CHAPTER VI.

OF THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS ABROAD.

The Federal statutes(1) provide that all naturalized citizens of the United States, while in foreign countries, are entitled to and shall receive from this government the same protection of person and property which is accorded to native born citizens. Whenever it is made known to the President that any citizen of the United States has been unjustly deprived of his liberty by or under the authority of any foreign government, it shall be the duty of the President forthwith to demand of that government the reason of such imprisonment, and if it appears to be wrongful and in violation of the rights of American citizenship, the President shall forthwith demand the release of such citizen; and if the release so demanded is unreasonably delayed or refused, the President shall use such means, not amounting to acts of war, as he may think necessary and proper to obtain or effectuate his release; and all the facts and proceedings relative thereto shall, as soon as possible, be communicated by the President to Congress. The means contemplated by the two sections above quoted would be in the nature of diplomatic negotiations between the government of the United States and the foreign government involved, and would be conducted through the secretary of state subject to rules and methods of procedure which need not be set forth in a volume of this character. It goes without saying that the same measure of protection will be extended by the government to native-born citizens abroad as is provided for naturalized citizens.(2)

(1) Rev. Stat. U.S., Secs. 2000, 2001; 1Fed. Stat. Annot. 789.
(2) "In regard to the protection of our citizens in their rights at home and abroad we have no law which divides them into classes, or makes any difference whatever between them. A native and a naturalized American may, therefore, go forth with equal security over every sea and through every land under heaven, including the country in which the latter was born." Right of Expatriation, (1859) 9 Op. Att.-Gen. 360. See also In re Look Tin Sing (1884) 21 Fed. Rep. 907.

Citizens by birth and naturalized citizens who reside abroad have the same right to protection of the government, and stand upon the same footing in all other respects. Expatriation - Foreign Domicile Citizenship (1873) 14 Op. Atty.-Gen. 295.

---

CHAPTER SEVEN

OF EXPATRIATION, ALIENS, AND WHO MAY NOT BECOME CITIZENS.

EXPATRIATION.

The doctrine of expatriation, or the right of a citizen formally to renounce allegiance to his country, and assume citizenship in a country of his adoption, is one that has been steadily advocated by the American people from the foundation of their government.(1) It was one of the principal causes of the War of 1812 with Great Britain.

Perhaps no better exposition of the American view can be found than in that Section of the Revised Statutes of the United States which declares the right as follows (Section 1999):

"Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the governments thereof; and whereas it is necessary, to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed: therefore any declaration, restriction, opinion, order, or decision of any officer of the United States which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the Republic."

This right to renounce citizenship declared by Congress has been affirmed and sustained in many decisions.(2) A native-born citizen of the United States who has chosen to expatriate himself and has been naturalized in a foreign country is regarded as an alien, and he cannot again acquire naturalization except by conforming to the laws of the United States providing for the admission of aliens to citizenship.(3)

The section comprehends citizens of our own country as well as of other countries. Where, therefore, a citizen of the United States emigrates to a foreign country, and there formally renounces his American citizenship, our government accepts the act as one of expatriation. It also recognizes the right of even a naturalized citizen to resume his original citizenship under such conditions as his government requires.(4)

Proof of expatriation is to be made like that of any other fact for which there is no prescribed form of proof; that is, by any evidence that will convince the judges.(5) A woman born in the United States, of American parents, married a Spanish subject residing here but never naturalized, removed to Spain, and lived there until her husband's death; it was held that such removal and residence in Spain were not evidence on her part of an intention to expatriate herself, and that she still remained a citizen of the United States.(6)

It has been held that the section of the Revised Statutes above quoted is, like any other act of Congress, subject to alteration by Congress whenever the public welfare requires it. The right of protection which it confers is limited to citizens of the United States. Chinese persons, not born in this country, have never been recognized as citizens of the United States or authorized to become such.(7)

A singular case of confused citizenship arose in the case of Contzen v. U. S.(8) Texas was an independent State when admitted into the Union. The effect of her admission was to make all the citizens of Texas citizens of the United States. Such per sons as then resided in Texas and were not then naturalized as citizens of Texas were relegated to the United States naturalization laws. Contzen was a minor alien separated from his parents, who had not been made citizens of the United States. He was living in Texas at the time of the admission of the State, and continued to reside there, not deeming any further naturalization necessary; but, the point being raised against him, it was held that, never having been a citizen of Texas and consequently never having become a citizen of the United States, he had no status in the Court of Claims of the United States.

Aliens.

The right to exclude or expel aliens or any class of undesirable strangers has been upheld by the Supreme Court as an inherent right of sovereignty.(9) So also the Act of Congress prohibiting the bringing in of aliens to perform labor has been held to be constitutional.(10) And in the case of U. S. v. Williams, deporting an alien who had illegally entered the United States was declared to be not against the XIV Amendment, and the Alien Immigration Act of Congress of 1903, which provides for the deportation of anarchists, was sustained as constitutional.(11)

An alien is a foreigner, a person resident in one country but owing allegiance to another. In England he is one born out of the dominions and allegiance of the King. In the United States he is one who is born out of the jurisdiction and allegiance of the United States, and who has not been naturalized under the Constitution and laws of the United States or of any one of them.(12)

An alien friend is one whose country is at peace with the country where he resides. While he is domiciled in this country be is entitled to the protection of its laws, and owes to it, in return for that protection, temporary and local obedience, which continues during the period of his residence. He is even entitled to the benefits of the protection granted by the XIV Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. But he is not a citizen. He is subject to the laws of the land, may be tried for crime, and may even be guilty of treason in giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this country.(13) He has a right to labor and engage in trade, that right being implied in the right to reside in the country. He may sue and be sued in the proper courts. He way by statute have the benefit of the insolvent laws and the poor laws of his temporary domicile, if they so provide. He may obtain a patent, may file a caveat, may register a trade mark and protect it by suit, and to a certain extent he may enjoy the benefit of the copyright laws. He may serve as executor or administrator, unless prohibited by statute, and may be a corporator or a trustee of a corporation. While not liable to enlistment for military service, he may voluntarily waive that exemption and enlist; in that case he is subject to all the liabilities incurred by a citizen soldier, and cannot escape them on the ground that he is an alien. But an alien may not vote or hold any political office, State or Federal, or be an officer of a county, a city, or a court, or serve as juror. Alienage constitutes a disqualification for practicing as an attorney at law.

The rights of an alien pertaining to his property may be briefly stated as follows: At common law he may take real estate by act of the parties or by deed or grant, or devise, or by other act of purchase, but cannot hold it except upon such terms as may be prescribed by the State. An alien therefore takes a defeasible estate good against all excepting the State, and good against it until it institutes proceedings and obtains a judgment by inquest of office or office found, or some legislative act equivalent thereto. But an alien does not acquire an estate by operation of law, as by descent; for since the law will be deemed to do nothing in vain, it will not cast descent upon one who cannot by law hold the estate. When an alien seized of real estate dies intestate, as he has no inheritable blood he cannot have any legal heirs, and so cannot transmit the estate by descent, and as the law will not deem it to be in abeyance except in case of absolute necessity, it vests immediately in the State without office found. Alienage in a mediate ancestor would interrupt the descent between persons who are capable of taking and transmitting real estate by descent. An alien is not entitled to courtesy. Alienage in the husband or wife bars the wife from claiming dower. Such are, in general terms, the common-law rulings concerning aliens.

In the United States the common-law doctrine concerning the rights of aliens his been greatly modified by statutes. In nearly all of the States statutes have been enacted by which the rights of aliens are defined, and in many instances resident aliens are placed on the same footing as natural born citizens, touching the acquisition, holding, and transmission of property, both real and personal. In some of the States the same liberal policy has been pursued toward nonresident aliens, while in others these privileges are accorded with restrictions, and in some cases denied altogether. It will be necessary for the student interested in this question of the rights of an alien in real or personal property, in any particular State, to examine the statutes and decisions of that State relating to the subject.

Under statutes of the United States all mining lands and territories belonging to the United States are open for the purpose of exploration and purchase to citizens of the United States, and to those who have declared their intention to become citizens; and all such persons who have discovered mineral lands and made location according to law have the exclusive right of possession thereof.

At common law, the disability of aliens in respect to the ownership of real estate did not extend to the case of personal property, and they were capable of acquiring, holding, and transmitting movable property in like-manner as citizens, and might bring suit for the protection and recovery of such property. The statutes regulating the rights of aliens concerning personal property have generally been merely declaratory of the common-law principle.

An alien is as liable to taxation as is a citizen, since the right to tax results from the general protection afforded to himself and his property.

The status of citizens of one country residing in or traveling through foreign countries is frequently the subject of treaties between their respective nations; such treaties, when made, are the supreme law of the land, and any State law denying to an alien the right secured by such a treaty would be unconstitutional, null, and void.

An alien enemy is one who owes allegiance to an adverse belligerent. He has no political rights. He may remain in the country at war with his own, and, when not chargeable with actual hostility or crime, has an implied license to remain until ordered out of the country, and on leaving it he is allowed to remove his goods and effects, and is protected in his other rights. During the pendency of war his rights are in abeyance. An alien enemy is not permitted to prosecute suits in court, and any such suit pending abates, and the right of action is suspended, until the cessation of hostilities. But while he may not sue, he may be sued, and his property is subject to legal process, and in such case he may make defense in person or by counsel.

All intercourse between citizens of two hostile nations, except such as may be permitted by the authorities conducting the war, is prohibited while war is flagrant between their respective countries. This includes any act or contract which tends to increase the resources of the enemy, or any kind of trading or commercial dealing or intercourse. But the tendency of the law of nations of modern times is to exempt individuals and private contracts from injury or restraint in consequence of war between the governments of the contracting parties. The effect of an outbreak of hostilities its to revoke agencies in the country of the enemy, for general purposes, during the pendency of the war; but an agency to preserve or collect property may be created, and war does not necessarily revoke a special agency established before it began.(14)

The Federal statutes on the subject of aliens(15) provide that, whenever war is declared between the United States and a foreign government, and in certain other contingencies, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, and removed. Power is given to the President, by proclamation or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed on the part of the United States toward aliens who become so liable, or to provide for their removal, and generally to establish regulations concerning them for the public safety. Provision is also made, in case the individual is not chargeable with actual hostility or crime against the public safety, for allowing him to recover and dispose of and remove his goods and effects, and to depart within reasonable time to be ascertained as prescribed.(16)

After the presidential proclamation, jurisdiction is given to the federal courts to cause any alien who lingers in the jurisdiction to be apprehended and conveyed before the court. The courts are empowered to cause such alien to be removed or to give security for good behavior, or otherwise to restrain him, conformably to the proclamation or regulations established, and to imprison or otherwise secure him until these orders are performed. Power is given to the marshal of the district in which such alien is apprehended to carry out the orders of the court.

To an Act of Congress passed March 2, 1897,(17) fixing the rights of aliens to hold and own real estate in the Territories of the United States as defined under that Act, the student is referred for the particular conditions upon which the alien may hold the same.

It is also provided by a Federal statute that all persons who deserted the military and naval service of the United States and did not return thereto or report themselves to a provost marshal within Sixty davs after the issuance of a proclamation by the President dated the 11th day of March, 1865, are deemed to have voluntarily relinquished and forfeited their rights of citizenship as well as their right to become citizens; and that such deserters are forever incapable of holding any office of trust or profit in the United States or of exercising any rights of citizens thereof.(18) But the provisions of this section can take effect only upon conviction by a court martial.(19) Another section of the Revised Statutes(20) provides that every person who hereafter deserts the military or naval service of the United States, or who, being duly enrolled, departs the jurisdiction of the district in which he is enrolled or goes beyond the limits of the United States with intent to avoid a draft in the United States service lawfully ordered, shall be liable to all the penalties and forfeitures of the section last above quoted. This law was enacted March 3, 1865, and is believed to be still in force. The penalties named by it can be enforced only after conviction by court martial.(21)

Immigration of Chinese.

Besides the disqualifications above enacted, a series of laws beginning with an Act dated May 6, 1882, and ending with the Act of April 2, 1902 (22) has been passed by Congress suspending the immigration of Chinese. By the terms of these sundry acts, Chinese immigration has been forbidden indefinitely. The laws prescribing the terms upon which Chinese may come to this country have been made very stringent, and under the authorities cited in connection with the subject of aliens their exclusion and deportation by these laws have been sustained. Under their operation it is impossible for the Chinese to come to this country or to be naturalized, and this may be said to be the only limitation placed upon immigration to the United States from any great nation of the globe.

The wisdom of these laws has been gravely questioned. Sundry influences have produced this legislation, chiefly that of certain classes in the extreme West who have feared the result of competition with the Chinese. On the other hand, powerful influences are at work to induce the repeal of these exclusive measures. No one will question the propriety of limiting the political rights of alien and antagonistic people who are permitted to enter this country; but the conditions of American labor are such that the need of additional labor is sorely felt, especially in agricultural sections, whence of late years immense numbers of laborers have flocked to the cities. Throughout large sections of the South and West a great and crying need of labor is felt to-day. The industry, thrift, and humble contentment of the Chinese would doubtless furnish a most desirable labor element to many sections in which laborers are scarce. A critic of American institutions has cynically said that "the idea that every citizen is a sovereign bas been cultivated in the United States until no citizen is content to be a servant." Whether that statement is exaggerated or not, it is certain that a great and crying need of the nation at present is some class of laboring men which shall not deem itself the natural antagonist of its employer. We sorely need a laboring class not composed of individuals who aspire to higher education, political prominence, social importance, and even the presidency of the United States.

When the nation becomes convinced, by its long trouble with labor problems such as have vexed it for several decades, that the Chinese population possesses what it needs, and that the Chinese are even less objectionable than many elements now in the country, we may look for a repeal of the Chinese exclusion laws. With those repealed America will in truth be the asylum of the oppressed of all nations.

FOOTNOTES

(1) "In this country, expatriation is conceived to be a fundamental right. As far as the principles maintained and the practice adopted by the government of the United States is evidence of its existence, it is fully recognized. It is constantly exercised, and has never in any way been restrained." Stoughton v. Taylor, 2 Paine U.S. 661.

The statement has been made by the United States Supreme Court that "the doctrine of allegiance ..... rests on the ground of a mutual compact between the government and the citizen or subject, which it is said, cannot be dissolved by either party without the concurrence of the other." Inglis v. Sailors Snug Harbor (1830) 3 Pet. U.S. 124. See also Talbot v. Janson (1796) 3 Dall. U.S. 162, et seq., where Mr. Justice Iredell sets forth at length reasons why concurrence on the part of the government is essential. Under Rev. Stat. U.S. Sec. 1990, quoted below. however, it has been held that assent on the part of the government renounced does not obtain in the United States. Jennes v. Landes (1897) 84 Fed. Rep. 74; In re Look Tin Song (1884) 21 Fed. Rep. 907; Pequignot v. Detroit (1883) 16 Fed. Rep. 214.

(2) Right of Expatriation (1859) 9 Op. Atty.-Gen. 356; Pequignot v. Detroit (1883) 16 Fed. Rep. 214; In re Look Tin Sing (1884) 21 Fed. Rep. 908; Elk v. Wilkins, (1884) 112 U. S. 107; Green v. Salas (1887) 31 Fed. Rep. 113; Boyd v. Nebraska, (1892) 143 U.S. 161; Fung Yue Ting v. U.S. (1893) 149 U.S. 715; Jennes v. Landes (1897) 84 Fed. Rep. 74; In re Rodriguez (1897) 81 Fed. Rep. 354; U. S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) 169 U.S. 704; Ruckgaber v. Moore, (1900) 104 Fed. Rep. 948.

"The Act of July 27, 1868. ch. 249, declaring the right of expatriation to be a natural and inherent right of all people, and reciting that 'in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship,' wbile it affirms the right of every man to expatriate himself from one country, contains nothing to enable him to become a citizen of another, without being naturalized under its authority. 15 Stat. 223; Rev. Stat., Sec. 1099." Elk v. Wilkins, (1884) 112 U.S. 107. See also Right of Expatriation, (1859) 9 Op. Atty.-Gen. 360. Compare Expatriation-Foreign Domicile Citizenship, (1873) 14 Op. Atty.-Gen. 295.

(3) Expatriation - Foreign Domicile Citizenship (1873) 14. Op. Atty.-Gen. 295.

(4) Green v. Salas (1887) 31 Fed. Rep. 112.

(5) Belcher v. Farren (1891) 89 Cal. 73; Green v. Salas (1887) 31 Fed.Rep.112.

