The World is... What the World is...

?What is the world? How does it relate to you, or, perhaps more directly, how do you relate to the world? How do you see the world? How do others see the same world?

?This may seem like a simplistic question, but I assure you, it is not. The world is. That is, the world is what the world is. What you see may have no relation to what is actually there, but what is there is there. And what you see, or what others "believe" they see, usually has no relationship to what is actually there. For instance, gravity.

?Gravity is not nice, but it is the Law. Therefore, you violate that Law at your own peril, whether it is in a plane, or stepping off a three story building, or being grossly overweight. Gravity is the Law, and it will be obeyed, but this does not mean that people do not ignore it on an almost daily basis, and pay the bill for doing so.

?The rest of His Law is the same, and the Law will rule, if you can see what is happening. Most everything you see around you is for the simple reason of covering up His Law, and to keep you confused and pliable.

?To understand the world around you, you must first understand the illusions of the world; illusions created especially for you and those like you. But to understand the illusions, you first must be able to see the illusions. And to see the illusions, you first must be aware of the illusions, and to be aware of the illusions is to understand that everything "of man" is an illusion. Everything! All advertising, all government, all religion, as if anything "of man" was ever done for any purpose except to benefit those who organized or started the illusion in the first place!

?The only completely self-less force in the Universe is God; no other exists, or can exist. That is what this Part is about. Do you "believe" what you are told? Or do you accept God? The two are self exclusive.

Your challenges are yours;

Your difficulties will benefit you to the extent that you accept responsibility for overcoming them. Success begins when you stop looking for a solution and start becoming the solution. Don't get caught up in assigning blame, or in fretting about how unfair it is. Such pursuits are unproductive at best, and will often make the situation worse.

The problems you face are yours, no matter how they occurred. Assigning blame would be useful if you could reverse the flow of time, but you cannot. Life moves forward. Let your thinking and your actions move forward, too.

Right now, you can take action or you can look for a way out. Eventually, you'll discover that there is no way out apart from your own responsibility. Your challenges are yours. They can be your greatest assets if you'll accept them and work your way through them.


?Do you see the world, or are you concentrating on the illusions created for you? Electricity is a good example of what I mean. Do you enjoy those public service announcements by the power companies which are designed to save you money by reminding you to turn off a light or two?

?Of course, it is idiotic of us to "assume" that the power company is interested in saving us money when they depend on collecting as much from us as possible in order to increase their profits, but we never think of that! So, do you pay for the electrify you use?

?Strictly speaking, no.

?Strictly speaking, no one in the entire world who is hooked up to an AC power grid pays for electricity; they pay for the demand they put on the system. (Remember, systems are designed to benefit those who control the system.)

?The meter hooked up on the side of your house is not an "use" meter; it is a "demand" meter, and it measures the demand that you place on the available power. When you think about it, this only makes sense. Electricity that is generated can not be stored. Once it is generated, it is gone. They feed it into the power grid, and it never comes back; it must go forward at a constant speed until someone taps the line and uses it. That tap on the line is a demand for power, and the power company must honor it or the result is a brown out, or a black out if the power drop is severe enough.

?All power companies work under power demand; nothing else is important to them. They could care less how much total electricity you use in any given month, but they care very much about how much total demand you put on THEIR system at any one time.

?So what is the purpose of advertising and encouraging you to turn off a light or two? Think about it this way; it has never saved a single dime for any customer of the power companies, but it has saved millions and millions of dollars in added expense for the power companies themselves by reducing demand at peak times while leaving intact the single event during the month when your bill is determined by the largest single load you place on the demand meter hooked to your house or business.

?All in all, public service advertising, which is free for the public utility, is one of the smartest advertising ploys ever worked out. And one of the most successful! Let me tell you a little story.

?Here in Mexico, I know a woman who has a trailer set up on a lot. A very nice camper trailer about thirty-five feet long, with a new fence, patio, garage, and all the bells and whistles. Very nice set-up. She comes down to this location from her home in Phoenix about once a month. The first thing she does is turn on the air-conditioning, the lights, the stereo, the outside lights (of which there are quite a few!), and every other electrical device she has been able to pack into the property she controls here (she doesn’t own it, of course, since she pays taxes every year to the Mexican government, but that is another story).

?And every month, just like clock work, she gets what for here is a very large electrical bill, amounting to about $100.00, for two or three days, and it just incenses her. I have tried to explain what is going on, but... she is convinced that I’m a raving lunatic, and she WILL find out what is really going on. There must be an answer, you see, and it probably has something to do with these Mexicans! You know how they are! One of them HAS GOT TO BE TAPPED INTO MY POWER!!!

?She has had three different electricians check out her system, for leaks (?), for unknown taps, for anything to explain the "problem," and always, no answers. But what the heck, they’re Mexicans too! I guess she is going to worry this until she decides to sell the property or something else happens, because she certainly is not going to listen to me! In fact, she won’t talk to me anymore. Do you think it was something I said?

?Clothing is another interesting subject. I know a man who is one of the original researchers on law in America, for my generation, that is. His name is George Gordon, and he operates under The Law. And I mean, God’s Law, and has done so for many years. In fact, he has taken at least two cases where his Rights were violated to the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, doing all of the work and the pleadings himself, so his understanding is pretty good.

?One day George was walking through an exhibition in a large city. This particular exposition had a lot of different things in it, including electrical field generators and equipment to verify such. In essence, what this refers to is a device which can measure what every man has around him, which is an "aura," and there are ways to sense this aurora. George and his wife were walking past such a display when the man working in the display called out to him and asked him to step over and talk to him. Being a generally genial man, George was happy to oblige.

?He expected that the man was going to try and sell him something, but that was not what the man was after. What the man wanted was information. It seems that the display of equipment that the man was working with was one of those that measured the aura around people, but generally, the people had to be within three feet of the machine for it to work, and this time the machine had sensed George and his wife from twenty-five feet away! Why? That was what the man wanted to know, and George understood perfectly why.

?Because George obeys the Law, and his clothing is exclusively of natural fiber, generally cotton, and he wears no plastics or mixed fiber clothing. At all. At any time, or for any reason. (He appeared once in nothing but his cotton briefs in a "courtroom" when the jailers would not honor his request for proper clothing. The judge was not amused!)

?This part of the story goes back to the experiment with water from the faucet, live water, in a glass container and in a plastic container, and we are working with the same principles here. A number of you have related to me how well this experiment works; how when you put your fingers into the water in the plastic container it shorts out your muscle control and leaves you weak, and how, when you change and insert your fingers into the glass container of water, your energy and strength, particularly in the extremities of your body, is re-energized. This is because we are electrical beings, and our bodies work under the same principles as the earth does. To be a living being, we must exhibit electrical pulses, and anything which deadens those electrical impulses is bad for us, and for our health in general. Plastic deadens electricity. It does not conduct electricity, but more importantly, it inhibits it.

?Plastic clothing works in the same manner, and inhibits the body from the natural function of projecting itself into nature; I think this refers to the phrase "at one with nature," and is a part of that. When you wear plastic (i.e., rayon, nylon, etc.), you confine your body, and end up much more tired than you need be, and this probably has more than a little to do with how poorly our immune system works after an extended period of time dressing in mixed fibers/plastic and how poorly our bodies clean themselves too. Also, how poorly so many of us now relate to other people and feel isolated is probably a part of this as well. Actually, our aura is undoubtedly the life force within us, and everything that we do which inhibits or deadens our life force leads directly to dis-ease and the inability of our bodies to care for itself. But, judge for yourself.

?The principles are here for you to study and make your own choice. One thing, however, I will assure you of; until the so-called medical establishment rediscovers the real principles of life and our relationship with the earth, you will suffer unless you arm yourself with knowledge. By the way, just what part of Scripture is the most unimportant, anyway? Cause I guess I just don’t get it.

?What do you think of law enforcement? Probably not what you did a few weeks ago! But, is it there for you, or is it there to serve a different purpose than what you expect, and have been told is the purpose? Such as making the streets safe for you?

?What if law enforcement, as practiced "within" the United States, is actually a military function? And, if it is, can we identify why and how it is?

?First, let’s start with the obvious; have you ever been in the military, or read any books about the military? When someone is stopped at a military check point, what are the questions that are asked? Do they not ask for "identification and your papers, please?" What are you asked when a "law enforcement" individual stops you? Why do the spokesmen for law enforcement agencies refer to "the civilians?" Are we to gather from this that he is not a civilian? Is this why most all "law enforcement" is now in uniform? And if so, where is the proof?

?Why, in the code books, of course! If you will look in 22 USC 263A, and follow the threads, you will find that all "law enforcement" authority "within" the United States is under Interpol, by international treaty, and this includes ALL law enforcement. Interpol is a military organization, and perhaps this explains why all law enforcement now is in uniform. Including what was once the sheriff’s office, and is now the sheriff’s department instead.

?Do you wear a wrist watch? Where? On your left wrist? Because of habit, right? But what if, with the present day wrist watches, this is dangerous?

?It used to be that wrist watches had leather bands under the case of the watch, which insulated your skin from the watch. Why?

?Because the control point for your heart is on the back of your left wrist, right where the body of your watch now sets, and watches are electrical devices; devices which, in any number of cases, can and do interfere with the operation of people’s hearts. I think most of us have heard of how a man with a heart attack has shooting pains down his left arm, and this control point is why. If you have doubts about this, read up a little on acupuncture and see what I mean.

?Meanwhile, let me tell you a little story. Some years ago a woman I know and trust read my eyes. If you have no knowledge of this, it is a fascinating study. Anyway, she told me that I was very healthy, except for two problems. One relatively minor in that I had a lot of extra sulfur in my body. I took care of that relatively easily over a period of about a year.

?The other problem was different, and it was something I was aware of. She told me I had a heart problem. This was true, as I was suffering from an irregular heart beat which just occurred whenever it seemed that it felt like it. I thanked her and went on my way, armed with another piece of knowledge. It is interesting about knowledge; it seems as long as you look and accept, knowledge comes, and in particular, it seems to come when you need it the most.

?Sometime after that, at least a year later, I was at a conference of freedom loving men where a speaker informed the group about the problem with watches being worn on our left wrists, right over the control point for the heart. At that time, I shifted my watch to my right wrist, and, except for very brief periods of inattention, I have not put my wrist watch back on my left wrist, and I have not had an irregular heart beat since that time. Not a single one. I wonder, do you think it pays to listen? The men at the seminar also made a direct point that the new designs of watches are deliberate as another in the long list of population control measures.

?Organ donors are interesting people. They believe that they are actually helping other people. Is that what all of the advertising is about? Helping other people? Probably not. (Have you ever thought about what the Bible says about organ donors, or, for that matter, blood donors? No. Period.)

?I have known a couple of self made millionaires who got their money in the car salvage business. Cutting up cars that have no further value to their former owners so that the parts can be sold for about half of the price of new parts. It is a good business, and a big help for the less advantaged among us. In the body business, however, bodies that have no further use for their former owners takes on a whole different meaning, especially when you read of the harvesting of body parts from prisoners in communist parts of the world, and you better believe that these reports are true! Why the body parts? Why are they needed? Go back and review Part X, and then listen to the news about Walter Payton and the failure of his liver. Scripture tells us that everything we need for health is here, in nature, on the earth.

?As for Walter Payton, I suspect that a strong, prolonged dosage of Milk Thistle would do wonders for his liver, but that would be a crime in the eyes of the medical establishment. You see, in replacing his liver, there is at least a million dollars involved, plus the advantage of the advertising to tell you that there are no other choices available. On the other hand, a good, highly concentrated bottle of Milk Thistle, 120 tablets, enough for the first thirty days of dosing Walter Payton, will cost about $30.00. You do the math.

?As for the body parts harvesters, a good healthy body, cut up and sold, is worth about $150,000.00. Well, again, you do the math, because while the men I knew in the car salvage business paid for their wrecked or just old, worn out cars, the body parts purveyors have no costs involved in acquiring their stock in trade. I wonder where all the pressure for "organ donors" comes from?

?And how about those athletes! Aren’t they a great addition to our entertainment dollar!? Why, without these modern day gladiators, what would we do! Just think of how great their hearts are that they sacrifice their bodies for our entertainment, and for millions of paper dollars, but that is just incidental, I am sure. Of course, anyone who believes that the bankers are going to let such people, who, if you will read books like "You Gentiles," rank as little above nothing, keep that paper wealth, you are confused about what is planned for the dollar, and for people in general.

?And what about those athletes? Why, in a population in America where less than 14% of the population is black, are most of the athletes black? In the NBA, over 90%, and in the NFL, about 80%. Why? And don’t give me any of that drivel about less advantaged and having to struggle more and more poverty and and and and... Endlessly. Let’s talk about the real reasons. About why there are few black golfers, and few black hockey players, for instance. Because this is important in another area as well.

?There are three races that inhabit the earth. Is this important? I suspect so, or these would be facts that would be taught in our schools by the "government" and not left up to us to find. And let’s clear up a point right now before we go any further. I am not a racist! One of my best friends is black, and we call each other brother and mean it. In addition, my wife (Maria: Mary) is Mayan, as in Indian, and is obviously so, Indian, I mean. Her family is 100% Mayan, and I and they are very close. We get along well, play dominoes on a regular basis, and I love all of them. So this discussion is about Reality, not race.

?So, there are three races which inhabit the earth, and this is reflected in the three blood types found. Yes, there are four, but one of them is an amalgamation of types A and B; Type AB. There are other differences; a white man has one less rib than a woman (Read Scripture; and God took one rib from Adam... Why? Did you think Scripture lied? This is important in another area as well; a man IS not and can not be complete without a woman. Remember the part about a chemical union in Part X? If you and your wife are one, then there is a union, in more than just physical act; there is a permanent connection as well or man would never be whole again. This is also important when you consider the "religions" such as the Roman church who deny to their priests what God ordained.)

?A black man and an Asian man have the same number of ribs as a woman. Is this important? Probably so, or the difference would not be there, and when you hear of information about the origins of race, and stories about Adam not being the father of all races, perhaps you should give it some thought. Because while I am unsure of the actual facts, although I have heard a number of versions, I do know that something else occurred back at the beginning that has been hidden from our view. If it is hidden, it is done so for a reason.

?But back to athletes. Why are so many blacks prominent in certain sports? Especially those sports where the players must run and jump? Because their legs are different from the legs of a white man or an Asian man. The thigh bone is longer in relation to the height of the black man’s body, and his muscles are attached to the bone in a different manner. All of this simply means that an average black man, given the same training as a man from a different race, will always run faster and jump higher than the average man from either of the two other races. No real secret about it, but it is carefully covered up. You figure out why.

?Eustace Mullins is a fine researcher and writer. I highly recommend that you read every book he has ever written, and start with "The Curse of Cannan" for a good beginning education on where most of the problems on this earth come from. Very enlightening.

?Polls are an interesting subject. The "science" of polling was developed in Britain. Surprised? Shouldn’t be, not by now, and sorry, but I no longer remember the name of the think tank that did the developing, but if you are interested, I am sure you can find the information. The following story is interesting, about polling.


Not all polls agree on Clinton: Some portray widespread sentiment for removal...

By David M. Bresnahan © 1999

Which poll do you believe? Do you believe any poll? Which poll do your senators believe? Americans take it for granted that the polls demonstrate broad support for President Clinton in his impeachment trial.

A little research by WorldNetDaily uncovered many surveys that contradict that conventional wisdom. In fact, they show the exact opposite.

In a CBS News poll of 631 likely voters, 84 percent believe Clinton is guilty. An ABC News poll of 803 adults determined that 69 percent think Clinton is not honest and trustworthy. In the same poll, 73 percent said Clinton does not have high personal and ethical standards.

Brown University conducted a recent poll of Rhode Island registered voters and found that 71 percent believe Clinton lied to the grand jury, 65 percent think he committed perjury in his testimony, and 49 percent believe he committed obstruction of justice.

"If the election were held today, whom would you vote for in your congressional district, the Republican or Democrat," asked a recent Zogby poll of 923 likely voters. It was a tight race with 40 percent for Republicans and 39 percent for Democrats.

Opinion Dynamics conducted a poll of 911 registered voters for Fox News. A full 70 percent agreed that Clinton perjured himself.

Another Zogby poll of 993 likely voters found that 55 percent believe that lying before the grand jury is an impeachable offense.

There are many polls, with many different questions and equally many different answers. Polls are used by political consultant to determine if their political spin is getting the results they want. If the poll numbers are off, they spin a little harder.

Polls are not only used to measure results, they are used to influence. Political insiders use polls to manipulate public opinion and market candidates all the time.

David M. Bresnahan, a contributing editor for, is the author of "Cover Up: The Art and Science of Political Deception," and offers a monthly newsletter "Talk USA Investigative Reports."


?Do you really believe the polls about Clinton’s popularity? Are Americans really that stupid in your estimation? Now, be honest with yourself. Did you think that Americans were that dumb? Then you have admitted that you permit the media to sway your opinion, and you do this because you are not aware of the real use of media, not just "within" the United States and America, but over the entire world.

?That being said, it is rather obvious that the most controlled press in the world in is America, and that is why the Internet is the next target, and Y2K is a real event.

?What about population? Is the world over populated? IF you live in a city, your opinion is probably biased, but that is beside the point. Ever driven through the middle of Wyoming or North Dakota? Better do that before you answer this question. Or, you could do a little math. I recommend that you do so.

?Let’s take Montana as an example. If you will look in an Encyclopedia, you will find the area of Montana. Do a little math, and reduce this to a square footage figure, then divide the population of the entire earth, about 5.8 billion or so, into this figure, and you will find that if you moved the entire population of the earth to Montana, every man, woman and child on the face of the earth, they would EACH have about 880 square feet of living space. Each. This is enough area, used as an intensive garden, to nearly feed one person for an entire year, yet the rest of the world would be bare of people. Totally. So, where is the over population problem? Or is the problem centered in the greed of the multi-nationalists whose only desire is to rape and pillage the earth for profit, and to force more and more people into cities where they are usable as "human resources" and more easily controlled?

?You be the judge, but do the math before you accept the premise of "over-population." I expect the earth could easily support forty billions or so without straining, but it would have to be done with full access to clean power, which has been deliberately denied to us for decades, and the production of true food close to the populations, and not in the profit chains now used for the benefit of the self-styled elite.

?When the Roman Empire fell, the most fertile land in the Empire was lying fallow, and the people had been stuffed into the cities where they demanded bread and circuses. The land was lying fallow because the farmers had been taxed off the land, and the Empire was existing on what could be taxed from the outer provinces under the control of the Empire. Between the people having nothing left, such as their own piece of land and no longer willing to fight for the Empire, and the outer provinces tired of the over taxation, is it any wonder that the barbarians won?

?Understanding this is like understanding that the state is making every effort to act as our god. For instance, we have discussed other words. How about Holiday? Why does the government establish Holidays? For you, or for their own purposes? Where did the word come from?

?Holiday. Holi - day. Holy day. Pretty simple, really. In English language construction, when you join the words together, simply change the i to y. Remember, the more you look to "them," the more benefits accrue to "them."

?How about the Interstate Highway System? Is there more here than meets the eye? The federal government began regulating (remember; something is regulated for someone’s gain) trucks and trucking with the Motor Carrier Act of 1935. I am sure that the date in 1935 has a lot more significance for you now than it did before. In the 1950s, Eisenhower ordained that the Interstate system of highways be built. Not for your use, but for an interior means of defense against invasion. Since this is patently an absurd reason, you can expect that there is another reason.

?No other nation could possibly invade America without the active cooperation of those in power to see to it that it could be successfully done; not against 100,000,000 armed Americans. But, in the case of cooperation with those in power, an armed invader would find the interior lines of the Interstate Highway System to be an invaluable tool for control and transportation purposes. And, in older Road Atlas’s, you will find that the Interstate Highway System is designated as military roads. As you read this, please remember what I told you about the Russian plan of building roads in Afghanistan, and how this was planned and carried out in the 1950s so that the roads could be used in the late 1970s.

?It is amazing when you begin to understand the many and diverse ways in which our views are altered to the benefit of other men. In this regard, I would like to share another little story. I have mentioned that I have had a number of interesting talks with scientists, particularly physicists. One, a real genius with math, although a little lost in real life, had some interesting information having to do with some math formulas that he had worked up just for the fun of it. Math and gravity. That was what interested him.

?So he took the gravity of the earth and applied math to it, and figured in man, and found out that, in the Reality of math, we were not capable of moving on earth without other factors being brought into play. So, he altered his formulas, and figured in the balancing gravity of the moon and the sun. That helped, but not enough; not by a long shot. So he applied math to the rest of the solar system and ran the equations again. Better, but we still would be unable to lift a spoon to our mouths from the top of a table.

?Now, what we are talking about here occupied his spare time for many years as he reduced all of this information to math and worked the bugs out of the formulas. What particularly frustrated him was that he could not get an answer that satisfied the math, and allowed man to walk, run, eat, play or engage in any other activity on the earth. Until he changed his formulas again, and factored in ALL of the stars in the heavens. All of them, because the influence of any one star is so minute that it takes literally billions of them to balance the equations. Literally billions. His final deduction was that without those stars you see in the sky every night, you could not move on the face of the earth given the musculature of our bodies.

?What is the earth? Is it the center of the universe? I expect so, and that is why we are taught otherwise. What is the purpose of the universe, and why does it move in such stately and majestic splendor? For your enjoyment? Or is there purpose in it? I expect that the universe serves God’s purposes, just as we do. Think about that, and what this information means to your perceptions of life, and of Truth.

?Read the following carefully, and I suggest you sign up for the newsletter from Bible Believers. There is a lot of very good, and very important information that they have to share. Is it all absolutely true? Sorry, you have to be the judge of that; just remember, they are men as well. And, as you read, remember the shield around the earth before the flood, and where the water came from.


Establishment thinking is reflected in "Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace" compiled from three year's research by 15 experts, and submitted to the US Government in 1966. Proposed replacements for war included: an open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets and an extraterrestrial threat. (Note; I have seen and read a copy of this report, and seen the evidence of it’s authenticity. I believe the report is exactly as presented here. - David)

In 1976, Taylor Caldwell demonstrated in her summary of the Iron Mountain Report, the military genius of plans by Rothschild, Albert Pike and the World Revolutionary Movement She wrote: "There will be no peace in the tormented world, only a PROGRAMMED and SYSTEMATIC series of wars and calamities -- until the PLOTTERS have gained their objective: an exhausted world, willing to submit to a planned Marxist economy, and total and meek enslavement -- in the name of peace." (Taylor Caldwell, Ceremony of the Innocent, p.289, Fawcett Books 1976; Leonard C. Lewin, Report From Iron Mountain On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace, 1967; Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, 1985; War III).

Let's quickly examine these two proposed replacements for war: an open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets, and an extraterrestrial threat. There are no "aliens" to visit from outer space. Scripturally there is life on no planet other than earth. Man is the highest form of life and he has NOT landed on the moon.

