, proxies, and guerrilla operations. This trend already is evident between Israel and some of its neighbors and between India and Pakistan. In the event of war, urban fighting will be typical and consequently, civilian casualties will be high relative to those among combatants. Technology will count for less, and large, youthful, and motivated populations for more. Exploitation of communal divisions within an adversary's civil populations will be seen as a key to winning such conflictsincreasing their bitterness and thereby prolonging them. |
Chemical and biological threats to the United States will become more widespread; such capabilities are easier to develop, hide, and deploy than nuclear weapons. Some terrorists or insurgents will attempt to use such weapons against US interestsagainst the United States itself, its forces or facilities overseas, or its allies. Moreover, the United States would be affected by the use of such weapons anywhere in the world because Washington would be called on to help contain the damage and to provide scientific expertise and economic assistance to deal with the effects. Such weapons could be delivered through a variety of means, including missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, or covertly via land, air, and sea.
Trends in Global Defense Spending and ArmamentsDefense-related technologies will advance rapidly over the next 15 yearsparticularly precision weapons, information systems and communications. The development and integrated application of these technologies will occur mostly in the advanced countries, particularly the United States. Given the high costs and complexity of technical and operational integration, few nations will assign high priority to the indigenous development of such military technology.
Over the past decade, a slow but persistent transformation has occurred in the arms procurement strategies of states. Many states are attempting to diversify sources of arms for reasons that vary from fears of arms embargoes, to declining defense budgets, or to a desire to acquire limited numbers of cutting-edge technologies. Their efforts include developing a mix of indigenous production; codeveloping, coproducing, or licensing production; purchasing entire weapon systems; or leasing capabilities. At the same time, many arms-producing states, confronted with declining domestic arms needs but determined to maintain defense industries, are commercializing defense production and aggressively expanding arms exports. Together, the above factors suggest: Technology diffusion to those few states with a motivation to arm and the economic resources to do so will accelerate as weapons and militarily relevant technologies are moved rapidly and routinely across national borders in response to increasingly commercial rather than security calculations. For such militarily related technologies as the Global Positioning System, satellite imagery, and communications, technological superiority will be difficult to maintain for very long. In an environment of broad technological diffusion, nonmaterial elements of military powerstrategy, doctrine, and trainingwill increase in importance over the next 15 years in deciding combat outcomes. Export regimes and sanctions will be difficult to manage and less effective in controlling arms and weapons technology transfers. The resultant proliferation of WMD and long-range delivery systems would be destabilizing and increase the risk of miscalculation and conflict that produces high casualties. Advantages will go to states that have a strong commercial technology sector and develop effective ways to link these capabilities to their national defense industrial base. States able to optimize private and public sector linkages could achieve significant advancements in weapons systems. The twin developments outlined aboveconstrained defense spending worldwide combined with increasing military technological potentialpreclude accurate forecasts of which technologies, in what quantity and form, will be incorporated in the military systems of future adversaries. In many cases, the question will not be which technologies provide the greatest military potential but which will receive the political backing and resources to reach the procurement and fielding stage. Moreover, civilian technology development already is driving military technology development in many countries. |
Theater-range ballistic and cruise missile proliferation will continue. Most proliferation will involve systems a generation or two behind state of the art, but they will be substantially new capabilities for the states that acquire them. Such missiles will be capable of delivering WMD or conventional payloads inter-regionally against fixed targets. Major air and sea ports, logistics bases and facilities, troop concentrations, and fixed communications nodes increasingly will be at risk.
Access to Space. US competitors and adversaries realize the degree to which access to space is critical to US military power, and by 2015 they will have made strides in countering US space dominance. International commercialization of space will give states and nonstate adversaries access rivaling today's major space powers in such areas as high-resolution reconnaissance and weather prediction, global encrypted communications, and precise navigation. When combined, such services will provide adversaries who are aware of US and allied force deployments the capability for precise targeting and global coordination of operations. Moreover, many adversaries will have developed capabilities to degrade US space assetsin particular, with attacks against ground facilities, electronic warfare, and denial and deception. By 2015, several countries will have such counterspace technologies as improved space-object tracking, signal jamming, and directed-energy weapons such as low-power lasers.
Arms Control: An Uncertain AgendaThe last three decades witnessed significant negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union (and Russia), but the future probably will not replicate those efforts in form or magnitude.
Prospects for bilateral arms control between the major powers probably will be dim over the next 15 years; progress in multilateral regimeswith less intrusive and lower-certainty monitoringprobably will grow sporadically. Beyond this generalization:
|
The following snapshots of individual regions result from our assessment of trends and from estimates by regional experts as to where specific nations will be in 15 years. To make these judgments, we have distilled the views expressed by many outside experts in our conferences and workshops. The results are intended to stimulate debate, not to endorse one view over another.
Political Rights in East and Southeast Asia
East and Southeast Asia
Regional Trends. East Asia over the next 15 years will be characterized by uneven
economic dynamismboth between and within statespolitical and national
assertiveness rather than ideology, and potential for strategic tension if not outright
conflict.