"The general evidence of expatriation is actual immigration. with other concurrent acts showing a determination and intention to transfer his allegiance." Stoughton v. Taylor, 2 Paine (U.S.) 661.

(6) Preto's Case, (1862) 10 Op. Atty.-Gen. 321.

(7) Fong Yue Ting v. U.S., (1893) 149 U.S. 716. See also in re Rodriguez, (1897) 81 Fed. Rep. 354.

(8) (1900) 179 U.S. 191.

(9) Fong Yue Ting v. U.S., (1803) 149 U.S. 698; Nishimura Ekiu v. U.S., (1892) 142 U.S. 651; Chinese Exclusion Case, (1889) 130 U.S. 581.
"It is an accepted maxim of international law, that every sovereign nation has the power, as inherent in sovereignty, and essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within its dominions, or to admit them only in such cases and upon such conditions as it may see fit to prescribe. In the United States this power is vested in the national government, to which the Constitution him committed the entire control of international relations, in peace as well as in war. It belongs to the political department of the government, and may be exercised either through treaties made by the President und Senate, or through statutes enacted by Congress." Nishimura Ekiu v. U.S., (1892) 142 U.S. 659.

(10) Lees v. U.S., (1893) 150 U.S. 476, where the court said: Given in Congress the absolute power to exclude aliens, it may exclude some and admit others, and the reasons for its discrimination are not open to challenge in the courts. Given the power to exclude, it has a right to make that exclusion effective by punishing those who assist in introducing, or attempting to introduce, aliens in violation of its prohibition. The importation of alien laborers, who are under previous contract to perform labor in the United States, is the act denounced, and the penalty is visited not upon the alien laborer - although by the amendment of February 23, 1887, 24 Stat. 414, c. 220, he is to be returned to the country from which he came - but upon the party assisting in the importation. If Congress has power to exclude such laborers, as by the cases cited it unquestionably has, it has the power to punish any who assist in their introduction."

(11) Repeated decisions of this court have determined that Congress has the power to exclude aliens from the United States; to prescribe the terms and conditions on which they may come in; to establish regulations for bending out of the country such aliens. His have entered in violation of law, and to commit the enforcement of such conditions and regulations to executive officers; that the deportation of an alien who is found to be here in violation of law is not a deprivation of liberty without due process of law, and that the provisions of the Constitution securing the right of trial by jury have no application." U.S. v. Williams (1904) 194 U.S. 289.

(12) 2 Am. and Eng. Encyc. of Law (2nd ed.) 64.

(13) Carlisle v. U.S., (1872) 16 Wall. (U.S.) 147.

An alien "is none the less an alien because of his having a commercial domicile in this country. while he lawfully remains here he is entitled to the benefit of the guaranties of life, liberty, and property, secured by the Constitution to all persons, of whatever race, within the jurisdiction of the United Stated. His personal rights when he is in this country, and such of his property as is here during his absence, are as fully protected by the supreme law of the land as if he were a native or naturalized citizen of the United States. But when he has voluntarily gone from the country, and is beyond its jurisdiction, being an alien, he cannot re-enter the United States in violation of the will of the government as expressed in enactments of the law-making power." Lem Moon Sing v. U.S. (1895) 158 U.S. 547.

"This national character which a man acquired by residence may be thrown off at pleasure, by a return to his native country, or even by turning his back on the country in which he resided, on his way to another. To use the language of Sir W. Scott, it is an adventitious character gained by residence, and which ceases by nonresidence. It no longer adheres to the party from the momentt he puts himself in motion, bona fide, to quit the country sine animo revertendi. (The IndianChief, 3 Rob.Adm. 17) The reasonableness of this rule can hardly be disputed. Having once acquired a national character by residence in a foreign country, he ought to be bound by all the consequences of it, until he has thrown it off, either by an actual return to his native country or to that where he was naturalized, or by commencing his removal, bona fide, and without an intention of returning." The Venus (1814) 8 Cranch. U.S. 280.

(14) The authorities in support of the above general statements will be found very fully set forth in the Am. and Eng. Encyc. of Law (2d ed.), title " Aliens," Vol. 2. pp. 64-90.

(15) See 1 Fed. Stat. Annot. 435.

(16) Rev. Stat. U.S., 4067, 4068; 1 Fed. Stat. Annot. 430.

(17) 29 Stat. at Large, c. 363, p. 618; I Fed. Stat. Annot. 437.

(18) Rev. Stat. U.S., See. 1906; 1 Fed. Stat. Annot. 788.

(19) Kurtz v. Moffitt, (1885) 115 U.S. 501.

(20) Rev. Stat. U.S., Sec. 998; 1 Fed. Stat. Annot. 788.

(21) Kurtz v. Moffitt, (1885) 115 U.S. 501.

(22) 22 Stat. at Large, ch. 126, 58; 23 Stat. L. 115, eh. 220; 25 Stat. L. ch. 1015, p. 476; 25 Stat. L. 504, ch. 1064; 27 Stat. L 25, ch. 60; 28 Stat. L. 7, ch. 14; 28 Stat. L. 581, Resolution 19; 31 Stat. L. 1093, ch. 845; 32 Stat. L. 176, ch. 641. See I Fed. Stat. Annot. 764, title " Chinese Exclusion."

(23) A convenient collection of these laws and the decisions under them may be found in 1 Fed. Stat. Annot., pp. 754-783.

APPENDIX A.

List of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court under the XIV Amendment to the Constitution, arranged in the order of their rendition.

Slaughter-House Cases (1872) 16 Wall. (U.S.) 36
Bradwell v. Illinois (1872) 16 Wall. (U.S.) 133
Bart emeyer v. Iowa, (1873) 18 Wall. (U.S.) 133
Minor v. Happersett, (1874) 21 Wall. (U.S.) 162.
Walker v. Sauvinet, (1875) 92 U.S. 90
Keanard v. Louisiana, (1875) 92 U.S. 480
U.S. v. Cruikshank, (1875) 92 U.S. 543
Munn v. Illinois, (1876) 94 U.S. 113
Hill v. De Cuir, (1877) 95 U.S. 485
Pennoyer v. Neff, (1877) 95 U.S. 714
Davidson v. New Orleans, (1877) 96 U.S. 97
Richmond, etc., R. Co. v. Richmond, (1877) 96 U.S. 521
Kirtland v. Hotchkiss, (1879) 100 U.S. 491
Strauder v. West Virginia, .(1879) 100 U.S. 303
Virginia v. Rives, (1879) 100 U.S. 313
Ex p. Virginia, (1879) 100 U.S. 339.
Missouri v. Lewis, (1879) 101 U.S. 22
Neal v. Delaware, (1880) 103 U.S. 370
Kelly v. Pittsburgh, (1881) 104 U.S. 78
Fox v. Cincinnati, (1881) 104 U.S. 783
Pace iv. Alabama, (1882) 106 U.S. 583
U.S. v. Harris, (1882) 106 U.S. 629
Gross v. U.S. Mortgage Co., (1883) 108 U.S. 477
Civil Rights Cases, (1883) 109 U.S. 3
Louisiana v. New Orleans, (1883) 109 U.S. 285
Hurtado v. California, (1884) 110 U.S. 516
Ex p. Yarbrough, (1884) 110 U.S. 651
Hugur v. Reclamation Dist., No. 108, (1884) Ill U.S. 701
Elk v. Wilkins, (1884) 112 U.S. 94
Foster v. Kansas, (1884) 112 U.S. 201
U.S. v. Waddell, (1884) 112 U.S. 77
Barbier v. Connolly, (1885) 113 U.S. 27
Head v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., (1885) 113 U.S. 9
Provident Sav. Inst. v. Jersey City, (1885) 113 U.S. 606

Soon Hing v. Crowley (1885) 113 U.S. 703
Ex p. Reggel (1885) 114 U.S. 642
Wurts v. Hoagland (1885) 114 U.S. 606
Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases (1885) 115 U.S.321
Missouri Pac. R Co. v. Humes (1885) 115 U.S. 513
Campbell v. Holt (1885) 115U.S. 620
Brown v. Grant (1886) 116 U.S. 207
Railroad Commission Cases (1886) 116 U.S. 307
Presser v.Illinois (1886) 116 U.S. 252
Boyd v. U.S. (1886) 116 U.S. 616
Royall v. Virginia (1886) 116 U.S. 572
Walling v. Michigan (1886) 116 U.S. 446
Arrowsmith v. Harmoning (1886) 118 U.S. 194
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) 118 U.S. 356
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pac. R. Co. (1886) 118 U.S. 394
Philadelphia F. Assoc. v. New York (1886) 119 U.S. 110
Schmidt v. Cobb (1886) 119 U.S. 286
Hayes v. Missouri (1887) 120 U.S. 68
Baldwin v. Franks (1887) 120 U.S. 679
Barron v. Burnside (1887) 121 U.S. 186
Church v. Kelsey (1887) 121 U.S. 282
Spies v. Illinois (1887) 123 U.S. 131
Sanda v.Manistee River Imp. Co. (1887) 123U.S. 288
Mugler v. Kansas (1887) 123 U.S. 623
Pembina Consol. Silver Min. etc. Co. v. Pennsylvania (1888) 125 U.S. 181
Redemption Bank v. Boston (1888) 125U.S. 60
Spencer v. Merchant (1888) 125 U.S. 345
Dow v. Beidleman (1888) 125 U.S. 680
California v. Central Pac. R. Co. v. Mackey (1888) 127 U.S. 206
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. (1888) 127 U.S. 210
Powell v. Pennsylvania (1888) 127 U.S. 678
Mahon v. Justice (1888) 127 U.S. 700
Kidd v. Pearson (1888) 128 U.S. 1
Nashville etc. R. Co. v. Alabama (1888) 128 U.S. 96
Walston v. Nevin (1888) 128 U.S. 578
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Beckwith (1889) 129 U.S. 26
Kimmish v. Ball (1889) 129U.S. 222
Dent v. West Virginia (1889) 129 U.S. 114
Huling v. KawValley R. etc. Co. (1889) 130U.S. 559
Freeland v. Williams (1889) 131 U.S. 405
Cross v. North Carolina (1889) 132 U.S. 131
Pennie v. Reis (1889) 132 U.S. 464
Sugg v. Thornton (1889) 132 U.S. 524
Louisville etc. R. Co. v. Mississippi (1889) 133 U.S. 587
David v. Beason (1890) 133 U.S. 333
Palmer v. McMahon (1890) 133 U.S. 661
Eilenbecker v. District Ct. (1890) 134 U.S. 31
Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania (1890) 134 U.S. 232
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota (1890) 134 U.S. 418
Minneapolis Eastern R. Co. v. Minnesota (1890) 134 U.S. 467
Louisville etc. R. Co. v. Woodson (1890) 134 U.S. 623
Home Ins. Co. v. New York (1890) 134 U.S. 594
Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co. (1890) 135 U.S. 641
In re Kemmler (1890) 136 U.S. 436
York v. Texas (1890) 137 U.S. 15
Crowley v. Christensen (1890) 137 U.S. 91
Wheeler v. Jackson (1890) 137 U.S. 245
Holden v. Minnesota (1890) 137 U.S. 483
In re Converse (1891) 137 U.S. 624
Caldwell v. Texas (1891) 137 U.S. 692
Kauffman v. Wootters (1891) 138 U.S. 285
Leeper v. Texas (1891) 139 U.S. 462
In re Manning (1891) 139 U.S. 504
Natal v. Louisiana (1891) 139 U.S. 621
In re Shibuya Jugiro (1891) 140 U.S. 291
Lent v. Tillson (1801) 140 U.S. 316
In re Rahrer (1891) 140 U.S. 545
New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co. (1891) 142 U.S. 79
McElvaine v. Brush (1891) 142 U.S. 155
Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay etc. Canal Co. (1891) 142 U.S. 254
Charlotte etc. R. Co. v. Gibbes (1892) 142 U.S. 386
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert (1892) 142 U.S. 339
Horn Silver Min. Co. v. New York (1892) 143 U.S. 305
Budd v. New York (1892) 143 U.S. 517
Schwab v. Berggren (1802) 143 U.S. 442
Fielden v. lilinois (1892) 143 U.S. 452
O'Neil v. Vermont (18i)2) 144 U. S. 323
New York v. Squire (181)2) 145 U.S. 175
Brown v. Smart (1802) 145 U.S. 455
McPherson v. Blacker (1892) 146 U.S. 1
Morley v. Lake Shore etc. R. Co. (1892) 146 U.S. 162
Hallinger v. Davis (1892) 146 U.S. 314
Yesler v.Washington Harbor Line Com'rs (1892) 146 U.S. 648
Jennings v. Coal Ridge Imp. etc. Co. (1893) 147 U.S. 147
Giozza v. Tiernan (1893) 148 U.S. 657
Paulson v. Portland (1893) 149 U.S. 30
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Emmons (1893) 149 U.S. 364
Fong Yue Ting v. U.S. (1893) 149 U.S. 698
McNulty v. Caiifornia (1893) 149 U.S. 645
Columbus Southern R. Co. v. Wright (1894) 151 U.S. 470
New York etc. R. Co. v. Bristol (1894) 151 U.S. 556
Lawton v. Steele (1894) 152 U.S. 133
Montana Co. v. St. Louis Min. etc. Co. (1894) 152 U.S. 160
Duncan v. Missouri (1894) 152 U.S. 377
Marchant v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (1894) 153 U.S. 380
Brennan v. Titusville (1894) 153 U.S. 289
Brass v. North Dakota (1894) 153 U.S. 391
Eagle Ins. Co. v. Ohio (1894) 153 U.S. 446
McKane v. Durston (1894) 153 U.S. 684
Scott v. McNeal (1894) 154 U.S. 34
Covingtun etc. Bridge Co. v. Kentucky (1894) 154 U.S. 204
Reagan v. Farmers' L. & T. Co. (1894) 154 U.S. 362
Pittsburgh etc. R. Co. v. Backus (1894) 154 U.S. 421
Pearce v. Texas (1694) 155 U.S. 311
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Gill (1895) 156 U.S. 649
Mattox v. U.S. (1895) 156 U.S. 237
Emert v. Missouri (1895) 156 U.S. 296
Bergemann r. Backer (1895) 157 U.S. 655
Gray v. Connecticut (1895) 159 U.S. 74
Central Land Co. v. Laidley (1895) 159 U.S. 103
Mills v. Green (1895) 156 U.S. 65l
Moore v. Missouri (1895) 159 U.S. 673
Winona, etc. Land Co. v. Minnesota (1895) 159 U.S. 526
Iowa Central R. Co. v. lowa (1896) 160 U.S. 389
Eldridge v. Trezevant (1896) 160 U.S. 452
Geer v. Connecticut (l896) 161 U.S. 519
Gibson v. Mississippi (1896) 162 U.S. 565
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Taggart (1896) 163 U.S. 1
Lowe v. Kansas (1896) 163 U.S. 81
Murray v. Louisiana (1896) 163 U.S. 101
Hennington v. Georgia (1896) 163 U.S. 299
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537
Fallrook Irrigation Dist. v. Bradley (1896) 164 U.S. 112
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Nebraska (1896) 164 U.S. 403
Covington etc. Turnpike Road Co. v. Sandford (1896) 164 U.S. 578
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Mathews (1897) 165 U.S. 1
Gulf etc. R. Co. v. Ellis (1897) 165 U.S. 150
Jones v. Brim (1897) 165 U.S. 180
Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor (1897) 165 U.S. 194
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Indiana (1897) 165 U.S. 304
Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897) 165 U.S. 579
New York etc. R. Co. v. New York (1897) 165 U.S. 628
Allen v. Georgia (1897) 166 U.S. 138
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Chicago (1897) 166 U.S. 226
Gladson v. Minnesota (l897) 166 U.S. 427
Sentell v. New Orleans etc. R. Co. (1897) 166 U.S. 608
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky (1897) 160 U.S. 150
Davis v. Massachusetts (1897) 167 U.S. 43
Merchants' etc. Bank v. Pennsylvania (1897) 167 U.S. 461
Turner v. New York (1897) 168 U.S. 90
Craemer v. Washington (1897) 168 U.S. 124
Hodgson w. Vermont (1897) 168 U.S. 262
Nobles v. Georgia (1897) 168 U.S. 308
McHenry v. Alford (1898) 168 U.S. 651
Holden v. Hardy (1898) 101 U.S. 366
Smyth v. Ames (1898) 169 U.S. 466
Wilson v. North Carolina (1898) 169 U.S. 586
Savings etc. Soc. v. Multnomah County (1898) 169 U.S. 421
Backus v. Fort St. Union Depot Co. (1898) 169 U.S. 557
Williams v. Mississippi (1898) 170 U.S. 213
Magoun v. Illinois Trust etc. Bank (1898) 170 U.S. 283
Williams v. Eggleston (1898) 170 U.S. 304
Tinsley v. Anderson (1898) 171 U.S. 101
King v. Mullins (1898) 171 U.S. 404
New York v. Roberts (1898) 171 U.S. 658
Meyer v. Richmond (1898) 172 U.S. 83
Blake v. McClung (1808) 172 U.S. 239
Norwood v. Baker (1898) 172 U.S. 269
Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs (1899) 172 U.S. 557
Wilson v. Eureka City (1899) 173 U.S. 33
Dewey v. Des Moines (1899) 173 U.S. 193
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Paul (1899) 173 U.S. 404
Lake Shore etc. R. Co. v. Smith (1899) 173 U.S. 684
Central L. & T. Co. v. Campbell Commission Co. (1899) 173 U.S. 84
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson (1899) 173 U.S. 692
Atchison etc. R. Co. v. Matthews (1899) 174 U.S. 99
Brown v. New Jersey (1899) 175 U.S. 172
Addyston Pipe etc. Co. v. U.S. (1899) 175 U.S. 211
Tullis v. Lake Erie etc. R. Co. (1899) 175 U.S. 348
Cumming v. Board of Education (1899) 175 U.S. 528
Bolin v. Nebraska (1900) 176 U.S. 83
Clark v. Kansas City (1900) 176 U.S. 114
Adiroinduck R. Co. v. New Yurk (1900) 176 U.S. 335
Roller v. Holly (1900) 176 U.S. 398
Weyerhauser v. Minnesota (1900) 176 U.S. 550
Maxwell v. Dow (1900) 176 U.S. 581
Petit v. Minnesota (1900) 176 U.S. 164
Gundling v. Chicago (1900) 177 U.S. 183
Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana (1900) 177 U.S. 190
Louisville etc. R. Co. v. Schmidt (1900) 177 U.S. 230
Saranac Land etc. Co. v. Comptroller (1900) 177 U.S. 318
Carter v. Texas (1900) 177 U.S. 442
L'Hote v. New Orleans (1900) 177 U.S. 587
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (1900) 177 U.S. 28
Sully v. American Nat.Bank (1900) 178 U.S. 289
Wheeler v.New York etc. R. Co. (1900) 178 U.S. 321
Taylor v. Beckham (1900) 178 U.S. 548
American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana (1900) 179 U.S. 89
Contzen v. U.S. (1900) 179 U.S. 191
New York v. Barker (1900) 179 U.S. 279
Williams v. Fears (1900) 179 U.S. 270
Wisconsin etc. R. Co. v. Jacobson (1900) 179 U.S. 287
Mason v. Missouri (1900) 179 U.S. 328
Chesapeake etc. R. Co. v. Kentucky (1900) 179 U.S. 388
McDonald v. Massachusetts (1901) 180 U.S. 311
W.W. Cargill v. Minnesota (1901) 180 U.S. 452
Rasmussen v. Idaho (1901) 181 U.S. 198
French c. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (1901) 181 U.S. 324
Wight v. Davidson (1901) 181 U.S. 371
Tonawanda v. Lyon (1901) 181 U.S. 389
Webster v. Fargo (1901) 181 U.S. 394
Cass Farm Co. v. Detroit (1901) 181 U.S. 396
Farrell v. West Chicago Park Com'rs (1901) 181 U.S. 404
Detroit v. Parker (1901) 181 U.S. 399
Red River Valley Nat. Bank v. Craig (1901) 181 U.S. 548
Mallett v. Sorth Carolina (1901) 181 U.S. 589
Simon v. Craft (1901) 182 U.S. 427
Cotting v. Kansas Stock Yards Co. (1901) 183 U.S. 79
Storti v. Massachusetts (1901) 183 U.S. 138
Orr v. Gilman (1902) 183 U.S. 278
Florida Cent. etc. R. Co. v. Reynolds (1902) 183 U.S. 471
Nutting v. Massachusetts (1902) 183 U.S. 553
McChord v. Louisville etc. R. Co. (1902) 183 U.S. 483
Clark v. Titusville (1902) 184 U.S. 329
King v. Portland (1902) 184 U.S. 61.
Booth v. Illinois (1902) 184 U.S. 425
Goodrich v. Detroit (1902) 184 U.S. 430
St. Louis Consol. Coal Co. v. Illinois (1902) 185 U.S. 203
Fidelity Mut. L. v. Mettler (1902) 185 U.S. 308
Travellers Ins. Co. v. Connecticut (1902) 185 U.S. 368
Turpin v. Lemon (1902) 187 U.S. 51
Reid v. Colorado (1902) 187 U.S. 137
Dreyer v. Illinois (1902) 187 U.S. 71.
Chadwick v. Kelley (1903) 187 U.S. 640
Otis v. Parker (1903) 187 U.S. 606
Billings v. Illinois (1903) 188 U.S. 97
Andrews v. Andrews (1903) 188 U.S. 14
Blackstone v. Miller (1903) 188 U.S. 189
Hooker v. Los Angeles (1903) 188 U.S. 316
Louisville etc. Ferry Co. v. Kentucky (1903) 188 U.S. 385
Williams v. Parker (1903) 188 U.S. 491
Reetz v. Michigin (1903) 188 U.S. 505
Kidd v. Alabama (1903) 188 U.S. 730.
Torrance v. Florida (1903) 188 U.S. 519
Prout v. Starr (1903) 188 U.S. 537
Glidden v. Harrington (1903) 189 U.S. 255
Farmers' etc. Ins. Co. v. Dobney (1903) 189 U.S. 301
Brownfield v. South Carolina (1903) 189 U.S. 426
Detroit etc. R. Co. v. Osborn (1903) 189 U.S. 383
Giles v. Harris (1903) 189 U.S. 486
Howard v. Fleming (1903) 191 U.S. 126
Missouri v. Dockery (1903) 101 U.S. 165
Atkin v. Kansas (1903) 191 U.S. 207
Hibben v. Smith (1903) 191 U.S. 310
State Board of Assessors v. Comptoir Nat. D'Escompte (1903) 191 U.S. 388
Arbuckle v. Blackburn (1903) 101 U.S. 405
Cronin v. Adams (1904) 192 U.S. 108.
Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin etc. Canal etc. Co. (1904) 192 U.S. 201
Rogers v. Alabama (1904) 192 U.S. 226
Butttield v. Stranahan (1904) 192 U.S. 470
Adams v. New York (1904) 192 U.S. 585.
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota (1904) 103 U.S. 53
Leigh v. Green (1904) 193 U.S. 79
Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones (1904) 193 U.S. 532
Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport (1904) 193 U.S. 56l
Cincinnati St. R. Co. v. Snell (1904) 193 U.S. 30
West v. Louisiana (1904) 194 U.S. 258
U.S. v. Williams (1904) 194 U.S. 279
Shepard v. Barron (1904) 194 U.S. 553
Ohio v. Dollison (1904) 194 U.S. 445
Public Clearing House v. Coyue (1904) 194 U.S. 407
Missouri etc. R. Co. v. May (1904) 194 U.S. 267
Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (1904) 194 U.S. 618
Fischer v. St. Louis (1904) 194 U.S. 361
Morris v. Hitchcock (1904) 194 U.S. 384
Aikens v. Wisconsin (1904) 195 U.S. 194
Seattle v. Kelleher (1904) 195 U.S. 351
Hodge v. Muscatine County (1905) 196 U.S. 276
Cook v. Marshall County (1905) 196 U.S. 261
Coulter v. Louisville etc. R. Co. (1905) 196 U.S. 599