In 1961, William Branham said: "If you go to the moon you couldn't set down because see, you'd jump right back up unless you had some magnet to hold you there. (Low gravity). You couldn't stay over night; you'd freeze to death. (One lunar night is 336 hours long). In the daytime you'd burn up. (One lunar day equals fourteen Earth days, but the temperature is constant 265 degrees F). What are you going to do when you get there?" (Basis of Fellowship 61-0214) (A lot of truth here. And this matches some of the discussions I have had with various scientists. - David)

The moon is almost 300,000 miles above the earth's surface. Two Van Allen belts located 300 and 2,000 miles above earth protect us from deadly radiation. The tremendous solar and cosmic radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, temperature control and other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere. NASA faked the Apollo moon landings. No man has been higher than 300 miles above Earth's surface, orbited or landed on the moon. Certainly not with any technology Americans claim to have used. (This is interesting, and you had better pay attention. Is this absolutely true? Probably. - David)

If you doubt this, explain how the astronauts walked on the moon's surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a constant 265 degrees F. NASA tell us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space. In this case they couldn't have walked, and the footprints which were photographed could not form on the moon's surface where gravity is so weak and the atmosphere so thin.

Most, if not all, of the photos, films and videotape of the Apollo Moon Missions are easily proven false. Their psychological effect, however, is very real, and intended to establish in people's minds that if man can travel to the moon, alien creatures can reach our earth. The moon landing was a psy-op by those lovely people who brought us Pearl Harbor, the fire bombing of civilians in Dresden, atomic bombing of Japan, Nazism, Communism, the Federal Reserve, IMF, UN, and that little-known real holocaust of over two million German soldiers murdered by American Jewish "revenge" (for what?) regiments in the two years AFTER World War II. (David Irving, NUREMBERG: The Last Battle, Focal Point Publications, London 1996; James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, Warner Books). (I have spoken previously about the death of a million or more German POWs after World War II while under the care of Eisenhower. - David)

If you don't believe NASA would LIE to you, let me demonstrate how your church, school and your government is LYING to you TODAY. The claim that 6 million Jews were killed by Germany in World War I was a LIE

( They pulled the same trick in the days of Rome. Gittin 57b (Talmud) states 4 billion Jews were killed by Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims they wrapped 16 million Jewish children in scrolls and burned them alive. However, ancient demography indicates there were not 16 million Jews in the entire world at that time, much less 16 million Jewish children (or four billion Jews).

In World War II, Rabbi Israel Goldstein announced 6 million Jewish deaths -- three years before the proclaimed events (New York Times December 13, 1942). This LIE was reduced to 4 million in 1979. But following a further resurrection of holocaust victims, their number was further reduced to 1.1-1.5 million by Walter Reich, former director of the US Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC (Washington Post, September 8, 1998).

The International Red Cross audit up to December 31, 1984 records a total 282,077 registered deaths of all internees in all German concentration camps from all causes. Deaths by natural causes were registered in triplicate; 23 copies of documentation were required to be registered for deaths other than by other causes) (;

Brother Branham said, "Russia, according to our own science, is five years ahead of us. And when we're caught up, in five years, they'll be ten years farther the other way. God is letting an ungodly nation, letting an ungodly people that took those Jewish scientists up there, and they are far ahead of us. We're putting our time to wine, women and big time. And they're working day and night, to blow us up... What's the meaning of these sputniks in the skies? What's the matter What is this modern Babylon that we're trying to build a machine to take us to the moon? YOU'LL NEVER MAKE IT. What's it all about? Science don't know. They're in a mad rush for something, and they don't know what it is." (Handwriting on the Wall #29:5, 15:121, 129).

But we know what it's all about. It's the "master race" working to build a totalitarian Marxist one world government, or NWO. The so- called moon landing is a part of an elaborate psy-op.

"Listen friends, there isn't a thing, this very hour, in the next twenty-five minutes or ten minutes, for Russia to send up it's satellite and sweep it over here across this nation, train it's missile, say, "Surrender, or in two minutes you'll be nothing but dust." They can do it right now. Think of it. They can do it right now."

(Up to that time America had been unable to launch a satellite. Now here's a picture of what WILL happen. Soon. Invasion of the United States).

NASA was created to make interstellar travel believable. The Apollo (i.e. "Lucifer") Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commission's Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a large-scale mock-up of the moon.

Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without ultimate discovery: and of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes. Russia could never claim a "moon landing" because Russia had no Walt Disney or Tomorrowland. (; NASA Mooned America?)

John Glenn's recent return to space focuses our minds back to that investment and breathes life into the myths taught in schools for thirty-years. The Masonic symbolism throughout the program shows Illuminati involvement and explains why the heads of all nations co-operate in perpetuating this LIE. They prefer the promise of a place in the NWO plot to the promise of a State funeral and local cemetery plot.

NASA's Hollywood production also explains the objective behind the CBS radio production, "War of the Worlds" which I was fortunate enough to hear when it was re-broadcast in Sydney last winter. All things work together for good to them that love God and are called according to His purpose. It was an experiment by the CFR on the American people. The US Government and those who control America have frequently experimented on citizens without their knowledge or their permission. But of course they are run by the same people who controlled Nazi Germany. And I don't mean the German people.

One of their own, John Dewey, said, "Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose." I think Ronald Reagan made a similar remark to the UN.

The Rockefeller Foundation funded the famous 1937 psy-op broadcast "War of the Worlds." Six million Americans listened as Orson Welles described an extraterrestrial invasion from Mars. Thousands responded in sheer panic and an estimated one million responded with sustained credulity and fear. Some committed suicide, and in Argentina the radio station was destroyed when citizens discovered the hoax. (That figure of "six" million itself indicates a hoax).

To these people we are accounted "human cattle" (That is why they number us). Read your Talmud (but not before going to bed -- you may have nightmares or feel so repulsed with the filth of that book you are unable to sleep). The fact is, this whole world is being set-up for massive depopulation and slavery. (The part about the Talmud being that filthy is correct. It is mind bending, it is so filthy and degenerate. One of the books of the Talmud is the book on witchcraft. I highly recommend that you find a copy of "The Talmud Exposed" and read it. - David)

An apparent extraterrestrial threat is definitely on the menu. People have been brainwashed by a steady diet of ET, Startrek and such like, so that when the Unites States brings fire from heaven, they will be deceived and turn to "that man of sin" man as their savior and not to God. In the United States the Law already states that contact with extraterrestrial beings or any space material is punishable by mandatory imprisonment at the discretion of a tribunal whereby you are guilty until proven innocent.

I'm not sure what mischief has been planned. German scientists are said to have built and flown very swift "flying saucers" during World War II. I am not able to speculate on these things but I have developed a greater respect for men like William Cooper who claim a knowledge and personal experience of secret installations and flying craft the size of aircraft carriers. (

NASA is reported to have a satellite-driven holographic projection system capable of producing realistic three-dimensional images over large areas of the sky. Could it be employed to paralyze the world into the united protection of a NWO by projecting an alien invasion? Was the Hale-Bopp comet real, or was it a recent test?

There have been many space deceptions recently like the discovery of fossil organisms in rock from Mars, and ice on the moon. Media speculation claimed a "city" approaching from outer space may be New Jerusalem, the Bride of Christ. How disappointing for the true Church on earth. Others claim to have detected a parallel earth, moon and sun. Whilst we are warned a collision with asteroids may mean the extinction of human beings as they falsely suggest caused the extinction of dinosaurs.

What is the real reason the GPS system is being turned-off from August 22 until December 31 this year? Is it possible the powers that be are restricting accessibility for some sinister purpose?

Phillip Day, Author of "Parousia," writes, "My background is in computers. You can take it from me that major chip manufacturers such as Intel plan their little silicon beauties down to the most minute detail. Nothing is left to chance or "under-designed", the potential for catastrophic litigation is far too great to overlook anything. In fact date and time functions are intrinsic to the development of faster and more versatile processors. No, this Y2K problem was not "accidental". It has presented one of the greatest strategic opportunities for the New World Order without anyone officially being able to lay the blame at the cryptocracy's door. It's "Gee, guys, someone messed up when computers first got going..." as in "Gee, guys, someone built this skyscraper and forgot the foundations." Meanwhile, many of the old, non- conforming chips will be thrown out the window and in will come the quintessential NWO processor, manufactured by the Boys, sold and installed for grandiose profits. It goes without saying.

Technicalities aside, it is the potential for satisfying mayhem that makes the concept of Y2K most appealing to the elite, which is why they are going to release a movie called, appropriately enough, "Y2K", through Warner Brothers in the Fall of 1999, just so people will react in a satisfyingly apocalyptic way when the real thing comes along a few months after."

One point I want to draw from Phillip Day's expert opinion is that he believes Y2K was a deliberate, planned, long-term exercise. The second point is that although Boeing's US$1.2 billion contract with the US Government is ostensibly to make America's satellites Y2K compliant, their task is impossible if they are non-compliant, because there is no way Boeing can replace the embedded chips.

One may reasonably assume civilian mainframe software and hardware would be replaced before the expiry of thirty or forty-years, so tolerating known design faults such as Y2K might be excusable. But satellites orbiting miles above the earth would have been designed and tested to ensure this problem did not arise.

So what are the facts? Someone is engineering a catastrophe. I can only repeat what God's Prophet has said regarding Revelation 13:13 and the other Scriptures we have quoted about signs in the heaven:

"And the Bible said that great final impersonator would rise up yonder and set on seven hills; he'd wear a triple crown, and he'd give power and have power, even so much as to make fire come down out of heaven in the presence of the people. He would do all of that, all of that in the last days."

". . . and I'll show wonders in the heavens above." Flying saucers and everything, great distress. And the earth will be shaken with divers -- big earthquakes will be coming, and great volcanics will take place, and great troubles and distress between the world. The nations will be trying to find peace with a knife behind their back; they'll be troubled in everywhere: all these things. And men shall grow worse and worse."


?Sign up for Bible Believers by following any of the links above. They have a newsletter that goes out, and their website is an incredible resource of information. How much of it you want to take literally, I do not judge. However, I will note here that they have a very different vision of what happened during the great flood and about what is coming in the world. Theirs is more conventional than mine, which I will talk about in Part XX. But mine is based on Israel as a people, not as a place; Israel was never a place, but always the tribes of Israel. The descendants who were to number as the grains of sand, as contrary to the Jews who number their own people every year.

?To begin to really grasp who Israel is, please write to the Philadelphia Church of God and request their two FREE books; "The United States and Britain in Prophecy" and "Mystery of the Ages." You can reach them at:

Philadelphia Church of god PO Box 3700 Edmond, Oklahoma 73083

?I suggest you do this right now, as you will need the book "The United States and Great Britian in Prophecy" when you begin Part XVIII, and they are free. This book is relatively short, no more than 60 pages, and it is a wealth of information.

?Please, once again go over the information about the stars (see above) and you will begin to grasp the difference that makes you realize our true relationship with God. He created the earth for us. Gravity and stars, and the reasons for them; and the reason for the universe itself, reveals the true nature of man and the true nature of God. Are we the center of the universe? I expect so. Is there any other part of the Universe which is capable of sustaining life? No.

?Drugs... What an interesting subject. Read on, dear friends:


Folks, Interesting data on deaths caused by illicit drug use versus adverse reactions to prescription drugs or meds administered under doctors' care. Interesting stuff. Why then, do we have a war on drugs? You get three guesses, the first two don't count. Regards, Brian


From: wolfeyes <>

Organization: CWA "" <>

Ladies & gentlemen: My friend Scott Dykstra has provided the 1996 figures on causes of death in America. Take a look at this:


from Scott Dykstra (

LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH in the USA in 1996 (unless marked otherwise).

According to the Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics, and the Journal of American Medical Association (for adverse drug reactions death numbers; April 14, 1998 issue of JAMA; 279: 1200-1205, 1998).


(unless year marked otherwise)

Total deaths........................................... 2,322,265


1. Heart Disease.......................................733,834

2. Cancer.............................................. 544,278

3. Stroke.............................................. 160,431

4. Adverse Drug Reactions (1994) from legal drugs at doses used for

prevention, diagnosis, or therapy.... 106,000*

* (see table below)

5. Pulmonary disease................................106,146

6. Accidents............................................ 93,874

7. Pneumonia/influenza...............................82,579

8. Diabetes............................................. 61,559

9. HIV/AIDS............................................ 32,665

10. Suicide.............................................. 30,862

11. Liver disease........................................ 25,135

14. Homicide............................................. 20,738

ILLICIT DRUG OVERDOSE: 3,800 to 5,200 (Deliberate or accidental) from all illegal drugs.

Got that? By the most accurate estimate, 5,200 people died as a result of illegal drug use in that year. No you are not mistaken or misled by these figures. 106,000 people died from adverse reactions to legal drugs!

Okay, I will admit that there are innumerable, non-death related problems associated with illegal drug use. I will stipulate to that. People become disabled and indigent as a result of illegal drug use, but look at the figure for liver disease: 25,135, and a substantial portion of that is due to "legal" alcoholism. And how many of those who committed suicide, 30,862, were under the influence of alcohol when they offed themselves?

I want to ask you this simple question: Are illegal drugs difficult to obtain today? And are illegal drugs more difficult to obtain now than they were when the War On Drugs commenced? The answer is a resounding NO.

People, the War On Drugs is a big fat, government sponsored LIE. There are no success stories associated with it, yet otherwise intelligent, well-intentioned people continue to support the WOD! The WOD is an abject failure. If there are just as many illegal drugs available for sale right now, and that fact is undisputed, how can anyone refute the fact that the WOD has had no effect on illegal drug use or availability?

Illegal drug dealing is a success only because it is illegal: Did you ever consider that possibility?

The very same people who support the WOD are the same geniuses who will admit that Prohibition was a mistake, but that the WOD is not. What's the diff? You ban something, and you open up a black market for it; and a lucrative black market, at that. You ban guns, and a black market will open for them. You ban aspirin, and a black market opens for aspirin. What in the hell is the matter with the minds of Americans?

If you want to kill something, you'd better know from whence it derives it's life, isn't that true? And if something derives it's life from the fact it has been branded as illegal, what is the next logical step?

No! You do not pull law-enforcers off the illegal drug dealers and let them have their way. We all know that would be stupid. What you do, is you make the illegal drug business unprofitable. You put these street hustlers out of business. And how do you do that? You allow the legal sales of these substances through licensed pharmacies at 15% over cost. No advertising allowed. If someone decides today is the day he becomes a drug user, let him! And when he buys those drugs over the counter, have him sign a release that says if he becomes ill, indigent or disabled as a result of his drug use, he will not be eligible for any form of social welfare or social medical benefits. He'll die in the gutter if he gets into trouble. So let him. Let's roll out the camera crew and record his last moments in the ditch, and then show that footage to the students in our public schools. You want effective drug education? That's the way to do it.

And what is the outcome? You have a society of people who consider illegal drug use to be about as bright as legal cyanide use.

Few people recognize the fact there are no "self-starters" in drug abuse. Illegal dealers, motivated by a profit motive, get others to try their wares through free samples, often at social gatherings where alcohol dims judgment and where peer pressure completely wipes out the influence of government sponsored programs like "Just Say No". (This man does not understand the D.A.R.E. program, or he would not mention it here. D.A.R.E. is the best advertising campaign ever devised for the promotion of drugs. - David) If the same pigeon knows he can purchase purer substances from the local pharmacy, why would he buy lesser quality substances from this predator at the party? That's how you kill the illegal drug trade, my friends. In fact, that is the ONLY way.

Carl F. Worden Liaison & Intelligence Officer Southern Oregon Militia


?Please read the above several times until you firmly understand that the number 4 cause of death in America is from legal drugs. Remember, as I said before, THEY ARE DRUGS! They are artificial substances which are impossible for our bodies to assimilate or use, and they will kill more and more people as time goes on. The only thing which keeps the drug pushers/manufacturers in business is the cooperation of the corporations we have allowed to manage our lives for the profits of select, corrupt men. More on this a little later. This is a good site to refer folks too who are all warm and fuzzy over the federal budget "surplus"! Does the so-called government ever lie to us? This is the wrong question; the proper question is does the so-called government ever tell us the Truth, and the resounding answer to this is NO!

?But then, what is government as we understand it in America today?> Subject: Ending Corporate Governance: Revoking Our Plutocracy

FYI Good historical and practical site



?We have discussed that the United States government is a corporation, and I have really left the subject alone for quite some time, more to let you adjust than anything. But just knowing that these are corporations does not answer all of the questions, because the most important one to answer, for full understanding, is: Where is the stock for these corporations? It exists!

?This is an essential conversation to what we are studying. No one charters a corporation except to register an interest of ownership. Yes, there is the so-called liability limiting function as well, and you see that in play as so-called public officials and the officers of drug pushing companies are held non-accountable for their actions, but that does not change the basic premise of corporations; every corporation which is chartered is chartered with stock issued. Part of this is revealed within the information that the United States government is now the largest stockholder in the IMF; a corporation owning stock must by definition have stock of its own which is carried on someone else’s books.

?Now, comes the QUESTION; you are an American, so what are you doing paying taxes to a corporation? So what makes you liable for the debts of a corporation (read as NATIONAL DEBT)? Why are you teaching your children to pledge allegiance to the flag of a corporation? Once you begin to grasp the real importance of these questions, you will begin to understand why your children are sent overseas to fight foreign wars for the profits of the stockholders of these various corporations. And for the profits of the money kings. More on this in Part XX.


How to stop the government from prying into your personal business...

THE END OF MONEY and the Struggle for Financial Privacy

by Richard W. Rahn (Discovery Institute Press, 1999)

IV7956 (hardcover) 223p. Publisher's price: $25.00 OUR PRICE ONLY $17.50

(reviewed by Jim Powell)

Economist Rahn reports there are over 3,000 federal criminal offenses in the US, plus millions of regulations. The Internal Revenue Code runs over 9,000 pages. This explosion of laws and regulations has brought government snooping on a gigantic scale.

Rahn shows how often government snoops get bank checking-account records, monitor overseas phone calls and otherwise invade privacy. He covers government seizure of the assets of peaceful people. He makes clear that government gains power to invade privacy in the name of supposedly high-minded objectives like stopping criminals and drug dealers, but the power to invade privacy is always abused.

Fortunately, Rahn explains that "new technology has made it impossible, at least in any cost-effective manner, to enforce such laws and restrictions and at the same time preserve civil liberties." He goes on to say that "The only form of communication remaining that an individual, with a high degree of certainty, can know is not being monitored is highly encrypted digital data. Other than a gun, this is one of the last individual defenses against corrupt or totalitarian institutions and individuals."

Rahn discusses the impact of the Internet (beyond the control of any government), the semiconductor chip (doubling in power about every 18 months), public key encryption (highly secure and becoming ever more difficult to breach), global futures markets (which enable anybody to learn the price of freely-traded currencies and commodities), asset securitization (enabling many assets to provide backing for private money), smart cards (storing money outside electronic communications systems) and the declining cost of communications systems (which makes it cheaper to use private money). He talks about the spread of optical communications and low orbit satellites which enable anybody using a pocket communicator to access the Internet--even when there aren't any wires around.

"Private money is on its way," Rahn declares, "and no government is going to be able to stop its arrival or its flow. Concealing one's financial transactions will be easy for those who wish to do so, and government efforts to make private money illegal or taxable will ultimately fail." (Says who? - David)

A provocative book with great news. "Richard Rahn is that rare, rare bird, an economist who can explain arcane matters in easy-to-understand language. Get the latest dope, in plain language, on the world banking and currency crisis, the techniques and importance of 'foreign' bank accounts, and how modern technology may spell the ultimate demise to intrusive and totalitarian governments." --Henry G. Manne, founder of the Law and Economics Center

THE END OF MONEY IV7956 (hardcover) 223p. OUR PRICE ONLY $17.50

This book can be ordered through our web site at


?And here we have Y2K in a nutshell. If you think that those with the power on this earth do not understand computers and their uses, and the power inherent therein, you are confused. They are not confused! They understood years ago what was coming and devised a method of dealing with it. Will this spell the end of all computing? No, but it will mean immense profits for them, and severe restrictions on personal use, perhaps through cost as much as anything. I can not conceive of a post-Y2K scenario where the corporations do not decree that "do to abuses in the computer fields which led to the severe dislocations of Y2K, it has been found that the wide spread and un-monitered use of computers is detrimental to the public good." Or words to that effect.

?Be prepared, that is what I am saying. But you can expect at some time that the same rules in effect within China will apply here to computers as well. There is simply to much information available to so many people, who otherwise would have no clue as to what is really going on. Preparation; for preparation information. When the corporations quit sending checks... To the welfare, social security, to the unemployed, to... virtually everyone, what happens? Think about it, and prepare.

Farm group warns of food supply

clusters By Janelle Carter, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) – Unless efforts are made to halt the pace of consolidation in agriculture, America's food chain will be controlled by a handful of corporations that will drive the independent family farmer to extinction, a farm group warned Thursday.

"We believe concentration will do more to influence the future structure of agriculture in the United States than the next farm bill,'' Leland Swenson, president of the 300,000-member National Farmers Union told the House Agriculture Committee.

"Many predict that we will soon have a system where three or four companies control the food and fiber system at every level, from the seed supply until the time it reaches the consumer,'' Swenson said.

Thursday's hearing was only the latest on the concentration issue. Concerns about the number of mergers in agriculture have risen since Cargill Inc. of Minneapolis, the nation's No. 1 grain company, announced plans in November to buy the worldwide operations of second-ranked Continental Grain Co.

With already low prices in both livestock and commodities markets, many lawmakers and farm groups worry that the Cargill-Continental deal, which is being reviewed by the Justice Department, will further depress prices for farmers.

"We can't continue to put the squeeze on those at the bottom of the production chain,'' said Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-Texas. (Of course they can, and they will! - David)

Harry L. Pearson, president of the Indiana Farm Bureau, said the American Farm Bureau also is concerned that concentration could lead to inadequate market access but has not taken a view on the Cargill-Continental deal.

But the National Farmers Union, which has called for a moratorium on mergers until the impact on agriculture is determined, painted a dimmer picture of what it calls "the industrialization of agriculture'' with a study it released by a team of University of Missouri rural sociologists.

In the livestock industry, four large firms in each sector are slaughtering four out of five beef cattle; three out of four sheep; three out of five hogs and half of all chickens, the study said.

In fact, 95 percent of all chickens are processed under production contracts – a trend that concentration critics fear could stretch to other areas of livestock.

"The farmer becomes the grower, providing the labor and often some of the capital, but never owning the product as it moves through the food system and never making management decisions,'' the report said.

The report also raised concerns about a "seamless system'' where companies control products from "gene to shelf.'' Such clusters are already forming, the authors wrote, pointing to alliances between Monsanto, one of the leading biotechnology firms, with Cargill.

Another example of a major food chain player would be ConAgra, the report said, noting the company has subsidiaries along most links in the food chain.

Still, Mark Drabenstott, an economist who heads the Center for the Study of Rural America at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, told lawmakers that consolidation in agriculture is "generally a positive trend'' that leads to lower priced and higher quality food for consumers. (If you are receiving ACRES USA, the lie behind this is obvious to you. - David)

"Farmers face a simple test, build new relationships or be left out of the game,'' Drabenstott said. © 1999, News America Digital Publishing, Inc. d/b/a Fox News Online. All rights reserved. Fox News is a registered trademark of 20th Century Fox Film Corp.


?Right, and we see one corporation being asked to oversee the operations of other corporations, and both probably have interlocking ownership at the top, but we expect that something good will come out of the mix, for the common man. This flies into the face of all reason and intelligence. And within this, you see the preparation talked of before as being even more necessary, as is the absolute need to begin to understand real food, nutrition, and establishing supplies of the same for yourself and your family. Not just in the event of a crash of the economy, but for the reasons of common sense.