The states of the region will be led by generally nationalistic governments eschewing ideology and focusing on nation-building and development. These states will broadly accommodate international norms on the free flow of information to modernize their economies, open markets, and fight international crime and disease. They also will encounter pressure for greater political pluralism, democracy, and respect for human rights. Failure to meet popular expectations probably will result in leaders being voted out of office in democratic states or in widespread demonstrations and violence leading to regime collapse in authoritarian states.
Political and Security Trends. The major power realignments and the more fluid post-Cold War security environment in the region will raise serious questions about how regional leaders will handle nascent great-power rivalries (the US-China, China-Japan, China-India), related regional "hot spots" (Taiwan, Korea, South China Sea), the future of challenged political regimes (Indonesia, North Korea absent unification, China), and communal tensions and minority issues (in China, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia). On balance, the number and range of rivalries and potential flashpoints suggest a better-than-even chance that episodes of military confrontation and conflict will erupt over the next 15 years.
The implications of the rise of China as an economic and increasingly capable regional military powereven as the influence of Communism and authoritarianism weakenspose the greatest uncertainty in the area. Adding to uncertainty are the prospects forand implications ofKorean unification over the next 15 years, and the evolution of Japan's regional leadership aspirations and capabilities.
Instability in Russia and Central Asia, and the nuclear standoff between India and Pakistan will be peripheral but still important in East Asian security calculations. The Middle East will become increasingly important as a primary source of energy.
Economic Dynamism. While governments in the region generally will accept the need to accommodate international norms on ownership, markets, trade, and investment, they will seek to block or slow the perceived adverse economic, political, and social consequences of globalization.
The most likely economic outlook will be that rich societiesJapan, Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, and pockets in China and elsewherewill get richer, with Japan likely to continue to be a leader in S&T development and applications for commercial use. In contrast, the poor societiesVietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and rural areas in western China and elsewherewill fall further behind. Greater economic links are likely to have been forged between Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South China as a result of the development of investment and infrastructure. China will be increasingly integrated into the world economy through foreign direct investiment, trade, and international capital markets. Energy markets will have drawn the region more closely together despite lingering issues of ownership of resources and territorial disputes.
Key uncertainties will persist on economic performance and political stability, including the rising costs of pensions and services for Japan's aging population; the adequacy of energy and water for China, political leadership in Indonesia and China, and the impact of AIDS in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Regional Interaction. Given the weakness of regional political-security arrangements, the US political, economic, and security presence will remain pronounced. At the same time, many countries in the region will remain uncertain about US objectives, apprehensive of both US withdrawal and US unilateralism. Key states, most significantly China and Japan, will continue "hedging," by using diplomacy, military preparations and other means to ensure that their particular interests will be safeguarded, especially in case the regional situation deteriorates.
Japan and others will seek to maintain a US presence, in part to counter China's influence. Economic and other ties will bind Japan and China, but historical, territorial, and strategic differences will underline continuing wariness between the two. China will want good economic ties to the United States but also will nurture links to Russia and others to counter the possibility of US pressure against it and to weaken US support for Taiwan and the US security posture in East Asia. US-China confrontations over Taiwan or over broader competing security interests are possible.
Although preserving the US alliance, Japanese leaders also will be less certain they can rely on the United States to deal with some security contingencies. More confident of their ability to handle security issues independently, they will pursue initiatives internally and overseas that are designed to safeguard Japanese interests without direct reference to the US alliance.
South Asia
Regional Trends. The widening strategic and economic gaps between the two principal
powers, India and Pakistanand the dynamic interplay between their mutual hostility
and the instability in Central Asiawill define the South Asia region in 2015.
Wary of China, India will look increasingly to the West, but its need for oil and desire to balance Arab ties to Pakistan will lead to strengthened ties to Persian Gulf states as well.
Demographic Challenges. Although population growth rates in South Asia will decline, population still will grow by nearly 30 percent by 2015. India's population alone will grow to more than 1.2 billion. Pakistan's projected growth from 140 million to about 195 million in 2015 will put a major strain on an economy already unable to meet the basic needs of the current population. The percentage of urban dwellers will climb steadily from the current 25-30 percent of the population to between 40-50 percent, leading to continued deterioration in the overall quality of urban life. Differential population growth patterns will exacerbate inequalities in wealth. Ties between provincial and central governments throughout the region will be strained.
Jammu and Kashmir: Ethnic Mix of a Disputed State
Resource and Environmental Challenges. Water will remain South Asia's most vital and most contested natural resource. Continued population and economic growth and expansion of irrigated agriculture over the next 15 years will increasingly stress water resources, and pollution of surface and groundwater will be a serious challenge. In India, per capita water availability is likely to drop by 50-75 percent. Because many of the region's waterways are interstate, water could become a source of renewed friction. Deforestation in India and Nepal will exacerbate pollution, flooding, and land degradation in Bangladesh.
