May 19, 1997
W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Oklahoma State Capitol
Oklahoma City 73105/tdc
OKLAHOMA STATE
Re: Complaint under Oklahoma
Corrupt Organization Law
ENCLOSURES: OTC-IRS Agreement &
my cover letter to Commissioner Anderson
Dear Attorney General Edmondson:
This letter is to convey a complaint against the Internal
Revenue Service and various people supportive of Service
initiatives under the Oklahoma Corrupt Organization Act.
The complaint immediately issues against the following: H.
Dale Cook, Frank McCarthy, and Sam Joyner, all of whom serve as
judicial officers for the Article IV United States District
Court, Northern District of Oklahoma; Stephen Lewis, United
States Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma; Neal
Kirkpatrick, Assistant United States Attorney; and Tracy Foster,
an inspector with the Internal Revenue Service, Arkansas-Oklahoma
District. In is not necessary to immediately name John and Jane
Doe defendants.
You may notify those complaints initially issued against and
K. J. Sawyer, District Director for the Arkansas-Oklahoma
District of Internal Revenue Service.
You are aware that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency
of the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, a foreign-based
entity which has no authority in the continental United States.
Public notice to that effect published as a legal publication in
The Journal Record the last two weeks of June and the first week
of July, 1996. Internal Revenue Service principals did not rebut
or correct any element of the public notice so the notice must be
presumed correct unless or until evidence to the contrary
establishes that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the
United States Treasury Department, or the United States
Department of the Treasury -- you will find at 31 U.S.C. §§ 301-
310 that IRS is not listed as a department or agency in the
United States Department of the Treasury.
Additional complaints will be filed by other parties with
respect to what appears to be opening as a rather expansive
conspiracy involving UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNEY F.
MOORE, et al. (#96-CR-082-C), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAN
LESLIE MEADOR (#96-CR-113-C), both in the Article IV United
States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOWARD BOOS, et al. (#97-CR-032-A),
in the Article IV United States District Court for the Western
District of Oklahoma, and possibly other cases.
Dan Meador Affidavit of Complaint:
Page 1 of 3
Article IV United States District Courts located in the
Union of several States party to the Constitution have authority
only to prosecute misdemeanor offenses committed within United
States jurisdiction under authority of 18 U.S.C. § 3401 and
attending Department of Defense and Bureau of Land Management
regulations. They do not have general jurisdiction in the Union
states. Further, as they accommodate IRS-initiated suits, all of
which are under color of law (Subtitle F of the Internal Revenue
Code does not become effective as law until Title 26 of the
United States Code is enacted as positive law), they function on
behalf of the "United States of America", an undisclosed foreign
principal (you will find that Titles 18, 26 & 28 authorize the
"United States" as plaintiff or defendant, not the "United States
of America", and that the Constitution of the United States vests
authority in a governmental entity identified as the "United
States"), the foreign principals being generally but not
particularly identified at 28 CFR, Parts 0.49 & 0.64-1.
The OTC-IRS agreement, with my letter to Commissioner
Anderson, demonstrates that IRS and Article IV United States
District Courts are operating on a presumed State grant of
authority to exceed United States jurisdiction in the Union of
several States party to the Constitution of the United States.
This is contrary to the Separation of Powers Doctrine (Tenth
Amendment), and contrary to the Oklahoma prohibition against
Federal officials serving as State officials (Art. II § 12, Okla.
Constitution). The OTC-IRS agreement, made with no statutory
authority from the Oklahoma Legislature or Congress (the Treasury
Department is vested with responsibility for administering the
Internal Revenue Code in the continental United States, I.R.C. §§
7701(a)(12)(a) & 7805(a)), implements administrative law which is
of no effect in the geographical United States or the Union of
several States. Further, the Article IV United States District
Courts operate under Admiralty-Civil Law rules, which is contrary
to intent of the "arising under" clause at Article III § 2.1 of
the Constitution of the United States, and Article VII §§ 4 & 7
of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma. As legislative
courts, they impose bills of attainder, prohibited by the
Constitution of the United States at Article I §§ 9.3 & 10.1, and
the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma at Article II § 15.
Please be advised that I am filing particular criminal
complaints against the above-named parties with the district
attorney for Tulsa County, and because there are Federal as well
as State offenses involved, will file complaints under the United
States anti-terrorism act with Janet Reno, Attorney General of
the United States.
At this juncture, I am electing not to include State
officers at the Oklahoma Tax Commission in complaints as I don't
believe most are cognizant of the extent of fraud and tyranny
accommodated by the OTC-IRS agreement even though David Smith,
the OTC State-Federal coordinator, was aware of the public notice
and other initiatives involving the Internal Revenue Service.
Commissioner Anderson and others are at least deserving of due
diligence notice and the opportunity to terminate the unlawful
agreement.
Dan Meador Affidavit of Complaint:
Page 2 of 3
You first received complaints pertaining to illegal Internal
Revenue Service initiatives in October or November 1995. You and
Mr. Richard Wintory, your first assistant, have been provided
with a considerable amount of research pertaining to the Internal
Revenue Service, the character and limited authority of other
Federal enforcement agencies (FBI in particular), jurisdiction of
the Federal Law Enforcement Community, and jurisdiction and
operation of Article IV courts of the United States. Yet you
have elected to do nothing, and have for all practical purposes
accommodated treason against people you pledged by oath to serve.
In other words, by your actions, you appear mired in and
committed to the Cooperative Federalism scheme, which was
designed to over-throw sovereignty of the several States and the
Constitution of the United States.
We have arrived at the time to fish or cut bait. The OTC-
IRS administrative agreement put the last piece in place
necessary to expose one of the more diabolical elements of
Cooperative Federalism - an element that has destroyed and
otherwise enslaved multitudes in ever-increasing numbers since
World War II. It is time to move ahead to correct the problem.
The initiative will proceed state-by-state as what we've
unearthed, along with my analysis contained in the OTC
commissioner letter, will probably be distributed nationally by
the time you receive this complaint.
Should you fail to respond with authorities sufficient to
overcome those cited herein and in the OTC Commissioner letter,
and fail to seek appropriate remedies dictated by the Oklahoma
Corrupt Organizations Act, I reserve the right to seek a
specially appointed attorney general via political forum (Art. II
§§ 1, 3 & 33, Okla. Const.), and otherwise secure lawful
remedies. If you elect to investigate complaints conveyed in and
with this letter, I would prefer that you appoint someone other
than Mr. Wintory to handle the matter.
Regards,
/s/ Dan Meador
Dan Meador
copies: as needed & convenient
Dan Meador Affidavit of Complaint:
Page 3 of 3
# # #
Return to Table of Contents