APPENDIX B.

List of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court on the right of the States to regulate procedure, arranged in the order of their rendition.

Edwards v. Elliott (1874) 21 Wall. U.S. 557
Walker v. Sauvinet (1875) 92 U.S. 90
Kennard v. Louisiana (1875) 92 U.S. 480
Pearson v. Yewdall (1877) 95 U.S. 294
Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 U.S. 714
Davidson v. New Orleans (1877) 96 U.S. 97
Strauder v. West Virginia (1877) 100 U.S. 303
Virginia v. Rives (1870) 100 U.S. 313
Ex p. Virginia (1879) 100 U.S. 339
Missouri v. Lewis (1879) 101 U.S. 22
Neal v. Delaware (1880) 103 U.S. 370
Hurtado v. California (1884) 110 U.S. 516
Ex p. Reggel (1885) 114 U.S. 642
Campbell v. Holt (1885) 115 U.S. 620
Arrowsmith v. Harmoning (1886) 118 U.S. 194
Hayes v. Missouri (1887) 120 U.S. 68
Church v. Kelsey (1887) 121 U.S. 282
Spies v. Illinos (1887) 123 U.S. 131
Powell v. Pennsylvania (1888) 127 U.S. 685
Mahon v. Justice (1888) 127 U.S. 700
Huling v. Kaw Valley R. etc. Co. (1889) 130 U.S. 559
Freeland v. Williams (1889) 131 U.S. 405
Cross v. North Carolina (1889) 132 U.S. 131
Pennie v. Reis (1889) 132 U.S. 464
Eilenbecker v. District Ct. (1889) 134 U.S. 31
Louisville etc. R. Co. v. Woodson (1890) 134 U.S. 623
In re Kemmler (1890) 130 U.S. 436
York v. Texas (1890) 137 U.S. 16
Wheeler v. Jackson (1890) 137 U.S. 245
Holden v. Minnesota (1890) 137 U.S. 483
In re Converse (1891) 137 U.S. 624
Caldwell v. Texas (1891) 137 U.S. 692
Kauffman v. Wootters (1891) 138 U.S. 285
Leeper v. Texas (1891) 139 U.S. 402
In re Rahrer (1891) 140 U.S. 554

McElwaine v. Brush (1891) 142 U.S. 155
Schwab v. Berggren (1892) 143 U.S. 442
Fielden v. Illinois (1892) 143 U.S. 452
O'Neil v. Vermont (1892) 144 U.S. 323
Brown v. Smart (1892) 145 U.S. 455
McNulty v. California (1893) 149 U.S. 645
Montana Co. v. St. Louis Min., etc. Co. (1894) 152 U.S. 160
Duncan v. Missouri (1894) 152 U.S. 377
Marchant v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (1894) 153 U.S. 380
McKane v. Durston (1894) 153 U.S. 684
Scott v. McNeal (1894) 154 U.S. 34
Pearce v. Texas (1894) 155 U.S. 311.
Bergemann v. Backer (1895) 157 U.S. 655
Central Land Co. v. Laidley (1895) 159 U.S. 103
Moore v. Missouri (1895) 159 U.S. 673
lowa Cent. R. Co. v. Iowa (1896) 160 U.S. 389
Gibson v. Mississippi (1896) 162 U.S. 565.
Lowe r. Kansas (1896) 163 U.S. 81..
Allen v. Georgia (1897) 166 U.S. 139
Hodgson v. Vermont (1897) 168 U.S. 262
King v. Mullins (1898) 171 U.S. 404.
Central L & T. Co. v. Campbell Commission Co. (1899) 173 U.S. 84
Brown v. New Jersey (1899) 175 U.S. 172.
Bolin v. Nebraska (1900) 176 U.S. 83
Roller r. HoIly (1900) 176 U.S. 398
Maxwell v. Dow (1900) 176 U.S. 581
Louisville etc. R. Co. v. Schmidt (1900) 177 U.S. 230
Saranac Land etc. Co. v. Comptroller (1900) 177 U.S. 318
Carter v. Texax (1900) 177 U.S. 442
McDonald v. Massachusetts (1901) 180 U.S. 311
Mallett v. North Carolina (1901) 181 U.S. 589
Nutting v. Massachusetts (1901) 183 U.S. 553
Turpin v. Lemon (1902) 187 U.S. 51
Dreyer v. Illinois (1902) 187 U.S. 71
Hooker v. Los Angeles (1903) 188 U.S. 315
Tarrance r. FIorida (1903) 188 U.S. 519
Farmers' etc. Ins. Co. v. Dobney (1903) 189 U.S. 301
Brownfield v. South Carolina (1903) 189 U.S. 426
Howard v. Fleming (1903) 191 U.S. 126.
Arbuckle v. Blackburn (1903) 191 U.S. 405
Rogers v. Alabama (19O4) 192 U.S. 226
Adams v. New York (1904) 192 U.S. 585
Leigh v. Green (1904) 193 U.S. 79
Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones (1904) 193 U.S. 532
Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport (1904) 193 U.S. 661
Cincinnati St. R. Co. v. Snell (1904) 193 U.S. 30
West v. Louisiana (1904) 104 U.S. 258
Ohio v. Dollison (1904) 104 U.S. 445

APPENDIX C.

List of cases decided by the United Statm Supreme Court on the power of the States to control and regulate the business of corporations arranged in the order of their rendition.

Richmond etc. R. Co. v. Richmond (1877) 96 U.S. 521
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Humes (1885) 115 U.S. 513
Railroad Commission Cases (1886) 116 U.S. 307
Barron v. Burnside (1887) 121 U.S. 186
Pembina Consol. Silver Min. etc. Co. v. Pennsylvania (1898) 125 U.S. 181
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Beckwith (1889) 129 U.S. 26
Minneapolis Eastern R. Co. v. Minnesota (1890) 134 U.S. 467
Home Ins. Co. v. New York (1890) 134 U.S. 594
Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co. (1890) 135 U.S. 641
Charllote etc. R. Co. v. Gibbes (1892) 142 U.S. 386
Budd v. New York (1892) 143 U.S. 517
New York etc. R. Co. v. Bristol (1894) 151 U.S. 556
Montana Co. v. St. Louis Min. etc. Co. (1894) 152 U.S. 160
Brass v. North Dakota (1894) 153 U.S. 391
Eagle Ins. Co. v. Ohio (1894) 153 U.S. 446
Reagan v. Farmers' L & T. Co. (1894) 154 U.S. 362
Covinginton etc. Turnpike Road Co. v. Sandford (1896) 164 U.S. 578
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Mathews (1897) 165 U.S. 1
Gulf etc. R. Co. v. Ellis (1897) 165 U.S. 150
New York etc. R. Co. v. New York (1897) 165 U.S. 628
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Chicago (1897) 166 U.S. 226
Gladson v. Minnesota (1897) 166 U.S. 427
Blake v. McClung (1898) 172 U.S. 239
Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs (1899) 172 U.S. 557
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Paul (1899) 173 U.S. 404
Lake Shore etc. R. Co. v. Smith (1899) 173 U.S. 684
Tullis v. Lake Erie etc. R. Co. (1899) 175 U.S. 348
Clark v. Kansas City (1900) 176 U.S. 114
Adirondack R. Co. v. New York (1900) 176 U.S. 335
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (1900) 177 U.S. 28
Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. (1901) 183 U.S. 79
McChord v. Louisville etc. R. Co. (1902) 183 U.S. 483
Prout v. Starr (1903) 188 U.S. 637
Detroit etc. R. Co. v. Osborn (1903) 189 U. & 383.
Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin etc., Canal etc. Co. (1904) 192 U.S. 201
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota (1904) 193 U.S. 63
Missouri etc. R. Co. v. May (1904) 194 U.S. 267
Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (1904) 194 U.S. 618

APPENDIX D.

List of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court relative to the power of the States to regulate State taxation, condemnation, etc., arranged in the orderof their rendition.