India in 2015. Indian democracy will remain strong, albeit more factionalized by the secular-Hindu nationalist debate, growing differentials among regions and the increase in competitive party politics. India's economy, long repressed by the heavy hand of regulation, is likely to achieve sustained growth to the degree reforms are implemented. High-technology companies will be the most dynamic agents and will lead the thriving service sector in four key urban centersMumbai, New Delhi, Bangalore, and Chennai. Computer software services and customized applications will continue to expand as India strengthens economic ties to key international markets. Industries such as pharmaceuticals and agro-processing also will compete globally. Numerous factors provide India a competitive advantage in the global economy. It has the largest English-speaking population in the developing world; its education system produces millions of scientific and technical personnel. India has a growing business-minded middle class eager to strengthen ties to the outside world, and the large Indian expatriate population provides strong links to key markets around the world.
Despite rapid economic growth, more than half a billion Indians will remain in dire poverty. Harnessing technology to improve agriculture will be India's main challenge in alleviating poverty in 2015. The widening gulf between "have" and "have-not" regions and disagreements over the pace and nature of reforms will be a source of domestic strife. Rapidly growing, poorer northern states will continue to drain resources in subsidies and social welfare benefits.
Pakistan in 2015. Pakistan, our conferees concluded, will not recover easily from decades of political and economic mismanagement, divisive politics, lawlessness, corruption and ethnic friction. Nascent democratic reforms will produce little change in the face of opposition from an entrenched political elite and radical Islamic parties. Further domestic decline would benefit Islamic political activists, who may significantly increase their role in national politics and alter the makeup and cohesion of the militaryonce Pakistan's most capable institution. In a climate of continuing domestic turmoil, the central government's control probably will be reduced to the Punjabi heartland and the economic hub of Karachi.
Other Regional States. Prospects for Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka in 2015 appear bleak. Decades of foreign domination and civil war have devastated Afghanistan's society and economy, and the country is likely to remain internationally isolated, a major narcotics exporter, and a haven for Islamic radicals and terrorist groups. Bangladesh will not abandon democracy but will be characterized by coalitions or weak one-party governments, fragile institutions of governance, deep-seated leadership squabbles, and no notion of a loyal opposition.
Security and Political Concerns Predominate. The threat of major conflict between India and Pakistan will overshadow all other regional issues during the next 15 years. Continued turmoil in Afghanistan and Pakistan will spill over into Kashmir and other areas of the subcontinent, prompting Indian leaders to take more aggressive preemptive and retaliatory actions. India's conventional military advantage over Pakistan will widen as a result of New Delhi's superior economic position. India will also continue to build up its ocean-going navy to dominate the Indian Ocean transit routes used for delivery of Persian Gulf oil to Asia. The decisive shift in conventional military power in India's favor over the coming years potentially will make the region more volatile and unstable. Both India and Pakistan will see weapons of mass destruction as a strategic imperative and will continue to amass nuclear warheads and build a variety of missile delivery systems.
Projected Demographic Trends in Eurasia
Russia and Eurasia
Regional Trends. Uncertainties abound about the future internal configuration,
geopolitical dynamics, and degree of turbulence within and among former Soviet states.
Russia and the other states of Eurasia are likely to fall short in resolving critical
impediments to economic and political reform in their struggle to manage the negative
legacies of the Soviet period. Changing demographics, chronic economic difficulties, and
continued questions about governance will constrain Russia's ability to project its power
beyond the former Soviet republics to the south, complicate Ukraine's efforts to draw
closer to the West, and retard the development of stable, open political structures
throughout the Caucasus and Central Asia. Those states that could make progress on the
basis of potential energy revenues are likely to fail because of corruption and the
absence of structural economic reform. The rapid pace of scientific and technological
innovation, as well as globalization, will leave these states further behind the West as
well as behind the major emerging markets.
The economic challenges to these countries will remain daunting: insufficient structural reform, poor productivity in agriculture as compared with Western standards, decaying infrastructure and environmental degradation. Corruption and organized crime, sustained by drug trafficking, money laundering, and other illegal enterprises and, in several instances, protected by corrupt political allies, will persist.
Demographic pressures also will affect the economic performance and political cohesiveness of these states. Because of low birthrates and falling life expectancy among males, the populations of the Slavic core and much of the Caucasus will continue to decline; Russian experts predict that the country's population could fall from 146 million at present to 130-135 million by 2015. At the other end of the spectrum, the Central Asian countries will face a growing youth cohort that will peak around 2010 before resuming a more gradual pattern of population growth.
The centrality of Russia will continue to diminish, and by 2015 "Eurasia" will be a geographic term lacking a unifying political, economic, and cultural reality. Russia and the western Eurasian States will continue to orient themselves toward Europe but will remain essentially outside of it. Because of geographic proximity and cultural affinities, the Caucasus will be closer politically to their neighbors to the south and west, with Central Asia drawing closer to South Asia and China. Nonetheless, important interdependencies will remain, primarily in the energy sphere.
Russia will remain the most important actor in the former Soviet Union. Its power relative to others in the region and neighboring areas will have declined, however, and it will continue to lack the resources to impose its will.
