[Model]
APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM
Now come Dan Leslie, Meador (Plaintiff), a Citizen and
qualified Elector of Oklahoma, one of the several States party to
the Constitution of the United States, a non-citizen national of
the geographical United States, as defined at 8 U.S.C. §
1101(a)(22)(B), and nonresident alien of the geographical United
States, as the term "United States" is defined at 20 CFR, Part
404.2(c )(6) and 26 CFR, Part 3121(e)-1(b).
Plaintiff seeks certain documentation, or in the
alternative, confession that documentation does not exist.
Plaintiff alleges that United States jurisdiction and other
matters addressed in his complaints and pleadings must be
objectively proven when challenged. In order for Defendants to
demonstrate United States jurisdiction and authority, they must
produce most information Plaintiff seeks by subpoenas duces tecum
into record, anyway, so securing documentation or confessions
will simplify matters for Defendants, and will resolve
considerable controversy pertaining to authority of the Internal
Revenue Service, the character, operation, and jurisdiction of
United States District Courts situated in the Union of several
States party to the Constitution of the United States, et al.
Plaintiffs alleges that the Sixth Amendment to the
Constitution assures him the opportunity to examine the
documentation requested in this application for subpoenas duces
tecum as the documentation, or lack of it, is essential to
determining what Plaintiff alleges and believes amounts to a
conspiracy to defeat the Constitution of the United States, over-
run sovereignty of the several States party to the Constitution,
and impose general servitude on the American people.
The law, as demonstrated in Plaintiff's complaints and
pleadings, has been unraveled to the point there is no longer
need for constructive arguments. Therefore, Plaintiff
respectfully requests that the following documentation be secured
by issue of subpoenas duces tecum to the following:
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 1 of 18
I. Stephen C. Lewis, United States Attorney,
Northern District of Oklahoma
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to Stephen C. Lewis,
the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma,
to produce the following documents into record:
1. A certified copy of the application for arrest and
extradition of Plaintiff, Dan Meador, from the State of Oklahoma,
said application in compliance with the Uniform Criminal
Extradition Act (Title 22, Sections 1141.1 et seq., of the
Oklahoma Statutes), with particulars specified at 22 O.S. §
1141.3. The said application should reflect the State for which
the application was made (i.e., Puerto Rico, 34 L.P.R.A. §§ 1881
to 1881bb), the basis for allegations that Plaintiff was in the
affected State at the time said alleged crime was committed, and
other particulars specified in the statute. (see also, 18 U.S.C.
§§ 3041, et seq. & 3182, et seq.) The application should also
bear the signature of the executive authority of the State or
Territory of the United States where the alleged offense was
committed, or in the alternative, the signature of the commandant
of the Coast Guard if such offense allegedly transpired in United
States maritime jurisdiction. (33 CFR, Part 1.07; see crimes,
Part 1.07 Appendix)
2. A properly executed warrant issued by the Governor of
Oklahoma, per 22 O.S. § 1141.7.
3. Evidence that Plaintiff was afforded due process of law
prior to extradition, per 22 O.S. § 1141.10, which stipulates
that the person who is to be extradited has the opportunity to
secure counsel, have an extradition hearing, and, if desired,
file an application for writ of habeas corpus against
extradition.
4. A certified copy of the affidavit of complaint
underlying grand jury indictments for Case No. #96-CR-082-C
(UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNEY F. MOORE, et al.), prosecuted
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Oklahoma.