Subject: [Melchizidekpriests] Dial Daily Bread

[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]

From: Dial Daily Bread <> To:

Subject: Dial Daily Bread

Dear Friend of Dial Daily Bread:

The Y2K problem (or potential one!) is driving many to stockpile food, toilet paper, generators, diesel fuel, etc. Even burying gold or silver in the back yard. Common sense is commendable. Says the Wise Man: "A prudent person foreseeth the evil" (Pr 22:3). "Go to the ant, thou sluggard . . .which . . . provides her food in the summer and gathers her food in the harvest" (6:6, 8).

Does Jesus say anything that might be relevant to this totally unprecedented problem of Y2K? Maybe! "Why do you worry . . .? Do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things" (Mt 6:28-32). Now before you accuse me of programming personal disaster, let me repeat, "Common sense is commendable." Be reasonable. Use good judgment.

But the REAL "famine" we face that we shouldn't forget is what we read in Amos 8:11-13: "People will be hungry, but not for bread; they will be thirsty, but not for water. They will hunger and thirst for a message from the Lord. I, the Sovereign Lord, have spoken. People will wander . . . from the north to the east. They will look everywhere for a message from the Lord, but they will not find it. On that day even healthy young men and women will collapse from thirst" (GNB). "Healthy"? It means happy Christian Baby-Boomers and Gen-Xers who are in the habit of going to church (maybe even prayer meeting?) but have never learned to "hear the word of the Lord" (that's the KJV rendering). Never sensed the soul-tingling thrill of knowing the Holy Spirit has spoken to YOU personally through the Bible (see Isa 66:2); never learned to LOVE the Bible more than they love a bagel for breakfast; never learned to shed tears of contrition-not in fear of disaster or punishment, but hot tears for wounding the Son of God (see Zech 12:10), never learned to regard what's in the Mall as "garbage" in comparison with an acquaintance with Him (see Phil. 3:8). The Year 1999 is a good time to "seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness" (Mt 7:33). I repeat, THAT IS ALSO COMMON SENSE.

Be sure to check your e-mail for Dial Daily Bread again tomorrow. Please forward these messages to your friends and encourage them to subscribe.

Robert J. Wieland's inspirational "Dial Daily Bread" phone message is available via e-mail to anyone who wishes to receive a daily portion of uplifting Good News. "Dial Daily Bread" is FREE. If you wish to add, delete, or make changes to e-mail addresses, send this information to: Due to travel or other circumstances, there may be intervals when "Dial Daily Bread" will not be sent.

The Dial Daily Bread web page resides at:

The last web page update was on 1/31/1999.

There is also have an archive at

Please also visit The 1888 Glad Tidings Newsletter web page at:

"All authority is given to me in the heavens and in earth. So go and make disciples (Talmidim) of all peoples, immersing them into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit (Ruach H'Kadosh);..." ***Last words of Yahshua (Jesus) on earth - Matthew 28:18-19.***


?What do you "believe" about God, and what do you know to be true about God? Gravity is true, and it comes from God, just as the Universe does, so... What passages from the Bible have you discussed with your children, or your wife, or your family? What is the meaning of life? Why are we here, on this earth, and why, in particular, at this particular time in the His-Story of the earth? What is the Law? Who is the Law for? What is the meaning of the Law? What is important in your life?

?Are you really worried about your house? Is it important to you to have a big, fancy home next to other big, fancy homes? Why? In 100 years, who will care? In 50 years, who will care? In 25 years, who will care? Who cares now? You, and only you. Because it is not important to anyone but you, and you permit it to be important, despite all evidence to the contrary.

?Food is important; your children, and how you teach and feed them, are important; your relationship with your children, your wife, and your family as well as your relationships with others of like mind are important; and, above all else, This is the Number One important thing on this earth: your relationship with God, through His Beloved Son, is important. Nothing much else matters.

?If you are confused on these matters, then God help you, because I can not. This is something that you must resolve to your own satisfaction, and I hope you do so soon.


From: "Freedom Law School" <>

Subject: L&J: Re: There is no such thing as a Social Security Trust fund.

Your article about the so called budget surplus and Social Security was a pleasure to read. It contained one misunderstanding regarding the "Social Security Trust Fund" which I beg you to take note of.

There was NEVER such thing as a "Social Security Trust Fund"; It is a BIG LIE; a FRAUD and DECEPTION which has gone on for too long. The language of the original Social Security Statute (Act of August 14, 1935, Chapter 531, 49 Stat. 620), explicitly stated that the money raised by this new income tax (yes the Social Security and Medicare Taxes are merely income taxes in disguise, with no deductions) go into the GENERAL FUND of the U.S. Treasury; Meaning that Uncle Sammy can do whatever he pleases with that money. (Please read this carefully: the corporation that resides in Washington, DC, simply let you apply to pay another income tax through the Social Security fraud. - David)

At the same time, FDR (may he pay the price for his treasonous lies), began a campaign of deceiving the American People into believing that the Social Security Tax money is not a tax at all, but merely "your own money going to your own saving account for your future retirement."

FDR was so successful at deceiving the American people that when in the case of Helvering v. Taylor, 310 U.S. 619 (May 24, 1937), the U.S. Supreme court pointed out the law (referred to above) to the losing citizens, the lawyers of Helvering were surprised; These lawyers (who were supposed to know the law) were also deceived by this campaign of deception of FDR.

In fact, the Supreme Court pointed out, that if the money were to go from one group of people (the Taxed) to another group of people (the Retirees), it would constitute a "taking of property (money) without the due process of law". Therefore the drafters of the law were correct in writing the law in a way that all the Social Security money would go into Uncle Sammy's General Fund.

Today you still hear many people cry and scream about "protecting the social security trust fund" when there is none in existence to save. Let's begin saving our great American Republics from the New World Order of the Banksters with true understanding of the law and truth. Let's live FREE NOW! Yours in Freedom, Peymon Mottahedeh, President, Freedom Law School


?That is right; Social Security is simply another disguised tax; so if you think that when they have the chance, through economic disruptions, to stop giving out all of those checks, you better believe that they will take it!

?Is there anything that we are told today that is not a lie? Nope! As I told you way back in Part III, 99%, at least 99%! Of everything you hear is a lie.


From: "jay rutledge" <>

From: DanMeador <>

Since about 1973, |the Internal Revenue Service hasn't even been able to take FRN's in payment of tax. But "public money" is a whole different critter as it has to be "created" by either private or public borrowing.

You are saying, then that Federal Reserve Notes are not legal tender for all debts public and private since about 1973? And that the Federal Reserve Notes circulating as cash are not part of the public debt ?


The Federal Reserve [bank] Note is a private scrip; there are no implementing regulations for the statute behind it to make it applicable in the several States; when Nixon detached our money from gold for international exchange purposes, and twice devalued it, it ceased being worth anything. That's when IRS ceased taking the stuff for payment of tax. I don't recall the I.R.C. section which authorized it for payment of tax, but it was repealed in either 1972 or '73.

We found this out in about 1995. Actually, by accident. A guy in Nebraska who was part of a class action managed by Lindsey Springer, who operates from a base in Tulsa, attempted to pay an assessment with FRN's. IRS personnel ran from them like a vampire from a cross. We then located the Code section, and Lindsey took the matter up in administrative & judicial forums. When he developed an "offer to pay" in FRN's, the government came back with something to the effect of there being no authority "to provide the relief..," requested.

Obviously, the FRN, so far as IRS is concerned, does not meet criteria of cash or its equivalent. Nor do they take love and affection for payment of tax. So what does that tell you?

If you happen to have a FRN handy, you will see that it is issued under authority of "The United States of America".

The Constitution vests authority in the United States, not the United States of America. We've demonstrated in various other transmissions that this particular "United States of America" is a relatively new creation comprised of territory (District of Columbia) and insular possessions of the United States (Puerto Rico, etc.) subject to sovereignty of the United States, not the original United States of America formally established in Article I of the Articles of Confederation. It is currently defined as an "agency of the United States" (see notes following 18 U.S.C. 1001; definition of "agency" at 18 U.S.C. 6), and if the EEOC definition someone else put into a discussion group is correct, as a corporate entity.

No, the "public money" scam is the far larger issue. There have been Title 31 regulations on the books for years instructing Government paymasters to press for electronic deposit. You will note the current Social Security Administration push for direct deposit. And as previously suggested, if you will read regulations relating to Federal Tax & Loan Depositories at 31 CFR 202 et seq., you will see that only officers and employees of the United States and its political subdivisions are authorized by law to receive and use "public money".

I haven't completed the George Mercier material yet, but think he is probably correct about the "bank signature card" being one of the key elements of fraud in the system that extends the contractual "equitable" (Ha!) remedy, civil and/or criminal, that hooks so many people in.

Think about it: "Public money" is based on obligations of the United States (Note: this is a corporation. - David) -- it is "credit" money. Whoever receives it is not paid for service, the United States is simply "discharging" the obligation to pay for service by advancing so much credit (debt of the United States), then whoever receives it passes "credit of the United States" along rather than ever paying for goods and services. This is the front end of our definition of "credit" in the Truth in Lending Act: The term "credit" is defined as the grant of authority [privilege] to defer payment of debt, or to create debt then defer payment.

When federally chartered financial institutions loan "money", they aren't loaning money. The loan "credit", with the credit "hypothecated" on credit of the United States -- Uncle Sugar stands in the background as third-party surety. In effect, Federal government tacitly underwrites all transactions to defer payment for goods and services, and all bank-generated lending.

To go one step further with this, FDIC insures ONLY "public money" deposits, and since ONLY officers and employees of United States Government and political subdivisions of the United States may lawfully possess public money, you are presumed to be a Federal employee if and when you open an account or secure a loan from a Federal Reserve-member or FDIC-insured financial institution. Your signature on the bank signature card therefore becomes "conclusive evidence" unless you are aware of its implications and know how to break one of the premises of the constructive trust.

Again, I haven't gotten through all of Judge Mercier's material yet, but I doubt seriously that he went into the "public money" scam, and he most certainly didn't distinguish between the "geographical United States" (territory and insular possessions of the United States) and the several States party to the Constitution. This is also key to the discussion as the Federal Tax & Loan Depositary may engage in lending only in the geographical United States -- it is only in territory and insular possessions of the United States that it legitimately serves as "fiscal agent" of the United States.

The question of "value" has been debated endlessly in the various discussion groups, so maybe asking the value of the FRN if IRS won't accept it in payment of tax has some merit. In other words, do 30 FRN's have any more value than 30 DMN's (Dan Meador Note)? Hardly. Whatever value the FRN has is simply perceived value; it has value only because Wal-Mart, the corner grocery and the gas station accept it in lieu of payment. On the front the thing says, "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE", but it says absolutely nothing about being lawful tender, and unless you know the "United States of America" is an agency of the United States, etc., you don't know where the stupid thing is legal tender. And it isn't even a "Federal Reserve Note" as such, it is a Federal Reserve [bank] Note. (see H.R. 1491 of March 9, 1933). (This is the beginning of where Dan and I disagree, and I know I am right. Federal reserve notes are not "perceived value," because everyone needs federal reserve notes to extinguish their debts to the bankers. The value, in salvaging the people’s pledged security, is very real. - David)

As to whether or not the FRN is part of the public debt ... it's darned sure part of the public fraud, whether part of the debt or not.

In the lower left corner on the face, you will notice that your FRN is signed by the Treasurer of the United States, and in the lower right corner, it is counter-signed by the Secretary of the Treasury. In other words, the FRN represents some kind of contractual obligation, but the matter needs considerably more study. This is particularly the case since recent research has demonstrated that at least some of our Secretaries of Treasury have been Secretary of the Treasury of the United States in name only -- they are nominated and confirmed as Governor of the so-called World Bank and other international development banks, most of which are chartered through the United Nations. Then there is the matter of the Treasury: Are you curious as to why the Treasurer of the United States would contract with the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States to create an obligation of the United States through a Federal Reserve Bank? It appears that the Treasurer of the United States who signed the FRN I am looking at is in the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. I'm curious as to how he got that title unless the Federal Reserve, as fiscal agent of the United States, is actually bankruptcy administrator over United States Government? Or maybe he is administrator over spoils of economic war. I haven't decided exactly why United States Government needed a private "fiscal agent" or exactly what a fiscal agent is or does other than manufacture money and credit out of thin air. Maybe it's simply another term for well-heeled, successful scam artists. Dan Meador


?No, Dan, it is much simpler than that. We will go over part of this again, possibly in Part XX, but the answer is so simple, and I can not get Dan off dead center to look! He is convinced that the Constitution is the finest document ever written, and... Well, enough about that.

?The "money" scam was well discussed in Part VI, so you have a better back ground than Dan Meador does in beginning to understand. But just as important as Part VI is Part VII, which reveals the real nature of what is going on. As I spoke above, and as I have pointed out before, the real value in federal reserve notes is the need of people to collect the notes to cancel debt for which those same people have pledged their homes, cars, businesses and on and on endlessly.

?Because of the nature of a credit system, where the interest is unpayable, it is very necessary that the pool of debt expand endlessly. Since it is physically impossible for anything to expand endlessly, we have a small problem coming; a run on the banks as people wake up.

?This is doubly dangerous for you, because all bank lending is dependent upon YOUR money being "on deposit" in the private commercial banks which "create" money "within" the United States. Think about this: When a bank accepts new deposits, it must create new debt within a short time using the new deposits so that the new debts which created the new deposits can be serviced. The commercial banks must stay close to 100% loaned up to their reserve requirements or many new loan failures result from a lack of new notes/debts in circulation which people can use to extinguish the old debts, and, of course, pay the interest owed to the banksters.

?When people begin to run the banks, and they will, as history proves time and time again, the banks are in an impossible position. Their reserve requirements are absolute, and can not be violated. Therefor, once a short run pulls their available deposits on hand down to the level required for their reserves, every dollar withdrawn after that requires that they call in at least $10.00 in loans, and they must do it NOW!

?Here is the math; for every dollar which goes out the door, they must recall at least $10.00. Ten for every one dollar withdrawn. It does not take a math genius to understand that when bank runs start, and bank lending stops, we are in the beginnings of a great depression, and it will be a really long, hard one. So when I told you before that your life was going to change, believe me, it will happen, and the above is a big part of the reason why. And the demand for dollars will be very extreme for a short period of time; this is another reason why they are transferring new international lending to the Euro. Meanwhile, as the dollar implodes and devalues, the bankers will use their reserve to buy up everything that is not indebted to them, paying in many cases much more than fair market value just to get their hands on what they want. It does not matter; there does not exist but a small fraction of dollars necessary to extinguish all existing dollar debts.

?Now, when you read what Dan has written above, the part he is missing is the understanding that I just wrote, and the nature of the corporations that authorize using debt as currency. He still thinks of the United States government as a government, and does not recognize, nor give credence to the true significance of the information about it being a corporation. The nonsense of permitting a corporation, designed for economic gain and profit in commerce, being allowed to manage our lives for the profit of unnamed men is beyond me. I will not permit it.


Greetings gentlemen, I received a call last evening from an editor of a patriot publication and he reminded me of an item I wrote a couple of months ago. He said I should do more writing. I dunno. Anyway here it is for pass on including address: "Proud to be an American ?"

I used to be proud that I lived in the world's first constitutional republic. Now I am told it is a "democracy", the final step before a dictatorship.

I used to be proud that this nation was an example of right for all to follow. Now I am ashamed to call myself an American because of our decline into wrong.

I used to be proud that we had a free nation of law, under GOD. Now we are a nation of "public policy", under bankruptcy to international bankers.

I used to be proud that I was born free and lived in Michigan state, a geographical area. Now I am told it is a corporate "State of Michigan", and I am subject to its statutes, codes and laws.

I used to be proud that the citizenry knew their rights and where >they came from. Now most believe that they only have privileges granted them by the all powerful corporate state.

I used to be proud when I knew juries and grand juries stood against bad laws and judges. Now they are nothing more than a prosecutorial tool of the prosecutors and judges.

I used to be proud of the education standards of our schools and university's. Now there are courses taught like 28 ways to shake hands and advanced basket weaving.

I used to be proud of my honorable military service in time of war. Now I know the people were, and are, constantly lied to about the causes and prisoners of that war.

I used to be proud when I saw a person in most any uniform on our streets. Now I fear for my safety because that person does not have me or my nation's security as his goal.

I used to be proud when I saw the "United States" (No yellow fringe) flag flying in our state. Now I see it as the symbol of a fearsome, manipulated, foreign corporation that is anti-American people.

I used to be proud to assert my right to vote for the statesman of choice. Now it matters not for whom or even if I vote, as politicians, mostly lawyers, are bought and paid for.

I used to be proud of the people at my local media for reporting truth, justice and all the news. Now it is controlled by the "editor" who censures it so that people cannot make fully informed decisions.

I used to be proud when I paid my fair share in taxes to support my government. Now I am aware none of that money goes to support our government.

I used to be proud that one qualification to become a police officer was local residency. Now the applicant must be a "citizen or resident of the United States", which is a foreign corporation.

I used to be proud that I had the freedom to travel without fear most anywhere in this nation. Now I worry when I see a policeman, lest I be caught breaking some edict of government and be jailed.

I used to be proud that all our government guarded my privacy as one of its main jobs. Now its main job is nothing less than the invasion and abolition of the privacy of all of the citizenry.

I used to be proud that I maintained my home and land well. Now I dare not improve it because I may not be able to afford the tax increase.

I used to be proud to enter most any neighborhood in this nation to visit friends or family. Now I fear doing so lest it be a "known" drug or crime area and my car be confiscated.

I used to be proud that I had been called to serve for jury duty. Now I avoid the courts as just another "business for profit" in the law enforcement industry.

I used to be proud that my neighbor's were watchful of my lands and property. Now I fear they could be the cause of its forfeiture for some victimless, mala prohibita crime.

I used to be proud that I had a right to responsibly own, possess and use "arms". Now those actions are being used to label me as "anti-government", or "militia", "terrorist", or worse.

I used to be proud to stand up and be counted as a loud voice on numerous issues. Now I hesitate to do so, should I, or my family, become targets of ignorant vindictiveness.

I used to be proud that I could read, study, and live, my religion's teachings. Now if I do so, I am falsely branded as "white supremacist", "anti-Semitic", "radical", "racist", or worse.

I used to be proud that I did not need government identification for all personal interactions. Now I fear that a national identification document for all transactions is law in the land.

I used to be proud that I could say or write most anything, with responsibility. Now if I speak or write freely, expressing unpopular views, I am called a "paper terrorist" or worse.

I used to be proud that I could teach my children my religion's moral views and ways. Now, if I do so, I may be charged with the crime of teaching religion without training and a license.

I used to be proud that my children were properly punished when they did wrong. Now I fear to do so because I might be charged with "child abuse".

I used to be proud to let my children learn by doing things for themselves. Now if I do so I may be charged with "child neglect".

I used to be proud that my spouse and I had a marriage license, believing it was required. Now I learn it is permission to the false god, the state, to control me, my spouse, and my children.

I used to be proud that I was among the creators of this earthly government. Now I am told I must obey any unreasonable demand of it's lowliest bureaucrat, as he is over me in authority.

I used to be proud to grasp and shake the hand of anyone, in mutual honor, dignity and respect. Now most want to "slap hands", in which there is no mutual honor, nor dignity, nor respect.

I used to be proud that my debts were "paid" with substance, not cheating those I dealt with. Now debts are "discharged" using "debt instruments".

I used to be proud that I was "no-account" and not a "shill" for debts. Now I cannot conduct business without approved "identification", "credit" or an "account with us".

I used to be proud that I could actually do a wide variety of things without anyone's permission. Now I am told I must ask permission of government beforehand as I may be violating some prohibitive law.

I used to be proud that my word could be believed as truth and without deceit. Now people will not believe even the most honest person because of the constant lies they get.

I used to be proud to be a responsible, conscientious, hard working, honorable, caring, voting, spouse, father and member of the political community. Now I am ridiculed, threatened, harassed, cheated, conspired against, and made a criminal, risking reputation, life and limb, because of my religious beliefs, my gun ownership, my stand on certain moral issues, my lack of instant compliance to every minuscule demand of government at all levels, and my sacred responsibility to my children, family, neighbors and nation.

Thank You "Workers of Iniquity"!

Proud to be an American? I don't think so, Tim.

James DeArman

P.O. Box 0913 Pinconning, Michigan


?Pretty interesting when you have the background to understand what this man has written, and the real depth of the "Workers of Iniquity" lies and deceit.


Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. is president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.

Even on the international level, no one is safe from the criminal actions of U.S. government policy. Indeed, U.S. foreign policy increasingly resembles the lawless behavior of a rogue state. We were told that U.S. air raids on Iraq last month were directed only at official buildings and sites. But a new U.N. report, buried by the U.S. media, reveals that the U.S. government has as little regard for foreign private property as it does for domestic.

The bombs damaged an agricultural school and at least a dozen other schools and hospitals (including a maternity hospital and an outpatient clinic). It wiped out the water supplies for 300,000 people in Baghdad. Bombs destroyed an important steel factory, and smashed a rice storehouse in Tikrit, north of Baghdad. In the Kurdish north, an entire secondary school was blown to smithereens.

There is a reason why international law has traditionally forbidden these kinds of tactics. They are worse than uncivilized. They are the actions of a terror state. And coming on the heels of the senseless destruction of a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan, they illustrate why the U.S. government has taken its place as the most hated institution in the world. (And this is the absolute truth. - David)


?No matter what I write, there will be a certain hesitation in many of you to accept the true depth of the evil that resides in the men who currently occupy Washington, DC. You will not be able, because of your own natures, to think of them as the murdering beasts that they really are. I understand that. It is better in some ways, because it does reveal more about you than about them. However that may be, the next subject is necessary to understand the world today and where America is headed. When I tell you that your life is going to change, your resistance to that knowledge is important, that you do not do something dangerous to your family without clear and steady deliberation. Provided also that your resistance to changing in the face of knowledge does not compromise that same safety. The people who head up the corporation in Washington, DC, intend to kill approximately 40% of the people living in America, and herd the remainder into what the UN calls "land use planned" enclaves. This following information is just one little tid-bit of the information that has been flowing over the net about this subject.


Subject: Contrails: Here is an attached text file.

Sent this to my Congressmen today. Suggest y’all go and do likewise. Hey, where are the Green Team goons when we need them? And what will Mr. Gore and his fellow eco-freaks do about this? – Hell, maybe it’s too late?


The lab director of Aqua-tech Environmental using samples taken from JP-8 contaminated fields of Maryland and Pennsylvania, reported today (9/18/97) that ethylene dibromide, otherwise known as EDB, has been the contaminate in the fuel and water samples taken or submitted by farmers, pilots and tanker drivers. EDB is one of the most tightly controlled EPA substances and was banned in 1983 due to its carcinogenieity. EDB is a pesticide that apparently is being placed in the jet fuel and dispersed on a daily, almost non-stop basis in our skies. The lines filling our skies are not contrails. The lines are dispersed and may linger for hours, slowly filtering down to unsuspecting pests, and I guess we’re the PESTS.