The Soviet economic inheritance will continue to plague Russia. Besides a crumbling physical infrastructure, years of environmental neglect are taking a toll on the population, a toll made worse by such societal costs of transition as alcoholism, cardiac diseases, drugs, and a worsening health delivery system. Russia's population is not only getting smaller, but it is becoming less and less healthy and thus less able to serve as an engine of economic recovery. In macro economic terms Russia's GDP probably has bottomed out. Russia, nevertheless, is still likely to fall short in its efforts to become fully integrated into the global financial and trading system by 2015. Even under a best case scenario of five percent annual economic growth, Russia would attain an economy less than one-fifth the size of that of the United States.
Many Russian futures are possible, ranging from political resurgence to dissolution. The general drift, however, is toward authoritarianism, although not to the extreme extent of the Soviet period. The factors favoring this course are President Putin's own bent toward hierarchical rule from Moscow; the population's general support of this course as an antidote to the messiness and societal disruption of the post-Soviet transition; the ability of the ruling elite to hold on to power because of the lack of effective national opposition, thus making that elite accountable only to itself; and the ongoing shift of tax resources from the regions to the center. This centralizing tendency will contribute to dysfunctional governance. Effective governance is nearly impossible under such centralization for a country as large and diverse as Russia and lacking well-ordered, disciplined national bureaucracies. Recentralization, however, will be constrained by the interconnectedness brought about by the global information revolution, and by the gradual, although uneven, growth of civil society.
Russia will focus its foreign policy goals on reestablishing lost influence in the former Soviet republics to the south, fostering ties to Europe and Asia, and presenting itself as a significant player vis-a-vis the United States. Its energy resources will be an important lever for these endeavors. However, its domestic ills will frustrate its efforts to reclaim its great power status. Russia will maintain the second largest nuclear arsenal in the world as the last vestige of its old status. The net outcome of these trends will be a Russia that remains internally weak and institutionally linked to the international system primarily through its permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
Ukraine's path to the West will be constrained by widespread corruption, the power of criminal organizations, and lingering questions over its commitment to the rule of law. Kiev will remain vulnerable to Russian pressures, primarily because of its continued energy dependence, but Ukrainians of all political stripes and likely to opt for independence rather than reintegration into Russia's sphere of influence.
In 2015, the South Caucasus will remain in flux because of unresolved local conflicts, weak economic fundamentals, and continued Russian meddling. Georgia probably will have achieved a measure of political and economic stability, fueled in part by energy transit revenues, but it will remain the focus of Russian attention in the region. Armenia will remain largely isolated and is likely to remain a Russianor possibly Iranianclient and, therefore, a regional wild card. Azerbaijan's success in developing its energy sector is unlikely to bring widespread prosperity: Baku will be a one-sector economy with pervasive corruption at all levels of society.
In Central Asia, social, environmental, religious, and possibly ethnic strains will grow. Wasteful water-intensive practices and pollution of ground water and arable land will lead to continued shortages for agricultural and energy generation. The high birthrates of the 1980s and early 1990s will lead to strains on education, healthcare, and social services. The region also is likely to be the scene of increased competition among surrounding powersRussia, China, India, Iran, and possibly Turkeyfor control, influence, and access to energy resources. Developments in Afghanistan and Pakistan will threaten regional stability.
Growth in Population From 2000 to 2015
The Middle East and North Africa
Regimes in the regionfrom Morocco to Iranwill have to cope with demographic,
economic and societal pressures from within and globalization from without. No single
ideology or philosophy will unite any one state or group of states in response to these
challenges, although popular resentment of globalization as a Western intrusion will be
widespread. Political Islam in various forms will be an attractive alternative for
millions of Muslims throughout the region, and some radical variants will continue to be
divisive social and political forces.
By 2015, Israel will have attained a cold peace with its neighbors, with only limited social, economic, and cultural ties. There will be a Palestinian state, but Israeli-Palestinian tensions will persist and occasionally erupt into crises. Old rivalries among core statesEgypt, Syria, Iraq, and Iranwill reemerge. International attention will shift anew to the Persian Gulf, an increasingly important source of energy resources to fuel the global economy, and oil revenues anticipated for Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia in particular will provide strategicand potentially destabilizingoptions for those states. New relationships between geographic regions could emerge between North Africa and Europe (on trade); India, China and the Persian Gulf (on energy); and Israel, Turkey, and India (on economic, technical, and in the case of Turkey, security considerations).
A key driver for the Middle East over the next 15 years will be demographic pressures, specifically how to provide jobs, housing, public services, and subsidies for rapidly growing and increasingly urban populations. By 2015, in much of the Middle East populations will be significantly larger, poorer, more urban, and more disillusioned. In nearly all Middle Eastern countries, more than half the population is now under 20 years of age. These populations will continue to have very large youth cohorts through 2015, with the labor force growing at an average rate of 3.1 percent per year. The problem of job placement is compounded by weak educational systems producing a generation lacking the technical and problem-solving skills required for economic growth.