5. A certified copy of the affidavit of complaint
underlying grand jury indictments for Case No. #96-CR-113-C
(UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAN LESLIE MEADOR), prosecuted in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Oklahoma.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 2 of 18
II. Chief Disclosure Officer,
United States Department of Justice
The Chief Disclosure Officer for the United States
Department of Justice should be ordered by subpoena duces tecum
to produce into evidence certified copies of the following:
1. The Constitution of the United States, at Article I §
8.15 & Article IV § 4, delegates authority for Congress to call
up the militia to repel invasion or put down civil uprising in
the several States party to the Constitution. Provide
documentation of a constitutional provision authorizing the
United States to exercise general municipal police powers in the
several States party to the Constitution, via civil enforcement
agencies and agencies of foreign entities such as the Department
of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, and a certified copy of the law, in
compliance with 4 U.S.C. § 72, which authorizes Department of
Justice general municipal powers (police powers) extended
throughout the Union of several States party to the Constitution
of the United States for prosecution of crimes other than those
specified in the Constitution and applicable Amendments, as cited
above.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 3 of 18
2. A certified copy of the Executive Order, properly
published in the Federal Register, per requirements of 3 U.S.C. §
301, which authorizes the Attorney General of the United States
to exercise general police powers in Union of several States
party to the Constitution.
3. A properly executed delegation of authority which
extends authority of the Department of Justice Criminal Division
(28 CFR, Part 0.55), and/or the Tax Division (28 CFR, Part 0.70),
to exercise of general police powers within the several States
party to the Constitution other than on Federal enclaves under
United States jurisdiction (18 U.S.C. § 7(3), secured in
compliance with provisions of 40 U.S.C. § 255 and State cession
laws (80 O.S. §§ 1, 2 & 3)).
4. A properly executed delegation of authority which
extends general municipal authority of the United States Attorney
and assistants for the various judicial districts established in
the several States party to the Constitution (28 U.S.C. § 81 et
seq.) beyond United States jurisdiction in the several States as
specified at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3), with jurisdiction secured in
compliance with provisions of 40 U.S.C. § 255 and State cession
laws (80 O.S. §§ 1, 2 & 3).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 4 of 18
5. Statutory authority for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (28 U.S.C. § 531), which is an administrative
department in the Department of Justice (not created by Congress;
no charter in the Library of Congress, see 28 U.S.C. § 531
historical notes), to investigate, arrest, bring charges against,
or otherwise disturb people living in the several States party to
the Constitution, other than officers and employees of United
States Government, as specified at 28 U.S.C. § 535, and other
than in United States jurisdiction defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
6. Statutory authority, the Executive Order (3 U.S.C. §
301), and the Attorney General delegation of authority (44 U.S.C.
§ 1505), which authorizes officers in the U.S. Marshal Service to
serve summonses and execute warrants in the several States party
to the Constitution save in United States jurisdiction specified
at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3), secured in accordance with provisions of 40
U.S.C. § 255. (reference territorial limitations at Rule 4(d)(2);
definition of "Local Law Enforcement Agencies" at 28 CFR, Part
60.3(b))
7. Documentation of authority by which warrants and
summonses issued from an Article IV United States District Court
(28 U.S.C. § 132) may be executed or served beyond United States
jurisdiction in the several States party to the Constitution as
defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3) (see also, Rule 4(d)(2) for
territorial bounds).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 5 of 18
8. In accordance with provisions of 40 U.S.C. § 255,
provide verification that the United States has secured general
jurisdiction over privately and/or State, county or city-owned
real property in the counties of Washington, Kay, and Tulsa, all
being within the territorial borders of Oklahoma state. In the
alternative, provide documentation to verify where precisely in
the three Oklahoma counties named above, other than Native
American Indian reservations and military installations, the
United States has secured exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction in
compliance with 40 U.S.C. § 255 and Oklahoma cession laws,
Sections 1, 2 & 3 of Title 80, Oklahoma Statutes.