Water samples are contaminated with EDB and crops are dying. EDB is just one more avenue for the UN NWO folks to starve us to death and make us ill by weakening our already compromised immune systems. Exposure to this toxic chemical may lead to cancer, liver and kidney damage, pulmonary edema, damage to a developing fetus and reproductive organs of both men and women. Let’s not forget that the chemical may also cause sterility. Doesn’t that fit into their plan for population control? They have really found the perfect chemical. EDB is a carcinogen and a mutagen that may also cause eye and skin irritation, cardiopulmonary arrest, and binds to DNA. Skin blisters and respiratory failure are other conditions caused by ethylene dibromide.

The conditions are too numerous to list but this will give you an idea of problems caused by this chemical. EDB is a carcinogen at any exposure level and humans are more susceptible than animals to the acute toxic affects. This does not mean that it will not kill animals. We have reports from California and Wyoming of the birds dying.

Ethylene dibromide was used in leaded gasoline until 1983 to remove lead from engines and was found in engine exhaust. This chemical is a heavy liquid with a chloroform-like odor that becomes a gas at temperatures greater than 40 degrees F. The higher the temperature it is dispersed at, the more toxic it becomes, therefore dispersing from a jet would be ideal.

The compound is stable, meaning it does not easily decompose. This would account for the substance staying in the sky for long periods of time. EDB is only slightly soluble in water, but dissolves easily in organic solvents. JP-8 is considered an organic solvent. A water sample from rain would be an excellent way to verify contamination and a fuel sample so much the better.

Please note that EDB is a colorless liquid, with a sweet odor, however no smell does not mean you are not being exposed. Substances are also added that counteract the smell. Pilots please note that dispersing JP-8, along with these toxic chemicals is killing people. You are not counteracting any type of biological that has been spread, or any antidote of any type.

We now have proof that our government is using chemical agents on populated areas they are adding it to military jet fuel. Have you ever looked up at a vapor trail behind military aircraft flying so high a symbol of Americas power. Look again!

Commercial jets also leave a lovely (non-toxic) vapor trail when the heat from the turbines come in contact with the cool air condensing the water droplets into steam. Softly the lines defuse into the blue sky. So what is different about the military aircraft, the answer is simple; It’s the Fuel JP-8+100 is some really bad stuff. When you look up over the skies of New York City on a clear, sunny morning you see the military aircraft making patterns across the sky with their vapor trails. The smoke is thick and does not go away. When it comes in contact with the sunlight it turns to a purple color, then dissipates into a over cast Purple Haze.

So what is this Purple Haze; A fuel sample of JP-8+100 was taken to an independent lab (NON GOVERNMENT FUNDED) and broken down. The sample revealed two toxic substances. 1. Ethylene Di Bromide

2. Zinc Chloride

EDB attacks the liver, lungs, and skin, causing liver damage, Lung and skin Cancer.

Don’t know the affects of Zinc Chloride yet. Also EDB lowers the immune system by depleting the body of B vitamins and zinc. Answer to problem, use a B Complex vitamin and Zinc.

I wonder how these chemicals react with ( MTBE ) Methyl tert Butyl Ether, that is added to the gas that is used in you families car. It’s bad enough they screw around with the Water but now the Air. What’s next? Bottled Air! this whole thing stinks of a Government DePopulation Program.

50 USC [U.S. Code], Sec. 1520 Jan. 16, 1996


Sec. 1520: Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials.

(a) Not later than thirty days after final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense, whether directly or under contract, involving the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, the Secretary of Defense shall supply the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives with a full accounting of such plans for such experiment or study, and such experiment or study may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date such accounting is received by such committees.

(b)(1) The Secretary of Defense may not conduct any test or experiment involving the use of any chemical or biological agent on civilian populations unless local civilian officials in the area in which the test or experiment is to be conducted are notified in advance of such test or experiment (that could be the local dog catcher), and such test or experiment may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date of such notification.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply to tests and experiments conducted by Department of Defense personnel and tests and experiments conducted on behalf of the Department of Defense by contractors.

WARFARE PROGRAM. Yes, it is true and here is the DIRECT evidence from USC 50- 1520. What unknown agents would you like tested on you without your permission: END

The Free American Newsmagazine

2943 US Highway 380 Bingham, NM 87832

505-423-3250 Fax 505-423-3258 E-mail:


Sample July Issue - $4.00 1 Year Subscription - $30.00 2 year or 2 subs - $50.00


by Ian Goddard (

[Comment from Joe 6Pk Burton - Myself, Clarence [Napier] and Tommy [Farmer], plus many others - have sent information to William Thomas because we know this situation to be serious. Help us by observing and spreading the word. Forget the nay sayers. I sent recently the DOCUMENTATION from CONusGRESS 1977 to you and have shown it to many others. Goddard was skeptical until he saw this documentation. THIS IS URGENT. Vira pneumonia plus many viruses and influenza appearing enmasse. Joe 6K AmeriCAN Ezekiel 33:6 (]

I just got the following message from William Thomas ( a veteran journalist covering military activity who broke the story on widespread accounts of spraying from USAF jets that makes people sick and leaves local hospitals overflowing.

USAF Jets Said To Be Spraying Something That Sickens:

USAF Jets Said To Be Spraying Something That Sickens

Since the story broke, William has been flooded with accounts from around the nation of massive jet-spray operations followed by widespread illness below. I've received many such accounts and I don't know what to make of this: Are these false associations? Are people pulling my leg? Or is this true? Will Thomas says yes! To get an idea of how widespread these jet-poisoning reports are, listen to the 1/25/99 Art Bell show here:

As we have seen, with respect to the now-repealed U.S. Code 10(1520), the use of entire "civilian populations" for the testing of any chemical or biological warfare agent has been fully permitted, subject only to minor conditions. The new law, USC 10(1520(a)), puts limits only on any public poisoning conducted by one official.

If mass poisoning is defined in the law, can we really say that reports of jets spraying sickness down from the skies is such a big surprise? -- Ian Goddard

This could be the biggest and most-covered-up story ever!!

Forwarded Message: To: Ian Goddard <>

From: William Thomas <>

Subject: Re: Foreign Troops?

Hi Ian, Please issue the following alert. The clock is tickin...

Something huge is going on. In many regions, I can confirm that hospital emergency rooms are filled to overflowing with a sudden epidemic of acute respiratory patients suffering from something doctors cannot diagnose - and that is NOT the flu. Newspapers in Bakersfield, California are reporting jammed emergency rooms. Here's a typical story from a North Carolina newspaper:

"FEELING ROTTEN? Outbreak of respiratory illnesses has doctors' offices full, but it's probably not the flu." by Rebecca Lentz, Staff Writer

"Call it the creeping crud. Call it a virus. Call it whatever you'd like. But whatever it is, it's miserable. "Adults and children alike are down for the count with the virus. Upper respiratory infections are keeping doctors' offices hopping and the hospital seeing record numbers of patients.

"Medac, a walk-in clinic, has been busy with patients complaining of similar symptoms. New Hanover Regional's patient count has been at its highest level in history, with 503 of its available 504 inpatient beds filled on Jan. 7. On Sunday, the patient count stood at 454. Even so, the majority of illnesses aren't influenza, health officials said.

This much we know:

1. Reports of odd "contrails" are coming in from 22 states so far. Many sightings occurred months or years before this story was made public - prompting impromptu snapshots and video recordings and calls to the attention of friends and bystanders by people who are quite used to seeing commercial airplanes and normal contrails - and were astonished to see giant X's and grid-patterns woven "like Tic-tac-toe" by large aircraft criss-crossing the sky, often for hours over the same area.

2. These are not "contrails" being reported. The aircraft have been positively identified as USAF Boeing KC-135 and KC-10 air-to-air refueling aircraft spraying an unidentified substance from their tail-booms.

3. The observed tanker aircraft are not engaged in routine formation flying or air-to-air refueling. JP8 fuel inadvertently spilled or dumped to lower landing weights atomizes at jet speeds and does not fall as "cobwebs" observed by police officers and other reliable witnesses. Routine fuel dumping does not continue over hours by multiple aircraft weaving furrows over the same area until clear blue skies are completely hazed over.

4. Now occurring daily, this extremely expensive nationwide "spraying" is deliberate and laid down in specific patterns over hours.

5. These are not "cloud-seeding" activities as no clouds are present and local weather does not turn to rain immediately after these events.

6. In some notable cases, violent and unseasonable storms such as the recent flurry of "summer" tornadoes over Tennessee and heavy snowfall in Bakersfield, CA and Phoenix, AZ have occurred within days of documented (videotaped) spraying. Sharp "spikes" in power output from the USN/USAF "ionospheric heater" known has HAARP have were recorded just before last December's "horizontal snowstorm", localized around Turret Peak, AZ. These weather anomalies - and HAARP - may be related to aerial spraying using fast-dissolving, "smart plastic" polymers to catch HAARP's high-intensity radio waves to heat the atmosphere. Or these may be separate experiments.

6. What is definitely known and verifiable is that thousands, quite possibly tens of thousands of Americans - and perhaps more - are becoming ill enough to seek medical attention after these fly-overs, which are continuing at a stepped-up pace as I write.

PLEASE get back on your network right away and ask your conscientious subscribers to once again come through for all of us and bombard their Congressional representatives with an avalanche of faxes and e-mails and phone calls demanding an immediate Senate and House investigation into the deliberate large-scale spraying currently going on across America. THIS IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY!!!!!

Thank you, and all Americans concerned for the fate of their children and their country.

God bless you all, William Thomas Independent Investigative Journalist

Spraying story:

See also my 4-hour interview with Art Bell:

Hear the 1/25/99 Art Bell show with William Thomas here:

USAF Jets Said To Be Spraying Something That Sickens:

Visit Ian Williams Goddard ---------->



?Could this story be true? I suspect that there is an element of truth in it no matter what the full story is. As I mentioned before, I have seen the documentation for some of the "testing" that was done on unsuspecting populations in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Salt Lake City, Utah. So this is completely within the area of possibility. The next thing you want to take into account is; Just how smart are these people?

?The ones who wrote the law; those who blindly follow orders; the blind supporters of the government/Constitution; the ones doing the flying or other experiments: they don’t get it I guess, because they, too, are population. And so are their families, friends, and neighbors. The material mentioned above can not be escaped "within" the United States, because it will contaminate food and water sources, as well as damage people directly. As we get closer to the year 2000, you can expect to see more and more of this type of thing going on. And this brings up another point stressed through the next report: Are you capable of taking care of yourself?

?Does that sound like a silly question, particularly to grown adults? But are you adults? Can you build yourself a hovel to shelter in? Or heat your own home if there is an interruption of major duration in the power supply? How about feed yourself? Can you do that? And, of course, I do not mean open up another can of non-nutrition; I mean, CAN YOU FEED YOURSELF, AND YOUR FAMILY? For one week? For one month? For a year? Can you do it? Or have you bought into the nonsense that you are part of the greater whole; a part of the system, and as long as you do your little bit, the system will take care of you?

?We have all forgotten that systems are designed to benefit those who control the systems, and that we are simply part of the benefit package, or we have no place (for reference, see the killing of the elderly "for their own good"). We also forget, that when those who control the "system" decide to change the parameters of the program, we are subject to being ruled excess baggage.


Take a look here at something that affects all of us. As a research/reporter non-attending member of the most senior programmers group on earth; the Washington DC y2k group I have partial access to correspondence between a few hundred of the best of the top 2,000 of the earth’s best programmers.

This letter is similar to what is being said more and more by more and more of these "Super Geeks" as they call themselves; the super programmers. I privately write to some of the best and help them figure out ways to stay on the job, programming longer and helping the rest of us more, before they Bug-Out to their rural retreats. Already some have left. Many are planning to leave in the next weeks. One of these guys leaving is a HUGE loss in the battle to mitigate y2k difficulties.

The shortage of programmers is growing. Also y2k programmers are now usually getting paid better --- up from $15 an hour of two years ago to about $60 to $80 per hour while the top testers for the same companies are being paid from $100 to nearly $1,000 per hour depending on the skill levels they have -- with huge bonuses next Feb. and March -- if the things they test work.

The y2k testers luckily don't usually have a clue YET, as to how bad y2k is going to be. Because, their tests are still being written. When they start to see the failure rates that the programmers know are coming -- then the testers will begin to prepare to run for the hills too.

All this does matter. It matters to all of us. Except for those few Mormons living in the caves, fishing the rivers, hunting the woods and farming the valleys of distant reaches in Alaska -- living with their several wives and shut out from all society for decades. They will lose only their cell phones and have to resort to archery when the bullets run out. For the rest of us. Ignorance is bliss. Let those who refuse to look lie back. It does little good to explain a sunset or a rose to a blind man. Jody <>;


From: Roleigh Martin <>

Subject: "Programmers are storing food, expecting the worst" [Apologies if you already know about this.]

Business Week February 15, 1999

Letter to the Editor: Programmers are storing food, expecting the worst



As a Cobol programmer fixing code for Y2K compliance for a large oil trading firm, I must strongly disagree with your conclusions in your recent editorial on Y2K.

I can assure you that most large companies are way behind schedule, including my own. Regrettably, these very same companies tell the general public everything is OK and not to worry when they know they have no chance of making the deadline.

Even though most large corporations will indeed finish their necessary code changes, they will not have enough time for testing. Testing is one of the biggest bugaboos in the whole Y2K fiasco. Also, there is no set protocol for date formatting using the popular "windowing" repair scheme between companies code repairs. Testing is at least 50 percent of most Y2K projects. There is a critical shortage of people qualified to test.

The situation is really quite desperate and most code programmers are indeed stocking up on food. Most people have no idea how severe and long-lasting the disruptions will be. Those who do not prepare may possibly die as a result of Y2K.

Another important area you did not mention was the dismal state of Y2K compliance of the federal government. Most other countries are way behind us. We are not an island. Foreign supply chains will be a big problem. Michael Taylor,

Mr. Lane Core Jr. or

Roleigh Martin

(easy to remember alias is: )

(A Web Site that focuses on Y2k threat to Utilities, Banks & more)

Print out this Y2K brochure to give to neighbors, friends & relatives:

Special Offer:


?Judge for yourself. Plan accordingly. Chose what you are spending money on, and how it will benefit your family, and you. Is that new car, or new TV, necessary? Ever considered food storage, or a few extra galleons of gas? How about a different location to live in? Or a back up heating system? Using a different fuel? Do I want to move back to the states? Probably not.


Quotes from Al Gore’s Book; "Earth in the Balance"

1. Al Gore. "We must make the rescue of the global environment the central organizing principle for civilization…(this) means using every policy and program, every law and institution, every treaty and alliance, every tactic and strategy, every plan and course of action….to halt the destruction of the environment and to preserve and nurture our ecological system. Minor shifts in policy, marginal adjustments in ongoing programs, moderate improvements in laws and regulations, rhetoric offered in lieu of genuine change --- these are all forms of appeasement, designed to satisfy the public’s desire to believe that sacrifice, struggle, and a wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary." pg. 269, 274 (Please carefully note the "wrenching transformation of society" nonsense. - David)

2. Al Gore. "….the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among all living things…the last vestige of organized goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity as late as the fifteenth century…it seems obvious that a better understanding of ( goddess worship ) could offer us new insights into the nature of the human experience." pg. 260 (Read this carefully, again. - David)

3. Al Gore. "I believe that our civilization is, in effect, addicted to the consumption of the earth itself…the froth and frenzy of industrial civilization mask our deep loneliness for that communion with the world that can lift our spirits and fill our senses with the richness and immediacy of life itself." pg. 20 (This from a man who owns several homes, is driven in a limousine, advocates more government and more control, necessitating more government which produces nothing, is a member of a family which as far as I can tell does not have a single member who has ever worked for a living, and he attends the secret meetings of the Elite who rape the earth for profit. - David)

4. Al Gore. "In this emerging scientific view, a palpable ‘physical’ role for human thought in the shaping of reality…(it is the) astounding view that consciousness is one of the building blocks of the physical universe and that a shift in the attention of an observer can have tangible consequences in the location and physical properties of subatomic particles." pg. 254

5. Al Gore. "…we internalize the pain of our lost sense of connection to the natural world, we consume the earth and its resources as a way to distract ourselves from the pain, and we search insatiably for artificial substitutes to replace the communion with the world that has been taken from us." pg. 231

From The Desk Of Dr. Michael Coffman 207-945-9878 Distributed by the Minnesota Republican Party Land Rights Task Force


?As you read the above, remember, this is the man everyone who wanted Clinton out was going to get for President, probably for ten years or so. This book by Al Gore contains no scientific research or basis in it’s discussions, but is simply a long dissertation on the benefits, more or less, of paganism; it is not based on facts, but on beliefs. It has in it no facts, but will tell you pretty much directly that one of the largest ills of the world is the proliferation of cars for so many people. That should tell you that restrictions on travel and on the use of cars, particularly by the poor, are coming, and soon. In essence, Gore believes that everyone should be locked into a cubicle, strictly to protect the environment, of course, and allowed out only to work for the production of wealth for the elite. Just as Nike and other multi-national corporation manage their "human resources" in Asia now.

?This is what population control is all about; to reduce the population of the earth so that the only people necessary, outside of the elite, is the work force necessary to produce the luxury that the elite desire. With no problems, such as arguments about taxes and such. Simply put, the only restriction today on the ability of the world to feed itself comes from so-called governments. And the real polluters of the earth look, quite successfully, to those same governments for protection from the consequences of their actions.

?What nonsense. This assumes that the spraying and other experimentation going on around the world on unsuspecting people does not affect the tax gatherer or the legislature. These people simply have no conceivable idea of the meaning of life.

?I hope you do take a look at: <> These people will try and teach you what the real meaning of life is, and that is a far different story after Mr. Gore...


Dr. Blaylock has written a book entitled "EXCITOTOXINS: THE TASTE THAT KILLS" (Health Press 1-800-643-2665).

Dr. H.J. Roberts, diabetic specialist and world expert on aspartame poisoning, has also written a book entitled "DEFENSE AGAINST ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE" (1-800-814-9800).

Dr. Roberts tells how aspartame poisoning is escalating Alzheimer's Disease, and indeed it is. As the hospice nurse told me, women are being admitted at 30 years of age with Alzheimer's Disease. Dr. Blaylock and Dr. Roberts will be writing a position paper with some case histories and will post it on the Internet. According to the Conference of the American College of Physicians, We are talking about a plague of neurological diseases caused by this deadly poison".

Dr. Roberts realized what was happening when aspartame was first marketed. He said "his diabetic patients presented memory loss, confusion, and severe vision loss". At the Conference of the American College of Physicians, doctors admitted that they did not know. They had wondered why seizures were rampant (the phenylalanine in aspartame breaks down the seizure threshold and depletes serotonin, which causes manic depression, panic attacks, rage and violence).

Just before the Conference, I received a FAX from Norway, asking for a possible antidote for this poison because they are experiencing so many problems in their country. This "poison" is now available in 90 PLUS countries worldwide. Fortunately, we had speakers and ambassadors at the Conference from different nations who have pledged their help. We ask that you help too. Print this article out and warn everyone you know. Take anything that contains aspartame back to the store. Take the "NO ASPARTAME TEST" and send us your case history.

I assure you that MONSANTO, the creator of aspartame, knows how deadly it is. They fund the American Diabetes Association, American Dietetic Association, Congress, and the Conference of the American College of Physicians. The New York Times, on November 15, 1996, ran an article on how the American Dietetic Association takes money from the food industry to endorse their products. Therefore, they can not criticize any additives or tell about their link to MONSANTO. How bad is this? We told a mother who had a child on NutraSweet to get off the product. The child was having grand mal seizures every day. The mother called her physician, who called the ADA, who told the doctor not to take the child off the NutraSweet. We are still trying to convince the mother that the aspartame is causing the seizures. Every time we get someone off of aspartame, the seizures stop. If the baby dies, you know whose fault it is, and what we are up against. There are 92 documented symptoms of aspartame, from coma to death. The majority of them are all neurological, because the aspartame destroys the nervous system.

Aspartame Disease is partially the cause to what is behind some of the mystery of the Desert Storm health problems. The burning tongue and other problems discussed in over 60 cases can be directly related to the consumption of an aspartame product. Several thousand pallets of diet drinks were shipped to the Desert Storm troops. (Remember heat can liberate the methanol from the aspartame at 86 degrees F). Diet drinks sat in the 120 degree F. Arabian sun for weeks at a time on pallets. The service men and women drank them all day long. All of their symptoms are identical to aspartame poisoning. Dr. Roberts says "consuming aspartame at the time of conception can cause birth defects". The phenylalanine concentrates in the placenta, causing mental retardation, according to Dr. Louis Elsas, Pediatrician Professor - Genetics, at Emory University in his testimony before Congress.

In the original lab tests, animals developed brain tumors (phenylalanine breaks down into DXP, a brain tumor agent). When Dr. Espisto was lecturing on aspartame, one physician in the audience, a neurosurgeon, said, "when they remove brain tumors, they have found high levels of aspartame in them".

Stevia, a sweet food, NOT AN ADDITIVE, which helps in the metabolism of sugar, which would be ideal for diabetics, has now been approved as a dietary supplement by the F.D.A. For years, the F.D.A. has outlawed this sweet food because of their loyalty to MONSANTO.

If it says "SUGAR FREE" on the label-- DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!

Senator Howard Hetzenbaum wrote a bill that would have warned all infants, pregnant mothers and children of the dangers of aspartame. The bill would have also instituted independent studies on the problems existing in the population (seizures, changes in brain chemistry, changes in neurological and behavioral symptoms). It was killed by the powerful drug and chemical lobbies, letting loose the hounds of disease and death on an unsuspecting public. Since the Conference of the American College of Physicians, we hope to have the help of some world leaders. Again, please help us too. There are a lot of people out there who must be warned, *please* let them know this information.


?The problem, of course, is that those same people who must be warned have so much faith in "the system" that a warning does not work. Even eye-witness information, such as about the contrails, is rejected out of hand. How can they be expected to accept something like the story of fluoride or aspartame? Something "their government" has approved as harmless for them to use? When do they start to listen, and for many, will they ever start? Unfortunately, for us as well as for them, no.



Below is the most intelligent and accurate post which I have seen from anyone here except for Dan Meador. Don Braun is on point... the rest of you are out in left field. The Constitutional Convention was in fact a Masonic Lodge meeting with George Washington, the Master of the Lodge, seated in the East in a chair with the Rising Sun on it's back for the secret sessions during which no notes were taken and no reports of the proceeding were made... they were secret. During the open sessions where notes and records and reports were made Washington stepped down and another person presided... most Americans are not aware of any of this.

This nation was not created as a Christian nation but as a Masonic nation with a "Secret Destiny".... that secret destiny being the "New World Order" which is in the process of being formed. All of you continue to spout your nonsense. You know nothing and you will get nowhere. William Cooper


?This is true, and to really understand what was said, it is very necessary to know that the Masonic nonsense is fully involved within the British government and has been for centuries. It was simply a transfer to America, but it had to be done in secret, because the people of that day understood how anti-Christian is the Masonic order.


Subject: San Francisco Blackout

Guess what, folks: the power system *is* vulnerable to a domino-effect failure. Earlier today (Tuesday), over one million residents of San Francisco lost power. According to this WIRED story (link below), here's what happened (as described by the WIRED story):

"An electrical power substation about 20 miles south of San Francisco failed shortly after 8:15 a.m. Tuesday, causing a chain reaction that tripped the two main power generators in San Francisco and knocked out power to 375,000 utility customers in a 49-mile square area. Pacific Gas and Electric estimated that 938,000 people were affected by the outage."