Munn v. Illinois (1876) 94 U.S. 113
McMillen v. Anderson (1877) 95 U.S. 37
Kirtland v. Hotchkiss (1879) 100 U.S. 491
Kelly v. Pittsburgh (1881) 104 U.S. 78
Hagar v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108 (1884) 111 U.S. 701
Provident Sav. Inst. v. Jersey City (1885) 113 U.S. 506
Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases (1885) 115 U.S. 321
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pac. R. Co. (1886) 118 U.S. 394
Philadelphia F. Assoc. v. New York (1886) 119 U.S. 110
Sands v. Manistee River Imp. Co. (1887) 123 U.S. 288
Redemption Bank v. Boston (1888) 125 U.S. 60
Spencer v. Merchant (1888) 125 U.S. 345
Dow v. Beidelman (1888) 125 U.S. 680
California v. Central Pac. R. Co. (1688) 127 U.S. 40
Nashville etc. R. Co. v. Alabama (1888) 128 U.S. 96
Palmer v. McMahon (189O) 133 U.S. 661
Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania (1890) 134 U.S. 232
Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay etc. Canal Co. (1891) 142 U.S. 254
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert (1892) 142 U.S. 339
Horn Silver Min. Co. v. New York (1892) 143 U.S. 305
Budd v. New York (1892) 143 U.S. 517
Columbus Suutbern R. Co. v. Wright (1894) 151 U.S. 470
Pittsburgh etc. R. Co. v. Backus (1894) 154 U.S. 421
Emert v. Missouri (1895) 156 U.S. 296
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Gill (1895) 156 U.S. 649
Winona etc. Land Co. v. Minnesota (1895) 159 U.S. 526
Eldridge v. Trezevant (1896) 160 U.S. 452
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Taggart (1896) 163 U.S. I
FAllbrook Irrigation Dist. v. Bradley (1896) 164 U.S. 112
Missour Pac. R. Co. v. Nebraska (1896) 164 U.S. 403
Covington etc. Turnpike Road Co. v. Sandfurd (1896) 164 U.S. 678
Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor (1897) 165 U.S. 194
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Indiana (1897) 165 U.S. 304
Sentell v. New Orleans etc. R. Co. (1897) 166 U.S. 698
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky (1897) 166 U.S. 150
Merchants etc. Bank v. Pennuylvania (1807) 107 U.S. 461
McHenry v. Alford (1898) 168 U.S. 651
Wilson v. North Carolina (1898) 101) U.S. 580
Savings etc. Soc. v. Multnomah County (1898) 169 U.S. 421
Magoun v. Illinois Trust, etc. Bank (1898) 170 U.S. 283
Williams v. Eggleston (1898) 170 U.S. 304
New York v. Roberts (1898) 171 U.S. 658
Meyer v. Richmond (1898) 172 U.S. 83
Blake v. McClung (1898) 172 U.S. 239
Norwood v. Baker (1898) 172 U.S. 269
Dewey v. Des Moiues (1899) 173 U.S. 193
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson (1899) 173 U.S. 592
Weyerhaueser v. Minnesota (1900) 176 U.S. 550
Wheeler v. New York etc. R. Co. (1900) 178 U.S. 321
American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana (1900) 179 U.S. 89
Williams v. Fears (1900) 179 U.S. 270
New York v. Barker (1900) 170 U.S. 279
Wisconsin etc. R. Co. v. Jacobson (1900) 179 U.S. 287
French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (1901) 181 U.S. 324
Wight v. Davidson (1901) 181 U.S. 371
Tonawanda v. Lyoun (1901) 181 U.S. 389
Webster v. Fargo (1901) 181 U.S. 394
Cass Farm Co. v. Detroit (1901) 181 U.S. 300
Farrell v. West Chicago Park Com'rs ( 1901) 181 U.S. 404
Detroit v. Parker (1901) 181 U.S. 309
Red River Valley Nat. Bunk v. Craig (1001) 181 U.S. 548
Orr v. Gilman (1902) 183 U.S. 278
Florida Cent. etc. R. Co. v. Reynolds (1902) 183 U.S. 471
Clark v. Titusville (1902) 184 U.S. 329
King v. Portlund (1902) 184 U.S. 61
Goodrich v. Detroit (1902) 184 U.S. 432
Chadwick v. Kelley (1903) 187 U.S. 540
Blackstone v. Miller (1903) 188 U.S. 180
Billings v. Illinois (1003) 188 U.S. 97
Louisville etc. Ferry Co. v. Kentucky (1903) 188 U.S. 385
Williams v. Purker (1903) 188 U.S. 491
Kidd v. Alabama (1903) 188 U.S. 730
Glidden v. Harrington (1903) 109 U.S. 255
Missouri v. Dockery (1903) 191 U.S. 166
Hibben v. Smith (1903) 191 U.S. 310.
State Board of Assessors v. Comptoir Nat. D'Escompte (1903) 191 U.S. 388
Shepard v Barron (1904) 194 U.S. 553
Seattle v. Kelleher (1904) 195 U.S. 351.
Cook v. Marshall County (1905) 196 U.S. 261
Coulter v. Louisville etc. R. Co. (1905) 194 U.S. 599

TABLE OF CASES.
Alphabetically Arranged

(See also the cases from the United States Supreme Court chronologically arranged in Appendices A, B, C, and D.)