9. The Constitution of the United States, at Art. I § 8.6,
stipulates that Congress may prescribe punishment for
counterfeiting securities and current coin of the United States;
at Article III § 3.2, the Constitution delegates authority for
Congress to prescribe punishment for treason; and in various
Amendments promulgated since 1868, the Constitution delegates
authority for Congress to secure and protect civil rights and
voting rights of citizens of the United States. Provide
certification of constitutionally delegated authority for the
United States to prosecute crimes other than those specified
above where such crime is allegedly committed in one of the
several States party to the Constitution other than in United
States jurisdiction as specified at Article I § 8.17 of the
Constitution and is otherwise defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 6 of 18
10. Provide documentation which identifies and discloses
the principal of interest, the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
Titles 18 & 28 of the United States Code, and the Internal
Revenue Code at § 7402, authorize the "United States" as
plaintiff or defendant under laws of the United States. The
"United States of America, ss, President of the United States",
is the principal of interest in United States courts in Puerto
Rico and the Virgin Islands (Title 48 of the United States Code,
Territories and Insular Possessions), and serves as nominee for
the "Central Authority" or "Competent Authority" (28 CFR, Parts
0.9 & 0.64-1), but the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" has no
authority vested by the Constitution of the United States, or
laws of the United States other than those applicable to United
States off-shore territories subject to Congress' Article IV §
3.2 municipal authority. Therefore, the "UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA" of necessity must be identified, and authority in the
Union of several States party to the Constitution, by way of
appropriate documentation.
11. Provide a certified copy of significant legislative
regulations published in the Federal Register in accordance with
requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 1505 which authorize prosecution of
18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1341, 1503 & 1504, and 26 UCS § 7212 in the
Union of several States party to the Constitution of the United
States in Article IV United States District Courts.
12. Provide a properly executed delegation of authority
which authorizes attorneys in the office of the United States
Attorney to bring suit for state qualified tax under provisions
of 5 U.S.C. § 5516.
13. Provide a properly executed delegation of authority
which authorizes attorneys in the office of the United States
Attorney to prosecute criminal actions arising from collection of
state qualified tax, said prosecution arising from 5 U.S.C. §§
5512 & 5517 authority.
14. Provide documentation which specifies any "person"
other than an officer of employee of a United States department
or agency or an officer of a United States corporation who is
subject to Federal civil collection or criminal prosecution under
authority of 5 U.S.C. §§ 5512, 5517 & 5520.
15. Provide a certified copy of a delegation of authority
which authorizes attorneys in the office of the United States
Attorney to carry out the functions of the "Solicitor of the
Treasury", now vested in the Attorney General, as prescribed at 5
U.S.C. § 5512(b).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 7 of 18
III. Department of the Treasury
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to the Chief
Disclosure Officer for the national office of the Department of
the Treasury, Washington, D.C., to produce certified copies of
the following:
1. Provide a copy of law, as required at 4 U.S.C. § 72 &
31 U.S.C. § 301, which authorizes the Department of the Treasury
to exercise general enforcement authority in the several States
party to the Constitution of the United States beyond United
States jurisdiction, as specified at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
2. Provide a certified copy of an Executive Order,
effected in compliance with 3 U.S.C. § 301, which applies to
internal revenue laws (customs laws) or excise taxes (Subtitles A
& C), authorizing the Secretary to establish revenue districts in
the several States party to the Constitution, with said Order
specifically extending beyond United States jurisdiction within
the several States party to the Constitution, as defined at 18
U.S.C. § 7(3).
3. A delegation of authority which authorizes the
Department of the Treasury or any component of the Department of
the Treasury, as defined at 31 CFR, Parts 1 & 2, to carry out the
functions of the General Accounting Office vested at 5 U.S.C. §§
5511 & 5512 under provisions of 5 U.S.C. §§ 5512(b).
4. An Executive Order delegation of authority to the
Secretary of the Treasury which authorizes the Secretary, or any
component of the Department of the Treasury, as defined at 31
CFR, Parts 1 & 2, rather than the Office of Personnel Management,
to approve regulations promulgated by agency heads for collection
of employee indebtedness under provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5514 (see
E.O. # 11609, Sec. 8(1)).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 8 of 18
IV. Internal Revenue Service National Office
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to the Chief
Disclosure Officer for Internal Revenue Service, at the Service's
national headquarters in Washington, D.C., ordering said
Disclosure Officer to provide certified copies of the following:
1. A copy or copies of the master contract, or master
contracts, if more than one, which specify the scope of services
the Internal Revenue Service is contracted to provide United
States Government.
