May 19, 1997 Robert L. Hoecker, Circuit Executive Office of Circuit Executive United States Tenth Circuit Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver 80257/tdc COLORADO STATE RE: Judicial complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 372(c) against H. Dale Cook, Sam Joyner & Frank McCarthy, United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma ENCLOSURES: OTC-C.I.R. agreement, my letter to OTC chairman of May 19, 1997 Dear Circuit Executive Hoecker: Last week I forwarded judicial complaints against those named above under the name of the Deputy Chief Executive, Gary H. Wente. Since original complaints were filed with your office, I unearthed new evidence which I wish to add to support for the complaints. Enclosed you will find a copy of a cover letter to me from David K. Smith, State-Federal coordinator for the Oklahoma Tax Commission, a copy of the Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration executed in 1982-83 between the Oklahoma Tax Commission and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and my response of this date to Robert E. Anderson, present chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commission. If you will verify my references, you will find that there is no authority for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to enter these agreements, nor for the Internal Revenue Service to administer them. The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for signing the agreements, and the Treasury Department (now General Accounting Office) is responsible for administration and enforcement. The agreement clearly conveys authority relating solely to Federal officers and employees liable for tax under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and whatever corresponding State tax is imposed, and does not extend general jurisdiction into territory where the Union of several States are sovereign -- the agreement, even if properly executed, does not exceed United States jurisdiction in the several States, as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 7(3). The important thing is this: The Administrative contract is of no effect as there is no State law or Federal law which authorizes the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to enter these agreements, and there is no law which authorizes the Internal Revenue Service to administer Subtitle A & C taxes in the geographical United States. By accommodating IRS initiatives, the three judicial officers against whom I filed complaints have clearly proceeded without the least semblance of law. Please add these exhibits and complaints conveyed in this letter to the original complaints filed last week. As I have the opportunity, I will revise the recommended subpoenas duces tecum to secure other documentation which will even more conclusively demonstrate that the three judicial officers have acted beyond United States jurisdiction and beyond any semblance of law to execute a bill of attainder and otherwise carry out the ends of undisclosed foreign principals. Regards, /s/ Dan Meador Dan Meador # # #
Return to Table of Contents