Globalization. With the exception of Israel, Middle Eastern states will view globalization more as a challenge than an opportunity. Although the Internet will remain confined to a small elite due to relatively high cost, undeveloped infrastructures, and cultural obstacles, the information revolution and other technological advances probably will have a net destabilizing effect on the Middle East by raising expectations, increasing income disparities, and eroding the power of regimes to control information or mold popular opinion. Attracting foreign direct investment will also be difficult: except for the energy sector, investors will tend to shy away from these countries, discouraged by overbearing state sectors; heavy, opaque, and arbitrary government regulation; underdeveloped financial sectors; inadequate physical infrastructure; and the threat of political instability.
Political Change. Most Middle Eastern governments recognize the need for economic restructuring and even a modicum of greater political participation, but they will proceed cautiously, fearful of undermining their rule. As some governments or sectors embrace the new economy and civil society while others cling to more traditional paradigms, inequities between and within states will grow. Islamists could come to power in states that are beginning to become pluralist and in which entrenched secular elites have lost their appeal.
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Trends. The interplay of demographics and diseaseas well as poor
governancewill be the major determinants of Africa's increasing international
marginalization in 2015. Most African states will miss out on the economic growth
engendered elsewhere by globalization and by scientific and technological advances. Only a
few countries will do better, while a handful of states will have hardly any relevance to
the lives of their citizens. As Sub-Saharan Africa's multiple and interconnected problems
are compounded, ethnic and communal tensions will intensify, periodically escalating into
open conflict, often spreading across borders and sometimes spawning secessionist states.
In the absence of a major medical breakthrough, the relentless progression of AIDS and other diseases will decimate the economically productive adult population, sharply accentuate the continent's youth bulge, and generate a huge cohort of orphaned children. This condition will strain the ability of the extended family system to cope and will contribute to higher levels of dissatisfaction, crime, and political volatility.
Poverty and poor governance will further deplete natural resources and drive rapid urbanization. As impoverished people flee unproductive rural areas, many cities will double in population by 2015, but resources will be inadequate to provide the needed expansion of water systems, sewers, and health facilities. Cities will be sources of crime and instability as ethnic and religious differences exacerbate the competition for ever scarcer jobs and resources. The number of malnourished people will increase by more than 20 percent and the potential for famine will persist where the combination of internal conflict and recurring natural disasters prevents or limits relief efforts.
Economic Prospects. Conditions for economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa are limited by the persistence of conflicts, poor political leadership and endemic corruption, and uncertain weather conditions. Africa's most talented individuals will shun the public sector or be lured abroad by greater income and security. Effective and conscientious leaders are unlikely to emerge from undemocratic and corrupt societies.
There will be exceptions to this bleak overall outlook. The quality of governance, rather than resource endowments, will be the key determinant of development and differentiation among African states.
South Africa and Nigeria, the continent's largest economies, will remain the dominant powers in the region through 2015. But their ability to function as economic locomotives and stabilizers in their regions will be constrained by large unmet domestic demands for resources to stimulate employment, growth, and social services, including dealing with AIDS. Even a robust South Africa will not exert a strong pull on its partners in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The success of the South African economy will be more closely tied to its relationship with the larger global economy than with Sub-Saharan Africa.
Ethnic, political, and religious conflicts
Role of Nonstate Actors. The atrophy of special relationships between European powers and their former colonies in Africa will be virtually complete by 2015. Filling the void will be international organizations and nonstate actors of all types: transnational religious institutions; international nonprofit organizations, international crime syndicates and drug traffickers; foreign mercenaries; and international terrorists seeking safehavens.
International organizations will be heavily engaged in Sub-Saharan Africa over the next 15 years, given its growing needs and slow growth relative to other regions. Africa will continue to receive more development assistance per capita than other regions of the world.
European Union Members and Aspirants
Europe
Regional Trends. Most of Europe in 2015 will be relatively peaceful and wealthy.
Its residents will do extensive business with the rest of the world but politically will
be more inward-looking than the citizens of Europe in 2000. Looking out to 2015, Europe's
agenda will be to put in place the final components of EU integration; to take advantage
of globalization; to sustain a strong IT and S&T base to tackle changing demographics;
and to wean the Balkans away from virulent nationalism.
EU enlargement, institutional reform, and a common foreign, security and defense policy will play out over the next 15 years, so that by 2015 the final contours of the "European project" are likely to be firmly set. Having absorbed at least 10 new members, the European Union will have achieved its geographic and institutional limits.
Economic Reform & Globalization. EU governments will continue to seek a "third way" between state control and unbridled capitalism: piecemeal and often unavowed economic reform driven in part by an ever denser network of overseas business relationships and changes in corporate governance. Lingering labor market rigidity and state regulation will hamper restructuring, retooling, and reinvestment strategies. Europe will trail the United States in entrepreneurship and innovation as governments seek ways to balance encouragement of these factors against social effects. Thus, Europe will not achieve fully the dreams of parity with the United States as a shaper of the global economic system.
In Prague, Vienna, and other European capitals, protestors have questioned the merits of globalization. By 2015, Europe will have globalized more extensively than some of its political rhetoric will suggest. It also will have less difficulty than other regions coping with rapid change because of high education and technological levels. States will continue to push private sector competitiveness in the international market. Three of the top five information technology centers in the world will be in Europe: London, Munich, and Paris.