For example, such master contracts may stipulate that the
Internal Revenue Service is authorized to develop and maintain
information-gathering systems, and provide record-keeping
services for the Treasury of the United States, or in the
alternative, said contract or contracts may be executed with the
Federal Reserve System in the Fed's capacity as fiscal agent of
the United States.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 9 of 18
2. Copies of all applications and other information
generated by Internal Revenue Service principals, and sent to the
Office of Management and Budget, to support applications for
Office of Management and Budget numbers issued under Paperwork
Reduction Act authority (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.) in compliance
with regulations at 5 CFR, Part 1320, relating to the family of
1040 information return forms, and OMB numbers assigned to
regulations for Internal Revenue Code statutes 6001, 6011, and
6012(a) (disclosure mandated at 5 CFR, Part 1320.14(b)).
3. Certification of statutory and regulatory authority for
Internal Revenue Service personnel to directly engage in
administrative and/or judicial collection initiatives pertaining
to Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A & C taxes in the several
States party to the Constitution beyond United States
jurisdiction, as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3) (the Treasury
Department, not the Department of the Treasury, is stipulated as
the Secretary's delegate at I.R.C. §§ 7701(a)(12)(A) & 7805(a)).
4. Certification of disclosure requirements pertaining to
the 1040 information return form as mandated by regulation at 5
CFR, Part 1320.8(b). Specifically, the following information
should be disclosed: (1) What is the reason specified by
regulations for collection of information on the 1040 information
return form? (2) How is the information to be used? (3) [Not
applicable]. (4) Is response on the 1040 information return form
voluntary, necessary to secure a benefit (cite authority), or
mandatory (cite authority)? (5) [Not applicable]. (6) Does the
1040 information return form disclose that there is no
requirement to fill out an information return form if it does not
have a currently valid OMB number?
Place certified copies of disclosure documents which comply
with OMB regulations cited above into record.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 10 of 18
5. Provide a certified copy of the delegation of authority
from the Secretary of the Treasury to the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, via authority vested in the Secretary under
E.O. § 11833, which authorizes the Commissioner to execute an
Agreement On Coordination of Tax Administration for
administration of qualified state, county or city tax, as
specified at 5 U.S.C. §§ 5517 & 5520, with officers or agencies
of the Union of several States party to the Constitution of the
United States.
6. Provide statutory authority which authorizes the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue to enter an Agreement On
Coordination of Tax Administration, as specified above, where
administration authority so authorized applies to people other
than Government departments and agencies, as defined at 5 U.S.C.
§§ 102 & 105, and definitions at 5 U.S.C. §§ 5517 & 5520, and
officers and employees of those agencies, as the term "employee"
is defined at I.R.C. § 3401(c ). In other words, if the
Commission has authority delegated to enter such agreements with
the Governor or Tax Commission of one of the Union states,
provide statutory authority which authorizes administrative,
judicial and other collection enterprise relating to qualified
state, county, or city tax which applies to the general
population which might be subject to these taxes exclusive of the
"employee" defined at I.R.C. § 3401(c ) and the Federal agencies
defined at 5 U.S.C. §§ 5517 & 5520.
7. Provide a certified copy of statutory authority and/or
a delegation of authority which authorizes the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue and the Internal Revenue Service to engage in
collection initiatives vested in the General Accounting Office at
5 U.S.C. § 5512(b).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 11 of 18
V. Chief Disclosure Officer,
Office of Management and Budget
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to the Chief
Disclosure Officer for the Office of Management and Budget to
produce certified documentation of the following:
1. Documentation of all current OMB numbers for
regulations and information-gathering forms issued to Department
of the Treasury components, as the term is defined at 31 CFR,
Parts 0 & 1. Documentation pertaining to information-gathering
forms should at a minimum include disclosure of (1) the current
valid number (2) the expiration date, (3) whether or not the form
is voluntary, necessary to secure a benefit, or mandatory,
(authorities should be cited if the form is necessary to secure
or retain a benefit or is mandatory), and (4) what class or
category of people is required under mandatory regulations to
file 1040 individual income tax return forms.