Ableman v. Booth 21 How. 506 25, 108, 126, 141, 148, 161
Abrigo v. State 29 Tex. App. 149 2
Adams v. New York 192 U.S. 586 143, 144, 146
Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor 165 U.S. 194, 118
Addyston Pipe etc. Co. v. U.S. 175 U.S. 211 118
Adirondack R. Co. v. New York 176 U.S. 335 132
Aikens v. Wisconsin 195 U.S. 194 214
Alabama State Bank v. Dalton 9 How. 622 139
Alberly v. U.S. 162 U.S. 499 53
Allen v. Baltimore etc. R. Co. 114 U.S. 311 130
Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Co. 191 U.S. 171 119
Allgeyer v. Louisiana 165 U.S. 579 209, 214
Almy v. California 24 How. 169 132
Amer. Ins. Co. v. 356Bales Cotton 1 Pet. 511 22, 23, 26, 47, 122, 124, 136
American Pub. Co. v. Fisher 166 U.S. 464 147
American Steel etc. Co. v. Speed 192 U.S. 500 133
Ames v. Kansas 111 U.S. 449 121
Amy v. Shelby County Taxing Dist. 114 U.S. 387 130
Amy v. Smith 1 Litt. (Ky.) 332 3
Anderson v. Dunn 6 Wheat. 204 113, 148
Anderson v. U.S. 171 U.S. 604 118
Andres v. Arnold 77 Mich. 87 57
Andrews v. Andrews 188 U.S. 14 137 140 148 204 240
Andrews v. Swartz 156 U.S. 272 137
Anglo American Provision Co. v. Davis Provision Co. 191 U.S. 373 140, 168
Anonymous 4 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 98 1 Fed. Cas. No. 465 60
Autoni v. Greenhow. 107 U.S. 769 130
Arbuckle v. Blackburn 191 U.S. 405 138
Arkansas Valley land etc. Co. v. Mann 130 U.S. 69 146
Armstrong v. Treasurer 16 Pet. 281 128
Asher v. Texas 128 U.S. 129 117
Ashley v. ltyan 163 U.S. 436 117
Aspinwall v. Daviess County 22 How. 364 128
Atkin v. Kansas 191 U.S. 207 214
Atlantic, etc R. Co. v. Georgia 98 U.S. 359 130
Augusta Bank v. Earle 13 Pet. 519 135, 139, 140, 168
Backus v. Fort St. Union Depot Co. 169 U.S. 557 137, 214
Baird v. Byrne 3 Wall. Jr. 1 59
Baker v. Grice 169 U.S. 284 137
Baker v. Kilgore 145 U.S. 487 131
Baldwin v. Franks 120 U.S. 678 201, 258
Baltimore v. Baltimore Trust etc. Co. 166 U.S. 673 131
Baltimore etc. R. Co. v. Maryland 21 Wall. 456 116
Baltimore etc. R. Co. v. Nesbit 10 How. 395 128
Baltzer v. North Carolina 161 U.S. 240 131
Bankers' Mut. Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis etc. R. Co. 192 U.S. 371 138
Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee 161 U.S. 134 131
Banks v. Walker 3 Barb. Ch. 438 59
Barbier v. Connolly 113 U.S. 27 211, 243
Barings v. Dabney 19 Wall. 1 129
Barnitz v. Beverly 163 U.S. 118 131
Barron v. Baltimore 7 Pet. 243 127, 144, 146
Barron v. Burnside 121 U.S. 186 136, 169, 209
Bartemeyer v. Iowa 16 Wall. 129 116, 212
Bauman v. Ross 167 U.S. 548 145
Beale v. New Mexico 16 Wall. U.S. 535 22, 25
Bedford v. Easter Bldg. etc. Assoc. 181 U.S. 227 132
Bedford v. U.S. 192 U.S. 217 145
Beers v. Arkansas 20 How. 527 128
Beers v. Haughton 9 Pet. 329 119, 128
Belcher v. Farren 89 Cal. 73 60, 265
Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania 134 U.S. 237 248
Benner v. Porter 9 How. 235 121
Benson v. U.S. 146 U.S. 325 124
Berry v. Hull 6 N. Mex. 643 57, 58
Berthemy's Case (1866) 12 Op. Atty. Gen. 7 65
Bier v. McGhee 148 U.S. 137 131
Bigelow v. Forrest 9 Wall. 339 139
Binghamton Bridge 3 Wall. 451 129
Blackstone v. Miller 188 U.S. 189 132, 140
Blake v. McClung 172 U.S. 239 140, 169, 209
Blanck v. Pausch 113 Ill. 60 3
Blight v. Rochester 7 Wheat. 546 60
Blount v. Walker 134 U.S. 607 139
Blount v. Windley 95 U.S. 173 129
Blyew v. U.S. 13 Wall. 581 136
Board of Public Works v. Columbia College 17 Wall. 521 139
Bonaparte v. Appeal Tax Ct. l04 U.S. 592 139
Booth v. Illinois 184 U.S. 425 245
Borer v. Chapman 119 U.S. 587 139
Boston Beer Co. v. Massachusetts 97 U.S. 25 116, 120, 212
Bowwan v. Chicago etc. R. Co. 125 U.S. 465 117, 148, 212
Boyd v. Nebraska 143 U.S. 161 264
Boyd v. Thayer 143 U.S. 135 22, 53, 60
Boyd v. U.S. 116 U.S. 616 143, 144
Boyle v. Zacharie 6 Pet. 348 119
Bradfield v. Roberts 175 U.S. 291 142, 188
Bradley v. People 4 Wall. 459 114
Bradwell v. Slate 16 Wall. 130 140, 214, 215
Brass v. North Di&kota 153 U.S. 391 117
Breedlove v. Nicolet 7 Pet. 413 135
Brennan v. Titusville 153 U.S. 289 117, 213
Brimmer v. Rebman 138 U.S. 78 117, 213
Briscoe v. Kentucky Com. Bank 11 Pet. 257 120,127
Broadis v. Broadis 86 Fed. Rep. 951 63
Bronson v. Kinzie 1 How. 311 128
Brooks v. Missouri 124 U.S. 394 146
Brown v. Houston 114 U.S. 622 116, 132, 139
Brown v. Keene 8 Pet. 112 135
Brown v. Maryland 12 Wheat. 419 115, 132, 133
Brown v. Smart 145 U.S. 457 120
Brown v. U.S. 8 Cranch 110 122
Brown v. Walker 161 U.S. 591 145
Brownfield v. South Carolina 189 U.S. 426 241
Bryan v. Board of Educution 151 U.S. 639 131
Buckner v. Finley 2 Pet. 586 148
Burrov-Giles Lith Co. v. Sarony 111 U.S. 53 121
Burr's Trial 4 Cranch 469 75, 138
Burton v. Burton 1 Keyes (N. Y.) 359 65
Bush v. Kentucky 107 U.S. 110 136
Butchers' Union Slaughter-House etc. Co. v. Crescent City Live Stock
Landing etc. Co. 111 U.S. 746 130
Butler v. Pennsylvania 10 Huw. 402 128
Butterworth Applicant 1 Woodb. & M. 323 57
Buttfield v. Strahan 192 U.S. 470 119, 145
Butz v. Muscatine 8 Wall. 575 129
Byrne v. Missouri 8 Pet. 40 127
Cairo etc. R. Co. v. Hecht 95 U.S. 168 129
Calder v. Bull 3 Dall. 386 127, 163
Caldwell v. Carrington 9 Pet. 86. 139
California v. Central Pac. R. Co. 127 U.S. 1 117, 208
Callan v. Wilson 127 U.S. 540 25, 144, 146
Calvin's Case 7 Coke 1 68
Campbell v. Wade 132 U.S. 34 130
Canada Southern R. Co. v. Gebhard 109 U.S. 527 130
Cannon v. New Orleans 20 Wall 577 133
Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio 183 U.S. 238 119 145
Cardwell v. American Bridge Co. 113 U.S. 205 116
Carlisle v. U.S. 16 Wall. 147 68, 69, 89, 90, 268
Carpenter v. Pennsylvania 17 How. 456 125, 128, 165
Carpenter v. Strange 141 U.S. 87 140
Carroll County v. Smith 111 U.S. 556 136, 141
Carter v. Texas 177 U.S. 442 137, 206, 208
Cary v. Curtis 3 How. 236 135
Case of Armes Popham 121 Foster 208 84
Cates v. Allen 149 U.S. 451 136, 147
Central Land Co. v. Laidley 159 U.S. 103 137
Chadwick v. Kelley 187 U.S. 540 140, 201
Chappedelaine v. Dechenaux 4 Cranch 306 135
Chappell v. U.S. 160 U.S. 499 124
Ch. to Grand Jury 4 Blatchf. 518 30 Fed. Cas. No. 18,270 77, 82, 85
Ch. to Grand Jury I Bond 609 30 Fed. Cas. No. 18,272 77, 84, 88, 89, 90, 138
Ch. to Grand Jury 2 Curt. 630 30 Fed. Cas. No. 18,269 77, 78
Ch. to Grand Jury I Sprague 602 68, 79, 82, 85, 87
Ch. to Grand Jury I Story 614 80, 86
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge 11 Pet. 420 128, 165, 166
Charlotte etc. R. Co. v. Gibbes 142 U.S. 391 241
Chemung Canal Bank v. Lowery 93 U.S. 72 140, 172
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 5 Pet. 1 135
Cherokee Nation c. Southern Kansas R. Co. 135 U.S. 641 117
Chesapeake etc. R. Co. v. Kentucky 179 U.S. 398 118, 194
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Chicago 166 U.S. 226 137, 147, 201, 206
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Fuller 17 Wall. 560 116
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota 134 U.S. 418 208
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota 134 U.S. 467 130
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Nebraska 170 U.S. 57 131
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Solan 169 U.S. 133 118
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Strum 174 U.S. 710 140
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Whitton 13 Wall. 270 136
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Wiggins Ferry Co. 108 U.S. 18 136
Chicago etc. R. Co. v. Wiggins Ferry Co. 119 U.S. 615 139
Chichester v. Phillips T. Raym. 404 84
Chinese Exclusion Case 130 U.S. 581 108, 122, 267
Chirac v. Chirac 2 Wheat. 269 64
Chisholm v. Georgia 2 Dall. 419 121, 134, 136, 148
Christ Church v. Philadelphia County 24 How. 300 128
Christmas v. Russell 5 Wall. 200 139
Church v. Kelsey 121 U.S. 282 130, 148
Church of Jesus Christ v. U.S. 136 U.S. 1 25, 122, 142, 188
Chy Lung v. Freeman 02 U.S. 275 116
Cincinnati etc. Packet Co. v. Catlettsburg 105 U.S. 559 127 133
Citizens' Bank v. Parker 192 U.S. 73 132
Citizenship (1862) 10 Op. Atty. Gen. 382 21
Citizenship (1874) 14 Op. Atty. Gen. 402 66
Citizenship etc. 21 Fed. 905 51
Citizenship-Levy's Case (1874) 14 Op. Atty. Gen. 609 56, 59
Citizens' Sav. Bank v. Owensboro 173 U.S. 636 132
City R. Co. v. Citizens' St. R. Co. 166 U.S. 557 131, 137
Civil Rights Cases 109 U.S. 3 29, 108, 192, 193, 199, 202, 205
Claflin v. Houseman 03 U.S. 130 136, 148
Clarke v. Clarke 178 U.S. 186 140
Clay County v. Savings Soc. 104 U.S. 579 130
Clinton v. Englebrecht 13 Wall. 434 22, 25
Clinton Bridge 10 Wall. 464 116
Close v. Greenwood Cemetery 107 U.S. 466 130
Coe v. Errol 116 U.S. 517 116, 133
Cohen v. Virginia 6 Wheat. 264 108, 121, 124, 135, 148
Cole v. Cunningham 133 U.S. 107 139, 140
Collector v. Day 11 Wall. 113 114, 148
Collet v. Collet 2 Dall. 294 54
Collins v. New Hampshire 171 U.S. 30 118
Colson v. Lewis 2 Wheat. 377 135
Columbia Bank v. Okely 4 Wheat. 235 146
Com. v. Blanding 3 Pick. (Mass.) 314 100
Com. v. Trowles 5 Leigh (Va.) 743 60
Commercial etc. Bank v. Slocum 14 Pet. 60 135
Confiscation Cases 20 Wall. 92 76
Confiscation Cases I Woods 221 76
Connecticut Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Spratley 172 U.S. 602 132
Conner v. Elliott 18 How. 591 140, 171, 172
Contzen v. U.S. 179 U.S. 101 58, 60, 266
Conway v. Taylor 1 Black 603 115
Cook v. Moffat 5 How. 296 119, 128
Cook v. Pennsylvania 97 U.S. 566 116, 132
Cook v. U.S. 138 U.S. 157 126, 146
Cook County v. Calumet etc. Canal etc. Co. 138 U.S. 635 136
Cooke v. Avery 147 U.S. 375 136
Cooley v. Board of Wardens 12 How. 299 114, 115, 120, 132, 133, 157
Cooper v. Roberts 18 How. 177 98
Cooper Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson 113 U.S. 727 116
Cope v. Cope 137 U.S. 682 25
Corfield v. Coryell 4 Wash. 371 99
Cornell v. Coyne 192 U.S. 418 126, 133
Corson v. Maryland 120 U.S. 502 117, 171
Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. 183 U.S. 79 209
Couughran v. Bigelow 164 U.S. 301 147
Counselman v. Hitchcock 142 U.S. 547 145
Covington v. Kentucky 173 U.S. 231 132, 137
Covington etc. Bridge Co. v. Kentucky 154 U.S. 204 118
Covington etc. Turnpike Road Co. v. Sandford 164 U.S. 578 131, 208, 241, 242
Coxe v. M'Clenachan 3 Dall. 478 113
Craig v. Missouri 4 Pet. 410 127
Crandall v. Nevada 6 Wall. 35 115, 122, 123, 124, 132, 140
Crawford v. Branch Bank 7 How. 279 128
Crenshaw v. U.S. 134 U.S. 99 130
Croesus Min. etc. Co. v. Colorado Land etc. Co. 19 Fed. Rep.78 56
Cronin v. Adams 192 U.S. 108 212
Cross v. Harrison 16 How. U.S. 164 22, 25
Crossman v. Lurman 192 U.S. 189 119
Crowley v. Christiensen 137 U.S. 91 212
Crutcher v.Kentucky 141 U.S. 47 117
Cumming v. Board of Education 175 U.S. 528 246
Cummings v. Chicago 188 U.S. 410 119 137
Cummings v. Missouri 4 Wall. 277 125, 129, 164
Curran v. Arkansas 15 How. 304 128
Darby v. Mayer 10 Wheat. 465 139
D'Arcy v. Ketchum 11 How. 165 139
Darrington v.Branch Bank 13 How. 12 127
Dartmouth College v. Woodward 4 Wheat. 518 128
Davidson v. New Orleans 96 U.S. 97 144, 250, 251
Davis v. Beason 133 U.S. 333 25, 142, 180, 188, 245
Davis v. Gray 16 Wall. 203 136
Davis v. Massachusetts 167 U.S. 44 244
Davis v. Packard 6 Pet. 41, 7 Pet. 276 135
Davis v. Packard 8 Pet. 312 135
Day v. Micou 18 Wall. 156 139
Dean, Petitioner 83 Me. 489 56
Delaware Railroad Tax 18 Wall. 206 116
De Lima v. Bidwell 182 U.S. 1 48, 115, 126
Denney v. Bennett 128 U.S. 489 130
Dent v. West Virginia 129 U.S. 114 215
Deposit Bank v. Frankfort 191 U.S. 499 132, 138
De Treville v. Smalls 98 U.S. 517 112
Detroit etc. R. Co. v. Osborn 189 U.S. 383 138
Dewey v. Des Moines 173 U.S. 193 137, 2O8
Diamond Glue Co. v. U.S. Glue Co. 187 U.S. 61l 119 132 140
Dobbins v. Erie County 10 Pet. 435 114
Dodge v. Woolsey 18 How. 331 128
Dooley v. U.S. 182 U.S. 222 25, 115, 137
Dooley v. U.S. 183 U.S. 151 126, 133, 151
Dorsey v. Brigham 177 Ill. 250 69 Am. St. Rep. 232 4, 63
Douglas v. Kentucky 108 U.S. 488 131, 137
Downes v. Bidwell 182 U.S. 244 25, 48
Downham v. Alexandria 10 Wall. 173 116, 140
Doyle v. Continental Ins. Co. 94 U.S. 535 130, 169
Dred Scott v. Sandford 19 How. U.S. 303
4, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 30, 47, 112, 119, 120, 140, 141, 107
Drehman v. Stille 8 Wall. 595 125, 120
Dreyer v. lllinois 187 U.S. 71 145
Dryden v. Swinburne 20 W. Va. 89 60
Dubuque etc. R. Co. v. Richmond 19 Wall. 584 116
Ducat v. Chicago 10 Wall. 410 168
Duncan v. Missouri 152 U.S. 377 131
Dunphy v. Kleinsmith 11 Wall. 610 124
Durousseau v. U.S. 6 Cranch 307 135
Dynes v. Hoover 20 How. 65 123, 144
Eagle Ins. Co. v. Ohio 153 U.S. 446 131
Eastern Bldg. etc. Assoc. v. Welling 181 U.S. 47 137
East Saginaw Salt Mfg. Co. v. East Saginaw 13 Wall. 373 129
Edwards v. Elliott 21 Wall. 532 140, 236
Edwards v. Kearzey 96 U.S. 595 129, 105
Ettinger v. Kenney 115 U. 8. 560 130
Eilenbecker v. Plymouth County 134 U.S. 311 42, 143, 145, 146, 147, 212, 235
Eldridge v. Trezevant 100 U.S. 452 172
Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94 32, 52, 197, 264, 265
Ellis v. Davis 109 U.S. 485 136
Emert v. Missouri 156 U.S. 290 118 214
Escanaba etc. Transp. Co. v. Chicago 107 U.S. 678 116
Essex Public Road Board v. Skinkle 140 U.S. 334 131
Expatriation - Foreign Domicile Citizenship 14 Op. Atty. Gen. 295 265
Ex p. Bain 121 U.S. 1 144
Ex p. Bollman 4 Cranch 76 76, 79, 80, 86, 125, 135, 138
Ex p. Boyd 105 U.S. 647 136
Ex p. Chin king 35 Fed. Rep. 354 51
Ex p. Cregg 2 Curt. 98 56
Ex p. Dorr 3 How. 103 125
Ex p. Garland 4 Wall. 333 125, 128, 142, 164
Ex p. Jackson 96 U. S. 727 120
Ex p. Karstendick 93 U.S. 396 125
Ex p. Kearney 7 Wheat. 38 125, 135, 125
Ex p. Knowles 5 Cal. 300 56
Ex p. Lange 18 Wall. 163 77, 125, 139, 144
Ex p. McCardle 7 Wall. 163 125
Ex p. McKenzie 51 S. Car. 244 56
Ex p. McNeil 13 Wall 236 116, 157
Ex p. Milburn 9 Pet. 704 125
Ex p. Milligan, 4 Wall. 2 125, 138, 143, 144, 148, 163
Ex p. Parks, 93 U. S. 18 125
Ex p. Quarrier 2 W. Va. 569 80, 81
Ex p. Reggel, 114 U. S. 642 141, 175, 238
Ex p. Reynolds 5 Dill. 314 52, 69
Ex p. Sauer 81 Fed. Rep. 355 58, 59
Ex p. Seibold, 100 U. S. 371 108, 134
Ex p. Smith 8 Blackf. 395 57
Ex p. Thompson 3 Hawks (N. Car.) 362 69
Ex p. Tweedy 22 Fed. Rep. 84 56
Ex p. Vallandigham 1 Wall. 243 121, 125,136, 189
Ex p. Virginia 100 U. S. 339 29, 125, 199, 204. 205, 208
