Chapter
49 — The
History
of Banking
(An
article of Alain Pilote, first published in the Sept.-Oct., 1985 issue
of the Vers Demain
Journal.) The
bankers' dictatorship and their debt-money system are not limited to one
country, but exist in every country in the world. They are working to
keep their control tight, since one country freeing itself from this
dictatorship and issuing its own interest- and debt-free currency,
setting the example of what an honest system could be, would be enough
to bring about the collapse of the bankers' swindling debt-money system
worldwide. This
fight of the International Financiers to install their fraudulent
debt-money system has been particularly vicious in the United States of
America since its very foundation, and historical facts show that
several American statesmen were well aware of the dishonest money system
the Financiers wanted to impose upon America, and of all of its harmful
effects. These statesmen were real patriots, who did all that they
possibly could to maintain for the U.S.A. an honest money system, free
from the control of the Financiers. The Financiers did everything in
their power to keep in the dark this facet of the history of the United
States, for fear that the example of these patriots might still be
followed today. Here are these facts that the Financiers would like the
population to ignore: The
happiest
population
We
are in 1750. The United States of America does not yet exist; it is the
13 Colonies of the American continent, forming “New England”, a
possession of the motherland, England. Benjamin Franklin wrote about the
population of that time: “Impossible to find a happier and more
prosperous population on all the surface of the globe.”
Going over to England to represent the interests of the Colonies,
Franklin was asked how he accounted for the prosperous conditions
prevailing in the Colonies, while poverty was rife in the motherland: “That is simple,”
Franklin replied. “In the Colonies we issue our own money. It
is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to make the
products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this
manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its
purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.” The
English bankers, being informed of that, had a law passed by the British
Parliament prohibiting the Colonies from issuing their own money, and
ordering them to use only the gold or silver debt-money that was
provided in insufficient quantity by the English bankers. The
circulating medium of exchange was thus reduced by half. “In one year,”
Franklin stated, “the conditions were so reversed that the
era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that
the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.” Then
the Revolutionary War was launched against England, and was followed by
the Declaration of Independence in 1776. History textbooks erroneously
teach that it was the tax on tea that triggered the American Revolution.
But Franklin clearly stated: “The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax
on tea and other matters, had it not been the poverty caused by the bad
influence of the English bankers on the Parliament: which has caused in
the Colonies hatred of England, and the Revolutionary War.” The
Founding Fathers of the United States, bearing all these facts in mind,
and to protect themselves against the exploitation of the International
Bankers, took good care to expressly declare, in the American
Constitution, signed at Philadelphia, in 1787, Article 1, Section 8,
paragraph 5: “Congress shall have the power to coin money and to
regulate the value thereof.” The
bank of the bankers
But
the bankers did not give up. Their agent, Alexander Hamilton, was named
Secretary of Treasury in George Washington's cabinet, and advocated the
establishment of a federal bank to be owned by private interests, and
the creation of debt-money with false arguments like: “A
national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national
blessing... The wisdom of the Government will be shown in never trusting
itself with the use of so seducing and dangerous an expedient as issuing
its own money.” Hamilton also made them believe that only
the debt-money issued by private banks would be accepted in dealing
abroad. Thomas
Jefferson, the Secretary of State, was strongly opposed to that project,
but President Washington was finally won over by Hamilton's arguments. A
federal bank was thus created in 1791, the “Bank of the United
States”, with a 20 years' charter. Although it was termed “Bank of
the United States”, it was actually the “bank of the bankers”,
since it was not owned by the nation, but by individuals holding the
bank's stocks, the private bankers. This name of “Bank of the United
States” was purposely chosen to deceive the American population and to
make them believe that they were the owners of the bank, which was not
the case. The charter for the Bank of the United States ran out in 1811,
and Congress voted against its renewal, thanks to the influence of
Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson:
“If Congress,”
Jackson said, “has a right under the Constitution to issue
paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated
to individuals or corporations.” Thus
ended the history of the first Bank of the United States. But the