2. An OMB numerical key which identifies the agency to
which OMB numbers are issued, thus disclosing what agency was
issued the number appearing on any given information-gathering
form. For example, the first four digits in OMB No. 1545-0074
might identify the Internal Revenue Service, where the first four
digits in OMB No. 0607-729 might identify the U.S. Department of
Commerce.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 12 of 18
VI. Disclosure Officer,
Internal Revenue Service,
Arkansas-Oklahoma District
A subpoena duces tecum requiring the Chief Disclosure
Officer for the Arkansas-Oklahoma District, Internal Revenue
Service, should require said officer to supply the following
certified documentation:
1. Certify documentation of all days and/or continuous
periods of time during which Tracy Foster, an Inspector for the
Internal Revenue Service who works in the Arkansas-Oklahoma
District, served as a Special Government Employee from January 1,
1995 through March 31, 1997.
2. Provide a certified impression of the District Director
of Internal Revenue seal for the Arkansas-Oklahoma District, or
Oklahoma District, as specified at 26 CFR, Part 301.7514-
1(a)(2)(ii). Said impression should be certified by signature of
the District Director or the District officer duly authorized to
affix and endorse said seal.
3. Provide the delegation of authority to the officer
charged with custody of the district director's seal for the
Arkansas-Oklahoma District, Internal Revenue Service (26 CFR,
Part 301.7514-1(b)).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 13 of 18
VII. Chief Disclosure Officer for the
Administrative Office for United States Courts
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued requiring the Chief
Disclosure Officer for the Administrative Office for United
States Courts to produce the following certified documentation
into evidence:
1. Provide a certified copy of statutory authority and
regulations which authorize Article IV United States District
Courts (28 U.S.C. § 132) to exercise judicial powers in the
several States party to the Constitution beyond United States
jurisdiction, as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
2. Provide a certified copy of statutory authority which
authorizes the Article IV United States District Court
established in the several States party to the Constitution to
exercise general criminal prosecution powers even on Federal
enclaves located in the several States, the Article IV District
Court of the United States (28 U.S.C. § 132), distinguished from
district courts of the United States established in the several
States, per 28 U.S.C. § 81 et seq. (this mandate is exclusive of
18 U.S.C. § 3401; implementing regulations for the United States
Magistrate System are for misdemeanor offenses on United States
military installations and lands under Bureau of Land Management
jurisdiction).
3. Provide certified copies of general application
regulations (must comply with 44 U.S.C. § 1505 requirements)
which authorize prosecution of offenses via the United States
Magistrate System, accommodated by Article IV United States
District Courts located in the several States party to the
Constitution, other than petty and misdemeanor offenses on
military reservations and installations, and in national parks,
etc., under Congress' Article IV § 3.2 legislative jurisdiction
(this is exclusive of regulations at 32 CFR, Part 1290.1 & 43
CFR, Part 9260.0-1).
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 14 of 18
VIII. United States Magistrate Judge Sam Joyner
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to United States
Magistrate Judge Sam Joyner requiring him to provide (1) a
certified impression of the seal supplied to him by the Director
of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts under
requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 638(c), and certified copies of all
entries into his docket book supplied by the Director of the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (28 U.S.C. §
638(a)) relating to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAN LESLIE
MEADOR, 96-CR-113-C.