Ex p. Wall 107 U. S. 265 144
Ex p. Watkins 3 Pet. 193 125
Ex p. Wilson 114 U. S. 417 144
Ex p. Yarbrough 110 U. S. 651 111, 216.217, 259
Ex p. Yerger, 8 Wall. 85 125, 136, 160, 162
Fairbank v. U.S. 181 U.S. 292 128
Fallbrook Irigation Dist. v. Bradley 164 U.S. 112 137
Fargo v.Michigan 121 U.S. 292 117
Farmers' etc. Bank v. Smith 6 Wheat. 131 119, 128
Farrell v. U.S. 110 Fed Rep. 942 52
Farrington v. Tennessee 95 U.S. 679 129
Felsenheld v. U.S. 186 U.S. 126 115
Fenne v. Holme 21 How. 481 136
Ficklen v. Shelby County Taxing Dist. 145 U.S. 1 117
Fidelity etc. lns. Co. v. U.S. 187 U.S. 315 146, 147
Field v. Barber Aspalt Paving Co. 194 U.S. 621 243
Field v. Clark 143 U.S. 649 113, 114, 115, 117, 134
Finney v. Guy 189 U.S. 335 140
Fisk v. Jefferson Police Jury 166 U.S. 131 130
Fister v. Davenport 22 How. 244 115
Fitts v. McGehee 172 U.S. 516 137
Fleming v. Page 9 How. 603 70
Fletcher v. Peck 6 Cranch 87 125, 128, 164
Folsom v. Township Ninety-Six 159 U.S. 611 137
Fong Yue Ting v. U.S. 149 U.S. 698 143, 145, 146, 147, 264, 266, 267
Forsyth v. Hammond 166 U.S. 506 137 148
Foster v. Kansas 112 U. i3. 201 116 212
Foster v. New Orleans 94 U.S. 246 116
Fourteen Diamond Rings v. U.S. 183 U.S. 176 114 115 126
Fox V. Ohio 5 How. 410 120 144 146
Franklin v. U.S. 1 Colo. 38 48
Franklin Branch Bank v. Ohio 1 Black 474 128
Freeland v. Williams 131 U.S. 405 130
French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. 181 U.S. 324 145
Fretz v. Bull 12 How. 400 135
Fritts v. Palmer 132 U.S. 282 117
Ft. Leavenworth R. Co. v. Lowe 114 U.S. 525 124, 125
Furman v. Nicol 8 Wall. 44 129
Gaines v. Fuentes 92 U.S. 10 136
Gagnon v. U.S. 38 Ct. Cl. 10 60
Galveston etc. R. Co. v. Texas 170 U.S. 226 131
Gardiner v. Miller 47 Cal. 575 48
Garrison v. New York 21 Wall. 196 129
Gassies v. Ballon 6 Pet. 761 23, 119, 140, 168, 196
Geofroy v. Riggs 133 U.S. 258 124
Georgia v. Stanton 6 Wall. 50 136
German Sav. etc. Soc. v. Dormitzer 192 U.S. 125 140
Gibbons v. District of Columbia 116 U.S. 404 112, 124
Gibbons v. Ogden 9 Wheat. 1 115, 132, 155, 156
Gibson v. Chouteau 13 Wall. U.S. 92 22, 25
Gibson v. Mississippi 162 U.S. 565 131, 216, 219, 238
Giles v. Harris 180 U.S. 486 185, 216, 220
Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co. 109 U.S. 401 130
Gilman v. Lockwood 4 Wall. 410 120
Gilman v. Philadelphia 3 Wall. 713 115, 157
Gilman v. Sheboygan 2 Black 510 129, 144
Giozza v. Tiernan 148 U.S. 657 211, 212
Gladhill, Petitioner 8 Met.(Mass.) 168 56
Gladson v.Minnesota 166 U.S. 427 118, 120
Glass v. The Sloop Betsy 3 Dall. 6 135
Glenn v. Garth 147 U.S. 360 140
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pennsylvania 114 U.S. 196 116
Golden v. Prince 3 Wash. 313 54
Gordon v. Appeal Tax Ct. 3 How. 133 128
Gordon's Case 1 East P.C. 71 88
Gougar v. Timberlake 148 Ind. 41, 62 Am. St.Rep. 489 4
Grand Lodge etc. v. New Orleans 166 U.S. 143 131
Grant v. Raymond 6 Pet. 218 121
Gray v. Connecticut 159 U.S. 74 212, 215
Green v. Biddle 8 Wheat. 1 128, 133
Green v. Mills 69 Fed. Rep. 852 159 U.S. 651 185, 216
Green v. Salas 31 Fed. Rep. 100 59, 264, 265
Green v. Van Buskirk 7 Wall. 139 139
Green Bay etc. Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co. 172 U.S. 58 118, 137
Greenwood v. Union Freight R. Co. 105 U.S. 13 130
Greer r. Connecticut 161 U.S. 519 118, 159, 173
Gross v. U.S. Mortgage Co. 108 U.S. 477 136
Gulf etc. R. Co. v. Ellis 165 U.S. 150 208, 241, 242
Gulf etc. R. Co. v. Hefley 158 U.S. 98 118
Gundling v. Chicago 177 U.S. 183 213
Gunn v. Barry 15 Wall. 610 129
Gut v. Minnesota 9 Wall. 35 128
Guy v. Baltimore 100 U.S. 434 116, 170
Hall v. De Cuir 95 U.S. 485 52, 116, 198
Hall v. Wisconsin 103 U.S. 5 130
Hamilton v. Dillin 21 Wall. 73 122
Hamilton Gas Light etc. Co. v. Hamilton 146 U.S. 258 131
Hampton v. M'Connel 3 Wheat. 234 139
Hanauer v. Doane 12 Wall. 342 89, 90
Hanauer v. Woodruff 15 Wall. 439 70
Hancock Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Warren 181 U.S. 73 148
Hancock Nat. Bank v. Farnum 176 U.S. 640 137, 140
Hanford v. Davies 163 U.S. 273 131
Hanley v. Donoghue 116 U.S. 1 139
Hannibal, etc. R. Co. v. Husen 95 U.S. 465 116
Hanover Nat. Bank v. Moyses 186 U.S. 181 119, 121, 132, 145
Hans v. Louisiana 134 U.S. 1 130, 136
Harman v. Chicago 147 U.S. 396 117
Hawaii v. Mankichi 190 U.S. 197 145, 146
Hawker v. New York 170 U.S. 189 128
Hawthorne v. Calef 2 Wall. 10 129
Hayburn's Case 2 Dall. 410 135
Hayes v. Missouri 120 U.S. 68 240
Head v. Missouri Univ. 19 Wall. 526 129
Headman v. Rose 63 Ga. 458 65
Head Money Cases 112 U.S. 580 115, 116
Henderson v. New York 92 U.S. 259 116
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson 141 U.S. 679 117
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson 173 U.S. 592 118, 132
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky 166 U.S. 150 118
Hennington v. Georgia 163 U.S. 299 118, 213
Hepburn v. Ellzey 2 Cranch 445 124, 126, 135
Hepburn v. Griswold 8 Wall. 603 129, 144
Hill v. Merchant's Mut. Ins. Co. 134 U.S. 515 131
Hinson v. Lott 8 Wall. 148 114 132
Hodgson v. Bowerbank 5 Cranch 303 136
Hogan v. Kurtz 94 U.S. 773 60
Holden v. Hardy 169 U.S. 366 214, 244
Holden v. Minnesota 137 U.S. 483 128
Hollingsworth v. Virginia 3 Dall. 378 135, 148
Holmesv. Jennison 14 Pet. 540 115, 125, 141, 175
Holyoke Water-Power Co. v. Lyman 15 Wall. 500 129
Home Ins. Co. v. Augusta 93 U.S. 116 129
Home Ins. Co. v. Morse 20 Wall. 445 136, 169
Home Ins. Co. v. New York 134 U.S. 600 241, 248
Home of Friendless v. Rouse 8 Wall. 430 129
Homestead Case 1 Pa. Dist. 785 69, 79, 86
Hooker v. Los Angeles 188 U.S. 314 137
Hooper v. California 155 U.S. 648 118
Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman 5 Cranch 57 135
Hopkins v. U.S. 171 U.S. 578 118
Hopt v. Utah 110 U.S. 574 126
Horner v. U.S. 143 U.S. 207 120, 142
Horn Silver Min. Co. v. New York 143 U.S. 305 117
Houston v. Moore 5 Wheat. 1 108, 123, 124
Houston etc. R. Co. v. Texas 170 U.S. 243 131
Howard v. Bugbee 24 How. 461 128
Howard v. Fleming 191 U.S. 126 138
Howe Mach. Co. v. Gage 100 U.S. 676 116
Humphrey v. Pegues 16 Wall 244 129
Huntington v. Attrill 146 U.S. 657 140
Huse v. Glover 110 U.S. 543 133
Hyde v. Stone 20 Huw. 170 136
Hylton v. U.S. 3 Dall. 171 114, 153
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Alabama 180 U.S. 28 132
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Illinois 146 U.S. 387 131
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. lllinois 163 U.S. 142 118, 120
Indiana v. Kentucky 136 U.S. 479 133
Inglis v. Sailor's Snug Harbor 3 Pet. U.S. 121 8, 69, 134, 263
Inman Steamship Co. v. Tinker 94 U.S. 238 132, 133, 148
In re An Alien 1 Fed. Cases No. 201a 60
In re Bailey 2 Sawy. 200 58
In re Bodek 63 Fed. Rep.813 3 Pa. Dist. 725 57, 69
In re Celestine 114 Fed. Rep. 553 53
In re Chapman 166 U.S. 661 143
In re Converse 137 U.S. 631 237
In re Debs 158 U.S. 564 118, 120, 137
In re Duncann 139 U.S. 449 141, 184
In re Frederich 149 U.S. 70 125, 161
In re Fronascone 99 Fed. Rep. 48 57
In re Garnett 141 U.S. 1 117, 136
In re Geagle 135 U.S. 356 136
In re Giovanna 93 Fed. Rep. 659 51
In re Green 134 U.S. 377 111, 121, 134
ln re Kanaka Nian 6 Utah 259 59
In re Kemmler 136 U S. 436 201, 211, 239
In re Kollock 163 U.S. 526 115
In re Langtry 31 Fed. Rep. 879 57
In re Lennon 166 U.S. 548 137
In re Loney 134 U.S. 373 121
In re Look Tin Sing 21 Fed. Rep. 907 262, 264
lu re McCoppin 5 Sawy. 630 61
In re Neagle 135 U.S. 1 125, 161
In re Quarles 158 U.S. 535 108
In re Rahrer 140 U.S. 545 117, 201, 212
In re Rapier 143 U.S. 110 120, 142
In re Rodriguez 81 Fed. Rep. 337 51, 58, 264, 266
la re Rose 140 U.S. 453 145, 146
In re Shibuya Jugiro 140 U.S. 291 146, 237
In re Spenser 5 Sawy. 195 58, 59
In re Tyler 149 U.S. 164 137
In re Wy Shing 36 Fed. Rep. 553 51
In re Yung Sing Hee 36 Fed. Rep. 437 51
Interstate Commerce Commission v.Brimson 154 U.S. 447 118, 137, 143
Iowa Cent. R. Co. v.Iowa 160 U.S. 393 240
Irvine v. Marshall 20 How. 558 136
Israel v. Arthur 152 U.S. 355 137
Jackson v. Goodell 20 Johns. (N. Y.) 188 69
Jackson v. Lamphire 3 Pet. 280 128
Jackson v. Twentyman 2 Pet. 136 135
Jachne v. New York 128 U.S. 189 128
James v. Bowwan 190 U.S. 127 203, 216, 258
Japanese Immigrant Case 189 U.S. 86 145
Jefferson Branch Bank v. Skelly 1 Black 436 128
Jeannesv. Landes 84 Fed. Rep. 74 264
Johnson v. Chicago etc. Elevator Co. 119 U.S. 388 117, 127
Johnson v. New York L. Ins. Co. 187 U.S. 491 140
Johnson v. Sayre 158 U.S. 109 145
Johnson v. U.S. 29 Ct. Cl. 1 59
Jones v. Brim 165 U.S. 180 213
Jones v. League 18 How. 76 136
Jones v. U.S. 137 U.S. 202 136, 146
Jones v. Van Zandt 5 How. 215 25, 141
Justices v. Murray 9 Wall. 274 146
Kane v. McCarthy 63 N. Car. 299 63, 65
Kansas v. Colorado 185 U.S. 125 137, 148
Keith v. Clark 97 U.S. 454 130
Kelly v. Owen 7 Wall. 496 64, 65
Kelly v. Pittsburgh 104 U.S. 78 144
Kendall v. U.S. 12 Pet. 524 124
Kennard v. Louisiana 92 U.S. 480 239, 252
Kentucky v. Dennison 24 How. 66 136, 141, 175, 176, 177, 185
Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co. v. Keokuk 95 U.S. 80 132, 133
Keppel v. Petersburg R. Co. Chase (U.S.) 167 14 Fed. Cases No. 7,722. 70, 77
Kidd v. Pearson 128 U.S. 1 117, 212
Kilbourn v. Thompson 103 U. 8. 168 113, 154
Kimmish v. Ball 129 U.S. 217 140, 173, 213, 217
Kirtland v. Hotchkiss 100 U.S. 401 116
Klinger v. Missouri 13 Wall. 257 125
Knowlton v. Moore 178 U.S. 41 115
Knoxville Iron Co. v. Harbison 183 U.S. 13 132
Kohl v. U.S. 91 U.S. 367 124, 144
Koshkonong v. Burton 104 U.S. 668 130
Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer 125 Ill. 141 60
Kring v. Missouri 107 U.S. 221 128, 142, 163, 165
Kurtz v. Moffitt 115 U.S. 501 275
La Abra Silver Min. Co. v. U.S. 175 U.S. 423 114, 137
Laeton v. Steele 152 U.S. 133 214
Lafayette Ins. Co. v. French 18 How. 404 169
Laing v. Rigney 160 U.S. 531 137, 140
Lake Shore etc. R. Co. v. Ohio 165 U.S. 365 118
Lake Snore etc. R. Co. v. Ohio 173 U.S. 285 118
Lake Shore etc. R. Co. v. Smith 173 U.S. 684 132, 209, 214, 241
Lamar v. Browne 92 U.S. 187 122
Lane County v. Oregon 7 Wall. 76 110
Langford v. U.S. 101 U.S. 341 144
Lanz v. Randall 4 Dill. 425 59
Lascelles v. Georgia 148 U.S. 537 141, 176
Laurent v. State 1 Kan. 313 3
Law of Treason 5 Blatchf. 549 84
Law of Treason 1 Story 614 84
Lawton v. Steele 152 U.S. 133 159 173
Leeper v. Texas 139 U.S. 402 240
Lees v. U.S. 150 U.S. 476 145, 267
Lee Sing Far v. U.S. 94 Fed. Rep. 834 51
Legal Tender Cases 110 U.S. 421 115
Legal Tender Cases 12 Wall. 457 108, 120, 129, 144
Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Pennsylvania 145 U.S. 192 117
Lehigh Water Co v. Easton 121 U.S. 388 130
Leisy v. Hardin 135 U.S. 100 117, 148, 212
Leitensdorfer v. Webb 20 How. 176 134
Leloup v. Mobile 127 U.S. 640 117
Lem Moon Sing v. U.S. 158 U.S. 547 269
Leonard v. Grant 5 Fed. Rep. 11 64
Levin v. U.S. 128 Fed. Rep. 826 56
Licenses Cases 5 How. 504 212
License Tax Cases 5 Wall. 462 114, 126, 132
Lincoln County v. Luning 133 U.S. 529 136
Lindsay etc. Co. v. Mullen 176 U.S. 126 118
Linford v. Ellison 155 U.S. 503 145
Liverpool Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts 10 Wall. 566 116, 140, 168
Livingston v. Moore 7 Pet. 469 140, 147
Locke v. New Orleans 4 Wall. 172 125, 128
Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock 187 U.S. 553 145
Looker v. Maynard 179 U.S. 46 132
Lord v.Goodall etc. Steamship Co. 102 U.S. 541 116
Loughborough v. Blake 5 Wheat. 317 113, 114, 124
Louisiana v. New Orleans 102 U.S. 203 130
Louisiana v. New Orleans IU8 U.S. 568 136
Louisiana v. New Orleans 109 U.S. 285 130
Louisiana v. Pilsbury 105 U.S. 278 130
Louisiana v. Texas 176 U.S. 1 118, 137
Louisville etc. Ferry Co. v. Kentucky 188 U.S. 385 119, 209
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Eubank 184 U.S. 27 119
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Kentucky 161 U.S. 677 131
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Kentucky 183 U.S. 503 119, 201, 236
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Mississippi 133 U.S. 587 117, 194, 245
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Petson 2 How. 497 135
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Woodson 134 U.S. 614 145
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Citizen's Gas Co. 115 U.S. 683 130
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Clark 143 U.S. 1 131
Louisville etc. R. Co v. Kentucky 170 U.S. 127 131
Lutherv. Borden7 How.U.S. 1 7, 123, 125, 135, 141, 180, 181
Luxton v. North River Bridge Co. 153 U.S. 625 117
Lynch v. Clarke I Sandf. Ch. (N. Y.) 583 21, 24
Lyng v. Michigan 135 U.S. 161 212
Lyons v. Cunningham 66 Cal. 42 3
Mackin v. U.S. 117 U.S. 348 144
Mager v. Grima 8 How. 490 115, 132
Mahon v. Justice 127 U.S. 700 141, 148, 176
Maine v. Grand Trunk R. Co. 142 U.S. 217 117
Mallett v. North Carolina 181 U.S. 589 128
Manchester v. Massachusetts 139 U.S. 240 117, 136, 140, 148, 173
Manning v. French 133 U.S. 186 145, 147
Marbury v. Madison 1 Cranch. 137 135
Marchant v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 153 U.S. 380 145
Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. Shield 171 N. Y. 384 190
Marshall v. Baltimore etc. R. Co. 16 How. 314 135
Martin v. Hunter 1 Wheat. 304 121, 122, 135, 148
Martin v. Mott 12 Wheat. 19 123
Marye v. Parsons 114 U.S. 325 130
Maryland v. Baltimore etc. R. Co. 3 How. 534 128
Mason v. Haile 12 Wheat. 370 128
Mason v. Missouri 162 U.S. 565 216
Massachusetts v. Western Union Tel. Co. 141 U.S. 40 117
Matter of ------------- 7 Hill (N. Y.) 137 59
Matter of Christern 43 N.Y. Super. Ct. 523 56, 59
Matter of Clark 18 Barb. 446 50
Matter of Conner 30 Cal. 98 56
Matter of Desty 8 Abb. N. Cas. (N. Y.) 250 60
Matter of Ramsden 13 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 429 56
Matthews v. Zane 7 Wheat. 164 135
Mattox v. U.S. 156 U.S. 237 146, 260
Maxwell v. Dow 176 U.S. 581 145, 146, 197, 211, 238
May v. New Orleans 178 U.S. 496 133
Mayfield v. Richards 115 U.S. 137 122
Mayhew v. Thatcher 6 Wheat. 129 139
Maynard v. Hill 125 U.S. 100 130
McAllister v. U.S. 141 U.S. 174 121
McCall v. California 130 U.S. 104 117
McCarthy v. Marsh 5 N. Y. 203 59
McChord v. Louisville etc. R. Co. 183 U.S. 483 119
McCracken v. Hayward 2 Ilow. 608 128
McCready v. Virginia 94 U.S. 391 116, 140, 159, 173, 174