bankers did not play their last card. The
bankers launch the war
Nathan
Rothschild, of the Bank of England, issued an ultimatum: “Either
the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United
States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” Jackson
and the American patriots did not believe the power of the international
moneylenders could extend so far. “You are a den of thieves-vipers,” Jackson
told them. “I
intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!” Nathan
Rothschild issued orders: “Teach
these impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to Colonial
status.” The British Government launched the War of 1812 against the United States. Rothschild's plan was to impoverish the United States through this war to such an extent that the legislators would have to seek financial aid... which, of course, would be forthcoming only in return for the renewal of the charter for the Bank of the United States. Thousands were killed, but what does that matter to Rothschild? He had achieved his objective; the U.S. Congress granted the renewal of the Charter in 1816. Abraham Lincoln
is assassinated
Abraham
Lincoln was elected President of the United States in 1860, under the
promise of abolishing the slavery of the blacks. Eleven southern States,
favourable to the human slavery of the black race, then decided to
secede from the Union, to withdraw from the United States of America:
that was the beginning of the Civil War (1861–1865). Lincoln, being
short of money to finance the North's war effort, went to the bankers of
New York, who agreed to lend him money at interest rates varying from 24
to 36 percent. Lincoln refused, knowing perfectly well that this was
usury and that it would lead the United States to ruin. But his money
problem was still not settled! His
friend in Chicago, Colonel Dick Taylor, came to his rescue and put the
solution to him: “Just get Congress to pass a bill authorizing the
printing of full legal tender treasury notes, and pay your soldiers with
them, and go ahead and win your war with them also.” This
is what Lincoln did, and he won the war: between 1862 and 1863, in full
conformity with the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, Lincoln caused
$450 million of debt-free Greenbacks to be issued, to conduct the Civil
War. (These
Treasury notes were called “Greenbacks” by the people because they
were printed with green ink on the back.) Lincoln
called these Greenbacks “the
greatest blessing the American people have ever had.” A
blessing for all, except for the bankers, since it was putting an end to
their racket, to the stealing of the nation's credit and issuing
interest-bearing money. So they did everything possible to destroy these
Greenbacks and sabotage Lincoln's work. Lord Goschen, spokesman of the
Financiers, wrote in the London Times (Quote taken from Who
Rules America by C. K. Howe, and reproduced in Lincoln Money Martyred by Dr. R. E.
Search): “If this mischievous financial policy, which has its
origin in North America, shall become indurated down to a fixture, then
that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off
debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to
carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in
the history of the world. That Government must be destroyed, or it will
destroy every monarchy on the globe.” (The monarchy of the money
lenders.) First,
in order to cast discredit on the Greenbacks, the bankers persuaded
Congress to vote, in February of 1862, the “Exception Clause”, which
said that the Greenbacks could not be used to pay the interest on the
national debt, nor to pay taxes, excises, or import duties. Then, in
1863, having financed the election of enough Senators and
Representatives, the bankers got the Congress to revoke the Greenback
Law in 1863, and enact in its place the National Banking Act. (Money was
then to be issued interest-bearing by privately-owned banks.) This
Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation
as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes. Lincoln
heatedly protested, but his most urgent objective was to win the war and
save the Union, which obliged him to put off till after the war the veto
he was planning against this Act and the action he was to take against
the bankers. Lincoln nevertheless declared: “I have two great enemies, the Southern army in front
of me and the bankers in the rear. And of the two, the bankers are my
greatest foe.” Lincoln
was re-elected President in 1864, and he made it quite clear that he
would attack the power of the bankers, once the war was over. The war
ended on April 9, 1865, but Lincoln was assassinated five days later, on
April 14. A tremendous restriction of credit followed, organized by the
banks: the currency in circulation in the country, which was, in 1866,
$1,907 million, representing $50.46 for each American citizen, had been
reduced to $605 million in 1876, representing $14.60 per capita. The
result: in ten years, 56,446 business failures, representing a loss of
$2 billion. And as if this was not enough, the bankers reduced the per
capita currency in circulation to $6.67 in 1887! William
Jennings Bryan: “The
banks
ought to get out”
Lincoln's
example nevertheless remained in several minds, as far along as 1896.