IX. United States Magistrate Judge Frank P. McCarthy
A subpoena duces tecum should be issued to United States
Magistrate Judge Frank P. McCarthy requiring him to (1) provide
a certified impression of the seal supplied to him by the
Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts
under requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 638(c), and (2) certified
copies of all entries into his docket book supplied by the
Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts
(28 U.S.C. § 638(a)) relating to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAN
LESLIE MEADOR, 96-CR-113-C.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 15 of 18
X. Court Clerk for courts of the United States,
Northern District of Oklahoma
A subpoena duces tecum should issue to the Court Clerk for
courts of the United States for the Northern District of Oklahoma
for the following:
1. The Court Clerk should provide an impression or ink-
impressed seal of the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma, said court being the Article IV
court established under authority of 28 U.S.C. § 132.
2. The Court Clerk should provide an impression or ink-
impressed seal of the Article III "district court of the United
States" for the Northern District of Oklahoma established under
authority of 28 U.S.C. § 116(a).
3. The Court Clerk should provide a certified copy of his
commission as Clerk of the Article IV United States District
Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
4. The Court Clerk should provide a certified copy of his
commission as Clerk of the Article III district court of the
United States for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 16 of 18
XI. Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission
A subpoena duces tecum should issue to the Court Clerk for
courts of the United States for the Northern District of Oklahoma
for the following:
1. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide a certified copy of the Agreement On
Coordination of Tax Administration effected between the Tax
Commission, or other Administrative office or officer, with the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, which authorizes the Internal
Revenue Service to participate in administration of State and
Federal tax within the State of Oklahoma.
2. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide certified copies of all facilitating
agreements for all kinds of tax which pertain to OTC-IRS
cooperative administration of taxes.
3. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide statutory authority (Oklahoma Statutes) which
authorize him to enter an Agreement On Coordination of Tax
Administration with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
4. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide constitutional and statutory authority which
permits him to authorize Federal agencies to collect qualified
state tax from people other than officers and employees of the
United States and United States instrumentalities, and officers
of United States corporations, or as any given qualified state
tax, as the term is defined, other than within United States
jurisdiction, as United States jurisdiction within the Union of
several States is defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
5. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide constitutional and statutory authority which
authorizes him to enter an Agreement relating to cooperative
administration of qualified state tax, as the term is defined at
5 U.S.C. § 5517, which authorizes enforcement through United
States Article IV territorial courts (United States District
Court, per 28 U.S.C. § 132) for general enforcement of Subtitle F
of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended in 1986 and since,
throughout Oklahoma, without limitations of United States
jurisdiction as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3).
6. The Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission should be
required to provide constitutional and statutory authority which
authorizes him to administratively enter an Agreement On
Coordination of Tax Administration which extends authority of
Titles 18 and 28 of the United States Code, and the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, as amended in 1986 and since, throughout
the sovereign State of Oklahoma.
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 17 of 18
Conclusion & Prayer For Relief
Each item listed above to be secured by Subpoena Duces Tecum
rests squarely on a requirement set out in the Constitution of
the United States, statutes and regulations of the United States,
or the Constitution and laws of Oklahoma, one of the several
States party to the Constitution. Each item requested, or the
lack of it, will contribute to proving or disproving venue
jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, jurisdiction over
person, legal standing, application of law, validity or
invalidity of Internal Revenue Service initiatives, and authority
of various people serving as judicial officers or in offices of
the United States Attorney and the United States Department of
Justice.
Plaintiff hereby certifies, under penalties of perjury under
laws of the United States of America, without the United States
(28 U.S.C. § 1746(1)), that to the best of my current knowledge,
understanding and belief, all matters of law and fact set forth
herein are accurate and true, so help me God.
/s/ Dan Meador
___________________________________ ___________________________
Dan Meador Date
P.O. Box 2582
Ponca City 74602/tdc
OKLAHOMA STATE
tel: (405) 765-1415
fax: (405) 765-1146
Model Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum:
Page 18 of 18
# # #
Return to Table of Contents