Many Europeans will see the role of foreign policy as protecting their social and cultural identities from the "excesses" of globalizationand from its "superpatron," the United States. One of the ways in which leaders will respond will be to clamor for greater political control over international financial and trade institutions.
The aging of the population and low birthrates will be major challenges to European prosperity and cohesion. Greater percentages of state budgets will have to be allocated to the aging, while, at the same time, there will be significant, chronic shortages both of highly skilled workers in IT and other professions and unskilled workers in basic services. Legal and illegal immigration will mitigate labor shortages to a limited extent but at a cost in terms of social friction and crime. As EU governments grapple with immigration policy and European and national identity, anti-immigrant sentiment will figure more prominently in the political arena throughout Western Europe.
Turkey. The future direction of Turkey, both internally and geopolitically, will have a major impact on the region, and on US and Western interests. Shifting political dynamics; debates over identity, ethnicity and the role of religion in the state; and the further development of civil society will figure prominently in Turkey's domestic agenda. The road to Turkish membership in the EU will be long and difficult, and EU member states will evaluate Turkey's candidacy not only on the basis of economic performance, but on how well it tackles this comprehensive agenda. Part of Turkey's success will hinge on the effectiveness of a growing private sector in advancing Turkey's reform efforts and its goal of full integration in the West. NATO's involvement in the Ballkans and expected enlargement in southern Europe will increase ties between Turkey and the West.
By dint of its history, location, and interests, Turkey will continue to pay attention to its neighbors to the northin the Caucasus and Central Asiaand to the south and eastSyria, Iraq and Iran. With few exceptions, these states will continue to struggle with questions of governance. As Turkey crafts policies toward the countries in these regions, no single issue will dominate its national security agenda. Rather, Ankara will find itself having to cope with regional rivalriesincluding what policies to adopt toward internal and interstate conflictsproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the politics and economics of energy transport, and water rights.
Europe and the World. Europe's agenda will require it to demonstrate influence in world affairs commensurate with its size in population and economic strength. The EU's global reach will be based primarily on economics: robust trade and investment links to the United States and growing ties to East and Southeast Asia and Latin America.
In dealing with matters outside the region, European leaders will construe their global responsibilities as building legal mechanisms, encouraging diplomatic contact, andto a lesser extentproviding nonmilitary aid. They will respond sporadically to foreign criseseither through the UN or in ad hoc "coalitions of the willing" with Washington or othersbut they will not make strong and consistent overseas commitments, particularly in regard to sending troops.
Transatlantic Links. Economic issues will have overtaken security issues in importance by 2015, and the United States will see its relations with Europe defined increasingly through the EU, not only on the basis of trade but in the context of using economic toolssuch as aid and preferential trading regimesto underwrite peace initiatives.
By 2015, NATO will have accepted many, but not all, Central/Eastern European countries. European Security and Defense Policy will be set in terms of partnership with, rather than replacement of, NATO.
Canada
Trends. Canada will be a full participant in the globalization process in 2015 and
a leading player in the Americas after the United States, along with Mexico and Brazil.
Ottawa will still be grappling with the political, demographic, and cultural impact of
heavy Asian immigration in the West as well as residual nationalist sentiment in
French-speaking Quebec. The vast and diverse country, however, will remain stable amidst
constant, dynamic change.
Ottawa will continue to emphasize the importance of education, and especially science and technology, for the new economy. Canada also will promote policies designed to stem the flow of skilled workers south and will seek to attract skilled immigrantsespecially professionals from East and South Asiato ensure that Canada will be able to take full advantage of global opportunities. The question of Quebec's place in the country will continue to stir national debate.
Canada's status as the pre-eminent US economic partner will be even more pronounced in 2015. National sensitivity to encroaching US culture will remain, even as the two economies become more integrated. Ottawa will retain its interests in the stability and prosperity of East Asia because of growing Canadian economic, cultural, and demographic links to the Pacific region. As additional trade links with Latin America are developed through the North American Free Trade Agreement and a likely Free Trade Area of the Americas, Canada increasingly will take advantage of developments in the Western hemisphere. Although Canadians will focus more on Latin America and less on Europe, they will still look to NATO as the cornerstone of Western security. Like Europeans, Canadians will judge US global leadership in terms of the relationship with Russia, especially regarding strategic arms and National Missile Defense (NMD).
Despite the relatively small size of Canada's armed forces, Ottawa still will seek to participate in global and regional discussions on the future of international peacekeeping. Canada will continue to build on its traditional support for international organizations by working to ensure a more effective UN and greater respect for international treaties, norms, and regimes. Canadians will be sympathetic to calls for greater political "management" of globalization to help mitigate adverse impacts on the environment and ensure that globalization's benefits reach less advantaged regions and states.
Latin America: Average Annual Population Growth: 1998-2015
Latin America
Regional Trends. By 2015, many Latin American countries will enjoy greater
prosperity as a result of expanding hemispheric and global economic links, the information
revolution, and lowered birthrates. Progress in building democratic institutions will
reinforce reform and promote prosperity by enhancing investor confidence. Brazil and
Mexico will be increasingly confident and capable actors that will seek a greater voice in
hemispheric affairs. But the region will remain vulnerable to financial crises because of
its dependence on external finance and the continuing role of single commodities in most
economies. The weakest countries in the region, especially in the Andean region, will fall
further behind. Reversals of democracy in some countries will be spurred by a failure to
deal effectively with popular demands, crime, corruption, drug trafficking, and
insurgencies.