The story quotes Peter Neumann, author of "Computer Related Risks," as saying, "The entire power generation, transmission, and distribution problem is suffering, because there is very little spare power anymore."

The cause of the problem? According to the power company, "The cause of the outage was simple human error, which then triggered a complex sequence of events."

That's frightening. If "simple human error" can cause this, what might complex human error (i.e. Y2K) cause?

The power outage caused massive problems. The SFO airport suffered a total power failure and was running on generators, and BART, the Bay Area Rapid Transit system, lost 17 of its 57 trains. Elevators were stuck mid-floor and the morning commute was a frenzy.


This event is a reminder of what can happen when Y2K hits, and it alerts us to the fallibility of the power services. This was ONE little glitch. What happens when the Y2K rollover causes a hundred such problems? Or a thousand? And then you combine those little glitches with other little glitches from the phone system, the 911 system, the transportation infrastructure and the banks. What do you get then?

By the way, this little incident is also going to deplete inventories of generators in the Bay Area as people finally get it: Hey, we could lose power! If you live in San Fran and you've been *thinking* about getting a generator, you're now TOO LATE. But it's not too late to move out of the city altogether, which is probably the safest option, considering what might happen if the power stays off for DAYS instead of hours.

AN OVERVIEW OF THE POWER PROBLEM There are few backup power supplies available, so some failures that used to have backups no longer do. Failures DO cascade throughout the system. In this case, one small substation caused a power loss to one million people. Power failures almost immediately bring a city to its knees. All transportation is immediately threatened, and few businesses have enough fuel to run generators longer than 24 hours. All it takes is one simple little human mistake to cause one million people to lose power. What might a complex, unpredictable problem like Y2K cause to happen? Demands on the power system are higher than ever, and extra power bandwidth is almost non-existent. There is very little "extra" to go around if power stations start to fail.


?What is a city? For the elite, it is a source of labor. For you, it is a pool of filth. The quality of the air is poor; the quality of the water is unknown but definitely suspect (chlorine & fluoride); and the food is almost nonexistent, and in any emergency, even the garbage served in the supermarkets will not be there. I know most of you think otherwise; perhaps you will begin to see my point of view. I hope, before it is too late.


'America, I'm Outa Here!' © 1999 Claire Wolfe

It was supposed to be another meeting of Hardyville's Official Unofficial Y2K Committee, but it didn't start out as planned.

The rest of us were milling around waiting for Carty, the ex-military logistics whiz who's our unofficial official. Carty's normally a smack-on-time kinda guy. But this night he thundered in late, flung some books and papers down on the table and roared, "I'm outa here!"

"No you're not," Janelle-the-waitress observed from behind her tray. "You just got here."

"I mean I'm outa here," Carty boomed with a sweep of one big hand. The rest of us -- even those not in the path of the hand -- reared back a little. "I'm out of America!"

Now, understand: Carty is huge, shaves his head, and considerably resembles Jesse "The Governor" Ventura. So we were all a bit loath to ask, "Whuh?" But Carty also breathes red, white and blue and we could not believe what we were hearing. So somebody eventually ventured the question:

"You mean, like, leaving the country?"

"Damn right. Leaving. I got outa the service because I couldn't hack having that ... person as Commander in Heat. And now that those spineless, crooked, limp-di... oh hell, those senators said he could do anything he damn well pleases. I just am not living in a country where that SOB's been turned loose to be dictator of the whole shebang. I'm tired of putting up with it. I'm outa here."

While some of the others were still hmming and errring in shock, I leaned over and looked at the pile of stuff Carty had thrown down on the table.

"Hey, I know who this guy is," I said, picking up a book called Escape from America by Roger Gallo. "He has Escape Artist, a giant Web site for people who want to live in other countries. The book is about how to do it."

"Is the book any good?"

"Dunno, I haven't read it yet," I answered, starting to page through. "But he knows what he's talking about on that Web site."

A few others gathered and started pawing through the papers and pamphlets.

"Sovereign Society?" Bob-the-nerd queried, picking up a fat envelope with a British postmark. "Is this about gold-fringed flags and not having a drivers license?"

"No," Carty said, a little calmer. "It's about offshore investing, second passports and like that. You've got to pay $195 a year to join, but looks like they've got real solid information. And you get either a Swiss or an Austrian bank account with your membership."

"Oh hoity toity, Swiss bank account!" someone scoffed. "What have you got to put in a Swiss bank account, Carty? Those bankers don't even want to talk to people like us."

"I've got about as much as you got, beer gut. But look, you can get things started in the account with as little as $5,000."

Readings. Hms. Nods.

"I know about those guys, too," I said into the silence. "They're on the up and up -- unlike some offshore investment hypers and hucksters. The Sovereign Society is people like James Dale Davidson and Lord Rees-Mogg, who wrote The Sovereign Individual, investment guys like John Pugsley and Doug Casey, and Vince Miller of the International Society for Individual Liberty."

"Hey, Claire, if you know so much about all this offshore stuff, how come you're still here in Hardyville?"

"Well, you can ask my banker and my Significant Sweetie about that. Believe me, I'd be on an island somewhere if my checkbook and my honey would go along with the plan."

"Well, Carty here ain't rich. So, Carty, how you gonna do it?"

"You don't have to be rich anymore," Carty said. "Only smart."

"Well, that lets you out, then."

"No, seriously," I interrupted. "What these writers and groups are all saying is that the Internet, free trade and other things are enabling independent people to slip out of control of bad governments. You can set up a corporation in, say, Costa Rica, Nevis or Anguilla, open a business on the Internet -- and you could be here or there or anywhere. You can live in one country, bank in another, operate your business in another... It helps to be richer than I am, and it's probably smart to have good legal advice. But I know perfectly ordinary people who've done it for only a few thousand dollars."

"Makes it hard for gubmint grabbers to know where your money is," Carty nodded. "And just think of all those other countries that don't have Mafia Bill for president."

"Yeah, but they do have, you know, Generalissimo Whosis, El Supremo Dictatoro of the People-o. Stuff like that."

"Well, that's why you research 'em all in advance and listen to people who've done it," Carty shrugged, waving at his paperwork.

"And maybe," I added, when countries see that all their bright, young, affluent brain-workers and entrepreneurs are heading elsewhere, they'll eventually wise up. Then we might actually have countries competing for who can offer the most freedom. How about that?"

"Never work." Nat Lyons shook his head. "No such thing as a government getting better instead of worse over time."

"Only because people put up with it," Carty insisted. "Now it's a lot easier to vote with your feet."

"Weren't there some people trying to start their own countries?" Dora-the-Yalie asked me.

"Oh, yeah. All the time. People want to build artificial islands. Or they want to negotiate some sovereign territory inside another country.

"The most interesting one I know is Laissez Faire City. Some heavy hitters behind that one, too. They're working on a cyber community -- with its own banking system and everything -- while hoping long term to build a physical community, probably in Central America. Whether they'll pull it off, who knows? Their operation always seems to be under construction, and never quite constructed. But even with their struggles, they seem

better funded and better planned than some other projects."

Hey, I know. Let's build Hardyville South," Nat cracked, sweeping off his cowboy hat and offering it around, brim up. "I'm takin' donations for it. Swiss bank money accepted."

"Me," Bob-the-nerd sighed, "I'm holding out for the ultimate escape -- outer space."

"I really think you guys oughta come back to earth for a while," Janelle bossed, entering with coffeepot. "And Carty, you can take care of Mr. Clinton later. Right now, I think you oughta get back to saving Hardyville from that Y2K thing."

We all milled to our places. Carty pulled out his notes and began saying something about availability of natural gas supplies. But I found myself sitting in the back of the room with Escape from America on the table in front of me, reading and pondering.

Could there really be places on earth where ordinary people don't have to slave half our lives just to pay protection money? Where bankers don't report every innocent move to some snoop agency? Where cops don't stop us on the streets and steal the money from our pockets? Where we can live the way we want on our own land? I think I'm gonna find this Gallo guy and see if he'll answer a few questions. I'll let the Hardyvillians know what I find out.


?This is an interesting story, and all of you already know what decision I made. Part of that decision was easy; other parts not so easy. In particular, I had no family problems to hinder my decision, and I recognize that; so should you. I like to think that I would have made the same decision if I had been with a family, but I can not be sure. And, I hope each of you understands by now that I really try and not mislead or lie.

?But, given the nature of the information that I am dispensing, what I said at the end of Part I, way back when, still holds; you must look and confirm everything, because it is your responsibility to do so. In that regard, this story is very important; I am not the only voice crying in the wilderness, and Scripture tells us that the wise man is careful with the information that he accepts, and that he heeds the warnings that he hears. If you stock up on food, and a few other essentials, what have you lost? Are you afraid of looking like a fool? That is a very poor reason to put your family at risk. I am here because I have what I think is a pretty clear picture of what is coming to America. Much more on this in Parts XVIII to XX.

?I think you will find some of the links Claire has supplied interesting. There are many people looking for banking and other tools offshore. I think that the men I work with have very good tools, but I certainly do not want you to exclude other sources or information. I want you to make the decisions which are best for you and for your family. In this regard, the following is interesting.


All, (comment from ICE)

One step at a time. Mr. Weyrich's fortitude is respectable as far as it goes. It would be interesting to hear Mr. Weyrich explain how one "drop(s) out of this culture" and continues to allow the gov't to fraudulently confiscate thiry to fifty percent of the fruits of one's labor, utilizing much of that "revenue" in all manner of evil pursuits both within America and around the world. How does one "drop out" and continue to ask permission of the gov't in the form of application for licenses for the most basic of life's activities -- e.g., travelling, working to support oneself, building a house on property one "owns", marrying before God, to name a few. Has Mr. Weyrich reached the point where he is about to confess that most Americans, including himself and those who agree with him, are in fact mere subjects, even abject slaves to a tyrannical and evil force? Hopefully, ... one step at a time.

As long as a galley slave continues to row, he has not "dropped out". ICE

From: County Action News <>

From: "Paul Clark" <>

Conservative Leader Comes out for Local Sovereignty

Many of you have seen the stories, or heard on talk radio, about the letter written by Paul Weyrich (head of Free Congress Foundation, and well known "Conservative" leader) stating that Washington politics is hopeless and urging fellow conservatives to abandon efforts to change Washington and focus on changing their local communities.

He wrote that "we need to drop out of this culture, and find places, even if it is where we physically are right now, where we can live godly, righteous and sober lives."

In another passage he wrote that traditionalists must separate themselves from the American culture as a whole and continued, "What I mean by separation is, for example, what the homeschoolers have done... They have separated themselves from public schools and have created new institutions, new schools, in their homes. The same thing is happening in other areas. Some people are getting rid of their televisions. Others are setting up private courts, where they can hope to find justice instead of ideology and greed.."

This policy is the result of discussion which myself and several other advocates of Local Sovereignty (especially Bill Lind from Free Congress) have had with Weyrich over the last couple of years. Although Weyrich has been friendly to the idea he has only now come out espousing the idea that trying to change things in Washington is a complete waste of time.

Just a few months ago no major leader would openly advocate private courts (something I recently brought to Weyrich's attention) but even that is beginning to sink in as people recognize the corruption of the American legal system.

[Comment: Interesting comments from a man once known as the "Godfather

of Grassroots Conservatism." Jim Hill (]

WASHINGTON - A prominent conservative, giving voice to frustration within the Republican Party over President Clinton's acquittal, is telling conservative leaders that American society is ''approaching barbarism'' and is out of step with their political movement.

''I no longer believe that there is a moral majority,'' Paul Weyrich wrote in a letter dated yesterday to several hundred conservatives. ''I do not believe that a majority of Americans actually share our values.''

Weyrich, head of the Free Congress Foundation in Washington, argues that it may be time to ''drop out of this culture,'' and perhaps even abandon efforts to influence the American political system. ''We need some sort of quarantine,'' he wrote in the letter.

Though no other leading conservatives have gone that far, Weyrich's letter underscores the level of resentment and anger over Clinton's acquittal. ''If there really were a moral majority out there, Bill Clinton would have been driven out of office a month ago,'' Weyrich said.

Weyrich criticized not only the president and GOP leaders in Congress but society in general. And he is plowing relatively new ground by suggesting that the conservative movement cannot succeed in today's culture. ''The culture we are living in becomes an ever-wider sewer. In truth, I think we are caught up in a cultural collapse of historic proportions, a collapse so great that it simply overwhelms politics,'' he said.

Arguing that it may be time for ''separation'' from society, Weyrich points to conservatives who teach their children at home, form private courts, or get rid of their televisions. ''I think that we have to look at a whole series of possibilities for bypassing the institutions that are controlled by the enemy,'' he wrote.

He offered to hold a meeting to discuss the movement's next step. ''I don't have all the answers or even all the questions. But I know that what we have been doing for 30 years hasn't worked, that while we have been fighting and winning in politics, our culture has decayed into something approaching barbarism.''

In an interview, Weyrich said he was not suggesting that conservatives stop fighting. ''I'm just suggesting that the chance of victory that we thought was excellent is now not in the cards,'' he said.

This story ran on page A13 of the Boston Globe on 02/17/99.

© Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company.

From: "Paul Clark" <> Here is the actual text of the Weyrich letter. February 16, 1999 Dear Friend:

Late last year, I had the opportunity of speaking to the Conservative Leadership Conference on the state of the conservative movement. I've given similar talks in the past, and usually they have focused on the most recent election or our situation in Congress or something similar. This time, the thoughts I offered were very different, and frankly rather radical. The strong, positive response they brought forth - which came as something of a surprise to me - has led me to think that I should share them more widely. That is the purpose of this letter.

What many of us have been trying to do for many years has been based upon a couple of premises. First of all, we have assumed that a majority of Americans basically agrees with our point of view. That has been the premise upon which we have tried to build any number of institutions, and indeed our whole strategy. It is I who suggested to Jerry Falwell that he call his organization the "Moral Majority." The second premise has been that if we could just elect enough conservatives, we could get our people in as Congressional leaders and they would fight to implement our agenda.

In looking at the long history of conservative politics, from the defeat of Robert Taft in 1952, to the nomination of Barry Goldwater, to the takeover of the Republican Party in 1994, I think it is fair to say that conservatives have learned to succeed in politics. That is, we got our people elected. (He is severely lacking in understanding of the nature of the beast. - David)

But that did not result in the adoption of our agenda. The reason, I think, is that politics itself has failed. And politics has failed because of the collapse of the culture. The culture we are living in becomes an ever-wider sewer. In truth, I think we are caught up in a cultural collapse of historic proportions, a collapse so great that it simply overwhelms politics.

That's why I am in the process of rethinking what it is that we, who still believe in our traditional, Western, Judeo-Christian culture, can and should do under the circumstances. Please understand that I am not quarreling with anybody who pursues politics, because it is important to pursue politics, to be involved in government. It is also important to try, as many people have, to re-take the cultural institutions that have been captured by the other side.

But it is impossible to ignore the fact that the United States is becoming an ideological state. The ideology of Political Correctness, which openly calls for the destruction of our traditional culture, has so gripped the body politic, has so gripped our institutions, that it is even affecting the Church. It has completely taken over the academic community. It is now pervasive in the entertainment industry, and it threatens to control literally every aspect of our lives.

Those who came up with Political Correctness, which we more accurately call "Cultural Marxism," did so in a deliberate fashion. I'm not going to go into the whole history of the Frankfurt School and Herbert Marcuse and the other people responsible for this. Suffice it to say that the United States is very close to becoming a state totally dominated by an alien ideology, an ideology bitterly hostile to Western culture. Even now, for the first time in their lives, people have to be afraid of what they say. This has never been true in the history of our country. Yet today, if you say the "wrong thing," you suddenly have legal problems, political problems, you might even lose your job or be expelled from college. Certain topics are forbidden. You can't approach the truth about a lot of different subjects. If you do, you are immediately branded as "racist", "sexist", "homophobic", "insensitive", or "judgmental."

Cultural Marxism is succeeding in its war against our culture. The question becomes, if we are unable to escape the cultural disintegration that is gripping society, then what hope can we have? Let me be perfectly frank about it. If there really were a moral majority out there, Bill Clinton would have been driven out of office months ago. It is not only the lack of political will on the part of Republicans, although that is part of the problem. More powerful is the fact that what Americans would have found absolutely intolerable only a few years ago, a majority now not only tolerates but celebrates. Americans have adopted, in large measure, the MTV culture that we so valiantly opposed just a few years ago, and it has permeated the thinking of all but those who have separated themselves from the contemporary culture.

If in Washington State and Colorado, after we have spent years talking about partial birth abortion, we can't by referendum pass a ban on it, we have to face some unpleasant facts. I no longer believe that there is a moral majority. I do not believe that a majority of Americans actually shares our values. (There is a lot of truth in this statement. - David)

So, I have contemplated the question of what we should do. If you saw my predictions on the elections, you know that my views are far from infallible. Therefore, I do not represent this as any sort of final truth. It is merely my deduction based on a number of observations and a good deal of soul-searching.

I believe that we probably have lost the culture war. That doesn't mean the war is not going to continue, and that it isn't going to be fought on other fronts. But in terms of society in general, we have lost. This is why, even when we win in politics, our victories fail to translate into the kind of policies we believe are important. (Pay careful attention to what he is saying; in Part XVIII I will show how this relates to Revelations and the Judgement which is coming upon America. - David)

Therefore, what seems to me a legitimate strategy for us to follow is to look at ways to separate ourselves from the institutions that have been captured by the ideology of Political Correctness, or by other enemies of our traditional culture. I would point out to you that the word "holy" means "set apart", and that it is not against our tradition to be, in fact, "set apart". You can look in the Old Testament, you can look at Christian history. You will see that there were times when those who had our beliefs were definitely in the minority and it was a band of hardy monks who preserved the culture while the surrounding society disintegrated.

What I mean by separation is, for example, what the homeschoolers have done. Faced with public school systems that no longer educate but instead "condition" students with the attitudes demanded by Political Correctness, they have seceded. They have separated themselves from public schools and have created new institutions, new schools, in their homes.

The same thing is happening in other areas. Some people are getting rid of their televisions. Others are setting up private courts, where they can hope to find justice instead of ideology and greed.

I think that we have to look at a whole series of possibilities for bypassing the institutions that are controlled by the enemy. If we expend our energies on fighting on the "turf" they already control, we will probably not accomplish what we hope, and we may spend ourselves to the point of exhaustion. The promising thing about a strategy of separation is that it has more to do with who we are, and what we become, than it does with what the other side is doing and what we are going to do about it.

For example, the Southern Baptists, Dr. Dobson and some other people started a boycott of Disney. We may regard this boycott in two ways. We might say, "Well, look at how much higher Disney stock is than before. The company made record profits, therefore the boycott has failed." But the strategy I'm suggesting would see it differently. Because of that boycott, lots of people who otherwise would have been poisoned by the kind of viciously anti-religious, and specifically anti-Christian, entertainment that Disney is spewing out these days have been spared contact with it. They separated themselves from some of the cultural rot, and to that extent we succeeded. (It is the only success that matters; personal success. - David)

I am very concerned, as I go around the country and speak and talk to young people, when I find how much of the decadent culture they have absorbed without even understanding that they are a part of it. And while I'm not suggesting that we all become Amish or move to Idaho, I do think that we have to look at what we can do to separate ourselves from this hostile culture. What steps can we take to make sure that we and our children are not infected? We need some sort of quarantine.

It is not only political conservatives who are troubled by the disintegration of the culture. I gave a speech not long ago in which I was very critical of what was on television. Several people who described themselves as liberals came up to me and said "Well, I know I don't agree with your politics, but you are absolutely correct on this and we don't allow our children to watch television any more." (The point is, do you watch it? If it is not good for the children, is it good for you? Are you an adult, or not? - David)

Don't be mislead by politicians who say that everything is great, that we are on the verge of this wonderful, new era thanks to technology or the stock market or whatever. These are lies. We are not in the dawn of a new civilization, but the twilight of an old one. We will be lucky if we escape with any remnants of the great Judeo-Christian civilization that we have known down through the ages.

The radicals of the 1960s had three slogans: turn on, tune in, drop out. I suggest that we adopt a modified version. First, turn off. Turn off the television and video games and some of the garbage that's on the computers. Turn off the means by which you and your family are being infected with cultural decadence.

Tune out. Create a little stillness. I was very struck by the fact that when I traveled in the former Soviet Union, I couldn't go to a restaurant or any place else without hearing this incessant Western rock music pounding away. There was no escape from it. No wonder some Russians are anti-American. When they think of the United States, they think of the culture that we exported to them.

Finally, we need to drop out of this culture, and find places, even if it is where we physically are right now, where we can live godly, righteous and sober lives.

Again, I don't have all the answers or even all the questions. But I know that what we have been doing for thirty years hasn't worked, that while we have been fighting and winning in politics, our culture has decayed into something approaching barbarism. We need to take another tack, find a different strategy. If you agree, and are willing to help wrestle with what that strategy should be, let me know. If enough people are willing to do something different, we will call a roundtable meeting here at Free Congress this year to discuss it. I hope I will see you there. Sincerely, Paul M. Weyrich


?More and more are catching on. Something else is going on, and maybe, finally, a few will start looking at what was unthinkable just a few years ago. Maybe it is not too late, but I believe it is, and the evidence of the contrails and the other things going on, including Y2K, seems to me to be evidence enough. The problem with what has been going on for the last thirty years is that these men, such as the man above, have been trying to use a "system" which was not designed for their benefit to create a benefit for themselves and their friends. It can not be done. The only solution to what is happening involves self-government, under His Law. It really is pretty simple, as you will see in Part XX. That is the only thing which puts an end to the following nonsense.


From: Charles Marcus <>

On 12/23/98 9:54 AM, said:

However, I haven't figured out the "trick" used to distinguish between the so-called- "nonconstitutional statutory" court of the State and the legitimate constitutional court.

The key may simply be in the heading. Where the Oklahoma constitution specifies a District Court, the common heading used in our first-level courts is, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF...

When we get on the right track at the first level, we can move to the next, etc., to demand a constitutionally legitimate court, whether State or Federal.

The dejure courts no longer exist, as they are inherently connected to 'sovereignty', which our country lost when we lost our independent treasury. Understand, I absolutely support your efforts (I am even involved) to uncover the fraud, and to even attempt to re-assert our sovereignty...but I think it is a mistake to ignore this seemingly tiny but very significant fact.

As long as we ALL ignore and violate the fundamental Law (how many of us actually PAY our debts with SUBSTANCE, even among ourselves??, Or, said another way, how many of us violate the commandment against unequal weights and measures, which is codified in most of our Constitutions?), we will continue to fail to invoke the assistance of our Creator. Imho, ALL of our substantive Rights attach to this one little detail.

Charles Marcus


Enough people have been discussing "value" and "money" questions that I thought this might be a good place to throw something into the soup. I happened across the following definition in the Consumer Protection Act, at 15 U.S.C. 1602:

"(e) The term 'credit' means the right granted by a creditor to a debtor to defer payment of debt or to incur debt and defer its payment."