That year, the Presidential candidate for the Democrats was William
Jennings Bryan, and once again, history textbooks tell us that it was a
good thing that he did not succeed in his bid for the Presidency, since
he was against the bankers' “sound money”, the money issued as a
debt, and against the gold standard. Bryan said: “We
say in our platform that we believe that the right to coin and issue
money is a function of Government. We believe it. Those who are opposed
to it tell us that the issue of paper money is a function of the bank,
and that the Government ought to get out of the banking business. I tell
them that the issue of money is a function of Government, and that the
banks ought to get out of the Government business... When we have
restored the money of the Constitution, all other necessary reforms will
be possible, but until this is done, there is no other reform that can
be accomplished.” The
Fed: The most gigantic trust
Finally,
on December 23, 1913, the U.S. Congress voted in the Federal Reserve
Act, which took away from Congress the power to create money, and which
handed over this power to the Federal Reserve Corporation. One of the
rare Congressmen who had understood all the issue at stake in this Act,
Representative Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. (Rep-Minnesota), father of the
famous aviator, said: “This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on
earth. When the President (Wilson) signs this bill, the invisible
government of the Monetary Power will be legalized... The worst
legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and
currency bill.” The
education of the people
What
allowed the bankers to finally obtain the complete monopoly of the
control of credit in the United States? The ignorance among the
population of the money question. John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson,
in 1787: “All the perplexities, confusion and distress in
America arise, not from defects in the Constitution, not from want of
honor or virtue, so much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin,
credit, and circulation.” Lincoln's
Secretary of Treasury, Salmon P. Chase, stated publicly, shortly after
the passage of the National Banking Act, in 1863: “My agency in promoting the passage of the National
Banking Act was the greatest financial mistake of my life. It has built
up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country. It should be
repealed, but before that can be accomplished, the people will be
arrayed on one side, and the banks on the other, in a contest such as we
have never seen before in this country.” Automobile
manufacturer Henry Ford said: “If the people of the nation understood our banking
and monetary system, I believe there would be a revolution before
tomorrow morning.” The
education of the people, that's the solution! It is precisely the method
advocated by the “Michael” Journal: to build a force in the people
through education, so that the sovereign government of each nation will
have the courage to stand up to the bankers and issue its own money, as
President Lincoln did. If only all those in favour of an honest money
system understood their responsibilities for spreading the “Michael”
Journal! Social Credit, which would establish an economy where
everything is organized to serve the human person, is precisely aiming
to develop personal responsibility, to create responsible people. Each
mind won over to Social Credit is an advance. Each person formed by
Social Credit is a force, and each force acquired is a step towards the
victory. And for the last sixty years, how many forces have been
acquired!… If all of them were active, it is really before tomorrow
morning that we would obtain the implementation of the Social Credit
proposals! As
Louis Even wrote in 1960: “The obstacle is neither the financier, nor the politician, nor any avowed enemy. The obstacle lies in the passivity of too many Social Crediters who hope for the coming of the triumph of the Cause, but who leave it up to others to promote it.” In
short, it is our refusal to take on our responsibilities that delays the
implementation of Social Credit, of an honest money system. “Much will
be asked of the man to whom much has been given” (Luke 12:48). Examine
your consciences, dear Social Crediters; personal conversion, one more
go, and let us take on our responsibilities: the victory has never been
so close! Our responsibility is to make Social Credit known to others,
by having them subscribe to the “Michael” Journal, the only
publication that makes this brilliant solution known.
|