Latin Americaespecially Venezuela, Mexico, and Brazilwill become an increasingly important oil producer by 2015 and an important component of the emerging Atlantic Basin energy system. Its proven oil reserves are second only to those located in the Middle East.
Globalization Gains and Limits. Continued trade and investment liberalization and the expansion of free trade agreements within and outside of Latin America will be a significant catalyst of growth. Regional trade integration through organizations such as MERCOSUR and the likely conclusion of a Free Trade Area of the Americas will both boost employment and provide the political context for governments to sustain economic reforms even against opposing entrenched interest groups.
Latin America's Internet market is poised to grow exponentially, stimulating commerce, foreign investment, new jobs, and corporate efficiency. Although Internet business opportunities will promote the growth of firms throughout the region, Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries.
Shifting Demographics. Latin America's demographics will shift markedlyto the distinct advantage of some countrieshelping to ease social strains and underpin higher economic growth. During the next 15 years, most countries will experience a substantial slowdown in the number of new jobseekers, which will help reduce unemployment and boost wages. But not all countries will enjoy these shifts; Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Paraguay will still face rapidly increasing populations in need of work.
Democratization Progress and Setbacks. By 2015, key countries will have made some headway in building sturdier and more capable democratic institutions. Democratic institutions in Mexico, Argentina, Chile, and Brazil appear poised for continued incremental consolidation. In other countries, crime, public corruption, the spread of poverty, and the failure of governments to redress worsening income inequality will provide fertile ground for populist and authoritarian politicians. Soaring crime rates will contribute to vigilantism and extrajudicial killings by the police. Burgeoning criminal activityincluding money laundering, alien smuggling, and narcotraffickingcould overwhelm some Caribbean countries. Democratization in Cuba will depend upon how and when Fidel Castro passes from the scene.
Growing Regional Gaps. By 2015, the gap between the more prosperous and democratic states of Latin America and the others will widen. Countries that are unable or unwilling to undertake reforms will experience slow growth at best. Several will struggle intermittently with serious domestic political and economic problems such as crime, corruption, and dependence on single commodities such as oil. Countries with high crime and widespread corruption will lack the political consensus to advance economic reforms and will face lower growth prospects. Although poverty and inequality will remain endemic throughout the region, high-fertility countries will face higher rates of poverty and unemployment.
The Andean countriesColombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Peruare headed for greater challenges of differing nature and origin. Competition for scarce resources, demographic pressures, and a lack of employment opportunities probably will cause workers' anger to mount and fuel more aggressive tactics in the future. Fatigue with economic hardship and deep popular cynicism about political institutions, particularly traditional parties, could lead to instability in Venezuela, Peru and Ecuador. Resolution of the long-running guerrilla war is key to Colombia's future prospects. The Cuban economy under a Castro Government will fall further behind most of the Latin American countries that embrace globalization and adopt free market practices.
Rising Migration. Pressures for legal and illegal migration to the United States and regionally will rise during the next 15 years. Demographic factors, political instability, personal insecurity, poverty, wage differentials, the growth of alien-smuggling networks, and wider family ties will propel more Latin American workers to enter the United States. El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua will become even greater sources of illegal migrants. In Mexico, declining population growth and strong economic prospects will gradually diminish pressures to seek work in the United States, but disparities in living standards, US demand for labor, and family ties will remain strong pull factors. Significant political instability during a transition process in Cuba could lead to mass migration.
Illegal migration within the region will become a more contentious issue between Latin American governments. Argentina and Venezuela already have millions of undocumented workers from neighboring countries, and resentment of illegal workers could increase. Although most Haitian migrants will head for the United States, Haiti's Caribbean neighbors will also experience further strains.
Significant DiscontinuitiesThe trends outlined in this study are based on the combinations of drivers that are most likely over the next 15 years. Nevertheless, the drivers could produce trends quite different from the ones described. Below are possibilities different from those presented in the body of the study:
|
In September-October 1999, the NIC initiated work on Global Trends 2015 by cosponsoring with Department of State/INR and CIA's Global Futures Project two unclassified workshops on Alternative Global Futures: 2000-2015. The workshops brought together several dozen government and nongovernment specialists in a wide range of fields.
The first workshop identified major factors and events that would drive global change through 2015. It focused on demography, natural resources, science and technology, the global economy, governance, social/cultural identities, and conflict and identified main trends and regional variations. These analyses became the basis for subsequent elaboration in Global Trends 2015.
The second workshop developed four alternative global futures in which these drivers would interact in different ways through 2015. Each scenario was intended to construct a plausible, policy-relevant story of how this future might evolve: highlighting key uncertainties, discontinuities, and unlikely or "wild card" events, and identifying important policy and intelligence challenges.