The Federal Reserve Note, and "loans" from Federal Reserve-member banks, and non-Fed-member financial institutions insured by FDIC, are all predicated, or better put, "hypothecated" on "credit of the United States". Liability for "debt" is transferred from whoever accepts the FRN or "public money" distributed via these financial institutions in lieu of payment. The receiver is not "paid", he simply accepts an obligation of the United States (credit of the United States) in lieu of payment, relying on the ability to pass the debt on and thereby secure what he wants and needs by a subsequent transfer to debt.

We have to have the proper perspective of gold and silver coin of the United States to see the fraud in this: While the United States minted gold and silver coin, this was merely an authentication process, the gold and silver coin did not belong to the United States, per se. The gold and silver still belonged to whoever had the coin minted. In the beginning, at least, Congress provided this service without charge. The United States had no claim to gold and silver coin impressed with the national currency emblems except for the amount collected as tax and for various services, and as penalties for infractions. The coin belonged to whoever originally owned it or came into possession by way of exchange.

"Credit of the United States" is an entirely different matter. The above definition helps to see what it is and what it does -- it is a medium employed to "defer" payment, and thereby, transfer debt. The FRN is a "private" issue instrument which amounts to a note effected against an obligation which is not paid, therefore the "credit" of the United States.

All national banking "associations" are formed as corporate bodies to provide financial services to officers and employees of the United States -- people entitled to use of "public money". Once the association is established, it must subscribe to Federal Reserve membership by buying stock in the regional Federal Reserve Bank, and must insure through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Even then, national banking associations and other Fed-member financial institutions have a limited scope of activities; they must become Federal Tax and Loan Depositories in order to expand operations. In that capacity, they become agents or agencies of the United States, one of the capacities being that of "fiscal agent", so when they serve as "depositaries" for tax and/or loan purposes, they are agencies of the United States, albeit independent or contract agencies. Digest that, and we'll address the matter more at length another time. /s/ Dan Meador


?Pretty much on point, but it still ignores one or two points we have covered before. However, the strong point about it is where we are the ones ignoring His Law, and by now you should understand exactly how well His Law works; by ignoring His Law, we have created a situation where we are bringing judgment against ourselves, and I will admit that at least a part of what I understand of what is facing America takes this into account. His Law. His Law works perfectly, and when you ignore it, as we are taught to do deliberately by the so-called ministers, judgment does indeed come, by your own actions.



If I might, for the sake of clarity, bring several of these discussions back to earth... SupposeRW is right and we are under martial law....what is his suggested course of action?

Suppose Dan is right, and no constitutional courts are readily available...that all we have are private courts....with the president being "King Clinton" and passing out law in the form of edicts that are obeyed by ignorant "sheeple"......what is his suggested course of action? Perhaps there are many who are into this for the mental exercise....I am not one of them....I suspect there are others.

I think to many of our discussions turn into "pissing contests" and we lose sight of the "solution" motive, or we get caught up in the joy of our intellectual prowess....I would appreciate something in each post which draws the thoughts presented to a logical conclusion and a positive direction... Just a thought.


Ultimately, short of the Second Coming, we have two solutions: Either we can rectify the system by lawful means, or we can issue a call to arms. Or three: We can submit to despotism and plunder.

In order to correct the system in peaceful political and judicial forums, we must learn what the law is, and we must learn what remedies the law provides (There are no remedies provided in man’s law; it is always self-serving, therefore, no remedy is possible. Dan and I totally disagree on this point. - David). Breaking through the "shell of illusion" has been a difficult task that has just been accomplished in recent months. We now know we are dealing with "Cooperative Federalism", and we know there is a "third tier of government", formed by various intergovernmental compacts. And we know that these compacts are "nonconstitutional" in substance and essence.

My position, which is occasionally contrasted by that of RW, might be characterized by this: "Here, if we know the law, we have the means to use the law to attack outlaw courts and agencies that exceed constitutionally enumerated powers." Additionally, putting the law before those in public office, including legislatures of the several States, provides the opportunity to secure peaceful political remedies. I assure you, most people who work as public servants, particularly in functionary capacities, don't know as much about the fraud as those who participate in these discussion groups.

If we know the law, and we also know lawful remedies that are supposed to be available, we have the opportunity to develop and deploy a plan of action that is lawful by nature.

RW and I occasionally get after each other, but he hasn't used slanderous personal attacks, nor do I have any intention of using those kinds of attacks. I don't question that we share common objectives. Consequently, you haven't heard me complain about his sometimes forward responses, nor have I heard him complain about mine. Contrasts must be visible for the discussion to be fruitful, and occasionally there will be the equivalent of verbal fist-fights, but hopefully those who engage in the enterprise benefit, and others who read both sides of issues will hopefully profit.

In general, the so-called patriot community has suffered because individuals and groups have taken off on tangents without having forums in which to prove the basis of their respective initiatives.

Solutions? I know a number of things that should work, but I'm running several months behind on initiatives as we are presently enjoying an "explosion" on the research side. There simply aren't enough hours in the day, and we have to move with "deliberate speed" rather than trying to run ahead. Or put another way, "The hurrier I go, the behinder I get."

I suspect RW and I would get along fine if we had a weekend or week together, so don't be overly concerned about contrasts in our respective submissions. We occasionally take up issues outside discussion groups, so differences articulated in the groups aren't intended to be ultimate condemnation in either direction.

Without the "loyal opposition," a linear point of view would dominate, and would inevitably get off track. The dynamics of spirited discussion will be us closer to the truth than we would get otherwise. /s/ Dan Meador


?I read everything that Dan and his group put out, because they are an excellent source of information about the courts and what is currently being found. I do believe that they have many things figured out. The problem with that is simply that the people at the top know how close they are getting as well, and will not give up the power gracefully. When the tide turns significantly against the elite, when enough information becomes apparent to a significant number of people so that the dynamics of mass begin to come into play, the most danger is then. We are near that point, now, just as we are near the critical mass of the credit money system. Beware.


In response to these Constitution subjects (Business Trust / Creator

approved / Devil's Writ) may I ask the following:

Where does the original CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 1787AD (before Bill of Rights) make even a passing reference to anything religious or scriptural?

Does it not appear to be totally without any higher power inspiration, (as contrasted with a very inspired Declaration of Independence)?

I recently learned that, with regard to the Constitution, "Again Freemasonry set the pattern in ideology and form. Since the Masonic federal system of organization was the only pattern that patriotic Brethren intent on strengthening the fledgling nation should turn to the organizational base of the Craft for a model. Regardless of the other forces that affected the formation of the Constitution during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the fact remains that the federalism established in the civil government the Constitution created is identical to the federalism of the Grand Lodge system of Masonic government created in Anderson's Constitutions of 1723." (H.C. Clauson "Masons Who Helped Shape Our Nation" 1976 pg. 82)

Here are "some Not-so-Famous-Quotes:"

"The government of the United states is in no sense founded on the Christian religion." (From the Trade Treaty with North Africa of 1791 passed by Senate under John Adams, signed by George Washington.

"The American Revolution of 1776 was to a large degree led by men steeped in the rational humanism of the Enlightenment who considered all established religion a form of barbaric superstition. Thus their insistence on the separation of church and state, which was universally regarded as the MOST RADICAL aspect of the American Revolution." George Washington

What is being said here?? To agitate the air even more, may I post an update of something I sent on Thanksgiving Day about just who "We the People" are?

[No one ever told me where I was wrong, below; can You?]:

Greetings to my Friends and Associates:

Perhaps it is wise at Holiday time to reflect on history, tradition, and origins of our country--and just who "We the People" are here in this great land we call the (u) U S of A:

This includes two sets of comments on a Letter that Douglass R Graham, Ret. Sci. Instr. & Ret. Mil. Off'r, AUS wrote to the Supreme Court. My comments are in [Brackets (Oscar Meyer)]---Please question my comments and sources.

ICE comments.

PART 1 of [My comments on a very basic Mistaken Premise in] the "Open Letter to Members of supreme Court" when Douglass R Graham (D.R.) begins to write [EMPHASIS is his]:

The Constitution FOR the united States (of America)

Oscar [Originally it had no title. My version reads "The CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES" ]

DR: makes very clear that WE THE PEOPLE are, (collectively), the REAL SOVEREIGNS of the nation, that the states and the federal government are merely OUR AGENTS to which WE have DELEGATED A VERY LIMITED part of that sovereignty. We did NOT relinquish it.

[This is essentially correct, but almost opposite to what DR thinks. Who, (collectively?) appoints OUR agents - Who delegated?]

[and D.R. re-writes:]

There is a PREAMBLE to the Constitution which explains WHY WE the PEOPLE believed that such a document was necessary to be published.

ICE: It is not altogether clear who "WE the PEOPLE" really were in late 18th century American gov't. Given the state of communications compared to today, the idea that a high percentage of Americans were well informed on what was being argued at the Constitutional Convention is dubious at best.

Oscar: [The Constitutional Convention was a secret meeting--not for public knowledge at all. It is not only dubious, what the people ever learned is only what the leaders and delegates wanted them to know. (There was no C-span coverage-nobody watched!)]

ICE: And the idea that those who argued FOR a "Bill of Rights" spoke for "We the People" then and now is completely baseless. At least then, there were large numbers who wanted no Constitution at all, no federal gov't at all, and/or who saw any "Bill of Rights" as an unnecessary evil which by its very existence created the idea that this new federal gov't had all powers NOT DENIED in the "Bill of Rights." [Federalist vs Anti-Federalist papers: Economic efficiency vs. Human rights/liberty]

and DR re-writes and re-emphasizes (his ALL CAPS):

To emphasize the Points of the Constitution, WE THE PEOPLE added Article 6, in which WE made it clear that IT (and laws made "in pursuance thereof") are THE HIGHEST LAWs IN THIS LAND, NOT something government can lawfully ignore whenever it finds it to be "inconvenient." [Which government(s) = State governments!]

Oscar: [Article 6 reads "This Constitution And the Laws of the Unites States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United states, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the the Contrary notwithstanding..." Does this not say that Treaties are co-equal to the Constitution and part of the supreme Law of (where? = ) the Land over which the United States has Authority? (See 2 below.) And, why is Pursuance capitalized?]

Oscar: [The Preamble begins precisely: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Just who are "We?":

Oscar: [1. Why is the word "People" capitalized??? In grammar, when a noun is capitalized, it means a special, rather than general term. Were all the people on this continent considered as participating members of the United States? Were blacks/slaves? Were women? Were Indians/Native Americans? Hardly. This Constitution was written by a special group of people for a group of those special People of the United States, mostly for commercial expedience among the States and overseas. The 55 delegates to the Constitutional convention were mostly lawyers, statesmen, business entrepreneurs and the chosen educated elite of society. They all had vested interest and power positions in the 13 new States. These leaders were special people, a chosen select People. See number 3 below.

Oscar: [2. Why are both the phrases "United States" and "United States of America" in the same first sentence? Just a slight mistake, an oversight, or does it sound better this way? OR could there be actually be two (2) different geo-political entities?? Research reveals that there are two (2) entities -- a deliberate bifurcation (split) of the government and its venue, the country - plainly written for all to discern in the very first words of the Constitution. "United States" is the corporate governmental structure set up by the elite People to govern the land of "the United States of America" and all the common people. The People of the United States corporate elite government, through this Constitution, created the supreme Laws to control its lands and peoples.

Oscar: [3. Say, why is the word "Order" capitalized. Isn't that odd? - just a mistake or oversight, or it looks prettier? According to Websters 1823 Dictionary, "order" is a verb; when capitalized, it becomes a noun, often indicating a Secret Order. Eighteen supporters of the Constitution were dedicated Masons who seemed to be its most dedicated crafters. The basic goal of Masons always has had something to do with control -- eventual global control, a new World Order. The Constitution of 1787 was mostly modeled after the Masonic "Constitution" and its goals of eventual world control, as established in 1776 (May 2) which is the date highlighted at the base of a pyramid on the backside of every dollar bill in your wallet--to denote the founding date of the Illuminati.

Oscar: [4. The true reading of the pre-amble indicates that "We the People" are the special People of the corporate government elite who established this Constitution (and create the District of Columbia) to contract and rule over the land and US little people. So it is not our (you and me = we) Constitution; it is Their Constitution--very sorry, very sad. Is not the whole "selling" of We the everyday people.. concept of the Constitution to US little people a Fraud??!

[The corporate Federal U.S. government has unlimited power given to it in this Constitution. - For example, the corporate U.S. government can make anything it wants serve as money (State's can't, but what restricts the Federal gov't?). It can even to declare bankruptcy (what happened March 9, 1933??) and can it not operate effectively today under martial rule and Executive Orders, with a "rubber-stamp" Congress. ]

DR Only within the federal zone of jurisdiction, that is on federal territories such as D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, and Military/Naval bases, is government free of the Constitutional Limitations WE THE PEOPLE IMPOSED UPON IT!

Oscar: [Sorry, not US little people. It is those leading People who imposed---not us. Why, these People even established an elaborate Electoral College to keep us common people from directly electing "our" Presidents, who then appoint "our" fearless executive leaders = cabinet.]

ICE: Constitutions are written on pieces of paper. I have never seen a piece of paper impose anything on anyone -- much less gov't and other powerful interests determined to do exactly as they please.

Oscar:[Esp. when that Constitution grants extra powers to a Federal zone that can eat up the States it was superficially design to serve and protect.]

Oscar: [It goes on to my Part 2, which is more of D.R.'s writing, Ice's comments and my interjections, which I am reworking]. [Please, will someone do extra research and tell me I am completely wrong, ---and that everything is just the way I learned it in "our" government run public schools!?!]


?The above is a pretty good sample of some of the messages that have gone back and forth and which I have been privileged to receive, and is a comprehensive development of much the same conclusions I and my friends have reached, using different logic and sources. You should pay particular attention to the quotes from George Washington. There is another quote from him which dates from about 1776 in which he states that it is not his intention or desire to be separated from the King. Isn’t it amazing how carefully the information we are to receive is selected and distributed? Much more on why they did not want to be separated from the King in Part XVIII.

?What it comes down to is that our programming is very careful and extremely comprehensive. It basically covers everything that we experience, and it takes a concerted effort to break the molds formed for our thinking. You are among the select who have achieved this breaking away.

?Once you begin to accept that there are things about which you have been deceived, it is easy to break open the web of lies. The same is true of women; we have all been taught (deliberately?) that men can not understand women. Why? Women are very simple (just as men are), and it is not difficult to establish a relationship with any woman that you want to once you understand this. Women are different, and have different needs and wants than men. Men who do not wish to look at women as a partner and helpmate (read Scripture) will never grasp this, and their women will never give to the men what they do not first receive.

?You see, the parameters of a man/woman relationship is up to the man (this is true MOST of the time; some women will force adjustments in a relationship but this is a rare occurrence and does not work very often, as men rebel unless the woman is very discreet). If this is not understood by you, simply answer the question; who asked who out first? The woman will wait and adjust to you so as not to upset the possibilities of the beginning relationship. She will allways mirror back to you what she receives. So, what is the first rule of happiness for a man?

?Happiness for the woman. This does not mean material happiness, although that is important to most women (I have met one who is so different it is amazing; I have watched her give away the whole stock of food of the house, the car, blankets, radios, everything for needy people, and her husband, Bless him, understood). To most women, material happiness means security, and a home. Within this context, we are talking about a family, and the necessary elements for a secure place to raise the family. Do you remember the three major causes of breast cancer from Part X? Few or no children, little or no breast feeding, and the use of the pill for birth control. If this does not lead you directly to how God designed woman, I do not know what will. And if you fight this part of your woman, there will be no peace in your home.

?But there is more to a woman. They need to be acknowledged. Allways. I NEVER walk past or near my wife without touching her; not intimately, perhaps just to brush my hand across her hand or arm, and this always brings a smile, which I gladly return. I am simply telling her that I like her, and I like having her near me. After my wife and I are intimate, I always spend as much time holding her as she wants. She needs this; she needs to know that I want more from here than just sex, just as she needs my touch during the day, and my smile. My first wife told me something, after we had been married several years, that really struck home after I had thought about it for some time; she said "You know, you’re the first man I have ever been around that actually acted like he liked me when I wasn’t lying down." She was a very beautiful woman, and extremely popular with the men, and after I thought about that statement for awhile, I finally realized why she married me, and not someone else.

?I never do anything major without discussing it with my wife; I have learned that not only does she value being part of the decision making process, but after I grew up enough to understand, I found that many times she was offering advice that I better listen too! Because she was using a different way of looking at things; a different way that revealed, often, unexpected future problems with what I wanted to do. When I started listening, my life, not only with her but in general, became easier, and simpler. Was it easy to start using her input, rather than just paying lip service to listening? Yes. Was it worth it? Absolutely! Absolutely, but within the context that I still made the decisions. This also meant that I had to listen to "I told you so!" a number of times, but such is life. I am the man of the house, and I make the decisions. I did it then, and I do it now, just as I will into the future.

?What this breaks down to is the man being willing to think about his wife, instead of taking her for granted, and the return from the woman is so great once you start to do this, that you wonder why every man does not do the same. Woman are not hard to understand; men simply do not take the time to think about the subject. It is pretty much the same with the Constitution, and with what is going on in Washington, DC; just think about it and you will be led to different information. You have no choice, because the Truth is self-evident, once you begin looking. The problem is, YOU MUST BEGIN!


My thanks to Ed for sending this to the list. I have a related question to this but it is at the state level. What is the rule and effect of 'Governors Executive orders'? I have long wondered about those and just how 'lawful' they are. Jackie


Subject: Re: EO 13107 - 30 days? (Some clarification)

X-Mailer: Juno 1.49 From: (Edwin F. Moats)

Some clarification.

1. EOs are not "law" in the sense that a statute is law. But it is law for executive branch employees. An EO is an order to all executive branch employees from the CEO of the Executive branch. Is it law for you and me? Well, no and yes. No, an EO is not addressed to me, so I can't violate it. And no, it is not addressed to me, so it can't be enforced against me. But, if I'm going to have any dealing with an executive branch employee, then the EO affects my life because it binds that employee. And since the tentacles of the fed govt have spread so far and wide, the EO might well affect all of us. So if the EO says "no one may enter a National Park w/o first displaying his SSN", the Park Service employees will obey it or lose their jobs.

2. The "30 days" is both true and false. It's true that the EO takes effect in 30 days. That's to give "heads up time" to the executive branch employees. The only actual effect of this 30 days is that an executive branch employee can't be disciplined for failure to obey the EO until the running of the 30 days. And if Congress acted during this 30 day period it could prevent the EO from becoming effective. But the unspoken implicit claim that if Congress doesn't act w/i the 30 days it can never act thereafter is false. Congress can eliminate the EO anytime, before or after the running of the 30 days.

3. The claim that states will have to revise their law to conform to an EO is bogus. States only have to conform to federal law which is either (a) constitutionally required, or (b) a federal act pursuant to the commerce clause. An EO is neither. But again, the EO binds the federal employee. So if we imagine a federal employee whose job is pouring out federal largess to a state, and the EO says "no more largess unless the state adopts a fingerprint law", then we're back to our familiar federal blackmail situation.

So, although an EO is not "law", and the states are not legally required to conform their law to an EO, yet the combination of (1) Federal employee obedience, (2) Congressional passivity, (3) federal involvement in every aspect of our lives, (4) states' hooked on federal money, and (5) the practical fact that the president can produce EOs much faster than Congress or the States can react, means that for all practical purposes a determined and unscrupulous president can use EOs to rule the nation by dictatorial fiat.

This appears to be happening today. Ed Moats


?Absolutely right on point; and the comment on the effect is true as well. There is no power in the EO, except that given by Congress, and most EOs are simply treaties being given force and effect and saving Congress from having to answer for the treaties directly, and this is the point missed by the discussion above. Congress has already passed on the issues involved, by agreeing to the treaties, and they will not challenge the EOs as a consequence.


You may be able to fool all of the people some of the time.. You may be able to fool some of the people all of the time... However, you CANNOT fool GOD any of the time and that is what counts - it is ALL that counts. W.G.E.N. 11/24/98


What Keny says here is accurate truth and fact. I have a fair amount of info on this Lewis county incident from those that were actually there when it happened and also a copy of the newspaper article.

Subject: (Fwd) RE: RWL> Fwd: Organization: Freedom Makers

Forwarded Message

From: "Kenneth Wayne" <>

To: "Frank Taucher" <>, <>

Subject: RE: RWL> Fwd:

The post below appears to rely on code, or statute, as "constitutional authority" to impose martial rule ... however, exactly where in the constitution did the people delegate the authority to impose martial law /rule upon which these implementing statutes /codes rely?

Of course the whole issue is mute, as we are not under martial law /rule, but instead most of us have subjected ourselves (unknowingly) to commercial law /rule.

From an application standpoint, it is very difficult to discern between the two. However how they came to apply to you, tells the story ... if the rules are based upon contract, consent, or assent, under commercial principles, then its commercial enforcement ... if an invading military force is merely keeping the streets open for commerce while civil government is being restored, it may be military rule!

Recently, the Lewis County, State of Washington, county commission decided it was too costly to keep putting drivers in jail who were suspended, or otherwise without license. They 'passed' and ordinance directing the sheriff, and other law enforcement officers to instead impound the car(s), and imposed hefty fees to obtain release of the car(s) ... upon a formal Lawful Protest being declared upon the record, and being pushed on the issue, one county commissioner, QUOTED IN THE LOCAL PAPER, declared that Lewis County was still under martial law ever since Lincoln declared it, and the ordinance was under that martial law power!

Upon receipt of a copy of the article, units from Fort Lewis responded to Lewis County to investigate the matter ... upon a thorough explanation of the terms and conditions of martial law, functionally, pure anarchy, with every man for himself, and any 'public official' who trespasses upon private property, or directs another to so trespass, is subject to open season hunting rules, and the military's job is to keep the streets and highways open for commerce (remove any wreckage and bodies /stop any firefights which overlap the streets and highways) they promptly published a retraction of the martial law statement! "Keny"


Please Re-distribute widely:

I am currently the TV talk show host at KPVM TV 41 here in Pahrump, NV. The show is called "Hot Topics P.M." and air nightly at 8:00 PT for 2 hours. On Wednesdays, I host a one hour program entitled "Eye of 2000", where we cover the Y2K issues extensively.

As expected, we receive e-mail, snail mail and faxes from the audience. One that we received yesterday was *very* troubling, and is the reason for this posting. I have re-typed the fax in its entirety while omitting the sender's name. We have since verified the following via independent bank sources, and broadcasted this information last night locally (2/17/99) on our program. There are further comments below. -J.J.

In the "For What It's Worth" department, my wife went to the Smith's Nevada State Bank this afternoon to get a new ATM card. They had some pamphlets titled "Preparing For The Year 2000, A plan for success." The pamphlet goes to say how NSB is "right on track" and Y2K is their "top priority."

While my wife was talking with the branch manager, he noticed she had the pamphlet and said, "Just between you and me, if I were you, I'd begin taking your money out of the bank little by little, and stash it, before you can't. We are tracking everyone's withdrawal history. When the bank runs start, anyone who attempts to draw more than their history indicates they should, will find a closed account."