McCullough v. Virginia 172 U.S. 102 132, 137
McDaniel v. Richards 1 McCord L (S. Car.) 187 60
McDonald v. Massachusetts 180 U.S. 311 128, 145, 147, 238, 245
McElrath v. U.S. 102 U.S. 420 140
McElvaine v. Brush 142 U.S. 155 147
McGahey v. Virginia 135 U.S. 662 131
McGuire v. Massachusetts 3 Wall. 387 114
McNulty v. California 149 U.S. 645 137
McPherson v. Blacker 146U.S. 1 111, 134, 201, 216, 218, 236, 258
M'Colloch v. Maryland 4 Wheat U.S. 316 22, 25, 108, 114, 132, 147, 148
Medley, Petitioner 134 U.S. 160 128
M'Elmoyle v. Cohen 13 Pet. 312 139
Memphis etc. R. Co. v. Gaines 97 U.S. 697 130
Memphis etc. R. Co. v. Tennessee 101 U.S. 337 130
Memphis Gas Light Co. v. Shelby County Taxing Dist. 109 U.S. 398 130
Merchant's Nat. Bank v. U.S. 101 U.S. 1 115
Messenger's Trial J. Kel. 70 85
Meyer v. Richmond 172 U.S. 82 137
M'Growther's Case 1East P.C. 71, Foster Crown Law 13 88
Michigan v. Flint etc. R. Co. 152 U.S. 363 137
Miller v. Cornwall 168 U.S. 131 137
Miller v. New York 15 Wall. 478 129
Miller v. New York 109 U.S. 385 116
Miller v. Reinhart 18 Ga. 239 60
Miller v. U.S. 11 Wall. 268 122, 144, 146
Mills v. Duryea 7 Cranch. 481 139
Minneapolis v. Reum 56 Fed. Rep. 580 23
Minneapolis v. Reum 12 U.S. App. 446 53
Minneapolis Eastern R. Co. v. Minnesota 134 U.S. 467 208
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Beckwith 129 U.S. 209 241
Minneapolis etc. R. Co. v. Minnesota 186 U.S. 257 119
Minnesota v. Barber 136 U.S. 318 117, 213
Minor v. Happersett 21 Wall. U.S. 162 3, 4, 18, 63, 100, 215, 216, 259
Mississippi v. Johnson 4 Wall. 47 136
Missouri v. Dockery 191 U.S. 170 201
Missouri v. lllinois 160 U.S. 208 137
Missouri v. Lewis 101 U.S. 22 206, 208, 254
Missouri v. Murphy 170 U.S. 78 131
Missouri etc. R. Co. v. Haber 169 U.S. 613 118, 148
Missouri etc. R. Co. v. McCann 174 U.S. 580 118
Missouri etc. R. Co. v. Rock 4 Wall. 177 129
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Humes 115 U.S. 513 242
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Mackey 127 U.S. 209 241, 243
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Nebraska 164 U.S. 403 208
Mitchell v. Clark 110 U.S. 633 121
Mitchell v. Harmony 13 How. 115 144
M'Millan v. M'Neil 4 Wheat. (U.S.) 209 119, 128
Mobile v. Watson 110 U.S. 289 130
Mobile County v. Kimball 102 U.S. 691 116, 157
Mobile etc. R. Co. v. Tennessee 153 U.S. 486 131, 137, 201, 211
Mobile Transp. Co. v. Mobile 187 U.S. 410 137
Monongahela Nav. Co. v. U.S. 148 U.S. 312 117, 145
Montana Co. v. St. Louis Min. etc. Co. 152 U.S. 160 214
Montgomery v. Portland 190 U.S. 89 119
Moore v. Illinois 14 How. 13 25, 140, 141, 144
Moran v. New Orleam 112 U.S. 69 116
Morewood v. Enequist 23 How. 491 136
Morgan v. Dudley lr3 B. Mon. 693 56
Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of Health 118 U.S.455 117, 127
Morley v. Lake Shore etc. R. Co. 146 U.S. 162 131
Morris v. Hitchcock 194 U.S. 384 213
Mossman v. Higginson 4 Dall. 12 135
Motes v. U.S. 178 U.S. 458 146
Moultrie County v. Rockingham Ten-Cent Sav. Bank 92 U.S.631 129
Mrs. Alexander's Cotton 2 Wall. 404 122
Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623 212
Muller v. Dows 94 U.S. 444 136
Mulligan v. Corbins 7 Wall. 487 129
Mumma v. Potomac Co. 8 Pet. 281 128
Munn v. Illinois 94 U.S. 113 126, 127, 251
Murray v. Charleston 96 U.S. 432 129
Murray v. Hoboken Land etc. Co. 18 How. 272 121, 136, 143, 144, 250, 253
Nalle v. Fenwick 4 Rand. (Va.) 585 60
Nashua etc. R. Corp. v. Boston etc. R. Corp. 136 U.S. 350 136
Nashville etc. R. Co. v. Alabama 128 U.S. 96 25, 117
Natal v. Louisiana 139 U.S. 621 214
Nathan v. Louisiana 8 How. 73 115
Navigation Laws 17 Op. Atty. Gen. 534 60
Neal v. Delaware 103 U.S. 370 206, 208, 216, 217, 259
Neely v. Henkel 180 U.S. 100 126, 145
Neil v. Ohio 3 Ilow. 720 128
Nelson v. Police Jury Ill U.S. 710 130
Neves v. Scott 13 How. 268 135
New England Mut. Marine lns. Co. v. Dunham 11 Wall. 1 l36
New Haven etc. R. Co. v. Hamersley 104 U.S. 1 130
New Jersey v. New York 5 Pet. 284 135
New Jersey v. Wilson 7 Cranch. 164 124
New Jersey v. Yard 95 U.S. 104 129
New Orleans v. Benjamin 153 U.S. 411 131, 137
New Orleans v. De Armas 9 Pet. 224 133
New Orleans v. Houston 119 U.S. 265 130
New Orleans v. Morris 105 U.S. 600 130
New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co. 142 U.S. 79 131
New Orleans City etc. R. Co. v. Louisiana 157 U.S. 219 131
New Orleans City etc. R. Co. v. New Orleans 143 U.S. 192 131
New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Ligit Co. 115 U.S. 650 130
New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. 125 U.S. 18 130
New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Rivers 115 U.S. 674 130
Newport etc. Bridge Co. v. U.S. 105 U.S. 470 116
Newport Light Co. v. Newport 151 U.S. 527 137
Newton v. Mahoning County 100 U.S. 548 130
New York v. Miln 11 Pet. 102 109, 115
New York v. Knight 192 U.S. 21 119
New York v. Roberts 171 U.S. 658 118
New York v. Squire 145 U.S. 175 131, 214
New York etc. R. Co. v. Bristol 151 U.S. 556 131, 137, 214, 242
New York etc. R. Co. v. New York 165 U.S. 628 118
New York etc. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania 153 U.S. 628 115, 131
New York etc. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania 158 U.S. 431 118
New York Guaranty etc.. Co. v. Board of Liquidation 105 U.S. 622 130
New York L. Ins. Co. v. Cravens 178 U.S. 389 118, 132
Nichol v. Ames 173 U.S. 509 115, 126, 137
Nichimura Ekiu v. U.S. 142 U.S. 651 117, 119, 122, 123, 267
Norfolk etc. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania 136 U.S. 114 117
Norris v. Boston 7 How. 414 127
North Carolina v. Yemple 134 U.S. 22 136
Northern Cent. R. Co. v. Maryland 187 U.S. 258 132
Northern Securities Co. v. Minnesota 194 U.S. 48 241
Northern Securities Co. v. 193 U.S. 197 119, 155, 158
Northwestern Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde Park 97 U.S. 659 129
Northwestern Union Packet Co. v. St. Louis 100 U.S. 423 116, 126, 133
Northwestern Univ. v. People 99 U.S. 309 134
Norwich etc. R. Co. v. Johnson 15 Wall. 195 129
Norwood v. Baker 172 U.S. 269 208
Nutting v.Massachusetts 183 U.S. 553 119
Ochiltree v. Iowa R. Contracting Co. 21 Wall 249 129
Odgen v. Saunders 12 Wheat. 213 54, 119, 120, 125, 128, 164
Ohio v. Dollison 194 U.S. 445 149, 191
Ohio v. Thomas 173 U.S. 276 124
Ohio etc. R. Co. v. McClure 10 Wall. 511 129
Ohio etc. R. Co. v. Wheeler I Black 280 136
Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana 177 U.S. 190 214
O'Neil v. Vermont 144 U.S. 323 117, 147
Opinion of Justices 44 Me. 507 3
Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs 172 U.S. 561 168, 242, 251
Orr v. Gilmun 183 U.S. 278 132
Osborne v. Florida 164 U.S. 650 118
Osborne v. Mobile 16 Wall. 479 116
Osborn v. Nicholson 13 Wall. 654 29, 129, 144, 192, 193
Osborn v. U.S. Bank 9 Wheat. 738 53, 114, 121, 135, 148
Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. Oshkosh 187 U.S. 437 132
Otis v. Parker 187 U.S.606 245
Ouachita Packet Co. v. Aiken 121 U.S. 444 133, 148
Owensboro v. Owensboro Waterworks Co. 191 U.S. 358 132
Owings v. Norwood 5 Cranch 344 135
Owings v. Speed 5 Wheat. 420 128
Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County 166 U.S. 648 137
Pace v. Alabama 106 U.S.583 244
Pace v. Burgess 02 U.S. 372 126
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert 142 U.S. 339 117
Pacific R. Co. v. Maguire 20 Wall. 36 129
Parkersburg etc. Transp. Co. v. Parkersburg 107 U.S. 691 133, 136
Parkinson v. U.S. 121 U.S. 281 144
Parsons v. Bedford 3 Pet. 433 146
Passaic Bridges 3 Wall. 782 115
Passaic River etc. Bridge v. Hoboken Land etc. Co. 1 Wall. 110 129
Patupsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Bd. of Agriculture 171 U.S. 345 118, 133
Patterson v. Bark Eudora 190 U.S. 169 119, 138
Patton v. Brady 184 U.S. 608 137
Paul v. Virginia 8 Wall. 168 115, 139, 140, 168
Paup v. Drew 10 How. 218 128
Payne v. Hook 7 Wall. 425 136
Pearce v. Texas 155 U.S. 311 178
Pearsall v. Great Northern R. Co. 161 U.S. 646 131
Pearson v. Yewdall 105 U.S.294 131
Peete v. Morgan 19 Wall. 581 116, 133
Peguinot v. Detroit 16 Fed. Rep. 214 264
Pembina Consol. Silver Min. etc. Co. v. Pennsylvania 125 U.S. 181
118, 140, 169, 241, 242
Pennie v. Reis 132 U.S. 464 130
Penniman's Case 103 U.S. 714 130
Pennoyer v. McConnaughy 140 U.S. 1 131
Penuoyer v. Neff 95 U.S. 714 121, 139
Pennsylvania v. Wheeling etc. Bridge Co. 13 How. 518 115, 135, 146
Pennsylvania v. Wheeling etc. Bridge Co. 18 How. 421 115, 120, 126, 127
Pennsylvania College Cases 13 Wall. 190 129
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Miller 132 U.S. 75 130
Pensacola Tel. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. 96 U.S. 1 116, 120, 121
Peonage Cases 123 Fed. Rep. 671 192
People v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique 107 U.S. 59 132
People v. Cook 148 U.S. 397 131
People v. Hyatt 72 N.Y. 176 177
People v. Lynch 11 Johns. (N. Y.) 550 80
People v. McGowan 77 Ill. 644 58, 60
People v. McNally 59 How. Pr. 500 60
People v. Sweetman 3 Park. Crim. (N. Y.) 358 56
Pervear v. Massachusetts 5Wall 475 114, 147
Petit v. Minnesota 177 U.S. 164 213, 214
Philadelphia v. Collector 5 Wall. 720 136
Philadelphia etc. Steamship Co. v. Pennsylvania 122 U.S. 326 117
Philadelphia Fire Assoc. v. New York 119 U.S. 110 117, 140, 168, 242
Phillips v. Payne 92 U.S. 130 124
Pickard v. Pullman Southern Car Co. 117 U.S. 34 116
Pierce v. Carskadon 16 Wall 234 126
Pierce v. New Hampshire 5 How. 585 120
Piqua Branch of State Bank v. Knoop 16 How. 369 128
Pittsburgh etc. Coal Co. v. Bates 156 U.S. 577 118, 126, 133, 140
Pittsburgh etc. Coal Co. r. Louisiana 156 U.S. 590 118, 133
Planters' Bank v. Sharp 6 How. 301 128
Plessy v. Ferguson 163 U.S. 537 29, 193, 194, 199, 246
Plumley v. Massachusetts 155 U.S. 461 118, 137
Poindexter v. Greenhow 114 U.S. 270 130
Pollard v. Hagan 3 How. 212 25
Pollock v. Farmers' L. T. Co. 157 U.S. 429 112, 115, 148, 153
Pollock v. Farmers' L. T. Co. 138 U.S. 601 112, 153
Poole v. Fleeger 11 Pet. 185 133
Pope v. Williams U.S. 621 216, 220, 227
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Adams 155 U.S. 688 118
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Charleston 153 U.S. 692 117
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Taylor 192 U.S. 64 119
Postmaster at New Orleans 9 Op. Atty. Gen. 259 53
Pound v. Turck 95 U.S. 459 116
Powell v. Pennsylvania 127 U.S. 678 201, 213
Powers of Congress (1855) 8 Op. Atty.-Gen. 139 69
Prentice v. Miller 82 Cal. 570 60
Presser v. Illinois 110 U.S. 252 133, 240, 252
Preto's Case 10 Op. Atty. Gen. 321 266
Prigg v. Pennsylvania 18 Pet. 539 25, 26, 135, 141
Propeller Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh 12 How. 443 115, 135
Prout v. Starr 188 U.S. 537 209
Providence Bank v. Billings. 4 Pet. 514 128
Public Clearing House v. Coyne 194 U.S. 497 45
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania 141 U.S. 18 117
Pumperly v. Green Bay etc. Canal Co. 13 Wall. 166 144
Railroad Commission Cases 116 U.S. 307, 347, 352 116
Rasmussen v. Idaho 181 U.S. 198 118, 173, 213
Rasmussen v. U.S. 197 U.S. 516 34
Ratterman v. Western Union Tel. Co. 127 U.S. 411 117
Raymond v. Raymond 83 Fed. Rep. 721 53
Reagun v. Farmers' L. & T. Co. 154 U.S. 302 137, 208
Red River Valley Nat. Bank v. Craig 181 U.S. 548 132
Reetz v. Michigan 188 U.S. 505 128, 215
Reg. v. Frost 9 C. & P. 129 38 E. C. L 70 84
Reg. v. Gallagher 15 Cox (C. C.) 291 84
Reg. v. McCafferty 10 Cox (C. C.) 603 85
Reid v. Colorado 187 U.S. 137 119, 173, 213
Renaud v. Abbott 116 U.S. 277 139
Respublica v. Chapman I Dall. (Pa.) 53 70, 74, 77
Respublica v. McCarty 2 Dall. (Pa.) 86 88, 89
Rex v. Cook 13 How. St. Tr. 391 84
Rex v. Crunburne 13 How. St. Tr. 227 74
Rex v. Dammaree 15 How. St. Tr. 522 85, 90
Rex v. Gregg 14 How. St. @. 1376 89
Rex v. Regicides 5 How. St. Tr. 1224 85
Rex v. Stone 6 T. R. 527 84
Rex v. Vaughan 13 How. St. Tr. 486 74, 82, 85, 87
Reymann Brewing Co. v. Bri8ter 179 U.S. 445 118, 212
Reynolds v. S@kton 140 U.S. 254 139
Reynolds v. U.S. 98 U.S. 145 142, 140, 186, 187
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts 12 Pet. 657 135 140
Rhodes v. Iowa 170 U.S. 412 118
Richmond etc. R. Co. v. Louisa R. Co. 13 How. 71 128
Richmond etc. R. Co. v. R. A. Patterson Tobacco Co. 169 U.S. 311 118
Richmond etc. R. Co. v. Richmond 96 U.S. 521 129, 214
Right of Expatration (1859) 9 Op. Atty. Gen. 356 69, 262, 264, 265
Ritchie v . Putnam 13 Wend. 524 60
Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing Dist. 120 U.S. 489 117, 157
Roberts v. Reilly 116 U.S. 80 170
Robertson v. Baldwin 165 U.S. 275 29, 137, 189, 194, 195
Robertson v. Pickrell 109 U.S. 608 139
Roff v. Burney 168 U.S. 218 53
Rogers v. Alabama 192 U.S. 226 138, 200, 208
Roller v. Holly 176 U.S. 398 209
Rose v. Himely 4 Cranch. 241 135
Rosen v. U.S. 161 U.S. 29 146
Royall v. Virginia 116 U.S. 572 209, 215
Ruckgaber v. Moore 104 Fed. Rep. 948 64, 65, 264
Rushworth v. Judges 58 N. J. L. 97 56
Sands v. Manistee River Imp. Co. 123 U.S. 288 117
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pac. R. Co. 118 U.S. 394 208, 241
Sasportas v. De La Motta 10 Rich Eq. (S. Car.) 38 60
Satterlee v. Matthewson 2 Pet. 380 128
Schaefer v. Werling 188 U.S. 516 137
Schmidt v. Cobb 119 U.S.286 212
Scholey v. Rew 23 Wall. 331 112, 115
Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania 171 U.S. 1 118
Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon 7 Cranch 116 69
Schultz's Petition 64 N.H. 241 58
Scotland County Ct. v. U.S. 140 U.S. 41 131
Scott v. Donald 5 U.S. 58 118, 133, 137
Scott v. McNeal 154 U.S. 34 201, 209
Scott v. Neely 140 U.S. 106 147
Scranton v. Wheeler 179 U.S. 141 118, 145
Seibert v. Lewis 122 U.S. 284 130
Sentell v. New Orleans etc. R. Co. 166 U.S. 698 256
Sere v. Pitot 6 Cranch U.S. 332 23, 47
Sewing Mach. Co.'s Case 18 Wall. 553 136
Shapleigh v. San Angelo 167 U.S. 646 131
Sheldon v. Sill 8 How. 441 135
Sherlock v. Alling 93 U.S. 99 116
Shively v. Bowlby 152 U.S. 48 48
Shoemaker v. U.S. 147 U.S. 282 124
Shortridge v. Macon, Chase U.S. 136 70
Simmons v. Saul 138 U.S. 439 139
Simmons v. U.S. 142 U.S. 148 145
Sinking Fund Cases 99 U.S. 700 144
Sinnot v. Davenport 22 How. 227 115
Sioux City St. R. Co. v. Sioux City. 138 U.S. 98 131