Scenario One: Inclusive Globalization:
A virtuous circle develops among technology, economic growth, demographic factors, and
effective governance, which enables a majority of the world's people to benefit from
globalization. Technological development and diffusionin some cases triggered
by severe environmental or health crisesare utilized to grapple effectively with
some problems of the developing world. Robust global economic growthspurred
by a strong policy consensus on economic liberalizationdiffuses wealth widely and
mitigates many demographic and resource problems. Governance is effective at both
the national and international levels. In many countries, the state's role shrinks, as its
functions are privatized or performed by public-private partnerships, while global
cooperation intensifies on many issues through a variety of international arrangements. Conflict
is minimal within and among states benefiting from globalization. A minority of the
world's peoplein Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Central and South Asia, and
the Andean regiondo not benefit from these positive changes, and internal conflicts
persist in and around those countries left behind.
Scenario Two: Pernicious Globalization
Global elites thrive, but the majority of the world's population fails to benefit from
globalization. Population growth and resource scarcities place heavy burdens on
many developing countries, and migration becomes a major source of interstate tension. Technologies
not only fail to address the problems of developing countries but also are exploited by
negative and illicit networks and incorporated into destabilizing weapons. The global economy
splits into three: growth continues in developed countries; many developing countries
experience low or negative per capita growth, resulting in a growing gap with the
developed world; and the illicit economy grows dramatically. Governance and
political leadership are weak at both the national and international levels. Internal conflicts
increase, fueled by frustrated expectations, inequities, and heightened communal tensions;
WMD proliferate and are used in at least one internal conflict.
Scenario Three: Regional Competition
Regional identities sharpen in Europe, Asia, and the Americas, driven by growing political
resistance in Europe and East Asia to US global preponderance and US-driven globalization
and each region's increasing preoccupation with its own economic and political priorities.
There is an uneven diffusion of technologies, reflecting differing regional
concepts of intellectual property and attitudes towards biotechnology. Regional economic
integration in trade and finance increases, resulting in both fairly high levels of
economic growth and rising regional competition. Both the state and institutions of
regional governance thrive in major developed and emerging market countries, as
governments recognize the need to resolve pressing regional problems and shift
responsibilities from global to regional institutions. Given the preoccupation of the
three major regions with their own concerns, countries outside these regions in
Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central and South Asia have few places to turn
for resources or political support. Military conflict among and within the three
major regions does not materialize, but internal conflicts increase in and around other
countries left behind.
Scenario Four: Post-Polar World
US domestic preoccupation increases as the US economy slows, then stagnates.
Economic and political tensions with Europe grow, the US-European alliance deteriorates as
the United States withdraws its troops, and Europe turns inward, relying on its own
regional institutions. At the same time, national governance crises create
instability in Latin America, particularly in Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and Panama, forcing
the United States to concentrate on the region. Indonesia also faces internal crisis and
risks disintegration, prompting China to provide the bulk of an ad hoc peacekeeping force.
Otherwise, Asia is generally prosperous and stable, permitting the United States to focus
elsewhere. Korea's normalization and de facto unification proceed, China and Japan provide
the bulk of external financial support for Korean unification, and the United States
begins withdrawing its troops from Korea and Japan. Over time, these geostrategic shifts
ignite longstanding national rivalries among the Asian powers, triggering increased
military preparations and hitherto dormant or covert WMD programs. Regional and global
institutions prove irrelevant to the evolving conflict situation in Asia, as China
issues an ultimatum to Japan to dismantle its nuclear program and Japaninvoking its
bilateral treaty with the UScalls for US reengagement in Asia under adverse
circumstances at the brink of a major war. Given the priorities of Asia, the Americas, and
Europe, countries outside these regions are marginalized, with virtually no sources of
political or financial support.
Generalizations Across the Scenarios
The four scenarios can be grouped in two pairs: the first pair contrasting the
"positive" and "negative" effects of globalization; the second pair
contrasting intensely competitive but not conflictual regionalism and the descent into
regional military conflict.
Matrix: Drivers in the Global Futures Scenarios: 2000-2015
The National Intelligence Council
The National Intelligence Council (NIC) manages the Intelligence
Community's estimative process, incorporating the best available expertise inside and
outside the government. It reports to the Director of Central Intelligence in his capacity
as head of the US Intelligence Community and speaks authoritatively on substantive issues
for the Community as a whole.
Chairman (concurrently Assistant Director of Central Intelligence for Analysis and Production) |
John Gannon | |
Vice Chairman | Ellen Laipson | |
Director, Senior Review, Production, and Analysis |
Stuart A. Cohen | |
National Intelligence Officers |
||
Africa | Robert Houdek | |
At-Large | Stuart A. Cohen | |
Conventional Military Issues | John Landry | |
East Asia | Robert Sutter | |
Economics & Global Issues | David Gordon | |
Europe | Barry F. Lowenkron | |
Latin America | Fulton T. Armstrong | |
Near East and South Asia | Paul Pillar | |
Russia and Eurasia | George Kolt | |
Science & Technology | Lawrence Gershwin | |
Strategic & Nuclear Programs | Robert D Walpole | |
Warning | Robert Vickers |