J.J. I know you can't mention unsubstantiated tid-bit on the air, but I assure you this is legitimate. Scott knows me, and I hope trusts me. They had quite an effect on my wife, as I'm sure you can imagine. The manager repeated more than once that she shouldn't repeat this (RIGHT!) When she mentioned that she would tell her husband, he said he'd deny everything (of course). END

I also know this gentlemen. Nevada State Bank is one of three in this Valley of about 35,000 residents. The others are Bank of America, and Wells Fargo. It should also be known that in a small, conservative town such as Pahrump, there are very few secrets. We have also learned that our *only* local electrical utility, Valley Electric Association, has warned all counties agencies, and several other organizations to expect a 3 to 5 day power outage starting 1/1/2000 - and suggested these agencies and organizations should purchase generators. This has come in from several sources, but the VEA "officially" states that everything will be fine.

One more thing, Everyone is sick here, too. Got a "flu bug" going around that some people (especially the elderly) just can't seem to kick. J.J. Johnson

J.J. and Nancy Johnson - P.O. Box 3000 Suite 204 Pahrump Nevada 89041

(775) 727-6340 Home/Office (775) 727-6514 Fax


?The wise man prepares for any eventuality it is within his power to plan for. Be advised; As we saw in a previous paper, Y2K has been carefully planned for by the United States government. That much careful planning, over 35 years, can be expected to achieve what it has been intended to achieve. There will be civil unrest, hunger, public disruptions and foreign troops involved. Now, is this just my opinion? Judge for yourselves.


Original Message-----From:

On Behalf Of Frank Taucher Subject: RWL> Fwd:

From: Frank Taucher <>

Here are some excerpts from a letter regarding the movie, "The Siege" The newspaper article was titled, "MARTIAL LAW IS NOT ALWAYS UNCONSTITUTIONAL"

The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 USC 1385, and other statutes at 10 USC 331-335 outline the circumstances under which the president may call upon the military in (as the British say) "aid of the Civil Power." The War Powers Resolution is intended to regulate the president's war powers, not the power to quell domestic violence.

Ex parte Milligan confirmed congressional authority to suspend habeas corpus, but, by one vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the suspension could not take place if the courts were open. Left unanswered was the question, what if the courts are open but subject to mob rule or to coercion?

In Ex parte McArdle, the court concluded that an editor held for trial by a military commission for incitement and impeding Reconstruction could not appeal the denial of habeas corpus because Congress had withdrawn the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to hear such appeals. See Professor William Van Alstyne's article at 15 Ariz. L. Rev 229 (1973).

Detention without probable cause was authorized by the Emergency Detention Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1019, which delegated the right to declare an "Internal Security Emergency" to the president. When Congress repealed the act in 1971, 85 Stat. 347, it did so in terms suggesting that they could exercise that right. Thus it's dangerous to describe any declaration of martial law as "blatantly unconstitutional."


The Catholic University of America Regards to all, Frank Anthony, Taucher


?Gee, I wonder just how long the United States government has been planning all of this! Always remember the story about the Soviet Union and the roads in Afghanistan; the people in charge of Washington, DC, are the same people who have always (yes, even today) been in charge of the Soviet Union.


What happens when Americans are besieged by their own Government?

Two hundred and 224 years ago, when Americans felt themselves besieged a Civil War erupted. Two years later, this Civil War reached around the World, the Third World War of the 1700's.

The 104th Congress of the United States passed the most draconian legislation in the history of the Republic. This legislation has created a National Data bank for medical files, driver licensing files, Employment files, and Firearms files. Why? (Because most planning about world control revolves around the year 2000 and the beginning of the "new" millennium. - David)

The current occupant of the White House has created Executive Orders and Presidential Directives to empower an Agency under War conditions. This Agency known as the Federal Emergency Management Agency was created by Executive Order. This Agency is answerable only to the Chief Magistrate of the United States, the President..

Everyday the "National Media" propagates the need for enhanced security to be administered by the United States, and its alter ego the States. Just what is being secured? The Presidency from it’s usurpation’s of the rule of law? An Executive bureaucracy with a license to kill?

The United States is demanding that no one may secure any privilege (read license) from the United States or its alter ego, the State without producing a social security number. You will not be allowed to hire anyone American without first securing permission from the Government. Soon, You will not be able have children, marry, or work without securing permission from Government.

Is this America, the Constituted Republic? No, it is the Federal Corporation, a Municipal Corporation operating out of New Columbia, in a city known as Washington, District of Columbia.

Eventually history has proven that the Americans will be pushed beyond reason. The federal authorities will provoke a confrontation that will spiral completely out control. Three years after the King’s Army secured Boston violence erupted on what was now a routine military patrol throughout the country side. Could this is be the point of the Federal Presence in Andrew, North Carolina?

It is apparent that the President, William Jefferson Clinton will do what ever he needs to protect his position. He has shown a proclivity to use the United States Military to initiate Wars without reason to cover his domestic failures.

Today, We have a President that is under siege. He appears to willing order violent, and lethal operations against Americans, and foreign Nations without concern. His latest adventure in Iraq failed to forestall his impeachment in the House of the Representatives. What happens when the trial starts in the Senate?

America is at risk. Beijing, and now Pyongyang have the ability to launch Nuclear missiles upon Los Angeles. Los Angeles is sure a popular target these days. Is that why Maxine Walters spends so much time on the shore of the Potomac? Why has William Jefferson Clinton apparently supported this technological ability of these two nation states? Is Los Angeles the next "Pearl Harbor?" Is this nuclear threat to be encouraged by public pronouncements of the National Command Authority stating what Nuclear threat?

Does President William Jefferson Clinton discourage this threat? Apparently he chooses to state that the United States will not deploy the needed technology that will protect Americans from this Nuclear Threat? Now why would he publicly state such policy? Cordel Hull’s ambiguous messages to the Japanese in the Summer of 1941 led directly to Pearl Harbor. Six months after Dean Acheson stated that Korea was not a security concern of the United States, the Northern Armies moved south on June 26, 1950. Three months after April Gillespie apparently stated the Iraq’s moves on Kuwait were not a concern of the United States, The Iraqi Armies moved south.

Cities from Vancouver to Los Angeles are apparently targets of opportunity for Beijing, and Pyongyang. You would think the National Command Authority would defend America. No, the current national command authority apparently is willing to use the West Coast of North America as live bait.

These are perilous times in America. The President apparently runs amok. The Judicial Branch legislates from the Bench while the Congress of the United States deals through back doors in the Joint Committee meetings.

America is in for a rude awakening. The question is what are we going to do?

America’s first civil war lasted eight years. The War between the States and the United States lasted four years and cost over a million lives. What will this coming conflagration cost?

On April 19, 1775, shots were fired between Countryman. A civil war erupted. In the Spring of 1777, France became an ally of the United States, and the War spread around the World.

Today, Americans are once again under siege by a State and National governance that is out of control. The last civil war lasted eight years and involved the World. Today everything that happens in America will involve the World.

Liberty comes at the cost of eternal vigilance. To reclaim a liberty that is lost, comes at a higher cost, our lives.

America is at a crossroads. The officers of the Public Trust routinely abridge their oath of office for their political gain, and America’s demise.

We look to the Courts for relief, and find a Judiciary that has willingly converted our Courts of Law into Courts of Equity. (Sorry; they are not our "courts." - David)

We look to Congress for relief, and find a legislative branch that has sold out to the international monetarists.

We look to the Executive branch to enforce the Supreme Law of the Land as the Chief Magistrate, and we discover that the Presidency offers the wealth of our Nation to foreign principals for apparent political gain, and personal profit.

We find that the three branches of the United States Government have become the servants of foreign principals.

We find rulings by these Courts that are not law. We have legislative acts of the Congress that are enforced beyond its Constitutional authority. We find the Chief Magistrate failing to uphold the oath of office of the Presidency. (Again, we are the ones at fault for contracting into the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress; this is what men like this fail to take into account. Congress simply does what we allow to be done, and, apparently want, or we would not contract! - David)

The Republic is in danger from enemies from within the Nation. Few people are willing to open their eyes to the immanent danger that lies immediately in our Nation’s future.

The Congress of the United States appears to willingly empower a national "Gestapo" operating out of Puerto Rico. These two alphabet agencies have shown a peculiar zeal to use violent and lethal force to extract the property and lives of Americans. (The IRS can be and is regularly beaten, but the decisions are never published. Why? Because freedom requires knowledge and I agree with this; the success of a few should not be the basis for others achieving freedom. Their must be a national awakening before the problem is solved. Unfortunately, the time necessary for that to occur is painfully short. - David)

The Presidency appears to willingly enforces international agreements without bothering with the niceties of the Constitutional process.

The Judicial Branch has constructed a system of Administrative adjudication that bars the rule of law.

All across our Great Country people are fighting against corrupt systems, such as Salem County, Oregon. Everyday we uncover a new horror, such as Judicial Officer in the district Court of the United States who allows the prosecution to write his "rulings."

Lawyers control the Executive Branch, the Judicial Branch, and the Legislative Branch. There exists no separation of powers on the shore of the Potomac today. We Americans have become a second class people in our own Republic. (Nope. - David)

We discover that Government uses its own ‘secretive’ language found in Black’s Law Dictionary. We speak English, and the government speaks legalese.

This system that RULES America Today is the most successful despotic tyranny in the History of the World. This system enslaves over 125 million Americans who contribute over sixty percent of their working lives directly to this RULING elite. (Voluntarily, I might add, under contract. - David)

This system of governance has pillaged our most precious assets, us, and our children. (Voluntarily, I might add, under contract. - David)

There are those who wish for a peaceful transition back to our Constituted Republic. History has shown that those who are corrupted with power, will never willingly, intentionally, and knowingly relinquish their authority.

After the day long fire fight between Americans and the King’s Army on April 19, 1775, emissaries from the Colonies in London attempted to secure a peaceful end to this violent civil eruption. There were Englishman on the floor of Parliament who recognized the folly of the American Policy. They called for compromise, but none was given. Benjamin Franklin found a more comfortable response in Paris. The Colonial rebellion spread. Within a year, the United Colonies proclaimed a new nation, the United States of America. A year later, the World was at War.

Two hundred and twenty three years later, Americans again have a governance that puts itself above the Laws. Again the Governance is denying us our unalienable rights. We must find a way to remind these Officers of the Public Trust that We the People are the ultimate authority. The question is how?

The Courts are refusing our actions. Our arguments are marked as frivolous. Now we have learned why, these are Courts of Equity. What will happen next. During the Trial of William Penn, the Jury was brutalized by the King’s Minister to secure a guilty verdict. The Jury did not cave, it acquitted William Penn. Today Jurors who expound Jury nullification are routinely charged with, what else, "Obstruction of Justice."

The Congress ignores our demands. The 104th Congress of the United States created the most draconian statutes since the revision of the Trading with Enemies Act on March 6, 1933. The 105th Congress is so blind to its own corruption, and racked with insolence, that it fails to hold the Presidency accountable for illicit acts of War.

We are living under a system of governance that has institutionalized terror as a tool of political suppression of Americans. Do you really think that a system that is corrupted and brutal is going to peacefully surrender its positions of wealth and power?

Our children are imprisoned in an institution known as Public Education. The "National Media" is nothing more than a mechanization for governmentally created propaganda. We seek new communication nodes such as the Internet. The United States determines that this is a threat to it’s monopoly of information. So what happens, what else an all out assault on the Internet.

Yes we would all like to have the Judiciary recognize that we have unalienable rights. Yes we would like the Congress of the United States to abolish the alphabet soup of administrative agencies, and to revoke the charter of the Federal Reserve Bank. Yes we would appreciate the Presidency to abide by Article II of the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America. But as we can see, the constituted government of the United States for the United States of America has an agenda which is foreign, and detrimental to all Americans.

This ongoing social conflict in America will not end peaceably. Just look over the Executive Orders, and Presidential Directives promulgated by the current occupant of the White House. Those memorandums are orders for war, not for the administration of a peaceful Republic. Submit message by sending to


?Yes, most of this is correct. And what is going on has been carefully planned since at least the mid-1700s, and probably before. Does this mean that it has been a carefully crafted, minute by minute program? Yes.

?With the allowance that alterations are made for changing situations and times, but always the end is the same; the absolute control of the entire world and it’s population under one world government/dictatorship. Actually, if you understand Scripture, this has been an ongoing struggle since the days of Nimrod, and is strictly a dimension of man and his rebellion against The One True God, and we should not be appalled at the result. What we should be aware of that nothing that happens on this earth is of importance. What is important is our relationship with Him, and His promise that nothing will happen to us if we are Right with Him. This requires faith, and it requires action, and in-action as well. It is your job, and mine, to define where action is required, such as writing these papers, and where in-action is necessary, such as fighting to preserve the Constitution. Most will never understand the subtle differences involved, and the necessity for both.

?Within this framework, it is also necessary to recognize what the "other" side is doing, and I realize I keep coming back to this, but you might as well get used to it. I will guarantee to you, and I have not seen any proof, that there are commissions, in other words, groups of men and women, who are studying the results when certain steps are taken as regards the supply of food "within" the United States. This would include the addition of chemicals to the food or the use of inferior ingredients in the supply of food. And the studies would concentrate on how this would affect the "Human Resources" necessary to make the "system" work efficiently, and how closely they could arrange the death rate to correspond to the age where benefits to the system are no longer possible by keeping individuals alive. This is not particularly effective unless the individuals in question are locked into cities where their options concerning food can be totally controlled. For reference, see the UN land-use plans.


I sent part of this out to some of you before. Here is new/additional information that has been added. There are also links below. It has been known for a LONG time about he harm done by these products but it seems that little is being done to inform the public. Why don't you bookmark some of the links below and share them with friends. Thanks to my friends in Florida and Texas who forwarded this to me. Sharon DiLuvio

ASPARTAME Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998


Article written by Nancy Markle (1120197)

I have spent several days lecturing at the WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE on "ASPARTAME marketed as 'NutraSweet', 'Equal', and 'Spoonful"'. In the keynote address by the EPA, they announced that there was an epidemic of multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus, and they did not understand what toxin was causing this to be rampant across the United States. I explained that I was there to lecture on exactly that subject.

When the temperature of Aspartame exceeds 86 degrees F, the wood alcohol in ASPARTAME coverts to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, which in turn causes metabolic acidosis. (Formic acid is the poison found in the sting of fire ants). The methanol toxicity mimics multiple sclerosis; thus people were being diagnosed with having multiple sclerosis in error. The multiple sclerosis is not a death sentence, where methanol toxicity is.

In the case of systemic lupus, we are finding it has become almost as rampant as multiple sclerosis, especially Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi drinkers. Also, with methanol toxicity, the victims usually drink three to four 12 oz. Cans of them per day, some even more. In the cases of systemic lupus, which is triggered by ASPARTAME, the victim usually does not know that the aspartame is the culprit The victim continues its use aggravating the lupus to such a degree, that sometimes it becomes life threatening.

When we get people off the aspartame, those with systemic lupus usually become asymptomatic. Unfortunately, we can not reverse this disease. On the other hand, in the case of those diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, (when in reality, the disease is methanol toxicity), most of the symptoms disappear. We have seen cases where their vision has returned and even their hearing has returned. This also applies to cases of tinnitus. During a lecture I said "If you are using ASPARTAME (NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc.) and you suffer from fibromyalgia symptoms, spasms, shooting pains, numbness in your legs, cramps, vertigo, dizziness, headaches, tinnitus, joint pain, depression, anxiety attacks, slurred speech, blurred vision, or memory loss-you probably have ASPARTAME DISEASE!" People were jumping up during the lecture saying, "I've got this, is it reversible?" It is rampant. Some of the speakers at my lecture even were suffering from these symptoms. In one lecture attended by the Ambassador of Uganda, he told us that their sugar industry is adding aspartame! He continued by saying that one of the industry leader's son could no longer walk - due in part by product usage!

We have a very serious problem. Even a stranger came up to Dr. Espisto (one of my speakers) and myself and said, "Could you tell me why so many people seem to be coming down with MS?" During a visit to a hospice, a nurse said that six of her friends, who were heavy Diet Coke addicts, had all been diagnosed with MS. This is beyond coincidence. Here is the problem. There were Congressional Hearings when aspartame was included in 100 different products. Since this initial hearing, there have been two subsequent hearings, but to no avail. Nothing as been done. The drug and chemical lobbies have very deep pockets. Now there are over 5,000 products containing this chemical, and the PATENT HAS EXPIRED! At the time of this first hearing, people were going blind. The methanol in the aspartame converts to formaldehyde in the retina of the eye. Formaldehyde is grouped in the same class of dmgs as cyanide and arsenic-DEADLY POISONS!!!

Unfortunately, it just takes longer to quietly kill, but it is killing people and causing all kinds of neurological problems. Aspartame changes the brain's chemistry. It is the reason for severe seizures. This drug changes the dopamine level in the brain. Imagine what this drug does to patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease. This drug also causes Birth Defects.

There is absolutely no reason to take this product. It is NOT A DIET PRODUCT! The Congressional record said, "It makes you crave carbohydrates and will make you FAT". Dr. Roberts stated that when he got patients off aspartame, their average weight loss was 19 pounds per person. The formaldehyde stores in the fat cells, particularly in the hips and thighs.

Aspartame is especially deadly for diabetics. All physicians know what wood alcohol will do to a diabetic. We find that physicians believe that they have patients with retinopathy, when in fact, it is caused by the aspartame. The aspartame keeps the blood sugar level out of control, causing many patients to go into a coma. Unfortunately, many have died. People were telling us at the Conference of the American College of Physicians, that they had relatives that switched from saccharin to an aspartame product and how that relative had eventually gone into a coma. Their physicians could not get the blood sugar levels under control. Thus, the patients suffered acute memory loss and eventually coma and death.

Memory loss is due to the fact that aspartic acid and phenylalanine are neurotoxic without the other amino acids found in protein. Thus it goes past the blood brain barrier and deteriorates the neurons of the brain. Dr. Russell Blaylock, neurosurgeon, said, "The ingredients stimulates the neurons of the brain to death, causing brain damage of varying degrees. Dr. Blaylock has written a book entitled "EXCITOTOXINS: THE TASTE THAT KILLS" (Health Press 1-800-643-2665). Dr. H.J. Roberts, diabetic specialist and world expert on aspartame poisoning, has also written a book entitled "DEFENSE AGAINST ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE" (1-800-814-9800). Dr. Roberts tells how aspartame poisoning is escalating Alzheimer's Disease, and indeed it is. As the hospice nurse told me, women are being admitted at 30 years of age with Alzheimer's Disease. Dr. Blaylock and Dr. Roberts will be writing a position paper with some case histories and will post it on the Internet. According to the Conference of the American College of Physicians, 'We are talking about a plague of neurological diseases caused by this deadly poison".

Dr. Roberts realized what was happening when aspartame was first marketed. He said "his diabetic patients presented memory loss, confusion, and severe vision loss". At the Conference of the American College of Physicians, doctors admitted that they did not know. They had wondered why seizures were rampant (the phenylalanine in aspartame breaks down the seizure threshold and depletes serotonin, which causes manic depression, panic attacks, rage and violence).

Just before the Conference, I received a FAX from Norway, asking for a possible antidote for this poison because they are experiencing so many problems in their country. This poison is now available in 90 PLUS countries worldwide. Fortunately, we had speakers and ambassadors at the Conference from different nations who have pledged their help. We ask that you help too. Print this article out and warn everyone you know. Take anything that contains aspartame black to the store. Take the "NO ASPARTAME TEST" and send us your case history.

I assure you that MONSANTO, the creator of aspartame, knows how deadly it is. They fund the American Diabetes Association, American Dietetic Association, Congress, and the Conference of the American College of Physicians. The New York Times, on November 15, 1996, ran an article on how the American Dietetic Association takes money from the food industry to endorse their products. Therefore, they can not criticize any additives or tell about their link to MONSANTO. How bad is this? We told a mother who had a child on NutraSweet to get off the product. The child was having grand mal seizures every day. The mother called her physician, who called the ADA, who told the doctor not to take the child off the NutraSweet. We are still trying to convince the mother that the aspartame is causing the seizures. Every time we get someone off of aspartame, the seizures stop.

If the baby dies, you know whose fault it is, and what we are up against. There are 92 documented symptoms of aspartame, from coma to death. The majority of them are all neurological, because the aspartame destroys the nervous system.

Aspartame Disease is partially the cause to what is behind some of the mystery of the Desert Storm health problems. The burning tongue and other problems discussed in over 60 cases can be directly related to the consumption of an aspartame product. Several thousand pallets of diet drinks were shipped to the Desert Storm troops. (Remember heat can liberate the methanol from the aspartame at 86 degrees F). Diet drinks sat in the 120 degree F. Arabian sun for weeks at a time on pallets. The service men and women drank them all day long. All of their symptoms are identical to aspartame poisoning. Dr. Roberts says "consuming aspartame at the time of conception can cause birth defects". The phenylalanine concentrates in the placenta, causing mental retardation, according to Dr. Louis Elsas, Pediatrician Professor - Genetics, at Emory University in his testimony before Congress.

In the original lab tests, animals developed brain tumors (phenylalanine breaks down into DXP, a brain tumor agent). When Dr. Espisto was lecturing on aspartame with me, one physician in the audience, a neurosurgeon, said, "when they remove brain tumors, they have found high levels of aspartame in them".

Stevia, a sweet food, NOT AN ADDITIVE, which helps in the metabolism of sugar, which would be ideal for diabetics, has now been approved as a dietary supplement by the F.D.A. For years, the F.D.A. has outlawed this sweet food because of their loyalty to MONSANTO.

If it says "SUGAR FREE" on the label-DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT!! Senator Howard Hetzenbaum wrote a bill that would have warned all infants, pregnant mothers and children of the dangers of aspartame. The bill would have also instituted independent studies on the problems existing in the population (seizures, changes in brain chemistry, changes in neurological and behavioral symptoms). It was killed by the powerful drug and chemical lobbies, letting loose the hounds of disease and death on an unsuspecting public. Since the Conference of the American College of Physicians, we hope to have the help of some world leaders. Again, please help us too. There are a lot of people out there who must be warned, please let them know this information.

"There are in truth, no incurable conditions...that which exists is and was produced from a first cause, and may be met or counteracted, or changed, for the condition is the breaking of a law." (3744-1) Edgar Cayce

Note #2 More info and resources on Aspartame

Subject: Is there any aspartame in what you eat? The original article is now posted at:

In a nutshell aspartame destroys the brain, the optic nerve and the central nervous system and ravages every organ in the body. It triggers an irregular heart rhythm and doctors not realizing aspartame is a drug and not an additive medicate these patients, the drugs interact and there have been cases of complete heart block and sudden death. The drug also interacts with other drugs - changes brain chemistry and changes the dopamine level of the brain. It triggers all kinds of neurological diseases including Parkinson's Disease. You probably heard that Michael Fox has it, and already has had surgery trying to stop the tremors. He advertised Diet Pepsi and was using it. Now, its bad enough to trigger Parkinson's but to continue to use when it changes the dopamine level of the brain, means it can easily kill him - soon. Several on our list have written him letters and I'm trying to get someone in Hollywood to get to him personally and warn him off.

Another thing people need to know is that aspartame is being put in foods without labeling and this is very serious - and it has been estimated to be present in over 9000 products...


Subject: A reply to all on Aspartame Disease

Dear Mark: I'm glad to answer this for anyone who has any doubts. First of all, when my original post was picked up and somebody else’s name put on it, some of the lines appeared different. So first let me straighten this out on MS. In fact, if anyone wants to read by a physician go to

Dr. Roberts paper is titled MS or Aspartame Disease.