Slade v. Minor 2 Cranch (C. C.) 139 60
Slaughter House Cases 16 Wall. 36
20, 29, 31, 32, 51, 66, 99, 140, 173, 193, 197, 198, 211, 227
Smiley v. Kansas 196 U.S. 447 214
Smith v. Alabama 124 U.S. 465 117
Smith v. Maryland 18 How. 71 115, 135, 143
Smith v. Mississippi 162 U.S. 592 241
Smith v. Reeves 178 U.S. 436 137
Smith v. St. Louis etc. R. Co. 181 U.S. 248 118
Smith v. Turner 7 How. 283 54, 115
Smyth v. Ames 169 U.S. 466 137, 208, 209, 241
Sohn v. Waterson 17 Wall. 596 129
Soon Hing v. Crowley 113 U.S. 703 211, 255
South Carolina v. Georgia 93 U.S. 4 116
South Dakota v. North Carolina 192 U.S. 286 138
Southern Pac. R. Co. v. California 118 U.S. 109 136
Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Denton 146 U.S. 202 136
Southern Steamship Co. v. Port Wardens 6 Wall. 31 113
South etc. Alabama R. Co. v. Alabama 101 U.S. 832 130
Southwestern Coal Co. v. McBride 185 U.S. 499 126
Sparenburgh v. Bannatyne 1 B. & P. 163 87, 88
Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co. 191 U.S. 526 138
Spies v. Illinois 123 U.S. 131 142, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149
Spraigue v. Thompson 118 U.S. 90 127
Spratt v. Spratt 4 Pet. 406 59
Spreckles Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain 192 U.S. 397 138
Springer v. U.S. 102 U.S. 586 115, 126
Spring Valley Water Works v. Schottler 110 U.S. 347 130
Sprott v. U.S. 20 Wall. 459 70, 90
Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin etc Canal Co. 192 U.S. 201 312
St. Anna's Asylum v. New Orleans 105 U.S. 362 130
St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. St. Paul Water Com'rs 168 U.S. 340 118, 131, 143
Stark v. Chesapeake Ins. Co. 7 Cranch 420 60
State v. Barrett 40 Minn. 65 57, 59
State v. Denoyer 6 N. Dak. 586 53
State v. Hoeflinger 35 Wis. 393 60
State v. Hunt 2 Hill L. (S. Car.) 1 63
State v. Macdonald 24 Minn. 48 59
State v. Manuel 4 Dev. & B. L. (N. Car.) 20 21
State v. Maconald 2 Port. (Ala.) 440 79
State v. M'Donald 4 Port. (Ala.) 449 84
State v. Webster 7 Neb. 471 56
State v. Whittemore 50 N. H. 245 56
State Freight Tax Case 16 Wall. 232 115
State Railroad Tax Cases 92 U.S. 612 249
State Tax on Foreign-held Bonds 15 Wall. 300 114, 129
State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts 15 Wall. 284 116, 132
State Tonnage Tax Cases 12 Wall. 204 132, 133
St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand etc. Co. 192 U.S. 454 119
Stearns v. Minnesota 179 U.S. 223 132
Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Co. 141 U.S. 67 131
Stevens v. Nichols 157 U.S. 370 137
Stewart v. Kahn 11 Wall. 493 47, 122
St. Louis Consol. Coal Co. v. Illinois 185 U.S. 203 214
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Gill 156 U.S. 649 131, 137
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. James 161 U.S. 545 133, 137
St. Louis etc. R. Co. v. Mathews 165 U.S. 1 131
Stockard v. Morgan 185 U.S. 27 119
Stone v. Mississippi 101 U.S. 814 130
Stoughton v. Taylor 2 Paine 661 263, 266
Stoutenburgh v. Hennick 129 U.S. 141 117, 124
St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul 181 U.S. 142 132
Strader v. Graham 10 How. 82 25, 141
Strauder v. West Virginia 100 U.S. 303 29, 197, 204, 208
Strawbridge v. Curtiss 3 Cranch 207 135
Strickley v. Hill 22 Utah 268 60
St. Tammany Water Works v. New Orleans Water Works 120 U.S. 64 130
Stuart v. laird 1 Cranch 299 121
Sturges v. Crowninshield 4 Wheat. 122 119, 128
Susquehanna etc. Valley R. etc. Co. v. Blatchford 11 Wall. 172 136
Suydam v. Broadnax 14 Pet. 67 119, 135
Swafford v. Templeton 185 U.S. 487 111, 137, 216, 219, 259
Sweet v. Rechel 159 U.S. 380 145
Talbot v. Janson 3 Dall. 162 263
Talton v. Mayes 163 U.S. 376 145
Tarble's Case 13 Wall. 397 108, 123, 125, 136, 161
Tarrance v. Florida 188 U.S. 519 206, 208
Taylor v. Beckham 178 U.S. 548 141, 184, 216, 249
Taylor v. Taintor 16Wall. 366 141
Tennessee v. Davis 100 U.S. 257 136, 148
Tennessee v. Pullman Southern Car Co. 117 U.S. 51 116
Tennessee v. Sneed 96 U.S. 69 129
Terrett v. Taylor 9 Cranch. 43 142, 187
Terry v. Anderson 95 U.S. 628 129
Texas v. White 7 Wall. 700 141, 148, 183
Texas v. White 116 U.S. 252 124
Texas etc. R. Co. v. Interstate Transp. Co. 155 U.S. 585 118
Texas etc. R. Co. v. Southern Pac. CO. 137 U.S. 48 117
The Acorn 2 Abb. 434 60
The Alicia 7 Wall. 571 136
The Brig Amy Warwick 2 Black 673 110
The Daniel Ball 10 Wall. 557 116
The Hine v. Trevor 4 Wall. 555 136
The Lottawanna 21 Wall. 558. 116, 136
The Miantinomi 3 Wall. Jr. (C. C.) 40 17 Fed. Cas. No. 9,521 120
The Montello 11 Wall. 411 116
The Moses Taylor 4 Wall. 411 136
The Pizarro 2 Wheat. U.S. 227 4
The Propeller Commerce 1 Black 574 136
The Roanoke 189 U.S. 185 119, 137
The Steamer St. Lawrence 1 Black 522 136
The Venus 8 Cranch 280 270
Thomas v. U.S. 192 U.S. 363 112, 115
Thomasson v. State 15 Ind. 449 3
Thomson v. Pacific R. Co. 9 Wall. 579 115
Thompson v. Missouri 171 U.S. 380 128
Thompson v. Utuh 170 U.S. 343 146
Thompson v. Whitman 18 Wall. 457 139
Thorington v. Montgomery 147 U.S. 490 145
Thorington v. Smith 8 Wall. 1 70, 77
Thormann v. Frame 176 U.S. 350 140
Thurlow v. Massachusetts 5 How. 504 54, 114, 115
Tierman v. Rinker 102 U.S. 123 116
Tinsley v. Anderson 171 U.S. 101 137
Tomlinson v. Branch 15 Wall. 460 129
Tomlinson v. Jessup 15 Wall. 454 129
Tonawanda v. Lyon 181 U.S. 389 145
Trademark Cases 100 U.S. 82 116, 121
Travellers Ins. Co. v. Connecticut 185 U.S. 304 140, 172
Trial of Regicides J. Kel. 13 89
Tullis v. Lake Erie etc. R. Co. 175 U.S. 348 242
Tullock v. Mulvane 184 U.S. 497 137
Turner v. Maryland 107 U.S. 38 116, 132
Turpin v. Burgess 117 U.S. 504 126, 133
Twin City Bank v. Nebeker 107 U.S. 196 113, 114
Twitchell v. Pennsylvania 7 Wall. 321 144, 146
Tyler v. Defrees 11 Wall. 331 122
Union Pac. R. Co. v. Peniston 19 Wall. 5 113
U.S. v. Amedy 11 Wheat. 302 130
U.S. v. Arjona 120 U.S. 470 122
U.S. v. Arredondo 6 Pet. 091 135
U.S. v. Ballin 144 U.S. 1 114
U.S. v. Baltimore etc. R. Co. 17 Wall. 322 114
U.S. v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co. 176 U.S. 211 118
U.S. v. Bevans 3 Wheat. 336 123, 135
U.S. v. Bollman 4 Cranch 127 80
U.S. v. Boyd 83 Fed. Rep. 547 52, 53
U.S. v. Burlington etc. Ferry Co. 21 Fed. Rep. 340 123
U.S. v. Burr 25 Fed. Cas. No. 14 693 77, 78, 79, 85, 89, 91
U.S. v. Cook 17 Wa]l. 168 146
U.S. v. Coolidge 1 Wheat. 415 146
U.S. v. Coombs 12 Pet. 72 115
U.S. v. Coxe 18 How. (U.S.) 100 22, 25
U.S. v. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 2, 142, 143, 146, 199, 200, 211, 216, 217, 258
U.S. v. Dewalt 128 U.S. 393 144
U.S. v. Dewitt 9 %%@all. 41 124
U.S. v. Duell 172 U.S. 576 121
U.S. v. Dunnington 146 U.S. 338 139
U.S. v. E. C. Knight Co. 156 U.S. 1 118
U.S. v. Fox 94 U.S. 315 124, 148
U.S. v. Fries 3 Dall. (PR.)@ 515 9 Fe& Cas. No. 5126 78, 79
U.S. v. Furlong 5 Wheat. 184 122
U.S. v. 43 Gallons Whiskey 93 U.S. 188 116
U.S. v. Gratiot 14 Pet. 526 22, 25
U.S. v. Great Falls Mfg. Co. 112 U.S. 645 144
U.S. v. Greathouse 2 Abb. 364 68, 76, 78, 79, 86, 88
U.S. v. Greiner 4 Phila. (Pa.) 396 18 Leg. Int. (Pa.) 149 26 Fed. Cases No. 15,262 68 75 78 85 88
U.S. v. Grottkau 30 Fed. Rep. 672 60
U.S. v. Guthrie 17 How. 284 135
U.S. v. Hadley 99 Fed. Rep. 437 52
U.S. v. Hamilton 3 Dall. 17 125
U.S. v. Hanway 2 Jr. (C. C.) 139 76, 77, 78, 83, 86
U.S. v. Harris 106 U.S. 640 201, 205, 258
U.S. v. Higgins 103 Fed. Rep. 348 52
U.S. v. Higgins 110 Fed. Rep. 609 52
U.S. v. Holliday 3 Wall. 407 115
U.S. v. Hoxie 1 Paine 265 76, 77, 78, 80, 87, 138
U.S. v. Hudson 7 Cranch 32 135
U.S. v. Insurgents 2 Dall. 335 75, 70, 138
U.S. v. Joint Traffic Assoc. 171 U.S. 505 14
U.S. v. Jones 109 U.S. 513 114
U.S. v. Kagama 116 U.S. 375 117
U.S. v. Keller 13 Fed. Rep. 82 11 Biss. 314 64
U.S. v. Kopp 110 Fed. Rep. 160 52
U.S. v. LA Vengeance 3 Dall. 297 135, 146
U.S. v. Lehman 39 Fed. Rep. 49 66
U.S. v. Lynah 188 U.S. 445 119, 145
U.S. v. Marigold 9 How. 500 115, 120
U.S. v. McClellan 127 Fed. Rep. 971 192
U.S. v. Memphis 97 U.S. 284 130
U.S. v. Mills 7 PeL 142 146
U.S. v. Mitchell 2 pall. 348 75, 70, 138
U.S. v. More 3 Cranch 159 135
U.S. v. Morris 125 Fed. Rep. 325 4
U.S. v. Nelson 29 Fed. Rep. 204 30 Fed. Rep. 115 48
U.S. v. Norsch 42 Fed. Rep. 417 60
U.S. v. North Carolina 136 U.S. 211 131
U.S. v. Norton 1 U.S. 569 114
U.S. v. Ortega 11 Wheat. 467 136
U.S. v. Osborne 6 Sawy. 406 52
U.S. v. Palmer 3 Wheat. 610 122
U.S. v. Perez 9 Wheat. 579 144
U.S. v. Peters 5 Cranch 115 121
U.S. v. Power 14 Blatchf. 223 66
U.S. v. Pryor 3 Wash. 234 76, 83, 89, 90
U.S. v. Rauscher 119 U.S. 407 176
U.S. v. Realty Co. 163 U.S. 427 115
U.S. v. Reese 92 U.S. 214 210, 215, 258
U.S. v. Rice 4 Wheat. 246 70
U.S. v. Ritchie 17 How. 525 121
U.S. w. Rhodes 1 Abb. 28 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16,161 21, 52, 123
U.S. v. Rogers 4 How. 567 22, 25, 53
U.S. v. Singer 15 Wall. 111 114
U.S. v. Smith 5 Wheat. 153 122
U.S. v. Texas 143 U.S. 621 136
U.S. v. Thoman 156 U.S. 353 131
U.S. v. Tract of land I W@ 476 76
U.S. v. Union Pac. R. Co. 98 U.S. 569 121, 136
U.S. v. Vigol 2Dall. 346 86, 89
U.S. v. Villato 2Dall. (Pa.) 370 54, 76
U.S. v. Waddell 112 U.S. 76 216
U.S. v. Ward 42 Fed. Rep. 320 62
U.S. v. Weil 20 Ct. Cl. 540 114
U.S. v. Williams 194 U.S. 279 189, 245, 268
U.S. v. Wiltberger 5 Wheat. 76 74, 76, 122
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 20, 32, 33, 51, 64, 193, 197, 264
U.S. v. Zucker 161 U.S. 475 146
U.S. Bauk v. Deveaux 6 Cranch 61 135, 140, 167
Utter v. Franklin 172 U.S. 416 141
Van Allen v. Assessors 3 Wall. 573 114
Van Brocklin v. Tennessee 117 U.S. 151 115, 124
Vance v. Vance 108 U.S. 514 130
Vance v. W.A. Vandercook Co. 170 U.S. 438 118, 140
Vannevar v. Bryant 21 Wall. 41 136
Vaux v. Nesbit 1 McCord Eq. (S. Car.) 352 60
Veazie v. Moor 14 How. 568 115
Veazie Bank v. Fenno 8 Wall. 533 112, 114, 126
Vicksburg v. Tobin 100 U.S. 430 133
Vicksburg Water Works Co. v. Vicksburg 185 U.S. 65 132
Vidal v. Philadelphia 2 How. 127 142, 185
Vincennes Univ. v. Indiana 14 How. 268 128
Virginia v. Rives U.S. 313 199, 204
Virginia v. Tennessee 148 U.S. 503 133, 134
Virginia v. West Virginia 11 Wall. 39 136
Voight v. Wright 141 U.S. 62 117
Von Hoffman v. Quincy 4 Wall. 535 129, 167
Wabash etc. Canal Co. v. Beers 2 Black 448 128
Wabash etc. R. Co. v. Illinois 118 U.S. 557 117
Wabash R. Co. v. Defiance 167 U.S. 88 131
Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan 192 U.S. 29 140
Wabash R. Co. v. Pearce 192 U.S. 179 138
Waggoner v. Flack U.S. 595 132
Walker v. New Mexico etc. R. Co. 165 U.S. 593 147
Walker v. Sauvinet 92 U.S. 90 236
Walker v. Whitehead 16 Wall. 314 129
Wallace v. Harmstad 44 Pa. St. 501 69
Wallach v. Van Riswick 92 U.S. 202 76, 139
Walla Walla v. Walla Walla Water Co. 172 U.S. 1 131, 137
Walling v. Michigan 116 U.S. 446 116, 157, 170
Walsh v. Columbus etc. R. Co. 176 U.S. 469 132
Ward v. Maryland 12 Wall. 418 99, 140, 170, 171
Waring v. Clarke 5 How. 441 135
Waring v. Mobile 8 Wall. 110 115, 132
Washington etc. TurnpikeCo. v. Maryland 3 Wall. 210 129
Washington Univ. v. Rouse 8 Wall. 439 129
Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas 177 U.S. 28 118, 242
Watson v. Mercer 8 Pet. 88 125, 127
Weber v. Rogan 188 U.S. 10 132
Webster v. Reid 11 How. 437 146
Wedding v. Meyler 192 U.S. 573 140
Welton v. Missouri 91 U.S. 275 116
West v. Louisiana 194 U.S. 263 235
Westmoreland v. U.S. 156 U.S. 545 53
Weston v. Charleston 2 Pet. 449 114
West River Bridge Co. v. Dix 6 How. 507 128, 144
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Alabama State Board of Assessment 132 U.S. 472 117
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. Co. 178 U.S. 239 137
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Atty. Gen. 125 U.S. 530 117
Western Union Tel. Co. v. James 162 U.S. 650 118
Western Union Tel. Co. v. New Hope 187 U.S. 419 119
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Pendleton 122 U.S. 347 117, 148
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Taggart 163 U.S. 1 118
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Texas 105 U.S. 460 116
West Wisconsin R. Co. v. Trempealeau County 93 U.S. 595 129
Wharton v. Wise 153 U.S. 155 106, 133
Wheaton v. Peters 8 Pet. 591 121
Wheeler v. Jaskson 137 U.S. 245 131
Wheeling etc. Bridge Co. v. Wheeling Bridge Co. 138 U.S. 287 131
Wheeling etc. Transp. Co. v. Wheeling 99 U.S. 273 116, 133
White v. Clements 39 Ga. 232 3
White v. Hart 13 Wall. 646 29, 30, 129, 192, 193, 228
Whitehead v. Shattuck 138 U.S. 146 147
White's Bank v. Smith 7 Wall. 646 115
Whitman v. Oxford Nat. Bank 176 U.S. 550 137
Wiggins Ferry Co. v. East St. Louis 107 U.S. 365 110, 133
Wight v. Davidson igi U.S. 371 124, 145
Wiley v. Sinkler 179 U.S. 58 111, 137, 216, 219, 258
Wilkes County v. Coler 180 U.S. 506 114 140
Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. Hatch 125 U.S. 1 117
Willard v. Presbury 14 Wall. 676 124
Williams v. Bruffy 96 U.S. 170 129
Williams v. Eggleston 170 U.S. 304 131
Williams v. Fears 179 U.S. 270 118, 126, 140
Williams v. Mississippi 170 U.S. 213 185, 216, 219, 237, 255
Williams v. The Lizzie Henderson 29 Fed. Cases No. 17,726a 127
Willianson v. New Jersey. 130 U.S. 180 130
Wilson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co. 2 Pet. 245 115
Wilmington etc. R. Co. v. Alsbrook 146 U.S. 279 131
Wilmington etc. R. Co. v. King 91 U.S. 3 129
Wilmington etc. R. Co. v. Reid 13 Wall. 264 129
Wilson v. Eureka City 173 U.S. 32 214, 244
Wilson v. lseminger 185 U.S. 55 132
Wilson v. Lambert 168 U.S. 611 145
Wilson v. McNamee 102 U.S. 572 116
Windsor v. McVeigh 93 U.S. 274 76
Wisconsin Cent. R. Co. v. Price County 133 U.S. 496 25
Wisconsin etc. R. Co. v. Jacobson 179 U.S. 338 118
Wisconsin etc. R. Co. v. Powers 191 U.S. 379 132
Withers v. Buckley 2O How. 84 144, 146
Wolff v. New Orleans 103 U.S. 358 130
Wong Wing v. U.S. 163 U.S. 228 145, 146
Woodruff v. Miississippi 162 U.S. 291 131, 137
Woodruff v. Parham 8 Wall. 123 114, 132, 140
Woodruff v. Trapnall 10 how. 190 128
Woolen v. Banker 2 Flipp. 33, 30 Fed. Cases No. 18,030 121
Worcester v. Georgia 6 Pet. 515 115
Wright v. Nagle 101 U.S. 791 130
W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota 190 U.S. 452 118, 140, 214
Yick Wo v. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356 208, 211, 255, 256