Aspartame, not just the methanol, destroys the central nervous system and it mimics MS so many times someone is diagnosed with it who doesn't really have it. In fact, I believe on DORway you can read Alicia Morris' case history. She was almost blind in one eye and was diagnosed by two physicians as having MS. When I met her I told her she might not really have MS. She was drinking 3 Diet Cokes a day. Remember that the daily allowable dose was set for rats not for humans. There is not an amount of a poison that is acceptable for human consumption. Also Alicia had been married for 3 years and never had been able to get pregnant. I also told her that aspartame changes the menses and causes infertility. She got off aspartame and after about 5 weeks her vision returned, her memory returned which she had complained of and all symptoms of MS disappeared. After about 6 months she got pregnant. Her story was in a national magazine by Sarah Starr, First for Woman , July 7, l997. I know Alicia and talk to her every once in awhile. The magazine incidentally shows her picture with her baby boy. No symptoms have ever returned since she got off aspartame, probably around l995, you will see the date on her history as I don't remember.

Okay, now this man is quoting something I said that says "People are going blind from wood alcohol, getting Alzheimer’s, losing their memory, having babies with birth defects, getting Lou Gherigs Disease, brain tumors, etc. This is all correct and there is documentation for from physicians on In fact, in Focus Magazine, October issue, there is an article on aspartame titled WHAT'S BLINDING THE WORLD? Obviously, there should be no question about this. Anyone who remembers prohibition knows that thousands of skid row drunks went blind or died on wood alcohol. Wood alcohol is in aspartame. And in l996 the Community Nutrition Institute in Washington, D.C. petitioned the FDA to ban aspartame because so many people were going blind. There is an article that tells about some of these like Shannon Roth who went blind in one eye from aspartame and Joyce Wilson who went blind on aspartame, was misdiagnosed as having MS, lost her memory and died from NutraSweet like an Alzheimer victim. These stories are all on DORWay. Also, Dr. Roberts position paper on aspartame and the eyes and Dr. Morgan Raiford's paper on aspartame and the eyes. Dr. Raiford died a couple of years ago. He had the Atlanta Eye Clinic. He was an ophthalmologist but specialist in methanol toxicity and he diagnosed most of the people who went blind on aspartame - most of them were sent to him in Atlanta. He did everything he could to get aspartame banned because people were going blind on it.

Now the writer questions aspartame triggering Alzheimer’s. First of all, go to and read the FD- [FDA?] report of 92 symptoms caused by aspartame, from coma to death. Notice memory loss is #9 and is notorious with aspartame. Some of the victims who filed suit like Ron Anderson and Tammy Bell said when they left their house they had to write instructions on how to find their homes. Dr. Roberts has already written a book about it titled Defense Against Alzheimer’s Disease - 1 800 -914-9800.

Also an informant told us the National Soft Drink Association did a ten year story on aspartame and found Alzheimer’s, blindness and birth defects and never published the results. This may be why someone who knows people in Monsanto told us at the Olympics that they were warning their friends of aspartame because they said it triggered Alzheimer’s. This 20th century disease has now tripled. Neurosurgeon Ru-sell Bl-ylock, M.D., also writes about aspartame triggering Alzheimer’s in his book EXCITOTOXINS; THE TASTE THAT KILLS. When Joyce Wilson died from NutraSweet her husband told me when I interviewed him that she had no memory at all and was in diapers. This is what NutraSweet does to you! It's an agonizing death - do you wonder why we warn people off.

Now the writer seems to doubt the other things that aspartame triggers. On the brain tumor issue you can read Dr. Roberts' peer reviewed paper on aspartame and brain tumors. And many of you may remember that Dr. John Olney made world news on aspartame and its link to brain tumors in l996. He was on 60 Minutes and CNN, and there were reports all over the world. In original lab studies on aspartame the rats developed astrocytomas and the phenylalanine in aspartame breaks down into diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent. FD- toxicologist, Dr. Ad-ian G-oss wrote Senator Met-enbaum about these studies and listed the brain tumors. You can read his letters on - they are titled Gro-s' Letters.

As to Lou Gehrigs Disease. Anything that destroys the central nervous system like aspartame can cause all kinds of neurological diseases from Lou Gegrigs to Parkinson's Disease. And incidentally, aspartame changes the dopamine level of the brain so once someone gets Parkinson's from aspartame and he's using L-dopa, it can kill him. In fact, that's how I found out about aspartame. I had a friend who was diagnosed with Parkinson's and I knew you don't get it one day and die the next but he appeared to be dying.

His mouth could not form words, his arms and legs kicked out and he was losing his memory. That's how I met Dr. Roberts and he was the one who told me to get him off quick because it changes brain chemistry and the dopamine level of the brain. You can read it in his book if you like, Charles Press, Aspartame (NutraSweet) Is It Safe? Also read Metzenbaum's dead bill about studies he wanted having to do with the fact aspartame changes brain chemistry. You may remember that Michael Fox advertised Diet Pepsi and used it and now he has Parkinson's and I'm about ready to write him.

If you want to read about aspartame trigger Lou Gehrigs Disease from a doctor go to and read Dr. James Bowen's statement to the-DA. He mentions this and also says that aspartame is mass poisoning of the American public and more than 70 countries of the world. Dr. Blayl-ck also mentions Lou Gerigs Disease in his book and I believe he mentions in his lecture which you can also hear if your computer has audio. In this lecture he explains that the reactions to aspartame are toxic instead of allergic like from arsenic or cyanide. Aspartame is a literal poison.

Subject: Request For More Information About Aspartame.

Here are a couple of sites I found, John the first looks particularly informative....

Aspartame (Nutrasweet) Toxicity Information Center,





theWHOLEstory.html">ASPARTAME! The WHOLE story!

What is Aspartame?, aspartame consumption is never safe, Mission Possible at DORway,

A RECALL on the drug ASPARTAME, oh and equal time...

Debunking the "Official Aspartame Myth

I found some very interesting information on symptoms that are affected by this wonderful addition to living through chemistry! Toxicity Effects of Aspartame Use Selection of adverse effects from short-term and/or long-term use Note: It often takes at least sixty days without *any* aspartame or nutrasweet to see a significant improvement. Improvement in health is also often accompanied by weight loss. Check all labels very carefully (including vitamins and pharmaceuticals). Look for the word "aspartame" on the label and avoid it. (Also, it is a good idea to avoid "acesulfame-k" or "sunette.").

Finally, avoid getting nutrition information from junk food industry PR organizations such as IF-C or organizations that accept large sums of money from the junk and chemical food industry such as the Am-rican Diet-tic Ass-ciation.

seizures and convulsions



migraines and severe headaches (Trigger or Cause From Chronic Intake) memory

loss (common toxicity effects)

slurring of speech


numbness or tingling of extremities

chronic fatigue




panic attacks (common aspartame toxicity reaction)

marked personality changes


rapid heart beat, tachycardia (another frequent reaction)


chest pains

hypertension (high blood pressure)

nausea or vomiting


abdominal pain

swallowing pain


hives / urticaria

other allergic reactions

blood sugar control problems (e.g., hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia)

menstrual cramps and other menstrual problems or changes

impotency and sexual problems

food cravings

weight gain

hair loss / baldness or thinning of hair

burning urination & other urination problems

excessive thirst or excessive hunger

bloating, edema (fluid retention)

infection susceptibility

joint pain

brain cancer (Pre-approval studies in animals)


Aspartame Disease Mimmicks Symptoms or Worsens the Following Diseases



multiple sclerosis (MS)

Parkinson’s disease


multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS)

diabetes and diabetic Complications


Alzheimer’s disease

birth defects

chronic fatigue syndrome


lyme disease

attention deficit disorder (ADD and ADHD)

panic disorder

depression and other psychological disorders


?Now, if you think that the people in charge of the "United States" are stupid, you can possibly believe that all of this adds up to ignorance or greed; I certainly do not believe that for a single minute! So somebody, somewhere, understands exactly what is going on, and desires the result being obtained, or things would change!

?You must always remember that the United States government is a corporation; Social Security is simply another tax, and all those who are old enough to be granted Social Security by that corporation are a LIABILITY of that corporation; I do not want to be in a position where it is to the economic benefit of the owners of some corporation to see to it that I die at a convenient time for them. This means taking care of my own food as much as is possible and being personally responsible for my own health and general well-being, and this includes the well-being of my mind as well as of my body. And taking care of my family as well!

?That is how simple the subject is! Please read the next part, and reflect on this!


"The thing that bugs me is that people think the Food and Drug Administration is protecting them -- it isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day." --Dr. Herbert L. Ley, former Commissioner of the FDA

Subject: Health & Canola Oil information.

Canola Oil

Canola oil from the rape seed, referred to as the Canadian oil because Canada is mainly responsible for it being marketed in the USA. The Canadian government and industry paid our Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) $50 million dollars to have Canola oil placed on the (GRAS) List "Generally Recognized As Safe". Thus a new industry was created. Laws were enacted affecting international trade, commerce, and traditional diets. Studies with lab animals were disastrous. Rats developed fatty degeneration of heart, kidney, adrenals, and thyroid gland. When Canola oil was withdrawn from their diets, the deposits dissolved but scar tissue remained on all vital organs. No studies on humans were made before money was spent to promote Canola oil in the USA.

Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a rare fatal degenerative disease caused by a build up of long-chain fatty acids (c22 to c28) which destroys the myelin (protective sheath )of the nerves. Canola oil is a very long chain fatty acid oil (c22). Those who will defend Canola oil say that the Chinese and Indians have used it for centuries with no effect, however, it was in an unrefined form.* My cholesterol level was 150. After a year using Canola oil I tested 260. I switched back to pure olive oil and it has taken 5 years to get it down to 160. Thus began this project to find answers since most Doctors will say that Canola oil is O.K. My sister spilled Canola oil on a piece of fabric; after 5 pre-treatings and harsh washings, the oil spot still showed. She stopped using Canola oil, wondering what it did to our insides if it could not be removed from cloth easily.

Our Father bred birds, always checking labels to insure there was no rape seed in their food. He said, "The birds will eat it, but they do not live very long." A friend who worked for only 9 mo. as a quality control taster, at an apple-chip factory where Canola oil was used exclusively for frying, developed numerous health problems including loose teeth; gum disease, gum and nail beds turned gray; numb hands and feet with cramps, swollen arms and legs upon rising in the morning; extreme joint pain especially in hands; cloudy vision; constipation with stools like black marbles; hearing loss; skin tears from being bumped; lack of energy; hair loss; and heart pains. It has been five years since she has worked there and still has some joint pain, gum disease, and numbness. A fellow worker, about 30 yrs. old who ate very little product, had a routine checkup and found that his blood vessels were like those of an 80 year old man. Two employees fed the waste product to baby calves and their hair fell out. After removing the fried apple chips from the diet their hair grew back in.

Be sure to check products for ingredients. If it says, "This product may contain one or more of the following".... and lists Canola oiL (CL) you can expect it to contain Canola oil because it is the cheapest oil and the government subsidizes Canola oil to some industries involved in food processing, bakeries and schools. (Isn’t that nice; the corporation subsidizes the use of this product in food processing, bakeries and schools. I wonder why? - David)

My daughter and her girls were telling jokes. Stephany hit her mom's arm with the back of a butter knife in a gesture, "Oh mom" not hard enough to hurt. My daughters arm split open like it was rotten. She called me to ask what could have caused it. I said, "I'll bet anything that you are using Canola oil". Sure enough, there was a big gallon jug in the pantry.

Rape seed oil is a penetrating oil, to be used in light industry, not for human consumption. It contains a toxic substance (from encyclopedia). Even after the processing to reduce the erucic acid content, it is still a penetrating oil. We have found that it turns rancid very fast. Also it leaves a residual rancid odor on clothing.

Rape seed oil used for stir-frying in China found to emit cancer causing chemicals. (Rapeseed oil smoke causes lung cancer) Amal Kumar Maj. The Wall Street Journal June 7, 1995 pB6(W) pB6 (E) col 1(11 col in).

* taken from FATS THAT HEAL AND FATS THAT KILL by Udo Erasmus. Compiled by Darleen Bradley.

Canola is a coined word. It appeared out of nowhere and is not listed in any but the most recent reference sources. The flip side of the Canola coin reads "rape"! You must admit that Canola sounds better than rape. The name Canola disguised the introduction of rape oil in America.

Canola oil comes from the rape seed, which is part of the mustard family of plants. Rape is the Most Toxic of all-food plants. Like soy, rape is a weed. Insects will not eat it; it is deadly poisonous. The oil from the rape seed is a hundred times more toxic than soy oil! Canola is a semi-drying oil that is used as a lubricant, fuel, soap and synthetic rubber base and as a illuminate for the slick color pages that you see in the magazines. It is an industrial oil and does NOT belong in the body! Canola oil has some very interesting characteristics and effects on living systems. For example, it forms latex-like substances that agglutinate the red blood corpuscles, as does soy, but much more pronounced. Loss of vision is a known, characteristic side effect of rape oil which antagonizes the central and peripheral nervous system - again like soy oil, again worse. The deterioration takes years, however.

Rape (Canola) oil causes emphysema, respiratory distress, anemia, constipation, irritability and blindness in animals and humans. Rape oil was widely used in animal feeds in England and Europe between 1986 and 1991 when it was thrown out. You may remember reading about the cows, pigs and sheep, that went blind, lost their minds, attacked people and had to be shot. A woman called from Chicago to tell that she had been in England when the "Mad Cow Disease" was at its peak. She said that she had seen a television news report that told people not to panic if they had been using rape oil in their diet and were over 65 years of age. The 'experts' added that the effects of rape oil ingestion takes at least 10 years to manifest, and in all likelihood, most of these people would be dead by then anyway. COMFORTING!

In the reports the 'experts' blamed the erratic behavior on a viral disease called scrapie. However, when rape oil was removed from animal feed, 'scrapie' disappeared. No longer a European livestock problem; now it is ours. U.S. farmers grow rape seed, and manufacturers use its oil (Canola) in thousands of processed foods, with the blessings of government watchdog agencies, of course.

Officially Canola oil is known as "Low Euricic Acid".(a solid fatty acid, derived from oils of mustard seeds and rape seeds) rape industry experts love to tell how Canola was developed in Canada and that it is safe to use. They admit it was developed from the rape seed, but that through genetic engineering, i.e. irradiation, (Now, isn’t that comforting? - David)it is no longer rape seed, but "Canola" instead. "CAN-adian oil," get it?

They love to talk about canola's qualities, its unsaturated structure (Omega 3, 6 and 12), its wonderful digestibility and its fatty acid makeup. They turn us against naturally saturated oils and fats, while they come to the rescue with Canola oil. They even tell us how Asia has warmly embraced Canola due to its distinctive flavor. Isn't it wonderful how internationalist brokers "help" third world people?

Its new name provided perfect cover for commercial interests wanting to make billions in the USA. The euphemism is still very much in use, but is no longer needed. Look at the ingredients list on peanut butter labels. The peanut oil has been removed and replaced with rape oil. Rape oil is also the source of the infamous chemical-warfare agent, mustard gas, which was banned after blistering the lungs and skin of hundred thousands of soldiers and civilians during W.W.I. Recent French reports indicate that it was again in use during the Gulf War. Canola oil contains large amounts of "isothicyanates" cyanide containing compounds. Cyanide inhibits mitochondrial production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the energy molecule that fuels the mitochondria. ATP energy powers the body and keeps us healthy and YOUNG!

Many substances can bind metabolic enzymes and block their activity in the body. In biochemistry, these substances are called inhibitors. Toxic substances in Canola and soy oil encourage the formation of molecules with covalent bonds which are normally irreversible: they cannot be broken by the body when they have formed. There's more, but I think you get the idea. If you have further questions, you can go to:

I will do so tonight and see if I find anything out. I couldn't find anything about it in any of my alternative medicine books. Let me know if you know anything about it. MOnya.

Canola oil is a health hazard to use as a cooking oil or salad oil. It is not the healthy oil we thought it was, it is not fit for human consumption; do not eat Canola oil, it can hurt you. Polyunsaturated or not, this is a bad oil, Canola oil, do not use for cooking oil or salad oil, it is not fit for human consumption. It is not a healthy oil at all.

erucic acid (î-r¡´sîk) noun... A fatty acid,

CH3(CH2)7CH:CH(CH2)11CO2H, making up 40 to 50 percent of the total fatty acid in rapeseed, wallflower seed, and mustard seed.

rape oil noun... The edible oil extracted from rapeseed, also used as a lubricant and in the manufacture of various products. Also called rapeseed oil.

Canola (ke-no´le) noun... A rapeseed oil that is very low in erucic acid content.

<italic>The American Heritage(r) Dictionary</italic>. Third Edition copyright (c) 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

"Beverly B. Ferguson"

Canola oil comes from the rape seed, which is part of the mustard family of plants. Rape is the Most Toxic of all-food plants. Like soy, rape is a weed. Insects will not eat it; it is deadly poisonous. The oil from the rape seed is a hundred times more toxic than soy oil! Canola is a semi-drying oil that is used as a lubricant, fuel, soap and...

Guten Tag:

Just watched a program on TV "On the edge" CTV out of Vancouver about genetically engineered food. Discouraging, scary ... Canola is verbotten. Seems soy beans are being screwed around with also. Seems the amount of frigging around can vary from crop to crop. Just happened to tune in half way through. Tried your line but busy. Could have been additional info to add to your Canola file. 3 or 4 panelists, two definitely against the mega food industry one of which grows her own and/or buys from other growers she knows to be safe. One on the fence... Praising the Food distribution of the western world, yet faintly acknowledging there might be something in the other's panelist's concerns. Have you come to some conclusions re Canola since I trust you have had your file restored? I suspect you got many other contributions beside mine.

I remember reading somewhere (sorry, don't remember where) that we shouldn't use Canola oil, because it is a genetically engineered oil created in Canada from the old, familiar to me (used a lot in the Eastern Europe) rape seed oil. So it seems rape seed oil from the health food store is OK, while Canola oil from the supermarket is not. And have you seen those mixes of olive oil with Canola in stores? (True? I do not know; but I would err on the side of caution! - David)

AUDIATUR ET ALTERA PARS - Let the other side be heard too.

Canola Biodata

Clearly Canadian!

Canola is the combination of two words - Canadian and oil. It is produced by crushing seed from Canada's own oilseed crop - Canola. Canola is a genetic variation of Rapeseed developed by Canadian plant breeders through traditional plant breeding techniques, specifically for its nutritional qualities.

Grown primarily in Western Canada, each Canola plant grows anywhere from 1 m (3 feet) to 2 m (6 feet) tall and produces yellow flowers which, in turn, produce seed pods. The seedpods are about one-fifth the size of pea pods and contain about twenty tiny round black or brownish-yellow seeds.

Each Canola seed is approximately 40 percent oil. The seeds are crushed to obtain Canola oil for human consumption and the remainder is processed into Canola meal, which is used as a high protein livestock feed.


?And remember; Aspartame is now known to be in over 9000 different products and the corporation is subsidizing the use of Canola Oil, so judge how safe ANY food bought in a "supermarket" can be. I do not think I will be putting much more info on food into these reports. If you have not gotten the idea by now... Of course, since I have said that, the next thing out of my files will be a report I can not ignore.


Today in America, when our children are birthed, this State demands that the parents register the birth on a "Birth Certificate" and secure a "Social Security Number." A license to live, and a license to work.

Our Children, then become the physical ,and fiscal property of this State, and the United States. We the parents, are now mere custodians of State Property. This State has secured legal title to our children who are then bonded for the debts of the United States. (Remember, this is a corporation. - David)

We the parents, who created this new life, are now given equity title. This is use and possession. This use and possession comes at a life time cost of servitude to our children. We have endowed our children not with their unalienable rights from nature’s God, but with the equitable civil liberties of this State.

What can we do? Simple refuse to surrender our legal title to our children. We do not have to volunteer our children to be indentured by this State and the United States.

Now after 98 years of coercing Americans to register their children, and property, the United States is empowering this State by imposing the use of the Social Security Number on all transactions involving Government.

In 1760, the Parliament on the Thames passed the Navigation Acts which required the Colonials in America to secure an official Stamp on all transactions. Americans took to the streets. Ransacked and burned the offices and houses of Government Officials who imposed this Stamp Tax. That one law of the Navigation Acts was repealed.

238 years later, Americans apparently are unaware of the transgressions being imposed under the color of law. If we do nothing now, our children will suffer our legacy of slavery, in lieu of the blessing of liberty.


?All of the above is completely true, but there is so little knowledge within most Americans, except, of course, about the realllllllyyyyy important stuff, like who will be pitching for the Reds next week... Or starting at quarterback for the Saints, or...

?And finally, to finish Part XVII, something else to think about. Are you responsible for your own health, or not?


Deadly Doctors!! by Edgar A. Suter, M.D.

Doctors for integrity in Research and Public Policy Courtesy of Borderlands: The Crossroads of Science and Spirit

As previously reported, the 1990 Harvard Medical Practice study suggests that each year 150,000 people die from the negligence of doctors.

Since there are about 300,000 doctors in the United States, that means that approximately one out of every two U.S. doctors negligently kills one patient every year.

Over a 30-year career, this could mean that the average doctor would kill 15 patients. Since there are about 200,000,000 guns in the United States, and about 30,000 people die annually from gun assaults, suicides, and accidents combined, each year an American gun has a one in 6,666 chance of killing someone.

This means that any doctor, any year, is 3,500 times more likely to kill someone than any gun.

Even the raw numbers are astonishing. Doctors kill five times as many people as guns!

Think about it; should we be turning in our guns, or our doctors? Come to think of it, why is the A.M.A. pushing gun control?

In other medical news, a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical Association reports that adverse drug reactions may be the fourth-ranking cause in the United States, right after heart disease, cancer, and stroke. It is estimated that correctly prescribed prescription medications cause between 76,000 and 137,000 deaths a year, plus 2,200,000 serious nonfatal reactions. This death rate is roughly equivalent of a Boeing 747 crashing every single day of the year!


You make it so

Few things can hold you back without your cooperation. The challenges you face are challenges only to the extent that they find resonance in your own spirit. Though we despair our troubles we embrace them, too, for without our embrace they would have no hold on us.

Yet that which we empower we can also banish or divert. And in so doing, we turn troubles into triumphs. Success is success because you make it so. Success is found not in what comes to you, but in what you do with it.

What a joyful and powerful freedom it is to be free of your own chosen limitations! You are more than your body, more than your bank account, more than your job. Such things are yours to use wisely, and will hold you back only if you let them. Choose to be free. Chose to make a difference. Choose to achieve. Choose to succeed. Ralph Marston


An Interesting Plot

One Sunday morning during service, a 2,000 member congregation was surprised to see two men enter, both covered from head to toe in black and carrying submachine guns.

One of the men proclaimed, "Anyone willing to take a bullet for Christ remain where you are."

Immediately, the choir fled, the deacons fled, and most of the congregation fled. Out of the 2,000 there only remained around 20.

The man who had spoken took off his hood, looked at the preacher and said, "Okay Pastor, I got rid of all the hypocrites. Now you may begin your service.

Have a nice day!" And the two men turned and walked out...


?This concludes Part XVII. While it is the largest paper by a considerable margin, I hope you found it worth while. If you are ready, please E-mail <> and request Part XVIII. God Bless, David.